From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

(Redirected from VFD)

Rules and procedures:

Before doing anything else, make sure that you are well versed on Uncyclopedia's deletion policy.
1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
2. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
3. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
4. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so may invalidate the vote.
3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
1. Thank you.
2. No, really, thank you very much.
3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a *
  1. * - Creates a bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the *).
  2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
Do not revert edits of the administrators.
If you are neither an administrator nor a designated poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

VFD: Where bad articles go to get recycled.

Pages for Deletion

Shortcut:; UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD; Votes for deletion; Intensive Care Unit
	del log

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nailbat before we tear our hair out in frustration.

This also applies to Uncyclopedia In jokes (see: Category:Uncyclopedia In-Jokes).

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.

Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

If VFD is full, or if you are an IP or a user of less than 4 days, and you want to report something as potential rubbish for us to vote on in the future, please proceed to the Poopsmith's Lounge. Just remember not to sit on the chairs.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.

Peter Neal Taylor

Keep
Delete	5556 Strikes again.--Count of Monkey Crisco 11:02, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Don Vincent Brassi

Keep
Delete	5556 Need I say more?--Count of Monkey Crisco 11:02, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Bloodlust

Keep
Delete	Delete. Not just bandcruft, BELKAN bandcruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:30, November 25, 2009 (UTC) Delete. Fictional-country bandcruft with real names spells vanity, here particularly mundane. Spıke ¬ 10:49 25-Nov-09
Comments

ATI

Keep

Weak keep There were way too many rape puns, but it was keepable. ---Pelargonium (Talk)
Definitely feature worthy. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 05:21, 25 November 2009

Delete

Delete. I couldn't even find the jokes. pillow talk 05:16, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Nom and abstain. The article on New Hampshire, which I maintain, links to ATI, though I don't recall the chip-maker ever being in the state, before or after it ceased independent operation in 2006. This seems like a not-terribly funny employee inside joke, but I defer to youse. Spıke ¬ 01:24 25-Nov-09

Seriously?? Nom and abstain?? Aren't there enough utterly shitty articles on Uncyclopedia that you can find something to nominate that you would definitely like to see deleted? pillow talk 05:16, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

There are. I didn't. The indisputable fact that this isn't the absolute best use of our time is not an argument either way. Spıke ¬ 10:17 25-Nov-09

Snake Plissken

Keep
Delete	Delete. An article by User:5556, who, apparently, was never told that Uncyclopedia is a comedy site and not just a site for general fiction. pillow talk 19:36, November 24, 2009 (UTC) Delete. As below. Spıke ¬ 19:52 24-Nov-09 If this were Wikipedia, an in-universe template would be required. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 11:38, 25 November 2009
Comments

Vincent Vercetti

Keep
Delete	Delete. An article by User:5556, who, apparently, was never told that Uncyclopedia is a comedy site and not just a site for general fiction. pillow talk 19:36, November 24, 2009 (UTC) Delete. As below. Spıke ¬ 19:52 24-Nov-09 Delete. Damn GTAcruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:41, November 24, 2009 (UTC) Fiction. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 11:39, 25 November 2009
Comments

Paradigm City

Keep

Delete

Delete. An article by User:5556, who, apparently, was never told that Uncyclopedia is a comedy site and not just a site for general fiction. pillow talk 19:36, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Did Uncyclopedia used to be a site for general fiction, around 2007? Was it known as Uncruft-opedia? Spıke ¬ 19:46 24-Nov-09
Heh I put this page on my watchlist because I meant to look into it but I completely forgot. I expect I can unwatch it now. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 19:47, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:10, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
Wut? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 11:40, 25 November 2009

Comments

Did 5556 once have a user page, by which to divine whether he had plans to make his stuff funny? Spıke ¬ 19:51 24-Nov-09

He did once have a userpage. I don't know why an admin would delete it unless it were cyberbullying. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 19:53, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Could I have his userpage restored to my userspace? pillow talk 19:54, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Or I guess we could put it in his userspace, at User:5556/User:5556. pillow talk 19:54, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

I don't know to what extent you're allowed to manipulate others' userspaces without their permission. Better to have it at User:Hyperbole/User:5556/User:5556. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 20:02, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I've decided I don't want to take the blame for this. Let's move it to User:Syndrome/User:Hyperbole/User:5556/User:5556. pillow talk 20:07, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Okay, but I don't want anyone thinking it's mine or it might make me look bad. Put it at User:Syndrome/User:Syndrome/User:Hyperbole/User:5556/User:5556. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 23:04, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Kirsten Dunst

Keep

Move to Article not about Kirsten Dunst. No seriously, it'd make it considerably funnier. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 03:09, 22 November 2009
per socky and ~~redirect this toKeira Knightley In A White Corset And Kate Beckinsale In A Black One~~--Mn-z 23:21, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Okay, but how does Kirsten Dunst relate to Keira Knightley In A White Corset And Kate Beckinsale In A Black One? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 02:01, 23 November 2009
Nevermind, I'll too busy to read article titles. --Mn-z 04:56, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

Delete

Delete. This article is about Chuck Norris, Oscar Wilde, dildos, clitorises, Mr. T, and S&M. What it is not about, is Kirsten Dunst. pillow talk 01:54, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete and redirect to Keira Knightley In A White Corset And Kate Beckinsale In A Black One --Mn-z 03:02, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Redirect as suggested above. --RomArtus (talk) 08:00, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. No redirects, no name changes, just disintegrate it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:03, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

On a related note: "This meant that Dunst got to keep Paris as a sex slave. Due to her inability to do it, she keeps Paris chained up by a sex collar in her basement with a pineapple shoved up her ass and forces her to masturbate herself to her own sex video, using a jackhammer with a fire extinguisher attached to the end." --Mn-z 03:02, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

I am not clear, at all, on why we would redirect this to KKiaWCaKBiaBO. Someone comes here searching for Kirsten Dunst and gets, instead, Keira Knightly and Kate Beckinsale? That doesn't make any sense at all. Sure, Knightly, Beckinsale, and Dunst are all attractive women, but by that logic we should redirect Dick Cheney to Colin Powell because, you know, one Republican is as good as another. pillow talk 01:14, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I was too busy read to the title of said article. I was thinking Kirsten Dunst was mentioned in the title of KKiaWCaKBiaBO --Mn-z 04:56, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

Elisha Cuthbert

Keep

Keep. The article isn't that good, but the images make up for it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 13:14, 22 November 2009
So you'd vote "keep" on any article that included two pictures of an attractive woman in a bikini? pillow talk 20:25, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Well, that depends. Here, I think the article is consistent for the most part and has a fair enough concept (perfect woman/Kim Bauer). Some bits are utterly crappy, of course, but that shouldn't doom the whole article. Though I admit that without these images, I would have totally voted to exterminate this. I guess it's funny in a way how hot chicks get crap articles. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 02:09, 23 November 2009
You should know that Mnbvcxz has updated his undeleteable page, BUTT POOP, just for you. pillow talk 03:46, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
I have no idea what it's about, but I seem to like it for some reason. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 04:28, 23 November 2009

Delete

Delete. If I told you that I enjoy masturbating, would you laugh? If the answer is "no," then there's no humor in this article. pillow talk 01:47, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Another article from the Randumbo template. If the writer had at least stuck to 24 then I may have abstained...--RomArtus (talk) 11:33, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete No idea who she is and whilst she's quite fit in that empty 'I like kittens' way - well - this isn't funny. mattlobster. (hello) 23:20, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Would this be a good candidate for a Alessandra Ambrosio type macro? --Mn-z 03:05, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

No. pillow talk 08:31, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Why not? --Mn-z 23:17, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Honestly, in general, I'm not in favor of replacing shitty articles with image macros. In my opinion, that tends to discourage articles on those subjects from ever being written. Maybe no one will ever have a funny idea for an Alessandra Ambrosio article, but if they did, they'd probably land on that page and say "Oh. Well, I might offend someone if I campaigned to get that replaced, so I'll leave it alone." A wizard did it is a good place for an image macro because it isn't taking up any article namespace real estate, but Elisha Cuthbert is a page where, in a perfect world, we should have a fully realized article. pillow talk 01:20, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

We could always place a rewrite tag on the macro. Or, better yet a "we couldn't think of anything funny to write about this subject, so we made an image macro template, if you can think of a better idea, please rewrite this"- template. --Mn-z 18:35, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

Married Women

Keep

Keep. It's funny in this random kind of way. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 02:17, 20 November 2009
Keep. Crap keep but a keep all the same. --RomArtus (talk) 18:35, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Delete

Delete. An irredeemable shitfest of poop. pillow talk 19:54, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per Hyperbole. --Mn-z 23:24, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. No notable basis, inscrutable. PS--I'm biased toward Delete when any article breaks the encyclopedia canon with impossible year numbers just to display its zaniness. Spıke ¬ 20:50 23-Nov-09
soft delete Some workable random humor, but not enough to make it save worthy. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:23, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Am waiting for someone to tell us if there is a musical group by this name; that is, that this article has any basis, and that its inscrutability is an encoded reference to real facts. Spıke ¬ 22:48 19-Nov-09

So would you vote keep for real bandcruft and delete for fake bandcruft? Or the other way around? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 23:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

Mostly want to defer voting while I don't know what I don't know, which was a lot in the case of Suryavarman II. Yes, it would be more keep-able if it were clearly bandcruft. Spıke ¬ 23:26 19-Nov-09

A quick wikipedia and google search seems to say no, or at least they fail UN:CM. --Mn-z 23:49, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Comment. I would like to see an article on Marital Arts that combines marriage and fighting. Actually, that's kind of depressing. I'm off to sulk now. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 23:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

Marmitophone

Keep	Keep. Clever. Even the list is clever. Occasionally random, but fun for music-lovers. Spıke ¬ 21:14 19-Nov-09 Keep. If this goes , we will ever see an article like this again ? Remove the duff bits (Stalin zzzz etc) - and it can remain servicable. --RomArtus (talk) 18:37, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. A bizarre article. Kind of coherent, but in no way funny. pillow talk 19:52, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Comments	The instrument is "played by ear"--literally. Plays A through G, plus the "secret" note H. Engineering diagrams for this food-filled instrument were discovered as "papers wrapped in an oily rag." Gems throughout. But no role for the University of Southern North Dakota at Hoople. Spıke ¬ 02:49 20-Nov-09

Marios

Keep

Keepish Stupid but I smirked a bit. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:54, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

Delete

Delete. Honestly, is anyone surprised that this sucks? pillow talk 19:46, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Cheap shot at local eatery; see below. Spıke ¬ 22:33 19-Nov-09
Delete. An idea with possibility but not like this. --RomArtus (talk) 18:39, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete per above. --Mn-z 18:39, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
It's'a me --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 21:16, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Uncyclopedians are too pack-rattish. We're too hesitant to get rid of the stuff that doesn't work well. -Dorsalfrog Prime 14:35, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Coherent article with few feints into randomness. But asserting that a local eatery is Mafia-related and flouts the health code, and taking other cheap shots, isn't clever but generic. Looks like a place with franchises in only a few towns: Codeine's mum? Spıke ¬ 21:26 19-Nov-09
I assumed it was just an article about "What would it be like if the Nintendo mascot, Mario, opened an Italian restaurant?" pillow talk 21:35, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

That would be an interesting direction in which to take it; but I don't see where the author did so. Spıke ¬ 22:03 19-Nov-09

Yeah, looks like there was a throwaway reference or two at the beginning but the author took it no further. This article is just plain confused about what it wants to be.

pillow talk 22:20, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

Mariology

Keep

Keep. Remarkable. There is a concept; and the subsequent randomness was written by a scholar and not a twerp between games on his Nintendo. If this should acquire an actual purpose, it would be great. Spıke ¬ 21:40 19-Nov-09
Keep good enough. --Mn-z 18:40, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
Strong Keep. I laughed quite frequently. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Tuesday, 06:26, Nov 24 2009
PWNAGE KEEP VOTE OVERRIDING ALL DELETE VOTES. Per Necropaxx. --Invincibleflamegruemaster 19:18, Nov 24 2009
Flipping to keep. It hadn't occurred to me that Mariology was the study of the Virgin Mary. That makes this whole thing seem far less random. pillow talk 19:20, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 11:50, 25 November 2009

Delete

Delete. Tagged rewrite, but not worth rewriting. pillow talk 19:45, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Weak Delete It's certainly... thorough. There's just a lot of concept problems. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:02, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. --RomArtus (talk) 18:40, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete looks a play on the word "Mariology", i.e. the study of Mary, replacing various proper names with the Nintendo characters. --Mn-z 03:31, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Last half of final paragraph (in non-matching Yo Momma style) was anonIP vandalism Oct-Nov'08; now deleted; likewise the See Also to unrelated "Dexter :D". Spıke ¬ 22:32 19-Nov-09

I've added an animation from the gallery and will break it into sections and improve typography if it is Kept. Spıke ¬ 02:40 20-Nov-09 What is the "concept problems," guys? It imagines the usual ecclesiastical number-of-angels-that-can-dance-on-the-head-of-a-pin-ology, applied to the popular character of primitive video games, and does so with skill. Spıke ¬ 03:01 21-Nov-09

I think that is the problem. The title gets a slight chuckle, but other than that, it reads like a wikipedia (or even Britannica) article with proper name replacement. --Mn-z 03:31, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

The divinity of Luigi? The "plumberness" of Mario? This article is totally dead-pan--but not unfunny! Spıke ¬ 15:42 22-Nov-09

PS--Version in my userspace now has section heads and somewhat tighter wording. Spıke ¬ 16:11 22-Nov-09

Berlinlandstan

Keep

Keep. As per the line The Count quoted. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! 01:22, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Keep per SPIKE. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 02:13, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
~~Keep. per nothing at all. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 14:10, 21 November 2009~~

Delete

Delete. In 1944, Leeroy Jenkins declared that there was only one man bad-ass enough to destroy Hitler, who somehow was alive again. Rommel helped war effort while Robert E Lee took his place at Halo. It just goes on like that. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:22, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It's got no point. Spıke ¬ 00:41 19-Nov-09
Loeschung. Pisspoor Randumbo.--RomArtus (talk) 07:07, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Shitty dime-a-dozen article about nothing. pillow talk 19:26, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete too long to rise to the level of Mr winkler is GAY or That time I was nearly raped by a yak during my sojourn in Canada --Mn-z 18:42, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
Baleet it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Tuesday, 06:20, Nov 24 2009
Bizarro Keep. Because. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 11:53, 25 November 2009

Comments

Have the people citing our Delete rationales as their Keep rationales perhaps seen the movie Peyton Place, where the stereotypical New Englander votes against the majority on everything, including against adjournment when all the business is done? Are you voting just to be contrarian, or do you really see promise in this article? Do you realize that the italicized phrase above just goes on and on? Spıke ¬ 04:26 19-Nov-09

I don't see this "majority" of which you refer to. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 05:28, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

That's still referring to the movie, not here. Do you really see promise in this article? Spıke ¬ 06:03 19-Nov-09

I believe that what Colin and Syndrome are implying is that this article passes the "So bad it's good" test, in the vein of Mr winkler is GAY. That they consider it a special kind of incoherence where the author fails so badly that the author himself becomes the joke.

pillow talk 19:23, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

So glad you cited the winkler article before I stumbled on it and nominated it. Spıke ¬ 21:05 19-Nov-09

It's been nominated three times, and survived all three. Today, it's one of the most popular articles on Uncyclopedia - and a personal favorite of mine. I wrote the spinoff article A gay retared place.

pillow talk 21:10, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, that's what I meant. I wrote Heinrich himmler is GAY to add to the Winkler madness, although I don't expect this particular article will generate any spinoffs. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 22:29, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

All right, those are deliberately bad. This one is just bad. And, by the way, profoundly incomplete, and mostly ignored since Aug-07. Spıke ¬ 15:47 22-Nov-09

Ice Berg Plantation

Keep	Keep This article has a good idea and concept, but isn't finished. Mr N 17:27, Nov 16 Keep. It doesn't look promising and absolutely no one else except the author will know where this is going . Suggest it is checked again soon before letting it defrost. --RomArtus (talk) 23:53, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Definitive useless article. Maybe, just maybe could be merged with Crystal meth. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:36, November 16, 2009 (UTC) Delete. It's only a month old, but the author spent 8 days on Uncyclopedia and is probably unlikely to ever come back. I'm not encouraged about the future of this article. pillow talk 18:38, November 16, 2009 (UTC) Delete. You know what guys... I may have been... Mr N 20:32, Nov 19 Delete. Still seems drug-induced; on second visit, the only thing that jumps out is the way it uses every tired meme once, from cliché numbers to Russian Reversal. Spıke ¬ 10:55 25-Nov-09 Delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 11:55, 25 November 2009
Comments	The problem with drug-induced editing is that a random thought over which you laugh for 10 minutes convinces you it was funny. CoMC has a good idea of using part of this article to flesh out the other one, as you used to be able to take two Chevy Vegas and make one working one. Spıke ¬ 14:25 16-Nov-09

Coors

Keep	Keep. I'd rewrite this myself, but I'm not funny. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 22:17, Sunday 15 November 2009 Adequate. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:54, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete I checked to see if we had an article about The Coors that I could link to in my comment above and found this crappy article. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 01:54, November 13, 2009 (UTC) Delete. --Mn-z 05:18, November 16, 2009 (UTC) Delete. Bottom line is: it's not funny. Let's decide how to make this funny after this unfunny heap of slag is gone. pillow talk 20:19, November 16, 2009 (UTC) Delete. Like Obi-Wan Kenobi, its most promising life requires that this incarnation die. Spıke ¬ 01:13 17-Nov-09 Delete. Unfinished, uncared for , unillustrated and ditchwater dull to boot. --RomArtus (talk) 19:29, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
Comments	`{AAP}` (Needs-photos tag) was copied into this article instead of used as a tag; Section 1 was usage guide for the tag; fixed. Spıke ¬ 02:06 13-Nov-09 And `{VFD}` added--I'm sure this is above my pay grade. Spıke ¬ 02:12 13-Nov-09 Good concept (confuse Adolph Coors the brewer with Adolf Hitler), bad execution descending into babble. A fix would not be trivial. Spıke ¬ 02:10 13-Nov-09 post-edited