Vandalism

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiMEOWMEOW WikiMEOWMEOW

Bouncywikilogo6
For those without comedic tastes, the so-called experts at Wikipedia have an article about Vandalism.
Uncyclopedia Puzzle Potato Notext
There is an alternate version of this article at Vandalism.
Gss

Seen here is a highly valuble and quite rare photo of Sophia untouched by vand...damn it...not again.

Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of the encyclopedia. The most common type of vandalism is the replacement of existing text with obscenities, page blanking, or the insertion of meta-jokes or other nonsense. Fortunately, this kind of vandalism is usually easy to spot.

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia. For example, adding an opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated.

Committing vandalism is a violation of the Wikipedia policy; it needs to be spotted, and then dealt harshly with — sexy male users are encouraged to report and revert any vandalism they see.


Vandalism

Wiki Vandalism

Wiki vandalism is generally defined as editing a wiki in a way that is intentionally disruptive or destructive. There are four generally acknowledged types of vandalism: deletion of legitimate information, insertion of noncents or irrelevant content, addition of unwanted commercial links (spam), and policy violations specific to that wiki.

Spotting Vandalism

Vandal555

I know it when I see it

Does it really need to be defined?

It's arguable that most (identified) vandalism has consisted of really quite obvious cases. Hence, Wikipedia doesn't need to define an "official" policy on what constitutes vandalism at all. We can use the rule of thumb, "When a reasonable person might be in doubt as to whether something is vandalism, it would be polite not to call it vandalism."

Of course, that depends on the normative definitions of "obvious", "reasonable" and "polite", which are necessarily subjective, and vary from encyclopedia to uncyclopedia.

Patent vandalism is vandalism where both the reader and the contributor agree that it is vandalism. This is sometimes easy to determine (e.g. vandal puts HAHAHAHAH as their edit summary or otherwise states that it is vandalism), and sometimes slightly harder.

Vandalism, Otherwise

Vandalism is the act of intentionally and malevolently modifying or destroying something. (anything)

For an example of vandalism, click here

“When in Rome, do as the Vandals do.”
~ Napoleon on Vandalism

See also

Personal tools
In other languages
projects