Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Vote for deletion)
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit an article during a vote to delete it. You can flip your vote if the article improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read why we voted to keep it, the last time.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question, or else the moderator may invalidate the vote. If adding {{VFD}} to an article already under vote, reset the 24-hour clock.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Expert3222 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

Kitten plant H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 890 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. On the website since 2006. The only amusement is the self-amusement of creating a deliberately bad article. Spıke Radiomicrophone01:54 23-Apr-17
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Jesus wept.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:30, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Basically a stub which tries and fails to compellingly expand upon one of Uncyclopedia's more well-known in-jokes. Utterly pointless. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 21:47, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Delete Injoke and it isn't even put together well. —Oblique 03:47, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

In Utero, for 9 months H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 870 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Unfocussed waffle heavily seasoned with gibberish. SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:38, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A nonsense riff from the randumbo article about André the Giant. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:56, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Quotecruft kills the party before it gets going; an article about a nonexistent album that no one is going to look up; one paragraph of nonsense numbers before it descends to a track listing (UN:LIST). Also: Rape, penis, breasts. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:07 24-Apr-17
  4. Symbol delete vote Nevermind If I was Kurt Cobain, I would have shot myself after reading this. --WeatherUnderground (talk) 23:56, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Delete I... don't get it. —Oblique 03:50, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • You can't, now, it's gone. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:52 30-May-17

Obama and card stacking H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 870 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a single idea not an encyclopedic article. The premise could be developed into something amusing, yet you'd still be stuck with a single idea and not an article.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:51, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The notion that Obama excelled in figurative houses of cards could be applied to Obama-care, which at the moment is merely a redirect. The notion that he excelled in literal houses of cards is based on nothing and is not funny. Even if someone wanted to write about the land-mines built into Obama-care, you ought not start with the political thesis and then give the data (here, I think, Obama's relations with China), producing an article that promises to explain to the reader that Obama was a charlatan: Demonstrate, don't preach, and have funny and not persuasive be the obvious goal. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:13 24-Apr-17
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The concept could possibly be incorporated into one of the Barack Obama articles though I personally don't see any point.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:51, April 23, 2017 (UTC)

F-16 pilot H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 822 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Humourless waffle.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:34, April 25, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Author registered Falcon4 in 2006 to make this third attempt in one day at describing the job with the comedy strategy of fanboy cheerleading, now officially declared trite unless done well, which it is not done here. Immediately earned {{NRV}}, again, and author was told to stop re-creating it; then Admins wandered away and so did author. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:09 25-Apr-17
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Fire Vs. Water H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 736 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Purge Unsearchable waffling cack. A poor idea poorly executed  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 11:34, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never rose above the level of the awful Wacky War genre. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:36 29-Apr-17
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I reverted this to the last version of 2008, before the Anal Rape Humor started to appear. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:36 29-Apr-17

List of weapons that don't exist, but should/Firelegs H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 658 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete.This is subpage of the article List of weapons that don't exist, but should. While the former was great and was nominated, the latter is overly long and stupid, not funny. I would suggest that this is either deleted and replaced with a small section on the main article,or at least rewritten.Waitwhereaminow (talk) 17:13, May 2, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:27 2-May-17
  3. As per nominator, except the part about the original being great. It was never great. Oblique (talk) 03:01, May 3, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Tom's Pancake House H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 528 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Article that nobody will ever look for under its current name. It does have some decent content but I've merged said content into IHOP, which is what readers will be looking for.--HolUp (talk) 03:56, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. From Jonny appleseed from 2011. He wrote some good stuff but it doesn't include this article about a pancake restaurant Wikipedia is unaware of. Am not sure the merged content is decent; the Korea material is not comedy but a meme as a placeholder for comedy. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:05 8-May-17
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Is it a story? Is it an advert? No. It’s just cack.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 12:04, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Man Babies H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 458 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Please forgive us for the rambling bumbling nature of the commentary Found while searching the photos used by Mocha (VFD). An essay about men squatting. 2006 contest entrant (not winner) by Mindsunwound. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:00 11-May-17
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Purest waffle. Dull and meandering.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 19:26, May 12, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Elements H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 412 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A 'Dead end page' of meaningless gibberish.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  23:27, May 12, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. This dead end was created by Anon, seven months ago, and not tagged for monitoring to see if it grew into a funny article, which it didn't. Spıke Radiomicrophone11:12 13-May-17
  3. Redirect to Periodic table --Oblique (talk) 02:32, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

John Ritter H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 412 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote The illuminate want you to believe this is good Well, it isn't. Cack.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  23:41, May 12, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Apart from the use of the Illuminati as a meme, this article, mostly on the actor's notorious death, has no comedy strategy and no comedy. Spıke Radiomicrophone11:13 13-May-17
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

September 11 attacks H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 409 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. There is little humor in this article, it just pedals an Alex Jones-esque conspiracy ("America long-planned 9/11 as a false flag attack") as if it's a fact. It's well-written admittedly, but neat writing means nothing without humor.--HolUp (talk) 02:40, May 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A little bin-Laden fanfiction, and a huge rasher of tedious, unfunny conspiracy theory. "What’s even worst than that: that same majority does not care to know the truth and/or doesn’t want to accept it (especially in North America)." Reads like advocacy. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:56 13-May-17
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Bin Laden is so 2011. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:32, May 13, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Needs to be redirected somewhere; I've linked to this all over the place. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:58 13-May-17
    • I'd recommend doing it the other way around. When this page is deleted, our 9-11 page should moved to the "September 11 attacks" title. One, because that's what Wikipedia has it under (and we're a parody of WIki); two, it would eliminate the issue of not being able to put the page under its intended title, 9/11, because the slash would make it a subpage of 9.--HolUp (talk) 03:19, May 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • There is also Nine Eleven which is really bad, honestly 9-11 is the only one that is even remotely amusing. Any salvgable content from the other two articles should be merged into it and the page rename to September 11 attacks. --Oblique (talk) 12:27, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

Cold War (video game) H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 363 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. As Spike has pointed out, these game war pages are unfunny, and feel like they were made for a very specific target audience.--HolUp (talk) 00:54, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Next up. As tedious as all the others, this one with copious strikethrough and Cyrillic. There is nothing worse than a Video Game article except one written in code. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:56 15-May-17
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Bring out the nukes. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 05:11, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Charles Murray (author) H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 363 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Trite theme of Murray being a racist which has been done to death. Needs a fresh and original angle to be funny.--HolUp (talk) 00:58, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Overt advocacy and unfunny. Murray is controversial and it should be easy to have the encyclopedia writer misinterpret or botch Murray's points, even mistaking them for racism, provided the goal is playfulness rather than condemnation, as it is here. See Larry Kudlow. Spıke Radiomicrophone01:14 15-May-17
  3. Deserves an article, but none of this is good. Burn it and start again. --Oblique (talk) 02:51, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Asian Nazis H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 362 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is attracting cruft today because this article does nothing but invite it. Spıke Radiomicrophone01:29 15-May-17
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pointless.--HolUp (talk) 01:05, May 28, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Delete Dear god why —Oblique 03:57, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Soviet Britain H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 311 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Alternate history cruft.--HolUp (talk) 04:49, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Styling a country or political subdivision as a Soviet republic is so trite that How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid has begged authors not to do it for years. Casting Britain as a Soviet republic here is chock-full of allegory about actual (past) British politicians. The Soviet strategy guarantees that any "humor" will be heavy-handed. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:29 17-May-17
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Silliness is usually a good thing, but not here. --WeatherUnderground (talk) 23:53, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

George Lucas (nobody) H T D Survivor

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 294 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lame, inferior rehash of Chuck Norris (U.S. accountant).--HolUp (talk) 21:26, May 17, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. It's cute yes, but it's also a bit underachieving and largely irrelevant. Deleting this would pave the way for a better article. --WeatherUnderground (talk) 14:51, May 20, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. By The Thinker in 2007, an article on a mundane nobody despite his famous name. We don't need a ton of these, nor any more knock-offs of Nobody cares or AAAAAAAAA. The one I post-edited is Justin Beeber. Those we have now all cross-reference one another via nav-template {{Not famous}}. This one has a comedy strategy — different from the others — and achieves it. It's cute and should not be deleted just because it isn't best-in-class. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:26 17-May-17
Comments

Russophilie H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 289 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Wacky Disease article by Philippine problem child 50 Years of Victory!. No, sprinkling in Cyrillic characters doesn't make it funny. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:39 18-May-17
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree with Spike. --WeatherUnderground (talk) 14:55, May 20, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Adult H T D Survivor

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 66 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Very sloppily-written. Especially the "End Result" section.--HolUp (talk) 09:30, May 27, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Admin Simsilikesims rewrote it in 2014 and I voted to keep it. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:22 28-May-17
  2. Weak keep This article is messy. Need to ditch the infobox, break up the body into sections a little better and include some more images. But it's not delete worthy. —Oblique 04:01, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
Comments

Ubergeek H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 66 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lots of cruft, little comedy.--HolUp (talk) 09:33, May 27, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. This 2008 creation of EvilCecil4th tries to assemble the perfect caricature, and thereby sidesteps any creative comedy. When the article seems to be getting close, it turns aside into self-reference. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:15 28-May-17
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Template:Mass Media H T D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 54 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Unwieldy, clunky, and hideous template. For one, it appears permanently collapsed by default, and people almost never update it. The problem with the template is that it was made with the goal of cataloging all the "mass media" that has an Uncyclopedia article; every band movie, TV show, video game, etc. There are hundreds upon thousands of those, so that goal is a nigh impossible one.--HolUp (talk) 21:22, May 27, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Whether a template achieved, or could achieve, formal completeness, is not a factor on this website. The {{New Jersey}} template is not complete, and it would not be against some rule to create it until the editor had written an article on every New Jersey municipality. {{Mass Media}} is malfunctioning for me at the moment, but I know of no way in MediaWiki to store a user's preferences for collapsed/expanded. I think it defaults to collapsed because the size of its contents exceeds some parameter. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:58 28-May-17
Comments
  • Have detected a syntax error of mine in the system JavaScript that would have inhibited creation of the show/hide buttons for the last 14 months. However, these days, corrections have to be submitted to Wikia for approval. Spıke Radiomicrophone01:34 28-May-17

Personal tools
projects