Uncyclopedia:VFS

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Redirected from VFS)
Jump to: navigation, search
GoldenSandwich

The coveted golden sandwich.

Vote for Sandwiches

Welcome to Uncyclopedia's VFS, or Vote For Sandwiches to give it its full title.

This is the place where each month (or any other arbitrary length of time), Uncyclopedia users choose and vote for their favourite sandwich at any particular moment in time.

The winner shall be proclaimed Sandwich of the Month, and shall have the exclusive honour of being eaten by some, all, or no Uncyclopedia admins. Pictures may or may not be posted at their discretion.

Rules

  • Only sandwiches may be nominated.
  • All nominations must be edible by humans.
  • Votes are limited to 1 per household.
  • IPs may only nominate half a sandwich.
  • When nominating a sandwich, you must describe it in as much detail as you feel like.
†: Though "sandwich" could mean anything.
∆: Half sandwiches may be combined to form a full sandwich by two IPs.

Please note: anyone caught disobeying the rules will face either an instant ban, infinite decapitation, or both.

NB: The ops can change these rules at any time for any reason to help the fight against awesome sandwiches, such as - beans on toast

Edit


Past Winners

Schnitzel sandwichNigger Dogshit SandwichMénage à TroisDouble Cheeseburger?That sandwich my mom used to make me whenever there was a snow dayChicken ParmesanoKnuckle sandwichTHE GrinderBacon and Cheese Sandwich of 1905Bacon SandwichBUTT POOP!!!! SandwichFries with that SandwichBread & Butter SandwichSandvichThe sandwich that a kind black man shared with meZombiebaronTacoMy penis between two pieces of breadA sandwich which is certainly not a songA jesus sandwichMeAn allegorical sandwichSushiWait:What?Toasted Michael Jackson on white breadSand witchSandwich SandwichTomato and cucumber on whole wheat, with only mustard and bean sproutsAdmin sandwichPink TacoFile:Body sandwich.jpgAn open penis sandwich with maple syrupBoobs sandwich
Edit the winners

For full details, root through your stool

Do we need new administrators?

Score: 1
  1. Symbol for vote For. We haven't had any new administrators since December 2013, apart from Puppy, who, as far as I know, has been opped for technical reasons (and therefore without a community vote). And, no matter how you look at it, a system needs a regular blood and energy flow not to stagnate. The 'old' admins can be doing a great job, but the site can't survive on them only. Look at how many active admins we have: if one or two leave, then for us this will be comparable to a catastrophe. I therefore am sure we need to hold a new VFS. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:15, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol comment vote Comment. One of the possible concerns I can see is a difficulty in finding new candidates. I don't think we need any super-experienced people as administrators, who know every single in and out about the site. An interesting alternative will be to give the rights to new, but interested and active users (because they will be most likely to introduce great new initiatives). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:15, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
    Well if we do drop out, extended notice will be given. I have no plans to drop out or drop off.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:41, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol against vote Against. The drop-off in administrative service has kept pace with the drop-off in the need for it. If we were to suddenly walk away, Wikia would surely use staff to keep the site going until a new crew emerged. Spıke ¬ 22:11 9-Dec-14
  3. Symbol for vote For. Revolutionary, Anti-Bensonist, and TYATU Boss Uncyclopedian Meganew (Chat) (Care for a peek at my work?) (SUCK IT, FROGGY!) 08:04, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Meh I don't see a great need for new administrators. Romartus and SPIKE are still around most of the time. Chief, Sims & myself are around some of the time to get things done. But then again, I've always thought more doesn't really hurt + there are at least a few rollbackers around that would do just a good job as the current admins. So for the record this is just me abstaining because there is no need, but it can't really hurt either. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 22:09, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
  5. What fucknugget said. --Chiefjustice32X 15:07, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects