Why? talk:Remove Your Penis

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit From Pee Review


edit User:RAHB/Penis_Removal

Admittedly, this really isn't great. I hope to make it better later on, but any suggestions now would definitely help. It's another I found on the requests page by the way. -RAHB 05:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 7 Relevant humor.
Concept: 10 Cool concept.
Prose and formatting: 6 No spelling or grammer errors but needs some Minor touch-ups.
Images: 10 Not applicable.
Miscellaneous: 10 Perfect for HowTo:
Final Score: 43 You got yourself a hit.
Reviewer: NXWave

I'm just saying because the article is well written and based on a good subject, In fact the basis of the article is perfect for a HowTo article, But the article needs some minor touchups in formatting to make it look professional. --NXWave 13:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

As a second opinon, I don't see any flaw in the formatting, it's quite damned funny, but you definitely need more pictures. I recommend a circular saw, or something.--Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

edit Take Two


edit Why?:Remove Your Penis

This used to be called Penis Removal. Vfh'd it, got a positive score. Lots of people suggested a namespace move. I'm gonna probably add some to this to make it more fitting to the space, but I'd like a (second) review of it, as of now. Thanks. -RAHB 06:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 10 Damned funny, everything from life without a penis to doctors' clipboards. But seriously, what is up with that?
Concept: 10 It's crazy.
Prose and formatting: 10 Second person, but in the Why?: namespace (see a bit below). Even managed to pull off footnotes without being distracting. Found like, one error & fixed it.
Images: 7 Relevant pictures, particularly loved the first one. Changed "chainsaw" to "circular saw" in the article to match the picture. Can't think of anything you ought to add.
Miscellaneous: 8 Okay, one comment. It doesn't feel very much like a Why?, because it's not persuasive, it takes the reader through the process of chopping off his penis. But it's not a HowTo, either. Maybe UnBook it? I'm thinking of UnBooks:Only Business, which isn't really a book either, but it wouldn't have fit in those other namespaces.
Final Score: 45 Can I sew it back on?
Reviewer:  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 14:38 Aug 29, 2007

edit Autogeneration FAIL!

Everest fail
Lawl -RAHB 19:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools