Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Vote for deletion)
Jump to: navigation, search
Deletion Policy
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here

How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

The Last World War H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 336 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. In depth analysis, stage-by-stage using maps, of a made-up conflict that only the author cares about. Complete with made-up statistics like "123,456" as well. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:49, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote It is occasionally criticized for being slightly destructive. The intro--from which that sentence is taken--looked promising, but the descriptions of the conflict didn't do anything for me. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:27 11 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article about nothing keeps begging for editors' time to fix it up, while never inducing anyone to take control and make it funny. See also Comments. Spıke ¬ 12:05 13-Oct-14
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Sorry, but I found it funny, especially the maps. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:27, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  • I voted Symbol keep vote Keep last time based on Aleister doing work, a commitment that he says in the ballot he never made. I had been moved at the concept of the unknowability of a Last War; now I find the concept undeveloped and I think the bit about humanity going extinct and the author being a panda is dumb. Llwy is working on it, but the maps Anton199 likes suggest to me comic book, not encyclopedia; and the problem is the text, which needs a better comedy theme than "War so nutty!" Spıke ¬ 16:48 11-Oct-14
    All I did was fix some spelling and formatting, and I don't see myself doing any more; I wouldn't overestimate me. It's more readable now, but no funnier. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:56 11 Oct 2014

Devon H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 320 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yet another article about some small area in England which is said to be inhabited by some sort of subhuman creatures that don't really speak English. Snarglefoop (talk) 02:09, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
    Small area of England! It's one of the most famous counties. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:14, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
    To some of us, England itself is a "small area." Spıke ¬ 11:29 22-Oct-14
    Aye, to those of you with a small history, yes. ;) Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:59, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote the disease known as ‘chav’. Long string of attacks on Devon, with no humour and less concept. I believe there was a campaign to clear out such towncruft earlier in the century, but I wasn't there at the time; I was busy huffing imaginary rainbows. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:13 12 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Whatever ScottPat devises as a replacement will be better. Spıke ¬ 11:29 22-Oct-14
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't know how soon I'll finish the re-write so might as well delete this now. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:57, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. and Replace b Replace. with Scott's article, when it's ready. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:34, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

  • Here is the last version by the first author; it's nothing spectacular and it's very short, but it's better than what's there now. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:20 12 Oct 2014
    Not much in the original version worth keeping, nor even worth the time to give it mark-up. I've deleted a lot of cruft from the current version; there is material inside that one could make an article out of. The content-free Intro prepares the reviewer for the worst. Unfortunately, the new author of Dudley, Mjr74 lives far away from Devon, if I read my maps aright, so we can't saddle him with this. Spıke ¬ 11:25 12-Oct-14
    I notified Mjr74 anyway; he says he has visited Devon and has stuff he could add. Spıke ¬ 01:56 14-Oct-14
  • I've gone for a re-write. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:14, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
    Hooray! Spıke ¬ 11:29 22-Oct-14

Good Electricity and Bad Electricity H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 308 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A tiny bit of pseudo-intellectualism. Might fit on Illogicopedia. Spıke ¬ 14:04 12-Oct-14
  2. Agreed. I'll stick it there right now. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:36 12 Oct 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

  • It's well written. I'm inclined to leave it, so that it may pleasantly surprise those who stumble across it. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:19, October 22, 2014 (UTC)

Uterus or GTFO! H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 298 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Per Spike on my talk page, this article documents a meme without making it funny. It seems to exist mainly to advertise pictures of pregnant women. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:38 13 Oct 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per me on her talk page: "A flagrant example of (1) basing an Uncyclopedia article on a meme (viz, "Tits or GTFO," that is: post pornography or I will assume it never happened) from another website and (2) extrapolating so far that the reader has to "guess the punch line to read the joke." I stated no opinion on his goals, as I would grant Mnbvcxz his little affectation if he would just quit changing diapers and return. Spıke ¬ 00:49 13-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:17, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.


If anything brings back Preggo man, it will be deleting this article. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:05, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

Threesome H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 286 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Article, ostensibly about group sex, makes the point that Catholics whip sinners, and keeps making it and making it until it becomes totally non-encyclopedic and the goal is to see how far into the reader's head it can be driven, not to be funny. Spıke ¬ 12:11 13-Oct-14
  2. It's like the article is whipping the reader's brain for committing the sin of trying to read it. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:05 13 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Ho hum Whatever it is it doesn't seem to be funny. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:45, October 14, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Agreed. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 01:12, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. It has a joke: the narrator whips himself after each erotic moment, in order not to succumb to the sin, and his interlocutor finds it arousing, but it's the only one and I don't think it's worth it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:31, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It's a bit silly but I don't see why it should head for the shredder. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:01, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

Miranda Cosgrove's Uterus H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 285 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Yuk Delete I confess I only read the first paragraph. (If anyone wants to tell me I'm an irresponsible jerk for nomming it without first reading the whole thing, go right ahead ... but please read the whole thing yourself before you do that.) Snarglefoop (talk) 13:15, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
    Yeah, I'll step up to that task; the reason VFD is here is to ensure authors that their stuff won't be deleted without discussion, vote, and 24-hour notice; and authors should get the additional safeguard of knowing that any nominator will evaluate the whole thing. (Even the history, as the rules require, and perhaps the talk page.) If all you know is that it has a crappy Intro, repair might not require deleting the entire page. If you had gotten to the end, you would have seen a hint that this is one of the articles fleshing out Mnbvcxz's pregnancy infatuation. Some voters may view this as an inherent part of the history of Uncyclopedia. On the nomination itself, I'm abstaining. Cosgrove is a celebrity but there is no real comedy point to us speculating about her innards. We have deleted knock-offs of this meme. Spıke ¬ 14:23 13-Oct-14
    Wait ... did you say this is a meme? Like, claiming weird stuff about Miranda Cosgrove's organs is a standing joke on the Internet? I don't understand the world. That is clear. Snarglefoop (talk) 14:55, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
    I meant only an Uncyclopedia meme or in-joke, though this is not in any official list; not that it goes wider than Uncyclopedia. Spıke ¬ 15:03 13-Oct-14
  2. I, on the other hand, did read the whole thing, and I came to the same conclusion. Indeed, uterine newts (and sometimes eels) and Miranda Cosgrove (who played Carly Shay in iCarly, which may have originated the newt-pregnancy meme) are injokes here, perpetuated by Mnbvcxz--and I don't find the newt pregnancy stuff to be funny, which is to be expected from something that is merely an expression of someone's fetish. On this tine of the fork, arousal does not equal amusement. I will also echo the importance of reading the whole article, as Chess, which has a sucky intro but a perfectly good middle, was deleted on the fork in Forest Fire Week, IIRC after being tagged by someone who often does not read past the intro and has thus destroyed several perfectly good articles. This anecdote is here not to shoehorn in goings-on at another random website for no reason, but to provide an example of what we shouldn't do here. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 15:48 13 Oct 2014
    This is still a ballot, not a diary. Citing other websites and specific personalities at other websites is not a valid argument, in my opinion — either as examples or counterexamples. Spıke ¬ 16:09 13-Oct-14
    Well, you see, I think of it as citing Uncyclopedia to prove a point about Uncyclopedia. Clearly you don't see it that way, and your opinion is no less valid than mine so I suppose I'll just keep my mouth shut. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:26 13 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Straight to userspace. Unless I get to write an article about my disgusting fetishes. 19 year old Colombian boys and girls covered in honey and tied up lightly coming to the main page soon. --Nikau (talk) 17:50, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pointless article, most likely something not many people will look for. ConCass2 (talk) 20:35, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    No--but they may well look for Miranda Cosgrove and instead find themselves directed to the article on her uterus. Is this a good or bad thing? What was I trying to say? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:42 20 Oct 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote "Her doctor...pronounced her Fallopian tubes "Thin as Paper" at a Veterinarian's office in L.A. called Healthy Hounds." I too have now given it a complete read — for the first time, in fact — and I enjoyed the ride. Spıke ¬ 16:24 13-Oct-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I wanted to vote delete, but laughed several times while reading the page. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:37, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  • Yuk Yuk. So after being double-barked at over wimping out after the first paragraph, I went back and read the whole thing. It is a fantasy piece of the sort dreamed up by 12 year old boys, which gave the author the chance to write "uterus" many times and even use such exciting terms as "cervix" and "reproductive system" in a few places. Unfortunately most of it is too far away from reality to be taken as anything except nonsense, and none of it is funny. Furthermore, down at the end, it mutates briefly into a Wacky War article, which doesn't really improve things.
    On the plus side, the grammar and spelling are both very clean. And that'll get you a free ride on the MBTA (at least, it will if you've also got two dollars along, to put in the little 'contributions' box at the front of the bus). Snarglefoop (talk) 16:12, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

Arsene Wenger H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 261 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am nominating this to try to achieve improvements to, not deletion of, this article on the football manager by some editor Over There. I am not even sure whether getting thrown out of a cinema relates to anything. As it stands, the initial and recurring theme is Pedo/Anal/Rape/SexWithBlackMen Humor. Spıke ¬ 13:17 14-Oct-14
  2. Can't we just delete this? I don't see anyone stepping forward to help. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 21:32 18 Oct 2014
    We can and will, if we prevail in the vote. Spıke ¬ 01:27 19-Oct-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

  • I'm not sure what's supposed to happen here, but you might be interested in this slightly more sanitary version. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:36 14 Oct 2014
    It is much cleaner, but it is also from 2007, and presumably omits comedy based on news in the last seven years — I assume there is some. Is there a Brit in the house who would like to do a merge? Spıke ¬ 18:11 14-Oct-14

Laptop H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 148 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Obnoxious teenagers who talk to their parents like shit were caused by laptops. This article begins with the premises that laptops are useful for viewing porn and are 'three dimensional magic box[es]', then goes on to discuss... essentially nothing. It has been almost the same since it was rewritten in 2007; prior to that, it wasn't much better (It is project with much effort, but it not marketable and usable. Then he exploded.). I have a replacement at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Laptop. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 06:34 19 Oct 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Intro also has a list of memes and a junk acronym; pointless Section 2 is overwhelmed by illustrations; then nothing but listcruft until the trite finale: Laptops are actually alien lifeforms. Proposed replacement is not ready.... Spıke ¬  10:47, 19 October 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

  • Detailed editing comments moved to replacement article's talk page. Spıke ¬ 17:04 19-Oct-14
  • Not sure if this is the right place to say this, but I've tried to follow your suggestions, Spike, and would appreciate it if you could have another look. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 20:08 23 Oct 2014

Igpay Atinlay H T D

Score: 3 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 144 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Replace. 1 gimmick, 0 jokes (may be more than 0 but it's too tedious to scan the article to see if there are jokes). Page title with gimmick applied to it ensures no one will search for it, or they will get exactly what they expected and will not laugh. Spıke ¬ 10:38 19-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. How the Hell did it not cross the author's mind that nobody can read this page? (Unless this is a prime example of the author trying to amuse himself out of confusing the readers) ConCass2 (talk) 20:32, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Replace with non-Pig Latin version, and probably move to Pig Latin (unless there's something there, in which case I'm not sure what we do). I am no scholar of Pig Latin and I find it about as bothersome to read as do Spike and ConCass, but I found the actual content somewhat amusing. I strongly encourage anyone whose main or sole criterion for voting delete was its unreadability to read the English version and reconsider. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 22:53 20 Oct 2014
    Changing above vote to Replace. That was a fun read. How can anyone on a humor wiki prefer a page that is merely a perfect encoding? Spıke ¬ 22:55 20-Oct-14
  4. Replace b Replace. or something. The actual content is pretty good and the main problem seems that the article is hard to read. It would be good if it was replaced by Llwy's "translated" version, but the original should probably be kept as a subpage and linked to in the See also section, because there are people who will actually find reading the page in Pig Latin more amusing than reading it in English. Also, the page doesn't have to be deleted at all: the original one could be kept where it is now, and Llwy's version can be pasted at Pig Latin... Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:19, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    And you don't need a vote of VFD to replace a redirect that doesn't delete an Uncyclopedian's substantive work. But I won't flip my vote anyway; I don't want the gimmicky version to exist, because editors spend time polishing the codification that they could spend writing funny stuff. I recently tweaked HTBFANJS#Pages that look like the things they're about to be a little more disapproving; for instance, to cite only articles that have more than a gimmick, versus articles that pursue a gimmick unusually well. Spıke ¬ 16:31 21-Oct-14
    Have moved the plaintext article to Pig Latin, replacing the redirect. Spıke ¬ 23:49 23-Oct-14
    We could also have the Pig Latin and English versions side by side in the same article, with a table or something. That seems like enough of a compromise to satisfy everyone to some extent. In any case, I hope we preserve the history instead of just deleting the thing and moving 'mine' on top, because the real authors should be given credit. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 22:47 21 Oct 2014
    No, please! We ought not put fairness to previous authors on a par with having an article hang together and look good. A link is OK, for readers who really want Pig Latin in Pig Latin; but presenting him with multiple versions at once distracts him for the sake of someone's vanity. Spıke ¬ 13:55 23-Oct-14
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I think it's kind of cute. I got a laugh out of it. Granted, it's a little hard to read, but I think it should stay in Pig Latin -- it just seems totally appropriate. Snarglefoop (talk) 22:43, October 20, 2014 (UTC)

Igpay Atinlay H T D bis

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 34 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Having moved the plaintext version to Pig Latin, replacing the redirect to Igpay Atinlay, do voters still want the article about Pig Latin in Pig Latin to go away? I do. Spıke ¬ 23:49 23-Oct-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

  • Could it be a subpage maybe? (I have no opinion.) -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:13 24 Oct 2014
    In fact, it could stay right where it is, though I'd rather it not. Spıke ¬ 10:18 25-Oct-14
  • As per what I said in the first nomination, I think we should keep it somewhere. If it stays right where it is, it should have a link to the plain English version right at the beginning, however. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:25, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    That would be a Symbol keep vote Keep. Spıke ¬ 10:40 25-Oct-14

That Guy You Hate H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 137 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Gay humour. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:51, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A non-encyclopedic chat about no one. The title plus the template ("This page...is completely worthless") plus the Intro ("let's do some quality bitching about that little fucker") should keep the reader from reading further. Spıke ¬ 17:07 19-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote I'm gonna tear off his Penis and use it as a toilet plunger. Yet more disgusting gay-bashing. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:47 20 Oct 2014
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Strangely, the profanity knocks back the humour and makes the article less funny. But the subject has potential for a good page and doesn't look like something thrown together by an anon in 5 minutes. ConCass2 (talk) 20:36, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
    You mean it has potential for a good page, but it isn't one right now? If it's not good now, it shouldn't remain in its current state. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:47 20 Oct 2014
    I mean it can be redeemed with editing, without having to rewrite the whole page. I just couldn't word it right. ConCass2 (talk) 20:29, October 20, 2014 (UTC)

Short Circuit H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 130 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No redeeming qualities. Spıke ¬ 00:21 20-Oct-14
  2. With an article like this, I can't imagine that seeing the movies would make me think any better of it. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:55 20 Oct 2014
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I'm not a fan of humour about sex but the immature part of my brain did make me laugh while reading this and I can't vote to delete something that made me laugh so I'll vote to keep. We ought to cater for all humour types as long as it is a parody. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:06, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
  • Just wondering of you've even seen the movies, Spike? --ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 03:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    I have not. I was not evaluating the movies. The Uncyclopedia page is a start-to-finish Anal Sex Joke. Spıke ¬ 12:12 20-Oct-14
  • Yeah, try watching them!--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 23:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    No offence but... you are saying that the content of the movies somehow justifies the article's consisting entirely of sex jokes (and no, Spike, it's not just anal sex)? I can't really see that. Perhaps you could summarise the plot points you were parodying, for the benefit of us lazy bums who can't be bothered to watch the movies? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:53 20 Oct 2014
    Actually nevermind--I read Wikipedia's article, and I really can't see either the value of turning it into one long sex joke or the attributes of the movie that inspired you to do so. Sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:58 20 Oct 2014
  • I still recommend watching the movie so you know what you're reading about. I can't see any reason someone who doesn't know what an article is about would find anything funny about it if they don't get it. If that's the case, I could spend the next week adding VFD to so many articles on this site.--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 09:41, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    I know perfectly well what I'm reading about, as I said above. I could guess what the movie was about from your article, actually. There is nothing that can justify turning it into what you turned it into. Nothing. Besides, the article shouldn't require intimate knowledge of the subject matter to be comprehensible; if it does, and if many readers haven't got that knowledge, it probably shouldn't exist. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 13:38 21 Oct 2014
    Yeah cause alot of people just read random articles they know nothing about. My point is, it's not funny to you few people, yet the ones I showed it to found it pretty funny indeed. I just don't agree that the small majority of voters against something is able to rule out an article as being unfunny, just because it's not the type of humor they enjoy. So what it comes down to, is if it doesn't please you couple of people who have time to vote for peoples work to be deleted because you don't personally like it, that means it should not exist for those who do. right? I dunno, maybe it's non Australians not getting Australian humor? Too bad there is no Uncylcopedia.com.au I guess.--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 15:33, October 21, 2014 (UTC)

Owl H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 107 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Wow, I just... don't even know where to begin. This article is almost entirely random nonsense; it barely has a concept--that of documenting and/or parodying the O RLY meme, which probably won't go over too well with some people here, and I'm not fond of it either--and that's only after I cut out a lot of it. Prior to my edits, it really was about nothing. A much more cut-down version may be found at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/scratchpad, which I'm still not too happy with (though you are welcome to say you want that as the replacement). I feel like we should have an article on owls, but I have no clue what it should consist of, and it's certainly not what we have now. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:30 20 Oct 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nominator cleaned it up a lot, but it's still a ramble. Spıke ¬ 13:27 21-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:27, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.


🔒 Indiana Jones H T D Oldvfd Archive

Score: -1 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 89 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The introduction is the most random one I've ever read. After that, the article doesn't improve. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:03, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I spruced the intro up a bit to cut out some of the randomness and cut out a chunk of the article and replaced it with something new, entitled "Indiana Jones and the Adventure that May be at Variance to this Article." I think it just needs to be edited/ spruced up, that's all. IndianaJones104 (talk) 22:31, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. The article has a theme: the absurd lengths of movie titles of the form, "Indiana Jones and the...."; also pearls of good Choice of Words. The final three sections (ineptly typed following the {{Reflist}}, which had nothing in it anyway), were short sections that did nothing but tell the same joke again; and IndianaJones104's edits of today merely added red-links, memes, and a Section 2 at odds with the rest of the article. Spıke ¬ 22:44 21-Oct-14
  1. I don't get it. I made the first sentence less random, but I still don't see any good humour. "His brother, Han Solo", "a sickly young man, who contracted the terminal disease, bad-ass", "closet-gay extraordinare Benjamin Franklin"... I can explain several jokes but they still aren't funny. And about the absurdly long movie titles: I don't find "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" or "...the Raiders of the Lost Ark" very long, so there seems to be no basis for that comedy theme in this article. It might not have to be deleted, but most of its parts should be rewritten. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:30, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
    I stand corrected: The titles of the actual movies aren't absurdly long. But they are long, and inventing some that are absurdly long is humor by exaggeration. The article can absolutely benefit from further editing. Spıke ¬ 18:38 22-Oct-14
  • Should IndianaJones105's section be reverted? I'm not sure I care for either version of the section, but just putting it out there. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:15 24 Oct 2014

Nude figure-skating H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 71 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A dumb ramble. Spıke ¬ 11:41 22-Oct-14
  2. Fails to live up to the wonderfully silly premise of being naked in a situation that so clearly calls for warm clothing. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:24 24 Oct 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.


Turkish-Greek conflict H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 70 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Citizens of "two idiot countries" battle in our encyclopedia with all available weapons except good English. Fire all nonsense numbers! Spıke ¬ 11:52 22-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The preceding unsigned comment was added by ScottPat (talk • contribs) 14:12, 2014 October 22 (UTC)
  3. A bunch of shavings from the logs of randomness trees, glued together with English that was after its running through a food processor. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:37 24 Oct 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Personal tools