User talk:Zombiebaron/archive6

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

UOTM

BePrepared Braydie thanks you for voting for him to be Uncyclopedian of the Month January 2007.

Braydie at 15:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Well its not as if you didn't deserve it or anything. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

WOTM

Thank you.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Yarrr Welcome Matey. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
It's 'pirate day already'? /me rushes out to get parrot back from dry cleaners.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Invalid Link

Just letting you know, Zombiebaron, that your link to the Special:listadmin page says it is invalid when you click on it. I thought you might want to know...

General Tso's Chicken 04:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I ment Special:Listusers/sysop. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

O my mistake General Tso's Chicken 01:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

No....it was my mistake...thanks for point it out! --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

ETSU

What was wrong with the article? Rev joshua 03:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

2007 (UTC)

  • I don't think that article would be appropriate for anything other than a parody/satire encyclopedia, it's a relatively known university and the article was largely a satire of the Wikipedia entry. How is that a violation of the policy? The spirit of that seems to be in the same spirit as the Wikipedia policy, which is to avoid agents of the entry's subject using the encyclopedia for advertising or promotional purposes. Also, wouldn't it be reasonable to tag it for speedy deletion and see if anyone else has any opinions on it? Rev joshua 03:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
At Uncyclopedia we have a different vanity policy (which I assume you have read). It is in place not only so that people won't advertise, but also so that the literaly thousands of articles that state something along the lines of "Someone I know sucks", will get deleted. That is what your article is. Vanity. It is full of jokes that would probably make the person in the dorm next to you (if you go to ETSU, and live in a dorm, as I assume) would find funny, but the rest of the internet does not. If you can create an article that the internet finds funny about ETSU, then it can stay. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Also, I know humor is a personal thing, so feel free to ask anouther sysop about this. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
To clarify, I dropped out of ETSU four years ago. Yes, the article would be funny to other ETSU students, but the article also relies heavily on the stereotype/gospel truth that Southerners are stupid and the universal experience of going to a badly-run public school more interested in spending money they don't have on athletics than academics. You wouldn't actually have to attend ETSU to get that. Also, I'd think a 90-year old state university with a population of 12,000+ students might have a slightly broader appeal than "someone I know," making it less a violation of the spirit of the vanity policy than a violation of the letter. And we might know if the Internet finds the article funny if it was left up for more than, say, five minutes. Rev joshua 03:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
As a ETSU drop out, your page is vanity to the letter. Also, not everyone has been to a "badly-run public school". I for instance did not attend any such instutution. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
I have placed a VNRV template on it. It will be deleted in 7 days, unless you remove the vanity-style-comantary, and the slander of the members of Fraternities and Sororoties. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Jawarlalal Nehru

Hey dude, why exactly did you tag my Nehru article? I know its pretty short, but I was hoping people with more creativity and more time on their hands than I would make it longer and funnier.--24.125.42.37 02:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I tagged it because it is random, that is, it makes no sense and is to far from the truth to be funny. No one will make it better for you, because not only is Jawarlala not a real person (and hence there are no real facts to draw humor from), but also there are no clear paths to funny that can be drawn from the present article. Maybe HTBFANJS will help you write your article. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Necrophilia

You tagged an article I wrote, Necrophilia, as having No Redeeming Value... I'm just curious as to what exactly it is you thought was wrong with it. I've had several other people look at it and they all thought it was a good chuckle, so, I'm curious to see what your apparent dislike is. -Painezor 23:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

It makes no sense. While I do have respect for surreal humor, "your" acticle is a rambling story about a guy named Phil. First make as coherant story, and then layer the jokes on. Also, the coherent story should be inherantly funny. Maybe reading HTBFANJS will help too. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
I think you may have missed the jokes in the article entirely. Also, what's the deal with putting "your" in quotes like that? Are you implying I'm plagarising? I don't like the fact that you're implying I'm just being stupid, if several other people found humor in the article whilst you didn't, does that mean the problem is with the article? Different people have different senses of humor, but just because one person doesn't get it, it doesn't mean that the article has no redeeming value. The joke about "Phil" is just a play on words, necro*phil*ia, *phil*anthropists, It doesn't matter what his name was, it's all just part of an ongoing joke. -Painezor 23:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
I will address your points one by one.
1) "Your": This is a wiki, and hence you do not have ownership over any article or picture. It is "our" article, but for simplicity, I said "your". I doubt you plagerised it, because I checked.
2) I never said you were stupid. In fact, due to your ability to find and post on my talk page you are smarter then the average user.
3) If you feel I am in the wrong, go ask anouther admin for their opinion. If you want an active admin, I suggest the admins whose names appear in amongst the other users on this page.
4) I only mentioned Phil's name to show I had read the article. I don't care what you name your character.
5) UnBooks may be a better place for your article. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
And in return, I will address your points in a somewhat sporadic manner.
2) Linking to that "Not just stupid" page (which I read) didn't make it seem that way, and after reading that page my stance remains unchanged, because of this reason:: The article is about a cult who are necrophiliacs, and they take part in what is defined in the dictionary as necrophiliacs, it is not patent nonsense, it is a slant on necrophilia.
3) No need for that, as another admin already removed the ICU tag, without me saying anything to him/her.
5) Why would Necrophilia be better placed on unbooks when Christianity and Judaism both have articles in Mainspace? -Painezor 23:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
I didn't name that page, its a shame if the name offended you. Also, UnBooks is a place for stories, such as yours. Information, styled in a Wikipediatic manner goes in the Mainspace. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Actually, looking at it, only the first two sections are a story, and even that is written in an encyclopedic manner (the history of necrophilia) and the rest is background etc, fitting with the religion-slant of the article. I don't know if it's been improved since the above comments were made, but anyway, I don't think they're true for the article as it currently stands. While it's not the greatest article in Uncyclopedia, it's pretty damn good for a first try. -- Paw_print.jpg 00:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Fine...whatever...if its 3 against 1 I'll just give up and try to help the article out... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
/me beats Zombiebaron about the head and shoulders with the Great Salmon of Compromise. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Golden Path

Hi. I noticed an article you tagged as being in need of work, Golden Path, and changed it from a 1 sentence article to a 3 paragraph article as well as adding an image and I was hoping that you would allow me to remove the tag saying that the article should be edited within 7 days. You can respond here or on my talk page.

Thank you.

General Tso's Chicken 03:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

While it is much better in terms of length, it is very very ugly. Look at all those red links, and fix them (it doesn't need so many links). --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice. I will make sure to fix it.

General Tso's Chicken 23:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Pythagorean Theorem

Hey, I noticed you put the ICU template on my Pythagorean Theorem article. That's cool with me.
Now, I'm new to Uncyclopedia, and I'm looking for some guidance. What would you do specifically to change that article to make it better?
Any comments would be appreciated, and thanks for the input.
Realdeal 55 03:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Basically, you just explain something your math teacher taught you. With almost no jokes. Its not funny. At all. So yah, how about adding jokes? If you need help read HTBFANJS. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree with above comment. Nice info on Pythagorean Theorem, but no very humor. Also, randomly saying Fuck does not mean we will laugh our heads off, you know. Like I said before, nice info, but try to mess with the info a bit in a funny fassion so as to make the reader laugh.

General Tso's Chicken 03:51, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, guys. Looks like it's back to the cutting room floor. Yeah, you're both right. In hindsight, it was pretty dry. Like, very dry. So I'll try again. In all honesty, it can only get better, right...? Right? : P

I had one of those really boring days, today. Maybe I'll be inspired when I get back into math class next semester (which starts tomorrow).

I'm keeping the lead section, though. I was happy with that.

Thanks again for giving me a slap to read it again. : P

Peace out. Realdeal 55 03:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Your welcome. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Ninja star for you


--General Insineratehymn 01:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

WOOOO! --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Pee Review

Here's that link you wanted... Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bob the Generic n00b Thanks. --Andorin Kato 00:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Geece

I'm a bit bewildered as to why you would ICU the Geece article -- with no description as to why. It's not short, it's not a dead-end, and I certainly don't think it's unfunny (perhaps we could get more input). Could you clarify?

Also, all of the HTML stuff you've stuck in this page makes it render wrong in Konqueror, to the point where you can't even get to the "edit" button any more. I had to switch to Mozilla to post this comment. -- 129.255.93.180 21:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Acctaully, the ICU template on Greece pointed out how "random lies are worse then stuff that makes more sense", however, it is much better now. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Much better, meaning that I may remove the tag?  :) -- 129.255.93.180 00:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I removed it... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:Cut Your Own Head Off With a Chainsaw

Hi Zombiebaron - you ICUed this article which has since gotten massive support (well, two of us) on its Talk Page. It made me laugh lots when I read it, although possibly just because I am a sick, twisted freak of a human being. But could you possibly reconsider, or let us change it to VFD? --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Its to short. I mean really...more content or something. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Hmm... I suspect more content will kill rather than cure, but I shall think about it. Mmm... chainsaw... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I see what you mean, however, as it is the article is just a punch line (with a sentence as build up). The problem with such articles is that you can't add anything to them. However, you have a couple of days before it is up for deletion. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your vote

For your vote, I give you this award.

Insineratehymn has awarded you a pentagram!
...for voting on HowTo:Properly Whore Your Article.

Thumb TPoEMF-Pentagram
Don't worry, I'm not evil, I just do this as a publicity stunt.

--General Insineratehymn 22:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Good job. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Potato

Hey ZB, I may need a picture chopped if you're not busy. —Braydie at 19:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I will meet you in The lunch room. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


It's like I'm some kind of pet doing a trick, and then getting a brian. Alot like that in fact... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Medal

well this is my real IP address so if you feel like blocking this one i know i can never regain your trust. i didnt feel like making a medal so i found on here

Award im not sure how to do it so you can fix it later. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.110.208.107 (talk • contribs)

I'm Sorry, you Win

Ok you win I won't come back to harass anyone else. I just want to say think you for opening up my eyes to the fact that this site isn't worth being messed with. This site suck so bad I'm just wasting good time coming back here. Not that you or anyone else cares about my opinion. Please forgive my misconduct here on uncyclopedia. Go run tell all the others of your deed of defeating me. Bravo you deserve no less than a medal of service. I shall make one using Photoshop and comeback and give you one on my real IP address. It will be a sign of forgiveness if you choose not to block my real IP. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.90.73.102 (talk • contribs)

Wow. I'm like some kind of Sysop or something, eh? That medal would be accepted as a token of peace, so go ahead. But, may I ask you "Mr. Proxie", why? Why did you come to Uncyclopedia and start fucking with the admins? Did we do something to anger you or something? If you tell me, we could come to some kind of agreement, as we/I here at Uncyclopedia really like having new users who contribute around the site. Anyway, I only ban IP's and Users who deserve banning. If that IP account is clean, it will not be banned, as with this one. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Lending some help

I noticed that you are dealing with an obnoxious vandal who is using proxies. My advice is to indefinitely block all the proxies at popular proxy sites. I found one of the most popular here. --General Insineratehymn 20:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

There are literally thousands of open proxies, and from what I've seen so far, this guy is switching servers with every new visit, so it's really not worth it. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Also, I don't want to be the figure head of a giant banning where thousands of real editors who use open proxies can't edit. Plus, banning all those would take hours. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Days... Possibly weeks. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
At least tell this vandal that by using open proxies to harass someone, he is breaking the law by doing "unauthorized use of computer resources", which is punishable in many civilized countries as a part of hacking, cyber-crime, and harassment laws. --General Insineratehymn 21:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Will do. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Yah, me aswell. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Jokes on you Dumbass

I know how to change my IP address so you can't get rid of me. i can m4k3 a5 much b4d gr4mm3r a5 1 w4nt and there is nothing you can do to stop me. muwahahahahaha

O and this (Several hundred lines of the word "Fuck", deleted for sanities sake). The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.110.105.26 (talk • contribs)

Glowworm ?

Where is the article ? Did someone huff it ? It'll make the huffer sick. 65.173.104.76 08:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

You did'nt huff it, did you ? Glowworms make Admins really crabby. 65.173.104.76 08:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
It was huffed by Todd Lyons. However, due to your concern I have recreated your page at User:65.173.104.76/Glowworm. Enjoy. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello Fag

Hello ASS how are you doing? i have noticed that you are a complete Fucker. you are so dumb i just want to Fuck the shit out of your assHole. when i get done with you you'll have cum up your rectum and in your face. see you tonight Bizzatch. bring your mother with you idd like to shit in her mouth. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.198.5.138 (talk • contribs)

Hello 88.198.5.138, how are you doing? I have noticed you are infinitly banned. Your so witty, I just want to show you how much I respect you by responding to your message. When I get done with you, you'll probably remember that the letter "I" is capitialized when it is a word on its own. See you when your infinite ban is done. Bring yourself, and a cake, because I like cake. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok. Look i don't like you and you don’t like me. If you just submit to my power i will leave you alone. The other mods have done it so why dont you just do it. It’s not that hard just say " i'm sorry to have been a bother to you Joseph (that’s my name) if you choose to forgive me i will be forever in your debt" signed your name. That is all it takes to get rid of me and its allot easier that doing what you’ve been doing up till now right.

Mean Admin Award

--Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 15:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Trying...

Just trying to be funny. Seriously, need help with the Roach Huffing article. Got a hell of a welcome message on here. 65.163.112.194 09:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

You may want to glance there. Also, the reason your page has an {{ICU}} is because not only is it a rehash of an old joke, but the Kitten Huffing joke is uniquie, and whenever it is copied it just comes across as a terrible attempt at humor. That coupled with a link to Chuck Norris, and the blending of an original joke (Kitten Huffing) and a more modern spin-off (article huffing) makes it really confusing to read. However if you can find a way to make it better, the {{ICU}} will be removed. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

A Breath of Heaven

What do you think is wrong with the story?--(&(Inter)&)Tyr3 08:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

If you read the template I put on that page before you came here, you would already know what I think is wrong with it. It is not "encyclopedic" in format, or in content. Also, stories go in UnBooks. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
You obivously don't know what the word encyclopedic means. It comes from the Greek words ἐγκúκλιος παιδεí, which mean "total [or general] education." Not as if that matters, because — and correct me if I'm wrong — this site is supposed to be a parody of reality. Don't tell me that you don't understand sur-realism. As for the template, why don't you think for yourself and tell me what you think? Also: how am I supposed to neatly define concepts that are a rejection of what exists?—(&(Inter)&)Tyr3 08:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia is a spoof of Wikipedia. If your article can survive there its OK for here. For the record, I too think UnBooks is a more suitable home for it. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
"Ohhh look at me, I probably went to University or something and feel that by talking about fancy things like "Greek" I can get people to do what I want", is what you pretty much just said. "Encyclopedic" is DEFINED ON THAT TEMPLATE. In the main part of Uncyclopedia we write articles. You wrote a "story". I can move it to UnBooks for you, but other then that, you'll have to make it into a real article instead of just a story in 7 days or it gets deleted. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't see the word encyclopedic on that template . . . Anyway, I don't think it's either an article (i.e., essay) or a story. Also, I'd be happy to debate with you what the opposite of Wikipedia is if you'd stop changing the subject.—(&(Inter)&)Tyr3 09:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
"What do you think is wrong with the story" - You stated it was a story. " I don't think it's...a story." - You stated it was not a story. I used a templated called "{{ICU|~~~~~|sub=encyclopedic}}", which contains the word "encyclopedic" in the template name. I have been telling you for the past many minutes that your article is a story and belongs in UnBooks. You however, have brought up Greek, surrealism, the fact that you belive I don't think for myself all in one post. It is obvious that you are angry about my placing of an {{ICU}} on your article, but I will take it off when A Breath of Heaven is either an article, or in UnBooks. This is not a discussion about what Wikipedia is not, this is a disscussion about what Uncyclopedia is. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

UN:VFD

Can you remove the articles after you delete them? Thanks. goshzillacorrespondence 03:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I could. However, that would require work on my part, as the VFD voting is not deleted but archived. There are admins who do this kind of thing already, and do a much better job then I would. So I leave the task to them. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Done. —Braydie at 18:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
See gosh? What did I say...:) --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Award

You are doing a great job as an admin. For that, I give you an award.

Insineratehymn has awarded you a pentagram!
...for your good work being an admin.

Thumb TPoEMF-Pentagram
Don't worry, I'm not evil, I just do this as a publicity stunt.

Keep up the good work. --General Insineratehymn 01:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

  • ...This is called "sucking up to the new admin because he still remebers what it was like last week when he wasn't an admin", right? Well...thanks... :) --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey! Good idea!

Mordillo has awarded you a star of david!
...for future favors he might need

Starofdavid
Don't worry, I'm not antisemitic, I just do this as a publicity stunt.

Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 16:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

+S

Mewhenreadingstupidstuff Braydie thanks you for supporting him to become admin.
I would have done this sooner, but admins are supposed to be lazy.
There is no personalised message either.

Braydie at 23:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:Block the right person!

I just got done with dealing with someone you blocked in error (68.100.162.73 (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits)). The only edit to Bill Cosby he made was after the article was blanked. The IP address actually responsible for the blanking was 206.110.66.81 (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits), who wasn't blocked until I just went and did it. Please to be blocking the right person next time, or I'll be of the cutting head of you off. Thanks. —Hinoa talk.kun 00:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh crap. I'm ever so sad, because I thought I was doing the right thing...it won't happen again sir... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Jarhead

I noticed that this was on the NRV maintenace, I'm not sure what is going on with this as it is far to old for it to be ICUed, but because it's your article I thought I would check it out here first. Thanks. —Braydie at 17:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Wow, blast from the past. I say VFD it if you want it gone. But yah...I don't really care much for my articles, and that on in particular is crap. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Heh, I think that's first time that I've heard "Yeah, I don't care if my article gets deleted". I think I'm going to leave it to see what happens in the natural course of events. —Braydie at 21:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
That was always my plan: Write the stuff that makes it past the New Page Patrol, and then never edit it so the only people who find it either found it through my page, or through one of the five articles which link to it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Normal

I've looked it over several times and read the vanity policies as well, and I still don't understand why it was marked for vanity. I almost feel like this place is out to shut down any article I make and you guys just needed something to close the door on my article. I know I sound paranoid, I've been watching the X files all day, go figure, but what it comes down to is, why was Normal marked for vanity? The preceding unsigned comment was added by PhantomBPR (talk • contribs)

  • Okay. So I agree, its not as blatantly vanity as they come. However, I probably should have marked it with a {{ICU}}. Its just that it is a really random humor, very much like most vanity pages. It looks like you wrote this article with a buch of firends whilst in a coffee shop, and then came home and typed it in. The final straw was the pictures. I have replaced the VNRV with a more apropriate template. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:Revert

Aww.PNG Icons-flag-gb -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 18:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks champ. I hope I taught you a thing'r'two about reverting aswell... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Lying is rewritten

Zombie honeybug, I have rewritten Lying. I would appreciate your in put on the rewrite, and let me know its good enough to get the article out of VfD. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Much Better, I shall take it off VFD now. As for "in put" [sic], well its much better and much funnier. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
It acctually just needs one more vote to keep it before I can take it off...but I expect that to happen shortly. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects