Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Redirected from VFD)
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 391 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. Spıke Radiomicrophone20:55 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. The only salvageable parts were the intro and what it is made of, but that's not enough to justify keeping the whole thing. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:20, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Marx Shrugged H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 390 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2010 author Weri long wang writes the opposite of the plot of Atlas Shrugged, then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:08 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. --EStop (talk) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Title good but following article crap. I will take a bold punt and suggest the writer has never read any Marx. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:38, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Who Do You Think H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 230 hours
Delete (5)
  1. No redeeming value as far as I can tell Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. Spıke Radiomicrophone14:20 28-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Baffling gibberish. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Only after reading the talk page, did I kind of get the author's concept. The reader should not have to do that, especially if the piece is still no more amusing or comprehensible. Obscure nonsense. --EStop (talk) 09:19, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Relies on the sheer weirdness of how it is written, but has nothing else going for it. I get the impression that the author is insane, and/or trying to write some strange song lyrics (the repetitive table at the end could be the chorus...what do you think?). Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 07:04, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 192 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:35 30-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sexist and unfunny. Finishes off with a crappy list. No redeeming qualities. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:24, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never funny in a million years. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:31, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. --EStop (talk) 09:23, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

HowTo:Get a boner H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 73 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No humor except the glee of writing to strangers about sex. It is a chore maintaining the 2012 page of SecondChanceForMe against continual vandalism. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:56 5-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm sure there is a funny and clever article that could written with this subject header, but this isn't it.--EStop (talk) 09:31, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. An article with a promising title/concept, but poorly executed. Deserves a complete rewrite. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 06:56, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Dissociative Identity Disorder H T D Survivor

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 57 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. (Dissociative Identity Disorder was previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder, just so you all know.) To get the joke you have to visit the revision history, to see that the article was written largely by a single user who with every revision wrote about a different thing with a different style, sometimes reverting himself (and calling his own contributions vandalism). The idea wouldn't be bad, except for the fact that the reader has no clue what this is about, unless he randomly checks the page's history or talkpage. Also, none of the revisions are very well written, I find. Finally, (albeit it's of a minor concern compared to the rest), the disorder isn't portrayed particularly well. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. WTF? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:33, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't even see the invisible hand that Nominator does, but that author So So used this as a sandbox. His various projects and a few of Anon's could be thought of as a collective Dissociative Identity, but I agree that this isn't obvious to most readers. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:45 6-Jul-15
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another nonsense article (that is not even an article), that nobody will bother trying to figure out. It would have at least made more sense if each personality change was on one page, so the reader can see the dysfunction. The various personalities are barely described either, just cheesy lines left for the reader to try to figure out. --EStop (talk) 09:46, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The page is protected, so I couldn't add {VFD}. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)

Ben Ten H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 8 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Found this browsing "Categories with insufficient links". A few lines about a cartoon character that was only started, then abandoned since Sep 2013. --EStop (talk) 19:32, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. No one is going to look or finish this. Curtail. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:25, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. There's practically nothing here. If we really need an article on this, then someone will hopefully recreate it with more material later. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:42, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Author has tried to devise a comedy concept, but it is not too far from the real thing, and there is nothing else but a bit of an outline. WP:Ben 10 has ample material to parody, especially the angle that the protagonist's super-power watch might have something to do with the eventual iWatch, for better and much worse. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:22 8-Jul-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects