Do not put anything up for VFU that is not appropriate for VFU.
If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFU:
Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFU.
If you are here to vote on the undeletion/unsalvation of articles:
No really, thank you.
Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Undelete, Keep in userspace, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
# - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "This article is very funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article. Please precede comments with a * and NOT a # - a # is ONLY for when you are voting.
--~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
Undelete. Because it's a part of a series about the 'award'. Can be last if you think the idea has been used up. I think this one should be brought back to the main space. It won't hurt anybody and will close up my hurt pride :P SirPtok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 19:16, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
That's it! That's the one I've always wanted to nom in case this concept ever came into the light of day. Aleister 19:26 21-10-'11
Undelete A good article that needs some clean up for sure, but certainly shouldn't stay confined in userspace. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 22:18, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
Strong Support For Undelete. LOLZY!! TehGrammerNazi 00:06, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
Keep in userspace (2)
No thanks. "Good" is an adjective that doesn't quite apply to this article, which is apparently trapped in the darkest aspects of 2005. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:05, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
Unless Aleister or someone actually does rewrite it, I'm with Frogster. --BlackFlamingo 23:57, November 14, 2011 (UTC)