Uncyclopedia:VFH

1. Nom + For Let's hope this one doesn't get completely raped like my last two nominated articles did. ---Matfen815 13:03, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. I wasn't really expecting to enjoy an article about this guy, but it was certainly entertaining. SuperBario 18:56, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. It looks better. I change my vote. InMooseWeTrust 19:23, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. I have seen Glengarry Glen Ross (and he was awesome in it) and he was also pretty good in The Cooler, which I have also seen. It should be noted that he was also seen in that movie with him and Sean Connery in a runaway submarine with the overactor from Rocky Horror Picture Show and the underactor from Jurassic Park or something. It should also be noted that he's a shitty actor (he's got two expressions: "pursed lips" and "squint". Sometimes, when he's really, really acting, he combines the two). Sir Modusoperandi ^{Brute! Boinc!} 21:18, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

1. Self-Nom 'n' For. I wrote this for PLS but only got an honorable mention. So I got it reviewed and the Chief says it's good to go. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Monday, 07:02, Nov
2. Weak For. For no particular reason. :P • MUSHI • • 12:32, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:40, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. I think I said what needed saying already. It amused me. ChiefjusticeDS 22:30, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

1. Nom & For. A funny piece by GlobalTourniquet. If you're unfamiliar with Mr. Serling, you can find his collected works in the library...of the Twilight Zone. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:31, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
2. For! do do do do, do do do do... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Thursday, 19:07, Nov 5 2009
3. A simple vote for an article. On most days, that would be the end of it. But for <insert name here> tonight, the beginning of a nightmare... --    GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, film critic 19:30, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 19:59, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 23:34, 5 November 2009
6. DIG Wow...well Mr. Tourniquet, you'll have no semantic gripes from me here. Excellent work. --THINKER 08:57, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
7. Submitted for my approval and I approve. So many references to Twilight Zone episodes, Serling's life and career, and all nicely blended into a Twilight Zone-written style. A huge Serling fan thanks whoever wrote this very much. WHY do I not know??? 21:50, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. No... the rose is withering before my eyes.... withering... withering     Hadōken 12:05, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
9. for. close to perfect. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:52, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
10. Abso-fucking-lutely. But do fix the formatting at the end so that the template is below a centered picture instead of scrunched over to the side like that. And also watch this video: [1]. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:32, Nov 9

    You mean like that? --    GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, film critic 02:50, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

    Right on. Also: video = awesome? - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:56, Nov 10

11. For. Quality idea and quality execution. VFH all the way ! RomArtus (talk). 09:08, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
12. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:43, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
13. For. I enjoyed it. ChiefjusticeDS 22:28, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

Just checked the history and saw what this was before and after XxxxxxXxxxxxxxxx worked on it recreated it from scratch. I try not to check the author before I read an article to eliminate unnecessary bias. WHY do I not know??? 21:56, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom + Bless I'm not normally a fan of UnTweets, but my little Mooshy's one is actually very funny. Wooo..!..! Don Puttano cHeDDs    
2. Self for. • MUSHI • • 05:11, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. Improvements have been made. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:53, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. Fixed up and much better. :) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Thursday, 18:38, Nov
5. for -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 19:27, Nov 5
6. Za lol :) Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Talk to the Pole} 20:12, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
7. For. --Docile hippopotamus 22:48, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 23:33, 5 November 2009
9. For. I like what you've done with it, Mooshie. Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 15:58, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. Totally Twitter. Dame Pleb Cpt. Miley Spears (talk) 07:22, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
11. For Keeping Untweets an all featured category.    Orian57    Talk   02:33 8 November 2009
12. For. there's a few inaccuracies, but it's all good. ---Pelargonium (Talk)
13. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:45, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. against. hm, close, but didn't seem 'there' for me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:38, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
2. Nothing Special.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 02:49, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

   You sure know how not to hurt peoples' feelings. • MUSHI • • 08:26, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

3. Ugh There is a small amount of funny but the Twitter format drains any sense of timing or style so much it becomes just boring to read after a while. Imagine someone monotoning sentences of the same length for pages. Sorry but it would be just so much better if it wasn't in this format. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 03:31, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

• Pee Review Here Don Puttano cHeDDs     01:22,5November,2009
• Comment. I was asked to vote, but this just didn't excite me enough to get me to say yes, but didn't anny me enough to say no.     Hadōken 03:35, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain. For a Tweet style article it is too long in my view. Ends up more like a Dear Diary story. One thing - I am pretty sure Osama would not have a dog as they are regarded as unclean by strict muslims. RomArtus (talk). 13:07, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

• I think the dog thing was more to make him relateable, to make him seem like a regular human twitter user. Kinda like what was done with making him talk like a teenage girl, without making it irritating to read (no offense, Mooshie). Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 18:28, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

• • Well, Colin, I actually used it because it was unexpected (and therefore funny) from binladen to say that he has a dog, as romartus has said. And to a lesser extent, what you said. • MUSHI • • 18:48, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. NOM and FORE. You know this article makes you laugh. Go on and read it, I promise you that you will laugh. There. Now that you have laughed, don't go, ooh it's very nice and funny and I laughed but it spells things wrong and uses the voice of a child so I'm going to vote against and also I have a large stick up my rear. Vote FOR. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:44, Nov 4
2. For. For. For. For. For. For. For. For. For. For. For. For. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 03:46, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
3. Forever and ever and ever and ever Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 06:13, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. A timeless classic; I'm surprised it hasn't been featured before. Andorin K. (Silence! I vape you!) 06:38, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. –Flashfreez 07:06, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. Despite overt cuteness makes me barf, but this shit is great!! — H. Peebles - D - HS 09:50, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
7. Fol. masterpiece. • MUSHI • • 15:30, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:36, 4 November 2009
9. For. I love the article! It's awesome! --Invincibleflamegruemaster 05:13, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 20:04, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
11. For clean underwear. I got teary eyed. Seriously. (Also thank you thank you thank you for getting rid of the "o yea this reminds me of something else!" part that ruined previous versions). WHY do I not know??? 21:33, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
12. Vot chng. Thanks for removing the "o yea!" part. Cause all the other stuff maeks me lol. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Saturday, 02:09, Nov 7 2009
13. For. It's cute. Even though I don't like changing poopy diapers. :P Dame Pleb Cpt. Miley Spears (talk) 07:11, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
14. yuky doody Ill take SIX     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   18:08, Saturday 07 November 2009  
15. looks like you had a big day, champ. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:35, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
16. For. Wow, it's like my biography.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 02:52, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Against. That last section just kind of ruins it for me. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 04:20, Nov 4 2009

1. Against. Come off it ! This as a VFH ???? VFD Contender really. RomArtus (talk). 07:10, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
2. Still no. Yes, I'm a party pooper. Sir Modusoperandi ^{Brute! Boinc!} 16:40, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
3. Nope. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:17, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
4. Eh Only the first picture is actually funny. The article would be infinitely better if it were just that picture and the title, the rest sucks fat cock. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:51, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
5. Against. For ever and whatnot. Because this article doesn't make me laugh. --UU - natter 09:08, Nov 5
6. Against. See how it's in the category Category:Articles that will probably never get featured, despite their popularity among Uncyclopedians? Do you dare to make a liar out of our categorization system, Led Balloon?? THE VERY THOUGHT OF SUCH AUDACITY! pillow talk 18:49, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
7. Against. Potty humor, I prefer satire Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 12:41, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
8. Against. We featured the category to combat this issue. This article on its own is better featured within the annals of our hearts. Also the anal in our hearts. -- Also, penis. 02:13, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
9. AGAINST sigh... --THINKER 07:05, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
10. Against. Just because it's popular doesn't mean it's that good. 121.216.19.125 02:22, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
11. agaisnt Can't honestly complain on the grounds of spelling, givin my horrendous record on such affairs, or the fact it uses the voice of a child (On the grounds of building sandcastles, Nursery and LazyTown). but just yuck.    Orian57    Talk   02:38 8 November 2009
12. Against. 206.248.131.142 19:05, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
13. Sorry I'm normally all for toilet humor, and was on the fence for this for a long time, but no. Don Puttano cHeDDs     03:39,9November,2009
14. AGAINST. The "you've had a big day champ" line was great, but that's it really. Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo11 15:35, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
15. Against. You can write slang English with good grammar (whatever that means...) and still be really funny. Please clean it up and add a lot more content. InMooseWeTrust 17:42, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
16. Against. No thanks. ChiefjusticeDS 22:25, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Abstain Aww, TLB, you promised. I believed you, too, I totally got my laugh muscles ready and everything. Maybe I forgot to remove the stick from my "rear", but I didn't laugh. However, no particular reason to feel it should not be featured for people who will laugh at it. Have a nice day. --    GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, film critic 04:16, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

It was nominated for deletion in June 2006 but survived . What has changed since then ? --RomArtus (talk). 13:27, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. snf. I dunno if it's lies or not but according to this review it was worthy of a 49.5/50 score 0_0 Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 21:29, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Hey, the PEEBS don't lie. — H. Peebles - D - HS 22:57, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
3. You should go on a world tour. Call it - PHAT 2010. ~ 23:02, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. --Docile hippopotamus 23:54, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
5. OBESE. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 03:05, Nov 4 2009
6. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:43, 4 November 2009
7. for on the condition you also feature my parody which is just as "in date" as this, if not more so.    Orian57    Talk   02:27 8 November 2009
8. OBESE FOR | King Joseph® | Contact Goa Tse Clan Priest | Goa Tse Clan Sign Up | | My Brute | 09:32, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:46, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. What the No laughs here sorry. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:48, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. Hadn't seen the video, so just watched it and sorry, but I still don't find this funny. WHY do I not know??? 21:26, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
3. against. did not appreciate. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:32, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

• Assume I'm missing something here.... El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 20:35, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
• It's a simple parody on ur so gay by Katy Perry... Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 22:45, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
• I think this will clarify it. Makes me like this piece even more. ~ 09:13, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom and for. The author withdrew this to expand and edit based on the advice of readers and a Pee Review. What I thought was a feature-worthy article is now even better. WHY do I not know??? 06:39, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. On balance - a for though it stills looks a bit undercooked in the centre. RomArtus (talk). 08:38, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
3. Self For. Sorry it got nommed before I was totally finished! It's done now. Dame Pleb Cpt. Miley Spears (talk) 23:13, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. I hate the Spears. All of 'em. But not this article. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 03:09, Nov 4 2009
5. For. but Eww pregnant people. breeders. --Puffskein 04:16, November 4, 2009 (UTC) Puffskein 04:16, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:39, 4 November 2009
7. for. wow, i was impressed with this, considering i thought i would hate it. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:29, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:47, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

• Comment Pee Reviews really help and so do readers' suggestions! Dame Pleb Cpt. Miley Spears (talk) 21:14, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

1. self-nom & for. my last-minute PLS entry. pee review here, since it seems to be required to post such things nowadays. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:17, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
2. Gerry FTW! And he did indeed win. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 21:23, 2 November 2009
3. strong for. Excellent in every way. Woo! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Monday, 21:55, Nov 2 2009
4. For. I thought it was really good. ChiefjusticeDS 08:44, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
5. 5. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 17:28, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
6. Ape. • MUSHI • • 06:22, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
7. Four Score And Seven Votes Ago... —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:15, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. Funny, encyclopedic, and four score and seven percent true. WHY do I not know??? 19:49, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. IronLung 02:36, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:47, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

• Abstain. It has a few too many redundant ideas (the Onion isn't really developed as a joke and the Schwarzengger reference adds nothing either) to make me want to support this article without reservation. Perhaps I am a bit too harsh but I do normally like the Collected Works of Gerry Cheevers. RomArtus (talk). 08:31, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom+For. Something about turkeys. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:10, 2 November 2009
2. Turkey. Nice food. Nice cantry. Nice wezar. Byramids! • MUSHI • • 15:34, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. This was nominated last year, I think, but ultimately wasn't featured because it wasn't nommed near Thanksgiving. But now it's all good! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Monday, 21:36, Nov 2 2009
4. For. I enjoyed it. ChiefjusticeDS 09:01, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. RomArtus (talk). 07:30, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. This article's a turkey. WHY do I not know??? 19:26, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
7. I don't want anybody else. When I think about you, I touch myself. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 01:26, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. It's fresher now.--    14:58, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:48, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. What the? This article isn't funny. It could be extremely offensive to many people, and it just doesn't have any pizzazz or sparkle or edge to it. So, NO. --Invincibleflamegruemaster 05:27, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
2. reluctant against due to the alarming lack of links. if this isn't corrected soon, i'll do it myself, because this article is awesome. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:15, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Go for it. WHY do I not know??? 21:32, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom+For. A nice article by DrStrange. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:07, 2 November 2009
2. For • MUSHI • • 15:40, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. Almost a little too sciency..but it leads to Star Crap...so understandable — H. Peebles - D - HS 00:40, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. Underplayed humour but it works. RomArtus (talk). 08:10, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 20:08, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. I found it very well-written and uncyclopedic, but a little low on humour. Then I got sucked in at the end and found it very funny. WHY do I not know??? 19:20, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
7. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:52, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. I never laughed. This is almost a Wikipedia article, it's so dry. The only attempts at jokes I could see were passing Godzilla references. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Monday, 21:31, Nov 2 2009
2. Against. Just couldn't get into this one. It is vaguely amusing in places but, never seemed to get any better than that. ChiefjusticeDS 08:59, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
3. against as per those other againsts. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:45, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nomination and for. --Reverse Genocide Cockatrices 12:47, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
2. Yes. Great article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:23, 2 November 2009
3. For. Every time I go there, I lose seven hours. They've even got an article on us. It's the worst. Sir Modusoperandi ^{Brute! Boinc!} 17:47, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. --Docile hippopotamus 09:15, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. --180.95.16.16 23:41, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 20:16, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
7. for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:33, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:44, Nov 9

1. Against. While a perfect parody and representation of Tv Tropes, the site too tedious on its own for me to consider it funny. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 19:11, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. Really more a feature article for illogic crowd than here. Seems more of a visual assault than an article. RomArtus (talk). 08:36, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
3. Against. InMooseWeTrust 17:58, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
4. Disowned. It's just not feature material. Now if it were actually as long as, for instance, TV Tropes's Reverse Polarity page, or (FSM forbid) its Heel Face Turn page, I would vote for it in a heartbeat. Not really. Sir MacMania GUN—[00:49 10 Nov 2009]

• Comment. Undecided, it looks like it should be funny, but I'm not sure. — H. Peebles - D - HS 13:24, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain. Don't know tropes. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Monday, 21:26, Nov 2 2009
• Abstain. I'm also unfamiliar with the subject matter. ChiefjusticeDS 08:54, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain. I know "trope" is a Yiddish word, but already know TV tropes so don't need to visit the site. WHY do I not know??? 19:12, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom+For. A nice UnBook by SysRq—What the hell happened to that guy?—I happened to come across. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 16:46, 1 November 2009
2. 4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 17:05, Nov 1
3. That image of the book cover is taken from "Wayside School is Falling Down." Good book. Great article. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Monday, 05:39, Nov 2 2009
4. For. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 20:12, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
5. Weak For. It's just like high school except the TV show was weird so I almost voted no. Dame Pleb Cpt. Miley Spears (talk) 07:15, November 7, 2009 (UTC)

1. against. i did not enjoy it as much as i thought i would. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:54, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. Boring. InMooseWeTrust 17:57, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. I liked this, except that the ending didn't work for me as written, and it has several errors (spelling, and chapters skipping numbers). I may make a few fixes, then if I shouldn't have done that, somebody can yell at me and revert them. WHY do I not know??? 04:58, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
• the chapters skipping was intentional.    Orian57    Talk   21:35 5 November 2009

You might want to indicate that somehow. I remember Isaac Asimov started The Gods Themselves with Chapter 6, but he explained why. WHY do I not know??? 19:05, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

1. For People seemed to like the letters. Now more like an encyclopedia-entry. --Sog1970 21:24, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 05:34, Oct 27
3. For. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:20, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 16:09, 27 October 2009
5. For. Hills covered with wet sheep. That's badass :) • MUSHI • • 18:16, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
6. O blaid Cymru am byth, old fruit. --I'mthedaddy 12:38, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
7. For. I really like this. --UU - natter 12:41, Oct 28
8. for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:14, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. RomArtus (talk). 11:41, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. I saw this story on "Unsolved Mysteries." Or was it on "Fox News?" Also I think she really didn't have to worry about taking the time to wash her undies. WHY do I not know??? 19:09, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
11. For. Jude the Obscure 22:47, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
12. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:55, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

PEE

1. I thought this was genius while it was still in the making. ~ 20:29, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. I aint no number, I is a free man. • MUSHI • • 20:43, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
3. For of one, 1/3rd a dozen of the other. --monika 22:06, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. Not sure I've ever voted for and meant it quite so much. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:06, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
5. Five. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 16:04, 27 October 2009
6. You are Number Six --Number Two 06:06, Sixober 6, 1966 (UTC)
7. For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:48, 27 Oct
8. For. Rather spiffy. Also for this n00b tax suggestion. And for exiling Necropaxx to Portmerion until he's watched every episode... --UU - natter 21:54, Oct 27
9. For. I had to check that there had been a US remake (of sorts) first before voting on it. So kudos to the writer for making me do that. I thought it could have been wackier and the Beach Ball had gone on to a career scoring goals for Sunderland v Liverpool...but it gets my VFH support.. RomArtus (talk). 11:28, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
10. for b/c it gave me gas when I read it, and i like gas -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 02:01, Oct 30
11. For. I could have sworn I voted for this already, but I guess not. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:22, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
12. For. I will not be indexed, briefed, debriefed, or threatened by a stable explosive rigged to detonate by prepaid cellphone. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 21:20, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
13. For. Though Port Meirion was clearly a more glamorous location than Miami. --Sog1970 08:56, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
14. For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:27, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

Two things: 1. I've requested a pee. I won't be heartbroken if it doesn't happen (I'm busy and I'm reasonably happy with the state of the article as is), but if it does, that would be nice. 2. I don't suppose I could request a feature date of Nov. 15th if this gets featured, could I? Thanks. --monika 22:06, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

• Abstain. Don't know subject matter. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Tuesday, 03:03, Oct 27 2009

  I'd hope not; it's a not a real show! :D --monika 03:13, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

  Well, I know it's based off of Burn Notice; however, I don't know anything about that, either. :P • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Tuesday, 03:38, Oct 27 2009

  • gasp* you don't know the prisoner? *gasp* *gasp* *cough* *gurgle* ~ 09:58, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

  I suggest we have a whip round and buy Necropaxx the complete DVD boxed set asap. Nobody whould go through life without having seen The Prisoner! Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:06, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

  Can I get that set instead of him? ~ 10:15, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

  Wouldn't mind one myself, actually. I suggest the imposition of a Noob Tax so we can all have one. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:18, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

• Abstain. I really couldn't make up my mind. If anyone needs me I'll be over here on the fence.--ChiefjusticeDS 11:18, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
• I wasn't aware of this earlier, but The Prisoner is available on amctv.com (I guess they want people to see it before they see The Prisoner (US Remake)), complete, free, and legal. --monika 17:08, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  • You had to show that link, didn't you? You realize I'm supposed to be Pee Reviewing your article? Now it's going to be delayed for another 17 hours. Starting with Episode 1: Arrival.... WHY do I not know??? 21:44, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
    • If you look over to the side, they also have each of the episodes compressed to one minute. (But yeah, take your time with the review. No problem.) --monika 21:55, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
      • Stupid college. I would like to watch it, but homework... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Tuesday, 22:47, Oct 27 2009
• abstain. i haven't seen either of these shows...SirGerrycheeversGunTalk
• Abstain. I Pee Reviewed it and really enjoyed the writing and the images and found it funny at the end, but didn't find it funny in the beginning sections. With more humour early on, I'd happily change my mind and vote to for (not counting any other changes). WHY do I not know??? 22:09, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

1. For + Self-Nom. I was commanded by der UnFührer to nominate this --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 20:40, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
2. Very For. Per my review. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:50, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 16:35, 23 October 2009
4. For I like it... --Matfen815 17:02, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. This is the kind of article I like alot. Brilliant ideas, clever language and funny. mattlobster. (hello) 17:09, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. Just as I was staring thoughtfully ahead, almost getting bored with the repetition, you changed it. A well-timed switch. WHY do I not know??? 22:58, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
7. For. ChiefjusticeDS 10:17, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. RomArtus (talk). 11:25, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. I dont know who he is either, but reading this told me exactly who he is and in a very enjoyable way... Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 18:15, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. • MUSHI • • 03:24, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
11. For. Really well done. --UU - natter 12:05, Oct 28
12. For. InMooseWeTrust 18:00, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. I am not indie enough to understand who this "Charles Kaufberg" character is. Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 10:00, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
2. against. a little per murderfrog, a little per not finding enough chuckles. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:48, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
3. Alright then. And dude, quit with this fucking after-the-fact justifications of your poor decisions. You said the same bullshit when I critiqued Plink for PLS. If you want to stick by your poor choices that's 100% fine, but don't try to undermine my criticisms by making up some half-assed reasoning for article elements just to retort every critical comment. You're a decent writer, but here's yet another tip: respect your elders (especially ones who were WOTY and have decent bullshit detectors). --THINKER 00:53, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

What? Maybe there's a minor misapprehension here. All I did was disagree with your opinion. I respect your view, but I disagree. I do have a history of accepting criticism. Sorry if you took my comment personally, but I meant no disrespect at all, and I fail to read disrespect in my comment. Apologies. --    GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, film critic 05:50, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

• Abstain on account of lack of knowledge about the subject matter. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Friday, 05:40, Oct 23 2009
  • I knew people would be abstaining on this one. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:50, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
    • Glad I didn't disappoint. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Sunday, 04:48, Oct 25 2009
• Abstain. cause I'm a n00b and I don't know tihs dude -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 04:13, Oct 26
• Abs. pending some style improvement. The tip template is not the right choice for its use here. Like what I see comedy-wise though: I'll give it another more thorough read through if the formatting gets worked out. I'm rooting for ya as Kaufman is ripe for the treatment, the sad, brilliant motherfucker he is.. --THINKER 06:08, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

I think the Tip template enhances the amusement of the amusing juxtaposition of all of those similar white male in abject isolation staring thoughtfully ahead poses - one from each film - and it got a great response in the review. This may be a matter of taste - I am in love with its use here. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 06:39, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

1. For. My funkiness levels are severely drained after this, so it must be good. Sir Padddy5 CUN VFH 17:03, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Outtasite, man! Also, Pee Review? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 20:16, Oct 7
3. For. For a story about the love that dare not say its name on prime time TV. RomArtus (talk). 21:02, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. The most problematic issues are fixed, so yeah, see the review for more details on what I think. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:18, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. --Docile hippopotamus 00:25, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. per above. Mn-z 15:59, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
7. Nice. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 17:57, 8 October 2009
8. For. AWESOMENESSSS X 10 74.231.235.2 18:01, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. Well now, that appears to be the shit. --UU - natter 16:04, Oct 22
10. For. this baby needs a push • MUSHI • • 16:05, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
11. for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:32, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
12. For. 84.115.78.9 14:13, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
13. For --Matfen815 11:58, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. Not exactly my cup of tea. --You know what the music means... Our time is up. 20:13, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against Fine for the site, not FA. --THINKER 05:35, October 30, 2009 (UTC)

1. Comment. PEE review is here --ChiefjusticeDS 21:14, October 7, 2009 (UTC)