User talk:Zombiebaron/archive44

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

What's that word?

Like grape but starts with r? Raisin - that's it. Pup 09:56 26 Feb '12

Yes. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:30, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Restore Two Articles

Mind restoring The Dark Brotherhood (Skyrim) and I used to be an adventurer like you.... articles please?--Iwillkillyou 333 TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:09, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

I have restored your pages to here and here. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:49, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

Zombie

I just wanted to leave a sentence on your page that wasn't signed. I hope you don't mind :) The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)

Ok. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:42, February 29, 2012 (UTC)


Unprotect Pokemon

Can you remove the protection for Pokémon (video games series), and restrict the protection so that only admins and registered users can edit it? While you're at it, please restore Latios and Latias to my userspace, effectively destroying my previous one. GiratinaOriginForme |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill 800px-Flag of the Philippines svg | 09:29, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

View the source, Luke. No, seriously, there is comments in there that you really should read. Pup 11:42 01 Mar '12
Like Puppy says, there is no reason to unprotect that Pokemon page: it is made up of several fully editable subpages. If there is an edit you'd like to make to the page and not the subpages, you'll have to tell me what that is before I unprotect the page so that you can do it. I have moved the deleted page here for you. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:13, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

Sisyphus's message

Hello, I had a page called "Boko Haram" that was under construction, then someone moved it into my user space. I've embellished it to what I hope is a reasonable standard - could you have a look and if you agree move it back into public space? Rgds Sisyphus Sisyphus (talk) 22:02, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Yup, your article is much improved. Feel free to move it back out into mainspace. Also, you should add some more wikilinks (e.g.: [[User:Zombiebaron]]) to the main body of the article. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:41, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

Forum:An easier way to create userboxes

Could you have a look at this. Qzekrom mentioned it and I thought it was a good idea, and advised him to take it to the dump. I'm not a fan of user boxes as a general rule but having uniformity in them, along with an option to set up float and other bits and pieces with them makes sense. Romartus suggested there may be a restriction, but beyond server issues with significant transclusion I don't see any technical problem, and semi-protecting or protecting the base template will avoid using it for vandalism by transclusion. Given we transclude signature templates, that first technical issue is probably not so severe that it would make a major impact. Pup 12:04 07 Mar '12

Ok I threw in my two cents. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:01, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Did you want to take the first couple of weeks in April and I'll take the second couple. (One of these should start on the first though.) Pup 08:39 07 Mar '12
I was planning on starting the Extra Va Gan Za on the first. Dunno if you wanna take the second two weeks or hold off until the first week of May. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:50, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
There's been a bit of buzz - mainly on Mattsnow's talkpage, so I think 16th - 30th for entries might suit me. Pup 09:14 07 Mar '12
Fine with me. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:16, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Name Change

Would you please change my username to "HashBrownFunction" (without the quotes)?

Much appreciated. Thanks in advance,

--Rbpolsen (talk) 07:24, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

I cannot do that. Please direct your inquiry towards sannse. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:27, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

How is that possible???

How can reading something that another person wrote make them gay? What if a girl read that? Does that make her a guy who likes guys? What if it was read by a baby that hasn't even been born yet...does that make them gay too? And if Jesus is reading it from heaven...does that make the human reincarnation of god (the person who said gayness is an abomination) also gay? The more I think about it ... the less likely your statement could be true. --ShabiDOO 06:16, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

Shabby, I just realised, after reading what you're referring to, how pretty your eyes are. And how tight your buns. Pup 06:21 12-03-12
My grandmother always says I have lovely eyes. She never said anything about my tight buns though. --ShabiDOO 08:11, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
Gay women are called "lesbians". You may want to use google to do some research on the subject. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 11:51, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
So do women who read that edit summary become lesbians or gay? No search on the internet explains any of that :( --ShabiDOO 03:26, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
When discussing a lady, the terms "gay" and "lesbian" are synonyms. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:28, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
Unless the word "gay" is deliberately being misused to mean someone who likes men, but usually a "gay" woman is a lesbian, exactly. By the way, if you know of any tight male buns, I could use a pair. No sweet sticky buns though, those would only make me fatter plus I'm gluten intolerant.-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:40, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
Okay. And if Allah was reading the edit summary? Allah is nor male nor female...so how would Allah be gay? I checked the internet and the internet had no answers for that question. Thanks. --ShabiDOO 05:30, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
Of course Allah is male, have you READ the Koran? Because, you know...I haven't. It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 05:35, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
Well..considering I'm a born again non-muslim...then yes...yes I have read several of the very short books of the Koran. As far as I understood, Allah is not a man or woman nor being as we know it, but more of a force or all being or something like that...a being that gets particularly angry when the book he/she dictated to a halucinating man in a cave, is burned or reported to have been burned or may have been burned or some guy said that the Imam of a mosque in the neighbouring province claimed that some infidel wiped his ass with the page of it. That person/thing. How are they supposed to be gay? --ShabiDOO 05:51, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
You're sure there's nothing in there about being gay for Jesus? I'm pretty sure Allah was gay for Jesus. It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 06:04, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
Yes. That's the solution. Allah was/is/will always be gay for Jesus. Finally, what Zombie wrote makes sense. Thanks MrtheJazz! --ShabiDOO 07:22, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

UN:SIG

Could you also change Check "Custom signature" and you're good to go. to Check "I want to use wikitext in my signature" and you're good to go.? Thanks. Pup ·

Done. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 11:54, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

Excuse me, Sir... May I have my article stub back?

I was beginning work on it, but it vanished. It is my userspace, and I had stated in the shorter version of the page, that it was a placeholder. :( -- DameViktoria Heart_anim.gif Icons-flag-gb - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 03:21, 14 Mar

Oh. My bad. I just saw it on QVFD and deleted it... -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:26, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
She did not put it there, but looks like it's all sorted now. :) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 03:34, Mar 14
New trigger-happy noob? Yay! ^_^ I'm happy it's sorted. Thank you sirs! -- DameViktoria Heart_anim.gif Icons-flag-gb - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 03:37, 14 Mar

Yo

This thing I did to make it match what we currently have at Uncyclopedia:Maintenance/Fix. I don't understand what you mean when you said "This isn't the proper page for that". Totally foxed on that one... :-) As for "it's better that we know about the expired tags so we can remove them from those pages." what expired tags would we remove from where a when and who whatsaid what? ya? um?

I just figured the two should match. I use Uncyclopedia:Maintenance to look for pages which need to be dealt with / deleted and Uncyclopedia:Maintenance/Fix appears in bold on Uncyclopedia:Maintenance when there is something to delete, but it currently does not work because the code from the two does not match. Could you explain because I'm confused. :) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 06:35, Mar 15

I've rolledback my edit. I wasn't aware that you were making the two DPLs match (the one on UN:M, and the one on UN:M/Fix). It seems to me that by not including featured pages and vital pages on the list of pages with expired tags, the pages in those categories that have been tagged (if any have) will go unnoticed. Many times I find pages in (for example) UN:M/WIP that don't belong there, so I go to the page and remove the construction tag. So really, what I'm trying to ask is, how will be find featured pages that have been fix tagged? -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:15, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
I guess more the question might be why would an admin need to find vital or FA articles tagged with fix when looking from a maintenance point of view? Either we intend to delete vital or FA articles via expired fix or we don't, and if so I guess they just sit there for ever with the fix tag on them until someone finds them in the fix category and fixes them. Category:Rewrite appeared to disappear during my last absence from Uncyc so I guess the gap left by Category:Rewrite has been taken up by Vital articles tagged with fix. ... If you just wanted to find fix tagged vital articles, I think a DPL table could be made to generate that, as it's kinda the opposite of what we have now. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 07:35, Mar 15
Well, from a maintenance point of view it would be nice to see all the pages with expired fix tags in one list. The idea that important pages which somebody has deemed sub-par will be laying around "until someone finds them" doesn't seem like a good way to do things. Featured pages should be rolledback to revisions that don't require fixing, and low quality vital pages shouldn't be left to rot. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:45, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
It makes sense to me to have the vital and featured away from the list of those ripe for deletion. Can't we simply have a second or third DPL that shows use the intersect categories on the same page though. From a perspective of fixing by priority that would be the ideal for me. (Quick note - when I had a similar DPL on the VFD page I also removed the vital/feature filter, as I wanted to be able to see those on there as well, for the same rationale as expressed above.) Pup 08:20 15 Mar '12
What ever happened to that fix chart you put at the bottom of VFD? The sort of DPL I'm talking about (featured and vital pages with fix tags) should probably go on a fixing-pages-oriented project page (along with that chart). -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:25, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
I agree. UN:M/Fix isn't really a fixing pages chart, despite it's name and the shortcut. Maybe Uncyclopedia:What_You_Can_Do needs a facelift. Pup 08:32 15 Mar '12
I agree. I also think the responsibility to find the best version from the history should be on the person who places the tag in the first place. For FA articles there is always a well known "good" page so it's always easy and possible to RV to that. I can't see any time when a fix tag should ever be added to an FA article myself. As for what to do with the "vital" pages I agree that they need extra attention. I guess we either delete them with expired fix tags or we don't. I don't really have an opinion either way, on what we should be doing re the vital or not thing... I just did what I did with the DPL to make it match what was there. :-) It would help if we added more links around the place informing users about Category:Articles to fix or maybe Uncyclopedia:Articles to fix. PuppyOnTheRadio is one of our best users for fixing articles and he was not aware of the fix category until I pointed it out to him recently. He's an experienced user who regularly fixes articles at VFD and has done for years, so if he has missed it then I'm sure others have also. That's why I supported him when he wanted to add that list of category fix articles to VFD. I don't think there will ever be another fixing-pages-oriented project page which will actually be an ongoing successes. We have VFD, and people who want to fix articles hang out at VFD. That, however is another story...  ;-) If (from what I can tell) you want to change the DPL code at Uncyclopedia:Maintenance/Fix to include "vital" articles and match the code before I changed it then go for it. Like I said, I don't really have strong feelings either way. The Vital category is rather arbitrary. So long as the responsibility to find the best version is on the person who adds the tag then I'm not really that fussed. My rational being that by doing this pages with lots of history take more effort to correctly tag, and that's as it should be. Pages with only a few edits are easy to tag which is ideal as those are probably the pages which should be getting tagged the most in the first place. :) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 08:48, Mar 15
Oh, if we do start huffing vital articles with expired fix then we probably need a "rewrite" category for very vital articles which are not bad enough to delete, but need help desperately. That would be handy. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 08:58, Mar 15
To be fair on my lack of knowledge of it, I am an idiot. But yeah, I know Al was also unaware, and I think he was active when rewrite became defunct. Pup 09:43 15 Mar '12

The maintenance lists themselves exclude vital articles and features. Unless you updated those as well (and you shouldn't have, what with them being vital articles and features), please don't remove the exclusion from the overview list or it'll just get confusing. And if you want a list for fixing purposes, see Uncyclopedia:Articles to fix. It's not done, hence the lack of links to it, but the lists themselves are there and they are inclusive. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 15:28, 15 March 2012

Why?

18:30 . . Zombiebaron (talk | contribs) huffed "Talk:Nobody" (content was: "*Archived talk page - 15-3-12" (and the only contributor was "PuppyOnTheRadio"))

Pup 08:24 15 Mar '12

I had to delete it so that I could move the page history back. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:26, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
I asked before I saw the move, and you edit conflicted me before I could take the question back. Sorry. Pup 08:28 15 Mar '12
You're welcome. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:29, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
Do you mind not edit conflicting me while I'm edit conflicting you? Pup 08:40 15 Mar '12

Raichu

Raichu has a wikipedia page. I tried to warn the writer about the upcoming huffing, but he went on to create an unbook. Will he appeal? Waiting for that is better than March madness. Aleister 23:45 16-3-'12

Ok. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:53, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

St. Patty’s Day

Are you wearing green today? If not, don’t be surprised if I show up. Matthlock Bernie Soundgarden 800px-Flag of Moldova.svg Talal of Jordan Lionel Hutz 800px-Flag of India svg 23:47, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Please make your signature into a template. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:14, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

The Pea Buddy Awards

WOW! A brand new UnNews competition and we need you! Either prepare yourself mentally for the severity of the trials (don't sign up just yet, you cheat!) or commit your soul as a judge right now. May the Lord shine his blessings upon thee! Snowflake mini Mattsnow 16:44, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that you have been misspelling the name of the award on several people's talkpages. It's "Pee Buddy" not "Pea Buddy". -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:50, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
Zombiebaron, the one true zombie, nobody has put up a new feature in days, and none listed for many more days. There is a user who is better remaining nameless who will go over 40 features if the que is ever changed. The cake is getting ratty and stale! Thanks. Aleister 16:59 20-3-'12
I'd like to put the blame on somebody else for the typo, but that's not my style, I just hope it'll go unnoticed. And yeah, make those features roll baby! Snowflake mini Mattsnow 17:03, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
I may have mistyped it when I created the page, and it should be Pea Buddy. I blame my graphic design team.                               Puppy's talk page05:06 20 Mar
There isn't much on VFH right now that has reached a featureable score, nevertheless I will self-feature my one tonight if no one else does it. --Black Flamingo 17:09, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
Hey, you weren't supposed to be here or see this. Go away. Well, since you're here, flag it jup the flagpole and let's get the celebration started!!! Al (UTC)
I'm at work but I'll be home in a few hours. Prepare thine cake and virgins! I can't party without either. --Black Flamingo 17:14, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
It's supposed to be Pea??? That's not what you said on the image request... -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:22, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
I'm taking the poltical route and blaming everyone else. Also, I have a virgin here. In the right light you won't even notice his acne.                               Puppy's talk page05:25 20 Mar
Doesn't matter, turns out there was one even more featureable than mine. Throw out the cake. Send the virgins back to the developing nation where you found them. --Black Flamingo 17:28, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
Ok I've queued the next two features. You're welcome. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:37, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Hey

The no add section annoys me, even though I can guess why it's not there. Just wondering about the "pee review for self nom" rule. Given that the queue is now nearly non-existent, I'm wondering if this can be brought back in. It seems to me encouraging editors to review their own work (using skills they learn reviewing others) and seeking feedback on their work prior to VFH nom is a good idea. It also helps teach n00bs how to write funny, which may keep good writers here longer. (I wasn't around when the rule was dropped, as far as I'm aware, so I'm assuming it related to a stagnant pee. You were, so your thoughts would be appreciated.)                               Puppy's talk page12:34 21 Mar

I am a strong proponent of not requiring a pee review before self noms. What do you mean "the queue is now nearly non-existent"? -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:46, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
As in there are only three articles waiting to be reviewed. (Two of them are mine and one is about a topic completely foreign to me, so I'm opting out of reviewing it.)                               Puppy's talk page09:10 21 Mar
Oh ok. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:31, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

2007

Was a while ago, huh. Thanks for the memories, back then. goshzillacorrespondence 17:25, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Oh my gosh it's goshzilla! How have you been dude? Yeah 2007 was a grand time indeed. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:44, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
I dunno doods. 2007 was pretty ...uh...


Actually, '07 wasn't too bad for me, either. I hadn't caught toenail warts from that freaky stripper yet. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usThu, Mar 22 '12 20:21 (UTC)


Do you change names?

You change usernames, right? GiratinaOriginForme |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill 800px-Flag of the Philippines svg | 05:38, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

nope bureaucrats can't, you have to talk to Sannse ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 06:27, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Actually, the best way to get your username changed is to use Special:Contact. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:19, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

User:PuppyOnTheRadio/ASCII art game

Hey. I thought I had done with this but the coding I was playing with might be useful to someone else on another article. Do you mind restoring it for me, along with the attached talk page (if there is one - don't quite remember).                               Puppy's talk page12:11 29 Mar

Done. There was no talkpage. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:05, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
I'd thank you, but I was apparently banned for a day.                               Puppy's talk page09:10 29 Mar

File:Symbol against vote.svg

@Zombiebaron As you know, I'm leading the SVG Movement, and I ran into a problem with the image used in {{Against}}.

Symbol against vote

It doesn't render properly at full size in Chrome for some reason. Mattsnow told me you might be able to help, so I thought I should ask (or axe) you. --Qzekrom sig buttonalkies 01:51, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

I just tested it on Chrome, Opera, FF, IE, Safari for iphone, Chrome for iPhone, as well as downloading the file and viewing in inkscape and GIMP. No difference in any of them. That suggests that either it has been fixed (which is unlikely due to it being unchanged for over 3 years), it was a parser hiccup (which would suggest a refresh of cache should fix it), or that you have a plug-in on your browser that does something nasty to SVG, (or that you have an older version browser that doesn't natively support, or has faulty support, for SVG). Try refreshing the browser cache. If that fails then can you upload a screenshot of what is actually happening?                               Puppy's talk page02:42 31 Mar
And what movement? SVG                               Puppy's talk page02:45 31 Mar
And that you may have diabetes. Snowflake mini Mattsnow 03:23, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, please upload a screenshot of the issue. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 10:53, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Why?:Not To Kill Yourself

Spam in that it's not original content. Google came up with these:

Most of them are from May 2008. This article was created in 2009. There were a couple of others after this as well. And I'm sure there are still more that I didn't locate.                               Puppy's talk page12:41 01 Apr

You might have to go into the comments on a couple of these.                               Puppy's talk page12:42 01 Apr
Ok thanks. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 05:28, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
It's cool. I tried to actually link that search on QVFD but it came out all code-y. And thanks for coming back to it.                               Puppy's talk page05:54 01 Apr
Personal tools
projects