User talk:Zombiebaron/archive7

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

PotY

This is probably why Modus moved his nomBraydie 17:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

K thanks. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

template:VoteBox

Hey Zomb - I decided to nix the MonthlyTop10 template and just use your VoteBox. I edited it to make the border color variable (you can use either color names like "blue" or hexadecimal values) because if we're going to use it regularly to make announcements, which I think might be handy, it'll be useful to be able to make it stand out for people to notice when announcements change and so on. —rc (t) 04:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Awesome. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and the one you put on the hall of shame I just made blue for jokes. The real reason was it looked weird without a colour. Also, if you look in VFH you can see that I've changed it a bit and commented out next month's one. —Braydie 15:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Yah, exept it still says "Vote:" on the VFH one. Maybe we should make a CommentBox template, drop the "Vote:". --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, didn't notice that. I'll get to it. —Braydie 15:38, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Awesome. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Potatochoppers' Guild

Can you endorse me as an apprentice potatochopper? RadicalX says that I can join only if I can find a master potatochopper that will sponsor me. --General Insineratehymn 21:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Have a quick look at Mr Peanut

Hey, I saw Mr.peanut on the NRV page and saw that it was all about NINJA'S! How could I refuse an attenpt at saving a poor ninja from being huffed. I've made a quick edit of it, and i'm planning on coming back for more punishment fun!. I'd be glad if you could have a look and see if it rated taking off the ICU tag yet or not. If not, i'll keep working on it and come up with some more stuff. Thanks mate. -- Icons-flag-au 10rd Ben - talk to me now!!! - 30px-Sucrose_b.gif 12:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

It still needs work, but at this point its just above an ICU, and I will tag it ugly. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm in

Thanks for the invite. I've got three featured images and up for Potatochopper of the month currently. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Katharine McPhee

Hello, on the 9th you placed an NRV tag on this article. I just found it, and have done some extensive work on it, in an attempt to make it suitable and not-deleteable. I figured I'd tell you and not take that tag off myself or anything, just so you could review it and take it off possibly if you see fit.

If you could let me know if you choose not to, considering I've spent the time I have on it, I'd like to attempt to keep the article alive (and would attempt to improve it more).

Thanks!

AhhDiddums 22:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Alright, I removed it. It has been worked on, and is now better, it however is not the best that it can be, and still needs a bit more work. I hope you will continue to work on it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Potatochoppers' Guild

Pcg logo

RadicalX invites you to join the Potatochoppers' Guild. Please read through our charter and decide whether or not you would like to join. If you would, please contact RadicalX to find out more!

Basically, you use this template and fill in your own name when inviting someone to join. If you want in, I think you qualify for Mastery. R 18:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Vanity

Hi. I don't understand why my article CSI Swansea was classified a vanity page when it's clearly about a ficitonal program. What can I do to change the article so it fits

--Don alun 17:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

  • When I first found it, I thought that the actors were just people who live in Swansea (your friends and such). It seems that at least some of them aren't and are in fact British actors I've never heard of (being Canadain). I removed the vanity tag. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Many Thanks, I aim to flesh out the empty links I've left too.

--Don alun 17:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Everwood

Hi. You put an 'Ugly' tag on my article, but it's not nearly half as ugly as loads of other ugly articles. Is it the six pictures (shown in two columns) that aren't displaying correctly, or something? If that is the case, I'm sorry, but I'm not sure how to make an appropriate table. If need be, I'll stop being lazy and learn how. Thanks. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jerseystrato (talk • contribs)

  • Okay, I guess its not really that ugly. Its just that the formatting gets kind of repetitive, with the "Something in bold- What it is" repeated over and over. Also, that picture gets kind of...really repetative. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm... I see what you mean. I'll cut it down to four pictures. I'll try to find a better "episode format" template/table/thing for the episodes..... after I finish my homework maybe?

  • Alright, just as long as you end up doing it. As always (cue horror music) I will be watching you (fade out) (roll credits) --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Halifax (dump)

Hiya, just wanted to ask your opinion, as you placed the ICU tag in the first place, which may or may not have led to me editing it. Could you have a look please, then decide if the tag should stay or not. I would remove it, but personally, I still think it's rather crap, for various reasons, which I'll list if you want, but they aren't necessary. I also put it on Pee Review, if that's relevant. Thanks :-). --scaley1234 23:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC).

Well, if you've put it on Pee Review then those chums over there should be able to do a much better of straightening you out then I will. I've removed the ICU. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
OK, thanks. I'll see what feedback I get over there :-). --scaley1234 00:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC).

banning over Jew bag

I went to my room and thought about what I did and now I am very ashamed of myself. I thought initially that someone was vandalizing my article because they found it offensive to the point of violence/anti-Semitic or something. I'm actually half-Jewish (paternal) so don't be worried about me ubermenching the uncyc community in some kind of skin-head/neo-Nazi coup de grace. I'm also half-vampire (dunpeel) so don't worry about me breaking into uncyclopedia's blood reserves as a thief; I’ll just do it very subtly with minimal slaying if I can help curb my natural urges; however, more zombies is a bad thing??

Before reposting the Jew bag article, I had completely refurbished it to perfect formatting and added some new content and a couple new 'jokes' to it as well. Being new around here just creating articles for fun and not being familiar with VFD and the internal uncyc community of criticism, I've been unawares of that particular article's condemnation.

If you can find it in your heart to slap some nasty anti-Semitic tags right below some Jew tags on my user page for the creation of that article I would greatly appreciate it. --AmericanBastard 22:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


p.s. you moved some of my articles?

  • Yah, well don't do it again, eh? I also moved 4 of your HowTo:'s to conform with my person vendetta against names (something about the space after the :). I to am half jewish (in fact I am the only openly jewish admin...so far). But yah... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I guess so. Sorry, I'm strictly against any form of censoring on Uncyclopedia unless it contains graphic depictions "real" content, i.e. (goatse, shock media etc, viet prisoner getting shot with bang gun~slight). Cancer Porn and Holocaust Tycoon for some reason I found amusing; David Gerard has a knack for keeping content remotely subtle yet hilarious. I wish you would reconsider the Jew bag article. It doesn't insinuate any violent tendencies; it just plays off of stereotypes. I can see how the "orange jews" one was a little more on edge b/c it pertained to violence and used its imagery to an inflamatory effect; well, so did holocaust. Tell you the truth, i may have a little jew in my blood; but, I was raised Roman Catholic and the plethora of Jesus articles on Uncyc have not come off yet to offend me as they would a bus load of nuns. I'm a bit concerned about this Mordillo fellow who displays absolutely NO tolerance when it comes to articles that contain anti-semitical references. This noticeably happens to offend him/her. Take a look at the VFD as proof. (keyword:Jew). Boo Censors! --AmericanBastard 05:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

The obese man's handbook

okay i rewrote The Obese Man's Handbook into not being a list. Am i free to go? (P.S. yeah i wasn't sure what i was thinking saying it was not a list...) The preceding unsigned comment was added by Puppyeater (talk • contribs)

The Omg i h8 chavs article

Alright, it was a pretty poor attempt at a satire of snobbery, but was it not even worth an NRV tag first? --Smelly999 21:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Because it was slander against "chavs" (whatever those are). You can't just slander things that I've never heard of, because its probably vanity aswell. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, chavs are the biggest phenomenon of 21st-century Britain. They have a massive page on here, and I was attempting to spoof middle-class attitudes to them. The content of my article was blatantly ridiculous, so hardly slander... but meh. Gone now. --Smelly999 20:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry for only being from one of England's colonies and not knowing about your "chives" or whatever :) However, if you would like I can restore the article for you in a subpage of your userpage. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Shuddy

Hello Zombiebaron,

I went ahead and fleshed out the Shuddy article. I hope it's ok now! --UppyMan[chundi] 20:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Middlesex University

Hi Zombiebaron,

My page might have been rubbish because I wrote it at around midnight, but I disagree that writing about a university is vanity even if it is a former polytechnic. It has Google hits and a wikipedia page. Should I get someone funnier to write about it? - Jenni (unregistered user)

  • The reason "your" (in quotes because it belongs to the community as soon as you hit save) article was deleted because not only did it contain jokes about members of the staff, which nobody outside Middlesex understands, but it also seems to slander the students who go there, by saying that they are all alchoholics plagerisers who engage in vice and smoke in the tolets. This "style" of humor is called vanity and is not tollerated on Uncyclopedia. If you wish, you can create a username and I can recreate the page within your userspace so that you can work on it and then come back to me to see if it is still vanity. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks, will do.

HowTo:Win at Zork

I've made the article a version of Zork where you always die because you don't ever listen to the article. That's still not quite that good, but... Well, maybe you'll die funny. You decide. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Naughty Budgie (talk • contribs)

Jarhead

"This template is used to mark pages which have no present value, but which could perhaps be improved if their author were given a sharp poke in the arse."

This is the description from the template, the article was awful and whoever removed it, did so by removing it without improving it any way. Oh and nowhere at all does it state anything about new articles. Also please don't threaten me it makes me laugh too hard. Quadzilla99 20:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

In addition talk to the admin who huffed it not me. Quadzilla99 20:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
You do...ahh...realize I'm an admin right? Anyway, thank you for pointing that out, I am currently changing the template discription. Also, Braydie and I have talked about this matter, and he agrees that while he should have checked the article creation date, you should not have added the ICU tag in the first place. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
It's nice that you two agree and that you're together decided that a totally unfunny article should be allowed to stay around because it hasn't been erased yet. Please I beg you don't tell me you think that article is funny. He has a jar for a head, literally. That's the joke? Seriously? That's the worst joke on Uncyclopedia if that is the actual joke. Honestly you never addressed my actual complaint that the article is unfunny or even denied it. Do you really believe it's funny? Quadzilla99 02:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Please see here. Quadzilla99 03:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
I have read that page. If you still want to delete Jarhead, then go to VFD and vote for its deletion. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Four Letter Word

I have worked a lot to improve this article since you tagged it NRV. Check to see if you think it's worthwhile. Please consider just how hard it is to write an article using only four-letter words!Rogpyvbc 12:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Аддитонал Цоммент

Фром цоллецтаблес то царс, буы анд селл алл киндс оф итемс он еБаы хоме | паы | регистер | сигн оут | сите мап Шоп фор итемсСелл ёур итемТрацк ёур еБаы ацтивитиесЛеарн, цоннецт, анд стаы информед-фор бусинесс анд фор фунГет хелп, финд ансwерс анд цонтацт Цустомер Суппорт Адванцед Сеарч


Го бацкБацк то лист оф итемс Листед ин цатегоры: Тоыс & Хоббиес > Гамес > Wар Гамес > Wархаммер > 40К > Спаце Маринес Алсо листед ин: Тоыс & Хоббиес > Гамес > Wар Гамес > Wархаммер > 40К > Отхер 40К


ТАУ армы фор сале греат буы Итем нумбер: 280077102933

Ёу аре сигнед ин Wатч тхис итем ин Мы еБаы | Емаил то а фриенд


Стартинг бид АУ $500.00 Буы Ит Ноw прице: АУ $550.00

Енд тиме: 10-Феб-07 20:44:49 АЕДСТ (1 даы 3 хоурс) Постаге цостс: АУ $25.00 Регулар Сервице то Аустралиа Постс то: Аустралиа Итем лоцатион: Етталонг Беач, Неw Соутх Wалес, Аустралиа Хисторы: 0 бидс Ёу цан алсо: Wатч тхис итем Емаил то а фриенд | Селл оне лике тхис Листинг анд паымент детаилс: ХидеШоw

Стартинг тиме: 31-Йан-07 20:44:49 АЕДСТ Стартинг бид: АУ $500.00 Дуратион: 10-даы листинг

Паымент метходс: ПаыПал, Персонал чеqуе, Монеы ордер/Банк чеqуе Сее детаилс

Меет тхе селлер Селлер: ролзы69( 0 ) Неw еБаы Мембер (лесс тхан 30 даыс) Мембер: синце 31-Йан-07 ин Аустралиа

 	Реад феедбацк цомментс
 	Аск селлер а qуестион	
 	Адд то Фавоурите Селлерс
 	Виеw селлерьс отхер итемс

Буы сафелы 1. Чецк тхе селлерьс репутатион Но феедбацк ревиеwс ат тхис тиме 2. Леарн хоw ёу аре протецтед

Реад оур сафе буыинг типс


Десцриптион Селлер ассумес алл респонсибилиты фор листинг тхис итем.

Итем Специфицс

Цондитион: Усед



Хуге тау армы фор сале ит инцлудес 2 девилфиш, 1 хаммерхеад, 1 парана, 3 сqуадс оф фире wарриорс, сqуад оф кроот, 2 црисис баттлесуитс, абоут 10 дронес, цоммандер шадоwсон wитх дронес, 3 оф тхе неw стеалтх суитс wитх дроне анд беацон, 2 олд стеалтх суитс, 6 веспид стинг wинс, анд хеапс оф спарес.


Постаге, паымент детаилс анд ретурн полицы

Постс то Аустралиа

Цоунтры:

Постаге анд Хандлинг То Сервице АУ $25.00 Аустралиа Регулар Аппрох. 1 то 6 бусинесс даыс*

Цоунтры:

Постаге анд Хандлинг То Сервице АУ $25.00 Аустралиа Регулар Аппрох. 1 то 6 бусинесс даыс*

  • Селлерс аре нот респонсибле фор сервице трансит тиме. Тхис информатион ис провидед бы тхе царриер анд ехцлудес wеекендс анд холидаыс. Ноте тхат трансит тимес маы вары, партицуларлы дуринг пеак периодс.

Постаге инсуранце Нот офферед

Паымент метходс аццептед

Цредит ор дебит цард тхроугх ПаыПал Усе ПаыПал то еасилы паы wитх цредит цардс анд море. Леарн море

Персонал чеqуе

Монеы ордер/Банк чеqуе еБаы прохибитс тхе усе оф инстант цаш трансфер сервицес суч ас Wестерн Унион ор Монеыграм. Леарн абоут паымент метходс.

еБаы рецоммендед сервицес


Реады то бид ор буы? хелп ТАУ армы фор сале греат буы

	Плаце а Бид
	Буы Ит Ноw

Итем титле: ТАУ армы фор сале греат буы Стартинг бид: АУ $500.00 Ёур махимум бид: АУ $ (Ентер АУ $500.00 ор море) Ёу wилл цонфирм ин тхе нехт степ. еБаы аутоматицаллы бидс он ёур бэалф уп то ёур махимум бид. Леарн абоут биддинг.

Буы Ит Ноw прице: АУ $550.00 Ёу wилл цонфирм ин тхе нехт степ. Пурчасе тхис итем ноw wитхоут биддинг. Леарн абоут Буы Ит Ноw.




Wхат елсе цан ёу до? Го бацкБацк то лист оф итемс | Аск селлер а qуестион | Адд то Цалендар | Репорт тхис итем | Принтер Версион


Абоут еБаы | Анноунцементс | Регистер | Сецуриты Центре | Феедбацк Форум | Сите Мап | Едуцатион Центре | Хелп Цопыригхт © 1995-2007 еБаы Инц. Алл Ригхтс Ресервед. Десигнатед традемаркс анд брандс аре тхе проперты оф тхеир респецтиве оwнерс. Усе оф тхис Wеб сите цонститутес аццептанце оф тхе еБаы Усер Агреемент анд Привацы Полицы. еБаы оффициал тиме

Чеерс, 211.31.199.201 06:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I have no ide what you just said, and can't be bothered to translate it using BabbelFish. Next time, speak in English, eh? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Question

Dear Sir Zombiebaron i was wondering if i was alowd to assine my self this rank

i think i am a registerd user however i am un shur i would like to register if i have not already. and if i have not how do i do this. Thank You.

--AyumiKitada 20:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you are a registered user. Any user with a username (such as "AyumiKitada" or "Zombiebaron") is registered. Unrigistered users are known only by their IP adress. As such, you get the ranks of Officer Cadet, Airman, Private First Class, and Registered Users (OCdt). If you want higher ranks in the Uncyclopedia Army, you will need to do good deeds, get noticed, and have fun. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

My NrV

my article The Obese Man's Handbook got flagged as a list even though it isn't. I know its a little short but i find it fairly funny and would prefer to keep short and funny than long winded. Anyways if you still think its lame i'll take it down. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.55.181.82 (talk • contribs)

  • Look, I could define list for you, but it is a list. You could flesh out the article, and take out the numbers, without sacraficing any comedy. However, it is also neither your article nor your NRV (its acctually an {{ICU}}), as they belong to the community, and maybe helped by anouther user (not me sadly) may help you if you ask them. However, as it stands it will be deleted in 7 days. It also needs wikilinks, formatting, and maybe a picture. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Hehe

Thanks for the ban, I feel that I needed to be put back in order. However, I didn't actually create that account! :D —Braydie at 14:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll bet you can't prove that you little scamp :P --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

The matter of bans

First of all, I don't threaten users with bans all the time, just the users who cause a lot of trouble. And furthermore, I was pretending that you took bans into consideration. You have nothing to worry about. --General Insineratehymn 03:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Err...how about never. That's the better way. Leave bans to the people with the baseball bats. Instead, threaten to report them to the police or something. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Also, I do acctaully have your talkpage on my watchlist. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
"threaten to report them to the police or something" That's what I was about to do. I was just too lazy to do it. --General Insineratehymn 03:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Well next time go to sleep first, then once you have the strenght type "THE POLICE". --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

VFP

I'm going to add an automatic -1 to all images put up for VFP....=P You're not the Grinch of VFP, you're the new rcmurphy of VFP! heheh Seriously, though, I don't begrudge you that the headswap isn't my best...but it's not THAT bad...besides, I personally think that the rest of the compositioning makes up for it. But I respect your opinion while at the same time dismissing it. heheh R 03:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Yah...its just that I see VFP getting worse and worse now that I have started spending more time at Uncyclopedia (due to that thing with the bans and the deletion and the what not)...I did nominate something the other day...I don't know...all those text based jokes...it's a nice image...just kinda plain...yah...I still love you...and your still the best...I could vote for some images sometime...but it would be like lieing... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Maybe I refrain too much from the voting...I usually only vote against if I see that it's glaringly horrible in some way. hehe I guess I feel like maybe my words carry more weight or something. Anywho, I've been shot down by the best of 'em (including myself once!), so don't sweat it. R 04:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Wait...did Rad just include me in "the best of them", or was that just me hearing what I wanted to hear...anyway, I always vote against when I see an image I don't think should be featured, knowing full-well that a handfull of ill-informed newbies respect me when it comes to image editing. (no disrespect to anyone who voted for me for that thing that one time...) --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
And that MEANS something, dude. Look at me. 9 featured articles (in the top 10 of all Uncyclopedians), 19 featured images (#1 among Uncyclopedians), and chief knob-polisher of beaurocrats! You may worship me now. =P R 00:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandals

Dear mr Zombiebaron User 65.26.97.121 has vandalized my user page i reverted it my self but this is the second time i have been vandalized by some one i did nothing to prevoke an atack by user 65.26.97.121. plese thake care of user 65.26.97.121 for me thank you. --AyumiKitada 03:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Got him for 12 years. It turns out that he vandalized some other pages to, and probably would have kept it up. While I am honored that you came to me for this task, Ban Patrol also works quite well, and is on most admins watchlist. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Concerning Template:AAP

I disagree with your recent reversion to {{AAP}} (diff), because I feel that it loses some potentially useful humor value. I would like to have a proper discussion rather than edit-warring, which is why I have posted this message here. Please feel free to discuss. Thanks. Pentium5dot1 01:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay. So, AAP is a template that maybe be seen as kind of funny, but its main pourpose is adding pages to a category. This category is in place so that Photoshoppers can find those pages and give them images. Also, when I created AAP, I also created a Forum about it, Forum:AAP, from their a selection of admins gave me feedback-ish-stuff, and we cleaned up the wording. So basically what I am saying is that it is an information/categorization-for-easy-finding template and that the wording was crafted into its current form to be n00b freindly and informative. Sorry, but it stays this way. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Um, sorry I didn't know there was a forum topic about the template, but would you mind me forking the old version to my userspace, given that I will hardly ever be actually using that version of the template? </defensive> :-/ Pentium5dot1 01:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Sig?

Hi, I like my sig, it's not the best but it is prettier than anything else I see, it also holds a nuclear bomb that I will set off if I don't get my teddy back so la, and according to Uncyclopedia ettiquette, I HAVE to sign this message, so 3...2...1... Sir NeoZidane • CUN • talk

It is also horribly ugly. While I could protect your sig page, replace it with anouther sig, and then ban you forever, I won't. :) --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Babel (movie)

Hey, I've edited and added to Babel (movie) but remain unsure as to why it was tagged NRV. I thought it was funny; is it offensive? Thanks. Zogabongs 4th Feb 4.14pm

It is much better now. Good job. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Ever so kind.

nehru

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehru

Dude, you're pretty ignorant if you don't know who Pandit Nehru is. BTW just because something is random doesn't mean it isn't funny. I personally think the juxtaposition between the great Indian leader and the emo trend is funny! --24.125.42.37 17:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

First off, calling somone "ignorant" is a great way to start a fight, not a rational discussion about humor. However, I have no clue what article you are talking about, please link me to it so that I can understand what your talking about. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
it got deleted. thanks a lot, bitch.
Hey, 24.125.42.37 you are a frigging idiot. You give IP's a bad name you incivil prick. Cheers, 58.104.159.160 22:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Pete wentz

Is in the band Fall out boy. —Braydie at 12:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Oops. I guess it's a CRP then. Strange, niether my [en.wp] or my [google] buttons told me that... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Really big text - ICU?

Hi. Why the ICU tag on Really big text? What do you think I could do to make it funnier? I'm open to suggestions. Smrt-guy 23:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Its an illegable mess of an article. The only way to read it is to press [edit], and that's cheating! Make it readable, and then we'll talk partner. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
If it were readable, it wouldn't be Really Big.  :-) All that scrolling is part of the joke. If I weren't such a purist (Uncyclopedia articles should look like encyclopedia articles, etc.) I'd put something like, "If you've read this far then I owe you a beer" at the end. So, can we agree to disagree, or would you like me to set the font at some reasonable size? Smrt-guy 01:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I've acctaully now read it again, and I guess its alright... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, both for saving it and for your opinion. As a relative n00b to Uncyc, I'm still ready to accept all reasonable opinions. A few awards from now and I'm planning on becoming an impossible jerk.  :-) See you around. Smrt-guy 21:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
If I am to take your comment to mean that you plan to become a regular contributor, then I look forward to working with and against you in future. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects