Uncyclopedia:VFH
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Welcome to the Uncyclopedia Votes for Highlight page. To nominate an article, type the name into the box below and follow the directions.
- Vote for an article you find excellent.
- Previous featured articles can be found in the VFH archive.
- Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
- Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, UnTunes, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
- If a nomination disappears from this page, it is likely to be found in either the recently featured or recently failed nomination lists.
- If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be transfigured.
Nominate
Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must receive at least one critique via Pee Review before nomination (or at spend a week on Pee Review if you can't get anyone to look at it). Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
All nominated articles
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 0 things expressly forbidden in an obscure book of the Bible
|
| Nomination:
| —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 3
|
- Self-Nom & For. A political satire of mine. It got a very positive Pee review, which I used to fix it up ever-so-slightly before submitting it here. Vote away. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- For.Haven't even read it yet, but I'm a sucker for a good political satire. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 04:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Spoiler: This article isn't "good", and can barely be classified as "satire." --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 04:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Maybe too subtle for some. Satire it is --Asahatter (annoy) 07:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Asahatter (annoy) 07:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Against. Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 03:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against. --Docile hippopotamus 04:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Against. ERRR... Shellfish??? Acrolo 06:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 0.5 Interrupting News Broadcasts
|
| Nomination:
| ChiefjusticeDS 07:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 1.5
|
- Self For An article I enjoyed writing, I fixed everything that was wrong after I submitted it to Pee Review so figured I might as well have a stab at this. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Sure, it makes me go snigger, why not? I live in your eyes 22:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- Against. Okay first effort, but not front page. May I add, your reviews are excellent. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~
|
| Comments
|
Abstain. a bonus that it is at least an original idea (i think !) but it still lacks polish and I don't thank you set up the main premise well enough to encourage further reading. --RomArtus (talk). 10:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 1 pregame dumps
|
| Nomination:
| Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 20:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 4
|
- Self nom and 4 So, I started this a year ago, and finished it a few weeks ago. It did really good on pee review and I fixed what was said to be wrong, so... yea. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 20:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
I need to take a dump. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 20:57, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. As per my review, and the current lack of poo.
Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:57, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. MrN
02:41, Jul 5
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Against. Not bad, just didn't seem to hit my funny buttons. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:06, Jul 5
Against. Good idea but it doesn't step up to the funny hitting zone.--RomArtus (talk). 10:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Against. Per RomArtus and could use effective images, plain toilets are not funny unless they have bart simpson painted on the toilet seat. Acrolo 06:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 6 Silent ocean scenes
|
| Nomination:
| Dame  13:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 9
|
- Nom & For Another action-packed Unscript from the current WotM. --Dame
 13:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
For. I'm drowning in all these great articles. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 13:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Self-for I loved writing this one. Orian57 Talk
13:16 1 July 2009
- For. Why does she keep saying "yah!"? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 01:21, Jul 2
Yah Sorry, I know it's cheesy, but I had to say it. Don  Puttano cHeDDs 02:42,2July,2009
- forish. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sonje! okay. —Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 17:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, I just nommed it. Everyone knows I never learnt how to write. This is Orian57's handywork. But your enthusiasm is admirable. --Dame
 17:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
For. I liked it YAH! brilliant spoof on open water and open water 2! Acrolo 12:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ah! Thank you! That was the movie I was trying to remember, Deep blue sea has genetically enhanced sharks in in it. Orian57 Talk
12:52 3 July 2009
- As per below (my comment) Mr Zheliel Brute! ~12:26/5/July
- To clarify that's both "proud moment" and "For"? Orian57 Talk
12:29 5 July 2009
|
Against Votes: 3
|
Against. --RomArtus (talk). 19:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against Didn't enjoy it. Staircase 01:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against per above. --Docile hippopotamus 01:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- This is the first time I've commented. A proud moment. Mr Zheliel Brute! ~12:26/5/July
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 14 hellspawned future taxpayers
|
| Nomination:
| ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 04:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 14
|
- For. Gotten much better since last time I saw it. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 04:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Why, you! I wanted to nom this! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 05:41, Jul 1
- For. I've enjoyed watching this one grow... --UU - Oim frum Englund!
10:47, Jul 1
- For. A great article. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 13:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Bless. per my NotM nom. Don  Puttano cHeDDs 02:44,2July,2009
- for. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- I was there at its inception, witnessed its birth, and watched it take its first faltering steps. I'm proud to see it grown up and getting the respect it deserves.... -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
- For. Dame
 17:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
For. ... Acrolo 07:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
For.. --RomArtus (talk). 19:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
For. - Enjoyed it. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:27, 5 Jul
For. Ring a ding. -- 23:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- For --Docile hippopotamus 04:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
For. Was good. Some of the sentences maybe should be broken up into two but other that it made me giggle. Orian57 Talk 04:11 6 July 2009
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
I'm a dirty thief. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 06:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- How can I find my sig?!?! Its not here! By User:Flutter 21:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 8 Flower Power
|
| Nomination:
| Acrolo 07:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 12
|
- Nom+For My humour is satisfied, my vocal chords have been soothed by vigorous irregular tones as a result of Laughing.. Acrolo 07:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- I likes it =D Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool
18! 11:13 June 28 '09
- I like it too! —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 18:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ownage. I loved it and think it will make an excellent featured article! This article has just been
ruined edited by an idiot a genius.
For. Perhaps a Trifle Too Long but that should be no excuse for a yes. --RomArtus (talk). 22:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Dame  14:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Bless. Per Somebody Don  Puttano cHeDDs 16:43,29June,2009
- Not sure why this is doing so poorly... --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 02:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
For. Me neither! --Sog1970 15:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- For Just, but for. Ban Magnet Burninator!
Talking Woody Stalking Woody 05:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Great work Siddhartha-Wolf 00:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Charming, just a little lengthy. NaturalBornKieler (talk)
07:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 4
|
- Mmeh. Also couldn't get through to the end. Needs a spit and polish for a couple of typos. Also she seems to be modeled on Paris Hilton - so why doesn't she have photos of herself on there? (Hmmm... Divinity porn...) PuppyOnTheRadio woof! Vote4me Vote4it
- Against. per above. Mn-z 01:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against It kinda bored me.
Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 13:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Didn't laugh once.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 16:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 6 rockclimbers in televion commercials
|
| Nomination:
| T. (talk) 04:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 9
|
- For. Read it, loved it, read it in mp3. T. (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
For. I have made a reservation against what looks like a Cajek ejaculation on the last picture caption. Correct me If I am wrong ! --RomArtus (talk). 08:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. per above, was on VFG Mn-z 17:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- SelfFor at least this isn't
filial piety something else, something that won't offend people! BAN MAGNET! <19:42 Jun 25, 2009>
- For. Sadly, it isn't filial piety. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 20:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. He made (most of) the changes I specified in my review. I think it's ready. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 23:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- for. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- For I liked it--Sir Sunbeam
no u F@H KUN 08:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- For Its alright.—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Against on the count that all of Cajek's articles are exactly the same Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 19:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Still needs a little trimming. -- DameViktoria
- (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:46, 5 Jul 19:46, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Maybe I am missing something ... NaturalBornKieler (talk)
07:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 10 people who need therapy
|
| Nomination:
|
For Votes: 15
|
- .5SNF I've always really liked this song. Just out of curiosity, I'd like to see how it does the 2nd time around. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:41, Jun 24
- Yes As this guy is even more pathetic than me.
Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 02:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. I remember this! I feel so old BAN MAGNET! <6:55 Jun 24, 2009>
- Yes per the opposite of what Dexter said. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 08:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Just I was kinda torn on this, but I've decided it's the right sort of teriible, and the page itself was pretty good. Orian57 Talk
17:11 24 June 2009
- Die, you wrist-cutting emo faggot, DIIEEE!!! Norsk Arysk Blakk Mettall! RAHHH!! Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool
18! 18:49 June 24 '09
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 22:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
For. they should all die, you know "they" -- -
player2- 09:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Tres bean. ImNotASunbeam Have you been doing your ironing? 14:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. per above. Mn-z 17:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Very For. I thought I would vote against this, and the song is just a tad bit "over the top" for my own tastes, but the black background and absurdly large picture at the bottom make it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- 4 -OptyC Sucks!
CUN20:28, 25 Jun
- Why are my tight pants so uncomfortable?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 02:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. I think I helped make this or something... - UnIdiot |
| Talk | Contribs - 03:29, Jun 27
- For—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 23:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 5
|
- Unlistenable. I guess it's unlistenability is the joke, but I can't laugh much when the MP3 is literally hurting my soul.
pillow talk 20:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Against. Too random for me, nice background and stuff but the song coulda been funnier if played with more than one tune and rhythmic instead of minotonous strumming Acrolo 05:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- That's what makes it funneh, actually Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool
18! 14:41 June 26 '09
- Against Per my comments last time it was nommed. -
RAHB 14:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Liked the way you'd emo-ified the page, but the unlistenability puts me off. Nameable • mumble? 14:10, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against Staircase 04:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- abstain. i love the look of the page, but i wasn't a fan of the audio. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain The look of the page works, and I laughed out loud at the "Hea Guys" section. The song and audio wasn't as good though. Ban Magnet Burninator!
Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 7 women "servicing" fans
|
| Nomination:
| Mn-z 15:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 10
|
-
nom + 4 another find from VFG. --Mn-z 15:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Fantastic! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 16:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. I love when you can guess the author without looking at the page history. IronLung 21:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- For Don't care if the article is crappy or not!!!—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 20:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:33, 23 Jun
- Weak For. I would like to see a little higher word-to-pic ratio. But consider me serviced either way. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 23:49, Jun 23
- Well I think it needs a higher pic-to-word ratio. --Mn-z 04:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- for. especially for the conundrum part. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- A big fan! -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
- For. Enjoyed it very much. Sir Sunbeam
no u F@H KUN 05:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. -- DameViktoria
- (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:42, 5 Jul 19:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
Against. Reads like a male teen fantasy which is fine except that is basically the joke..Not a VFH in my view.--RomArtus (talk). 12:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- I LOVE this concept. The article just left something to be desired.... I mean other than sex. Ban Magnet Burninator!
Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against - Per Romartus. Staircase 01:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- I thought I'd probably get a comment like Romartus's, so this might bear explaining: "Fan service" is a term for a scene in an anime where a female character becomes nearly nude for little-to-no reason except that teen nerds want to see her drawn that way. So the joke is that literal "fan service" includes a lot of figurative "fan service." Yeah, I know, if you have to explain it, it isn't funny.
pillow talk 15:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- You should have put that in nom as a guide to people who are not into anime. Still...I won't change my vote except the comments but thanks for letting us know the humour source for the article.--RomArtus (talk). 06:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 12 followers of false religions
|
| Nomination:
| NaturalBornKieler (talk) 12:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 15
|
- Nom & For. Got some coffee in my nose laughing. NaturalBornKieler (talk)
12:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Great UnNews! —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 12:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
-
For. *Sings* what if god was one of us! -- Acrolo 13:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- for It got a good many laughs from me. Ban Magnet Burninator!
Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. I shared NaturalBornKieler's experience, but with apple juice. Dame
 22:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- SoSo. --UU - Oim frum Englund!
14:40, Jun 23
- Strong For. I sure hope He has a sense of humor. Otherwise... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 00:07, Jun 24
- This article was one of the top 10 articles of 2009(ish) Saberwolf116 02:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
For. It is good enough for VFH but we are putting up a lot of religiously styled stories of late. --RomArtus (talk). 00:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, that is only because we are nearing the end of times. NaturalBornKieler (talk)
15:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- For Staircase 00:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Bless. Don  Puttano cHeDDs 21:39,30June,2009
- Excellent. ~
21:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Though those cray-zee Muslims might not like it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. --I'mthedaddy 10:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Hmm... MrN
03:20, Jul 5
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Against meh. --Mn-z 15:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- against. didn't really hit the funnybone for me. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against I didn't really find much funny after the first bit. I think God as an ambivalent putz would've been funnier.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 21:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 8 enigmatic metaphors
|
| Nomination:
| I live in your eyes 06:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 11
|
- Self Nom and For - No idea how this is going to go down, my first go at a featured article... Not that I'm trying to influence your vote or anything... I live in your eyes 06:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. - Made me smile. I would say that William Burrough's should be in there, and it's a bit of let down that you missed out stuff like his late seventies work.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. It's a nice UnNews. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 15:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- For Oh man, look at those cavemen go!--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 16:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
For. On balance a yes even if I think the article could have been slightly longer with some other Bowie name checks about his 'lyrical lying'. --RomArtus (talk). 22:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. per above. Mn-z 15:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
For. because I said so. – (eye) (spy) ...·º•ø®@» 05:48, 17 June 2009
- for. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Funny stuff.
TALK FRESH MEAT ♥ talk to me 16:49 24 June 2009 16:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- For Staircase 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Damn Bowie never made sence! —
FlutterNayely Rodriguez Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 07:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- The "taking song lyrics literally" premise seems kind of weak for a feature article. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 07:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against. There was half a paragraph "in the style of" that I liked, the rest... meh PuppyOnTheRadio woof! Vote4me Vote4it 20:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not bad, but not feature-worthy. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 22:54, Jun 30
|
| Comments
|
Pee Review. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 07:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 8.5 mentions of John Galt
|
| Nomination:
| —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 9.5
|
- Nom & For. Clemens fixed this up a bit; I now think it's feature worthy. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
It's not. It has rptqts.75.18.174.159 03:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- You can't invalidate a nom without being an admin. In fact, I don't think I can even do this. Staircase 03:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Stop being a jerk, IP, or you'll get banned (Hint: you're already banned. Moo ha-ha!). Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 03:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Objective For. It's definitely good enough now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 22:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. I hope people remember I nommed this before it was cool! BAN MAGNET! <6:41 Jun 15, 2009>
- For. I do not usually think it appropriate to vote for your own stuff, but I believe that a satirical and reasonably balanced article on the subject is important. Thanks to Cajek, for his brilliant foresight! Thanks to Guildensternenstein for his invaluable advice and help. Thanks to all of you for giving this another chance. --Clemens177 07:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- CLEARLY IF YOU WERE TO BE HIT BY A TRAIN, YOU WOULD DESERVE TO DIE, BECAUSE YOU ARE A GODDAMN COMMUNIST. EVERYONE ON THAT TRAIN DESERVED TO DIE. THERE WAS NOT ONE AMONGST THEM WHO WAS SO CAPITALIST THAT THEY COULD DESIGN A CLOAKING RAY THAT WOULD CLOAK A VALLEY. WITH MY FREEZE RAY, I WILL STOP THE WORLD. WITH MY FREEZE RAY, I WILL FIND THE TIME TO FIND THE PARTS OF A MAN HACKED APART SO I COULD SEW THEM TOGETHER at random. THAT'S RIGHT, I'M TALKING TO YOU, ELLSWORTH MONKTON TOOHEY. Inebriated 06:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. per above. Mn-z 15:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Its OK. --Docile hippopotamus 04:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Much better! Dame  16:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. I farted... er I mean.... I LIKE IT! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Teh pwnerator (talk • contribs) 21:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. 24.108.253.110 07:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
Against. I hate repeated quotations from the same source.75.18.174.159 03:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Striking vote based on bannination. Did I do something wrong? Tell my creator! IronLung 04:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- You know what? We should unban this guy. I think it's funny with his stupid reasons for voting against and crap. Staircase 04:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Steps. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 16:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Against. Don't find it funny. --Docile hippopotamus 10:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)<s/>
Genuine against vote. –Flashfreez 06:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- This is too long for me to read! Gah! Staircase 06:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Leave the striking of the votes to members of the cabal. Thanks. ~
07:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- M'bad. IronLung 02:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. a reluctant abstain but not sure if the semi-conversational style works . Also it talks about the book and then splits off to mention the writer - and then back again to the book. It is an ambitious attempt on a difficult subject matter but I wonder if it would helped to be more general reader friendly. --RomArtus (talk). 22:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- If you have to explain the joke... The explanation at the ends of these sister articles bug me more and more every time I read them. Get rid of them and I'll gladly vote For. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN22:07, 16 Jun
- Comment. It looks like this article is still being worked on by the original author. Over 4 kilobytes of material has been added since the nomination. Mn-z 18:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Objectively, I hope. There's nothing I despise more than seeing edits that aren't Rational. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 18:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- abstain. very long, and i got bogged down, and i'm not really familiar with any of this stuff. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Abstain.. I voted against on the first nomination, and while it's a little better, it's still not a for. Don  Puttano cHeDDs 02:36,20June,2009 02:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'll go with an abstain, 'cause I've never read the book, and you kind of need to know what the book is about to get it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 19:47, Jun 20
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 11 Gardeners
|
| Nomination:
| ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 22:54 13 June 2009
|
For Votes: 13
|
- Nom and For! Nameable is my new best friend. This made me laugh harder than I have in ages. ~Orian57~
~Talk~ 22:54 13 June 2009
- For. Who was your best friend before Nameable then? —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 22:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Teeheehee... Ginger Pussy... teeheehee PuppyOnTheRadio 23:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Fawr SysRq, I guess Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool
18! 23:30 June 13 '09
- Weak For. There are some pretty funny bits, but it seemed overlong and I didn't like the ending. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 23:36, Jun 13
- For. Well seeing as its mine... Nameable • mumble? 13:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Dame  15:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Weak For It almost outstays its welcome but I will go yes for it all the same. --RomArtus (talk). 11:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- for. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Bless. Lol. —The la Zhel 04:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
456789101112 Epic tweets. My UncyclopedianAnniversary "Celebration" (21:31 06-18-2009) 21:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Oh yes, that was good. --UU - Oim frum Englund!
20:14, Jun 25
- For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 2
|
<s>Uber Strong Against. It's a tweet, not an article!
- 1.No voting based on namespace 2.You forgot to sign 3.No vote rigging. Saberwolf116 03:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I said you were banned before, but now you're on double-secret bannination. Jerk. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 03:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against. didn't find it funny. Mn-z 15:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm just not "down" with you kids and your "twitters," but this just didn't tickle me. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:33, Jul 2
|
| Comments
|
- Abstain I like it, it's well written and amusing, but not enough hahas. Ban Magnet Burninator!
Talking Woody Stalking Woody 01:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
|
[vote]
(feature) (remove)
| Vote
| Score: 11.5 ironic cameos of people who don't speak English, travelling to nowhere for no reason
|
| Nomination:
| BAN MAGNET! <17:02 Jun 10, 2009>
|
For Votes: 14.5
|
- GlobalTourniquet makes a good article here. I don't even know anything about this guy, and I liked this article, plus I learned something. BAN MAGNET! <17:02 Jun 10, 2009>
- For - Be careful when you vote for this - you may not be worthy. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 19:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
For.. GT has this one nailed and crucified to get my vote. --RomArtus (talk). 19:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. IronLung 22:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. I really should see more movies. None by this guy, but by somebody. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 23:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 10:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Dame  12:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
For. per above. --Mnb'z 06:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Amazing! Staircase 18:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- for. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- For no considerable reason. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Works for me. --UU - Oim frum Englund!
20:29, Jun 29
- For, per Under user—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 00:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC
- For. 70.60.28.126 15:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Against. Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 20:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against the first and last bits were good but the rest was kinda meh. Orian57 Talk
18:13 28 June 2009
Yet another unfunny director article. –Flashfreez 22:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe if you watched some real films you'd find them a little funnier. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
|
See also