Uncyclopedia:VFH

1. Self-Nom & For. A political satire of mine. It got a very positive Pee review, which I used to fix it up ever-so-slightly before submitting it here. Vote away. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For.Haven't even read it yet, but I'm a sucker for a good political satire. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 04:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

   Spoiler: This article isn't "good", and can barely be classified as "satire." --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 04:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

3. For. Maybe too subtle for some. Satire it is --Asahatter (annoy) 07:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Asahatter (annoy) 07:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 03:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. --Docile hippopotamus 04:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Against. ERRR... Shellfish??? Acrolo 06:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. SelfNomAndFor Ok so I got a favourable review and I'm a little board so just thought I'd see if I can get away with this.    Orian57    Talk   16:12 5 July 2009
2. LazyFor. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 16:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. For A very brilliant idea--IwillKILLyou333 Talk If you dare 21:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
4. Yeah I'll go for it. Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:50,5July,2009

1. Against Sorry, but it wasn't all that funny and I'm sort of sick of little Joshy. Staircase 16:18, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Abstain A curate's egg --Asahatter (annoy) 08:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Self For An article I enjoyed writing, I fixed everything that was wrong after I submitted it to Pee Review so figured I might as well have a stab at this. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Sure, it makes me go snigger, why not? I live in your eyes 22:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. Okay first effort, but not front page. May I add, your reviews are excellent. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~

Abstain. a bonus that it is at least an original idea (i think !) but it still lacks polish and I don't thank you set up the main premise well enough to encourage further reading. --RomArtus (talk). 10:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom + For. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 05:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Tehehe. ^_^ -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:57, 5 Jul 19:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Weak For Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:56,5July,2009
4. POTR. Mr Zheliel ^Brute! ~05:17/6 of July
5. For. --Docile hippopotamus 06:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. I don't normally say this but this article needs to about one paragraph long as that is the basic joke. The rest of the text is filler - though if that had been funnier then it would have worked a lot better i.e. medical nonsense or such like before it disappeared off the page. --RomArtus (talk). 10:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. I'm really just very flattered that you've looked at my work as a potential feature when it really does not differ that much in regard to text from the Wikipedia article. PuppyOnTheRadio woof! Vote4me Vote4it 11:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Self nom and 4 So, I started this a year ago, and finished it a few weeks ago. It did really good on pee review and I fixed what was said to be wrong, so... yea. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 20:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
2. I need to take a dump. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 20:57, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
3. For. As per my review, and the current lack of poo. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:57, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
4. For. MrN  02:41, Jul 5

1. Against. Not bad, just didn't seem to hit my funny buttons. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:06, Jul 5
2. Against. Good idea but it doesn't step up to the funny hitting zone.--RomArtus (talk). 10:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Against. Per RomArtus and could use effective images, plain toilets are not funny unless they have bart simpson painted on the toilet seat. Acrolo 06:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. --Sog1970 13:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
2. for Taffy! --^Dame 16:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Great article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 00:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

• Abstain It was good, but the end lost it for me. Staircase 15:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain. A reluctant abstain ..just don't think this is VFH though it has plenty of nice touches.--RomArtus (talk). 10:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom & For Another action-packed Unscript from the current WotM. --^Dame 13:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For. I'm drowning in all these great articles. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 13:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Self-for I loved writing this one.    Orian57    Talk   13:16 1 July 2009
4. For. Why does she keep saying "yah!"? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 01:21, Jul 2
5. Yah Sorry, I know it's cheesy, but I had to say it. Don Puttano cHeDDs 02:42,2July,2009
6. forish. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
7. Sonje! okay. —Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 17:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

   Dude, I just nommed it. Everyone knows I never learnt how to write. This is Orian57's handywork. But your enthusiasm is admirable. --^Dame 17:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

8. For. I liked it YAH! brilliant spoof on open water and open water 2! Acrolo 12:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

   Ah! Thank you! That was the movie I was trying to remember, Deep blue sea has genetically enhanced sharks in in it.    Orian57    Talk   12:52 3 July 2009

9. As per below (my comment) Mr Zheliel ^Brute! ~12:26/5/July

   To clarify that's both "proud moment" and "For"?    Orian57    Talk   12:29 5 July 2009

1. Against. --RomArtus (talk). 19:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Against Didn't enjoy it. Staircase 01:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Against per above. --Docile hippopotamus 01:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

• This is the first time I've commented. A proud moment. Mr Zheliel ^Brute! ~12:26/5/July

1. For. Gotten much better since last time I saw it. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 04:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Why, you! I wanted to nom this! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 05:41, Jul 1
3. For. I've enjoyed watching this one grow... --UU - Oim frum Englund! 10:47, Jul 1
4. For. A great article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 13:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
5. Bless. per my NotM nom. Don Puttano cHeDDs 02:44,2July,2009
6. for. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
7. I was there at its inception, witnessed its birth, and watched it take its first faltering steps. I'm proud to see it grown up and getting the respect it deserves.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
8. For. ^Dame 17:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
9. For. ... Acrolo 07:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
10. For.. --RomArtus (talk). 19:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
11. For. - Enjoyed it. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:27, 5 Jul
12. For. Ring a ding. --    23:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
13. For --Docile hippopotamus 04:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
14. For. Was good. Some of the sentences maybe should be broken up into two but other that it made me giggle.    Orian57    Talk   04:11 6 July 2009

No against votes

I'm a dirty thief. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 06:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

• How can I find my sig?!?! Its not here! By User:Flutter 21:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom+For My humour is satisfied, my vocal chords have been soothed by vigorous irregular tones as a result of Laughing.. Acrolo 07:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
2. I likes it =D Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 18! 11:13 June 28 '09
3. I like it too! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 18:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
4. Ownage. I loved it and think it will make an excellent featured article! This article has just been ruined edited by an idiot a genius.
5. For. Perhaps a Trifle Too Long but that should be no excuse for a yes. --RomArtus (talk). 22:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
6. For. ^Dame 14:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
7. Bless. Per Somebody Don Puttano cHeDDs 16:43,29June,2009
8. Not sure why this is doing so poorly... --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 02:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
9. For. Me neither! --Sog1970 15:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
10. For Just, but for. Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 05:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
11. For. Great work Siddhartha-Wolf 00:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
12. For. Charming, just a little lengthy. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 07:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Mmeh. Also couldn't get through to the end. Needs a spit and polish for a couple of typos. Also she seems to be modeled on Paris Hilton - so why doesn't she have photos of herself on there? (Hmmm... Divinity porn...) PuppyOnTheRadio woof! Vote4me Vote4it
2. Against. per above. Mn-z 01:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
3. Against It kinda bored me. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 13:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
4. Against. Didn't laugh once.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 16:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. Abstain. Jealous of the idea, it's a great one. I enjoyed reading it but I didn't laugh. Also, it seemed to go on a bit. Sunbeam no u Have you been doing your ironing? 08:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• abstain. i liked bits, but it was rather long-winded. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain.. Same as NotASunbeam. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 22:46, Jun 30

1. For. Read it, loved it, read it in mp3. T. (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
2. For. I have made a reservation against what looks like a Cajek ejaculation on the last picture caption. Correct me If I am wrong ! --RomArtus (talk). 08:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. per above, was on VFG Mn-z 17:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
4. SelfFor at least this isn't filial piety something else, something that won't offend people!   BAN MAGNET! <19:42 Jun 25, 2009>
5. For. Sadly, it isn't filial piety. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 20:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
6. For. He made (most of) the changes I specified in my review. I think it's ready. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 23:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
7. for. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
8. For I liked it--Sir Sunbeam no u F@H KUN 08:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For Its alright.—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

1. Against on the count that all of Cajek's articles are exactly the same Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 19:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. Still needs a little trimming. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:46, 5 Jul 19:46, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Against. Maybe I am missing something ... NaturalBornKieler (talk) 07:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

• @TKF: Touché   BAN MAGNET! <20:33 Jun 25, 2009>
• Abstain. You know, TKF brings up a good point. And this article was a little... eh. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 01:21, Jun 27
• Comment. Like the concept, but execution... I found myself wanting to want it to be better if it makes you feel better. PuppyOnTheRadio woof! Vote4me Vote4it 20:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

1. .5SNF I've always really liked this song. Just out of curiosity, I'd like to see how it does the 2nd time around. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:41, Jun 24
2. Yes As this guy is even more pathetic than me. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 02:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. I remember this! I feel so old   BAN MAGNET! <6:55 Jun 24, 2009>
4. Yes per the opposite of what Dexter said. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 08:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
5. Just I was kinda torn on this, but I've decided it's the right sort of teriible, and the page itself was pretty good.    Orian57    Talk   17:11 24 June 2009
6. Die, you wrist-cutting emo faggot, DIIEEE!!! Norsk Arysk Blakk Mettall! RAHHH!! Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 18! 18:49 June 24 '09
7. For. --Docile hippopotamus 22:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
8. For. they should all die, you know "they" --- player2- 09:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For. Tres bean. ImNotASunbeam Have you been doing your ironing? 14:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
10. For. per above. Mn-z 17:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
11. Very For. I thought I would vote against this, and the song is just a tad bit "over the top" for my own tastes, but the black background and absurdly large picture at the bottom make it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
12. 4 -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:28, 25 Jun
13. Why are my tight pants so uncomfortable?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 02:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
14. For. I think I helped make this or something... - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 03:29, Jun 27
15. For—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 23:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

1. Unlistenable. I guess it's unlistenability is the joke, but I can't laugh much when the MP3 is literally hurting my soul. pillow talk 20:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. Too random for me, nice background and stuff but the song coulda been funnier if played with more than one tune and rhythmic instead of minotonous strumming Acrolo 05:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

   That's what makes it funneh, actually Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 18! 14:41 June 26 '09

3. Against Per my comments last time it was nommed. -RAHB 14:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
4. Against. Liked the way you'd emo-ified the page, but the unlistenability puts me off. Nameable • mumble? 14:10, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
5. Against Staircase 04:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

1. abstain. i love the look of the page, but i wasn't a fan of the audio. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Abstain The look of the page works, and I laughed out loud at the "Hea Guys" section. The song and audio wasn't as good though. Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

1. nom + 4 another find from VFG. --Mn-z 15:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Fantastic! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 16:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. I love when you can guess the author without looking at the page history. IronLung 21:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
4. For Don't care if the article is crappy or not!!!—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 20:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
5. . -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:33, 23 Jun
6. Weak For. I would like to see a little higher word-to-pic ratio. But consider me serviced either way. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 23:49, Jun 23

   Well I think it needs a higher pic-to-word ratio. --Mn-z 04:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

7. for. especially for the conundrum part. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
8. A big fan! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
9. For. Enjoyed it very much. Sir Sunbeam no u F@H KUN 05:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
10. For. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:42, 5 Jul 19:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. Reads like a male teen fantasy which is fine except that is basically the joke..Not a VFH in my view.--RomArtus (talk). 12:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
2. I LOVE this concept. The article just left something to be desired.... I mean other than sex. Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Against - Per Romartus. Staircase 01:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

• I thought I'd probably get a comment like Romartus's, so this might bear explaining: "Fan service" is a term for a scene in an anime where a female character becomes nearly nude for little-to-no reason except that teen nerds want to see her drawn that way. So the joke is that literal "fan service" includes a lot of figurative "fan service." Yeah, I know, if you have to explain it, it isn't funny. pillow talk 15:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

You should have put that in nom as a guide to people who are not into anime. Still...I won't change my vote except the comments but thanks for letting us know the humour source for the article.--RomArtus (talk). 06:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

• Can't decide. The introduction was good enough, but the rest of it just felt drawn out and unnecessary. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • tweetings) 01:15 Jun 25, 2009
• Abstain. I cant put my finger in on it Acrolo 12:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom & For. Got some coffee in my nose laughing. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 12:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Great UnNews! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 12:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. *Sings* what if god was one of us! -- Acrolo 13:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
4. for It got a good many laughs from me. Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
5. For. I shared NaturalBornKieler's experience, but with apple juice. ^Dame 22:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
6. SoSo. --UU - Oim frum Englund! 14:40, Jun 23
7. Strong For. I sure hope He has a sense of humor. Otherwise... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 00:07, Jun 24
8. This article was one of the top 10 articles of 2009(ish) Saberwolf116 02:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For. It is good enough for VFH but we are putting up a lot of religiously styled stories of late. --RomArtus (talk). 00:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

   Oh, that is only because we are nearing the end of times. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 15:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

10. For Staircase 00:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
11. Bless. Don Puttano cHeDDs 21:39,30June,2009
12. Excellent. ~ 21:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
13. For. Though those cray-zee Muslims might not like it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
14. For. --I'mthedaddy 10:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
15. For. Hmm... MrN  03:20, Jul 5

1. Against meh. --Mn-z 15:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2. against. didn't really hit the funnybone for me. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
3. Against I didn't really find much funny after the first bit. I think God as an ambivalent putz would've been funnier.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 21:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

1. Self Nom and For - No idea how this is going to go down, my first go at a featured article... Not that I'm trying to influence your vote or anything... I live in your eyes 06:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
2. For. - Made me smile. I would say that William Burrough's should be in there, and it's a bit of let down that you missed out stuff like his late seventies work.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. It's a nice UnNews. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 15:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
4. For Oh man, look at those cavemen go!--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 16:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
5. For. On balance a yes even if I think the article could have been slightly longer with some other Bowie name checks about his 'lyrical lying'. --RomArtus (talk). 22:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
6. For. per above. Mn-z 15:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
7. For. because I said so.  –     (eye) (spy) ...·º•ø®@» 05:48, 17 June 2009
8. for. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For. Funny stuff.  TALK  FRESH MEAT  ♥ talk to me 16:49 24 June 2009 16:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
10. For Staircase 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
11. For. Damn Bowie never made sence! —Flutter^{Nayely Rodriguez} Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 07:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. The "taking song lyrics literally" premise seems kind of weak for a feature article. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 07:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. There was half a paragraph "in the style of" that I liked, the rest... meh PuppyOnTheRadio woof! Vote4me Vote4it 20:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
3. Not bad, but not feature-worthy. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 22:54, Jun 30

Pee Review. Sir Modusoperandi ^Brute! 07:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom & For. Clemens fixed this up a bit; I now think it's feature worthy. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

   It's not. It has rptqts.75.18.174.159 03:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   You can't invalidate a nom without being an admin. In fact, I don't think I can even do this. Staircase 03:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   Stop being a jerk, IP, or you'll get banned (Hint: you're already banned. Moo ha-ha!). Sir Modusoperandi ^Brute! 03:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

2. Objective For. It's definitely good enough now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 22:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. I hope people remember I nommed this before it was cool!   BAN MAGNET! <6:41 Jun 15, 2009>
4. For. I do not usually think it appropriate to vote for your own stuff, but I believe that a satirical and reasonably balanced article on the subject is important. Thanks to Cajek, for his brilliant foresight! Thanks to Guildensternenstein for his invaluable advice and help. Thanks to all of you for giving this another chance. --Clemens177 07:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
5. CLEARLY IF YOU WERE TO BE HIT BY A TRAIN, YOU WOULD DESERVE TO DIE, BECAUSE YOU ARE A GODDAMN COMMUNIST. EVERYONE ON THAT TRAIN DESERVED TO DIE. THERE WAS NOT ONE AMONGST THEM WHO WAS SO CAPITALIST THAT THEY COULD DESIGN A CLOAKING RAY THAT WOULD CLOAK A VALLEY. WITH MY FREEZE RAY, I WILL STOP THE WORLD. WITH MY FREEZE RAY, I WILL FIND THE TIME TO FIND THE PARTS OF A MAN HACKED APART SO I COULD SEW THEM TOGETHER at random. THAT'S RIGHT, I'M TALKING TO YOU, ELLSWORTH MONKTON TOOHEY. Inebriated 06:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
6. For. per above. Mn-z 15:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
7. For. Its OK. --Docile hippopotamus 04:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
8. For. Much better! ^Dame 16:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For. I farted... er I mean.... I LIKE IT! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Teh pwnerator (talk • contribs) 21:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
10. For. 24.108.253.110 07:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. I hate repeated quotations from the same source.75.18.174.159 03:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   Striking vote based on bannination. Did I do something wrong? Tell my creator! IronLung 04:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   You know what? We should unban this guy. I think it's funny with his stupid reasons for voting against and crap. Staircase 04:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   I agree with Steps. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 16:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

2. Against. Don't find it funny. --Docile hippopotamus 10:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)<s/>
3. Genuine against vote. –Flashfreez 06:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

• This is too long for me to read! Gah! Staircase 06:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
• Leave the striking of the votes to members of the cabal. Thanks. ~ 07:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • M'bad. IronLung 02:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Abstain. a reluctant abstain but not sure if the semi-conversational style works . Also it talks about the book and then splits off to mention the writer - and then back again to the book. It is an ambitious attempt on a difficult subject matter but I wonder if it would helped to be more general reader friendly. --RomArtus (talk). 22:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

• If you have to explain the joke... The explanation at the ends of these sister articles bug me more and more every time I read them. Get rid of them and I'll gladly vote For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:07, 16 Jun
• Comment. It looks like this article is still being worked on by the original author. Over 4 kilobytes of material has been added since the nomination. Mn-z 18:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

  Objectively, I hope. There's nothing I despise more than seeing edits that aren't Rational. Sir Modusoperandi ^Brute! 18:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

• abstain. very long, and i got bogged down, and i'm not really familiar with any of this stuff. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain.. I voted against on the first nomination, and while it's a little better, it's still not a for. Don Puttano cHeDDs 02:36,20June,2009 02:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
• I'll go with an abstain, 'cause I've never read the book, and you kind of need to know what the book is about to get it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 19:47, Jun 20

1. Nom and For! Nameable is my new best friend. This made me laugh harder than I have in ages. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 22:54 13 June 2009
2. For. Who was your best friend before Nameable then? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 22:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. Teeheehee... Ginger Pussy... teeheehee PuppyOnTheRadio 23:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
4. Fawr SysRq, I guess Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 18! 23:30 June 13 '09
5. Weak For. There are some pretty funny bits, but it seemed overlong and I didn't like the ending. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 23:36, Jun 13
6. For. Well seeing as its mine... Nameable • mumble? 13:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
7. For. ^Dame 15:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
8. Weak For It almost outstays its welcome but I will go yes for it all the same. --RomArtus (talk). 11:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
9. for. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
10. Bless. Lol. —The la Zhel 04:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
11. 456789101112 Epic tweets. My UncyclopedianAnniversary "Celebration" (21:31 06-18-2009) 21:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
12. For. Oh yes, that was good. --UU - Oim frum Englund! 20:14, Jun 25
13. For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

<s>Uber Strong Against. It's a tweet, not an article!

1.No voting based on namespace 2.You forgot to sign 3.No vote rigging. Saberwolf116 03:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I said you were banned before, but now you're on double-secret bannination. Jerk. Sir Modusoperandi ^Brute! 03:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. didn't find it funny. Mn-z 15:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Maybe I'm just not "down" with you kids and your "twitters," but this just didn't tickle me. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:33, Jul 2

1. Abstain I like it, it's well written and amusing, but not enough hahas. Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 01:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

1. GlobalTourniquet makes a good article here. I don't even know anything about this guy, and I liked this article, plus I learned something.   BAN MAGNET! <17:02 Jun 10, 2009>
2. For - Be careful when you vote for this - you may not be worthy. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 19:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For.. GT has this one nailed and crucified to get my vote. --RomArtus (talk). 19:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
4. For. IronLung 22:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
5. For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
6. For. I really should see more movies. None by this guy, but by somebody. Sir Modusoperandi ^Brute! 23:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
7. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 10:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
8. For. ^Dame 12:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For. per above. --Mnb'z 06:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
10. For. Amazing! Staircase 18:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
11. for. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
12. For no considerable reason. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
13. For. Works for me. --UU - Oim frum Englund! 20:29, Jun 29
14. For, per Under user—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 00:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC
15. For. 70.60.28.126 15:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 20:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Against the first and last bits were good but the rest was kinda meh.    Orian57    Talk   18:13 28 June 2009
3. Yet another unfunny director article. –Flashfreez 22:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

   Maybe if you watched some real films you'd find them a little funnier. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

• Abstain. A little too repetitive and poorly formatted for me. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 23:08, Jun 13