This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:Zombiebaron.
Braydie has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.
Thanks for voting me at NotM --—Braydie 00:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
You are welcome for me voting for you at NotM, and I thank you for feeding the fire of my ego with a cookie. --SirZombiebaron 21:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Praise
ORDER OF LYONS ~ 2nd CLASS
For demonstration of conduct most becoming an Uncyclopedian ~ virtue, mercy, courage, valour, fairness, protection of the weak and the poor, or some reasonable fascimile thereof, you are hereby instated to the Order of Lyons, with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto, should any ever exist.
Hey, thanks Todd. That's the first time anyone has called me "1337", but I'm finally glad that I've found something other then psudo-admining (see UotM votes cast for me awhile back, but I'm sure you know what I mean) that people seem to find good (since we all know my writing is crap). Anyway, thanks alot. --SirZombiebaron 19:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Congrats
...on the feature. Just 17 more and you'll pass RadX, eh?--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, nice one. I'm really proud of you.... /me wipes a tear from his eye. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Hmm...just 2 more and I pass that rouge Modusoperandi, and just 5 more to pass the rapscalion Mhaille! I love you guys, and thanks for the votes (I'm not planning on cluttering up other people's talk pages with thanks yous, but for everone who reads this and voted for my image/images, thanks) --SirZombiebaron 01:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Leaving messages to the author in plain view after adding a VFD template
I left messages in various articles that currently are in VFD after adding the template out of courtesy and to explain that I merely was performing an administrative task, not ventilating my personal opinion on the article. If this is understood implicitly by any and all then I will stop doing it, or hide my remarks inside a HTML comment. I hope that this is acceptable, and sorry for the inconvenience I caused. -- di Mario 10:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
You could just use the disscussion page provided. Or, use the comments section of the VFD entry to explain that you only added it because one was neccassary (I think you've done that a couple of times). Anyway, its nice to see you helping people with {{VFD}} adding. --SirZombiebaron 17:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Roger. Wilco -- di Mario 18:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank You
Just wanted to say thank you for the kind welcome. I'm working on a couple articles already, I'll make ask you if I need some help! -Kyle. **NOW IN THE RIGHT PLACE
And a comendable job for putting this in the correct place! Next time, please sign posts with ~~~~. Other then that, welcome aboard and I look forward to providing you with whatever you need. --SirZombiebaron 06:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Translation
"And then Codeine edited this, and I was like "I should also welcome Chron back, cause I'm a filthy link whore"
Bah, I'm off to bed, it's nearly 3 AM here. Slut yourself around all you like, the n00bs are all yours tonight ;-) -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 02:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Heh, thanks for for not putting this at the top like I asked in a big sign at the top of this page... :) --SirZombiebaron 02:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
I said it's 3AM, gimme a break! *really goes to bed this time* -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 02:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Is the sign not big enough for your tired brain? Oh well, I can relate so I can't berate, as I always say (I acctaully just made that up, I think) --SirZombiebaron 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Maybe you can understand my entusiasm: Chesty Morgan is a pret-a-porter joke. Go figure: a very-ugly-Nazi-refugee-Polish-mid-forties-porn-actress-with-a-6-foot-circunference-bust-that-killed-men-with-her-tits - and it's real (and natural as well). No one pissed at it in Pee Review - so, chap, you tell me if this is too much undergroundsy to be laughable. herrdoktorneedsAbolt[scream!] 00:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I think it is "nice" but it needs a NSFW tag. --SirZombiebaron 06:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
I will place it when I put the Deadly Weapons image at the bottom of the page. Why the quotes in "nice"? herrdoktorneedsAbolt[scream!] 18:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
I used quotes around nice to be nice, and I acctually didn't have a nicer reason. --SirZombiebaron 19:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Hay, so "nice" from you the pic you've created!
NeedABrain has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.
You're welcome. --SirZombiebaron 02:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Help, Zb!
I realized that I hadn't bothered you in awhile, so I went and found a problem for you. On Uncyclopedia:Best_of, what is "The"? --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 22:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I've wondered about that too. Relevant difs: addedbolded --monika 22:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Mystery solved, gang. Rc's changes led to this, which shows that it should be Manhattan Engineering District. "Jinkies! That makes no sense." you say. Of course it doesn't. Which leads me to my new theory, gang; it's old man Withers who is dressing up as the witchdoctor. He's doing it to scare us away from the abandoned airfield and the stash of gold hidden within. Zoinks! (Since I lack the requisite kerchief...dibs on Shaggy! I don't even have to dress up) --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
If I recall correctly, and I ussually don't, some fool person decided that nominating the word "the" on VFH was really funny. However, it won. And that's the story of "The". I think. --SirZombiebaron 15:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
This is no vanity page, on the contrary, it is a satirical article written by ex-pupils of the school. The school does exist, and as wikipedia has articles on many schools and colleges throughtout the coutry, it is only fair that uncyclopedia should follow suit. I have already posted the article on wikipedia, although this was counted as vandalism, and the page was removed and locked. Since no article on the same topic already exists, surely it is pointless to delete it. To those the article applies to, this is a very funny spoof of school wiki pages. The article is not attempting to be vain in any way, and continued reference to a certain individual is only for the sake of humour, not some self-centered attempt at vanity as this appears to have been misinterpreted as. This is in no way an attempt to make me or my ex-school feel more important, just a means for some very bitter pupils to have a laugh at the schools expense. Please remove the vanity template, because this article has no other home at present. I was under the impression uncyclopedia was a safe haven for such spoof articles, please don't do what wikipedia did to us as well.
First off, I'm glad you took the time to write such a long responce to my template. However, as of this moment, Codeine (an administrator of uncyclopedia) is probably the user you should speak to, because it was he who deleted you're page (twice), protected it from non-sysop edits, and added the Vanity template in question. --SirZombiebaron 13:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Added some things, and planning to make an article to match the redlink in the section I added. I just want you to take a look and approve the removal of NRV status.
Forgottenpassword 21:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Much better. Thank you for cheking with me. --SirZombiebaron 22:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Cheers for fixing that up for me and hiding the title--Braydie 16:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
You're very welcome. While the joke may be a tad overdone, see Blur, sdrawkcaB and plenty more, I still find it funny. --SirZombiebaron 22:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Anyway tthe Royals are my team. I was just tring to make fun of it but you don't seem to find any humer in the article. Give me some sugestions for it on what to add. 72.129.239.80 04:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Wow. Thanks for screwing up my entire user talk page with youre lack of proper formatting. Seriously not cool. Anyway, when I first saw the title I thought that it would be about monarchs, like kings and queens. The Royal Family of Kansas. That's my take on it anyway. Oh, and I'm sorry to say that what you have now is crap. --SirZombiebaron 23:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank You ^_^
THANK YOU
Thank you for supporting my image on the VFP In Soviet Russia, Image supports YOU!!'' You Are A True Comrade ~Premier Tom Mayfair
The userbox can be editted to your choice if you decide to us it. Again, Thank You ^_^ 23:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Umm...you're welcome. Maybe next time though try not polutting my talk page with you're stuff? A simple "thank you" is enough no matter how happy you are. --SirZombiebaron 15:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
You stated before that my resume was not funny. I added more to it, and made it an UnResume and I wanted to know what you thought about it? I hope I can inspire other UnResumes out there from other members. I hope you know enough about what I wrote to get the SCI-FI references and other nonsense added to it. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 01:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I acctaully have a short attention span and reading articles is hard for me. However, you're resume didn't make me giggle at, sadly. Not that I think I could do better. In the mornining I may be able to give you a better set of reasons. Not now. --SirZombiebaron 03:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
What changes are needed to make it funny? You've had a few days to think about it, and I thought by now you might have had a few suggestions or something. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 02:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
That was what I was trying to do, start a trend. The UnResume. Part factual, but mostly fictional. I made the first resume of a time traveler in history, notice the way the years jump. It was written to be funny, but I guess Zombiebaron does not get the sci-fi references and time travel and physics references and humor. It is supposed to tie into my user page where it is linked to for people to read more about me. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 02:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Eh, sorry to leave you hanging there Orion. Okay, so here is some actual feedback, now that I am not running out the door. Now the most obvious bit of critisism is that it is a list. {{anti-list}}. Also, I obviously don't get any of the jokes, but that's just between me and the article. Basicly, the time travel thing is kinda cool, but I feel like I'm not getting any of the jokes, and when I feel like I'm not understanding jokes I start looking deeper to see if I can find jokes, and for you're resume when I look deeper I still see no joke. I'm really sorry. I'm also not funny, so anything I said that may have sounded like something to improve will probably make you're resume even worse. --SirZombiebaron 00:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
You do understand that a real resume is a list of things anyway, right? Thanks for trying to find the jokes. I know they are in there somewhere and if you were White And Nerdy you'd get them. I posted about it at the dump, maybe it can start a trend of UnResumes or something? --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I kinda toyed with the idea of making one for me, but the whole "Zombiebaron is a Zombie" thing would very old very fast. --SirZombiebaron 22:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I am glad that you "love the page". I "love the page" aswell, and anybody who does not "love the page" deserves to be bitten by a rattle snake. --SirZombiebaron 21:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Mordillo! Do you mean to suggest that you do not "love the page"? If you do not know what "the page" is, how can you "love the page"? --SirZombiebaron 23:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
They voted for me. And I didn't even have to bribe them. Potatochopper of the Month-- Thanks for your vote for PotM. I would have made a pic to commemorate the occasion, but I wasn't expecting to win, so you get this crappy template instead. Hurrah!
Heck, I'm one of the top 50 most linked to pages, I have expecations to uphold. --SirZombiebaron 18:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello
Is it really vanity I was just poking fun at bad sigs and decided to use myself as an example please answer back I don't wanna get banned! —The preceding unsigned comment was added byLt. Wyoming (talk • contribs)
Yes it is really vanity. As this is you first offence (I hope) I doubt you'll be banned. The best way to do it is to leave the whole thing anonomous, or to poke fun at notable Uncyclopedian (See UotM for some notable users). Cheers, --SirZombiebaron 01:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
It is better, but it is very ugly. --SirZombiebaron 15:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Gert5's pet project
Aside from a couple of gratuitous porn articles, Gert5 has made a million edits over the past few days on his "Unlyrics" project. taking a look at his talk page, and at most of his others for that matter, he's not funny, INCREDIBLY stupid, and is shockingly bad at constructing even simple sentences. If you have a look at his contributions, you'll see what I mean. What is the best course of action for dealing with this sort of thing? or am I just being a selfish grammar-nazi anti-porn freak? --Soul101~MAREPENT! 13:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
The best reponce it to subtly "fix" it. If he gets mad, report it to an actual adim (I am not one), and they will sort it out. But this being a wiki, you fixing his grammar and toning down his lewd humor might be for the better. --SirZombiebaron 15:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
hmmm... there's a slight difference between lewd humour and soap suds. seriously... how do you tone that down. But yeah, I know you aren't an admin. I'll leave you in pieces now --Soul101~MAREPENT! 15:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
jolly good. --SirZombiebaron 15:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Craig Kielburger
I deleted the ICU template from Craig Kielburger after fixing it a bit. Please put it back if you think it still needs to be there.
--Viking 07:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Sure. Thank you for coming to me with this, instead of just removing the tag, you did the right thing. And it is better now for sure. --SirZombiebaron 12:55, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Hell, it looks like you're heaving an edit war with yourself! :) Looking good though. What do you think should be the next chapter if at all? Maybe just a wrap up? --Brigadier Sir MordilloGUNUotYWotMFPUotMAotMMI3AnotMVFH+S 13:53, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
I'm coming up with ideas. I was trying to get the box (which is now at the top) to be down at the bottom. The command line-esque stuff is done, and may need to be touched up. Maybe a history section? Maybe contrversy? Maybe we link to every article I've ever written in a hollow vanity effort? I dunno. I'll work on it more later. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 23:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay its all good. I just think that the "First Time Activation" section looks out of place. Don't get me wrong, its funny and everything, but maybe it should be worked in somewhere else, in a diffrent form? Anyway, other then that its probably done. And yah, Pee Review it, just in case I want to self nominate it ;) --SirZombiebaron 01:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello. --SirZombiebaron 23:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
for the WotM nomination! (I am so confused right now...) --monika 22:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
You're welcome. And why are you confused? I find you're articles funny, and it seems so do other people (hence the featured/noms) so you deserve it. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 22:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry. I'll try to be less confused. --monika 22:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
It looks good. As you know I made it more visually pleasing with a new box. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 22:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Looks great! Thanks for all the effort. BTW, you thing it needs another small "starship troopers" picture below (i.e. - "would you like to know more?") --Brigadier Sir MordilloGUNUotYWotMFPUotMAotMMI3AnotMVFH+S 08:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
I appreciated your comments on the image -- I realize head-swapping is a little too easy. You always get rid of the first pancake, right? Anyway, the feedback helped out. Merci. Now, if only they would release Photoshop into the public domain.--Procopius 03:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
There are *cough* not so legal *cough* ways of getting Photoshop that don't cost any money. However, GIMP seems to serve some people just as well as Photoshop serves people like me. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Noobsg.png
Thanks for fixing up the image. It looks a lot better now.
emc has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.
Thanks for the cookie. It was nothing really. Maybe next time you need an image, you should come on down to the Corner instead of uploading subpar MSPaints, eh? Oh, and how about reading the sign at the top of this page which told you to put you're new stuff at the top? --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, what's wrong with this interwiki? [2]Szoferka 14:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay. The first thing wrong is that you can't follow simple signs wich tell you that new messages go on top at my talk page. Second of all, interwiki links are ones which link to other wikis. This is an interwiki link. Now, I assume that you want an intrawiki link (inside the wiki, not outside the wiki). You acomplished an intrawiki link in the header for this section, by placing [[UnNews:Google's new idea]]. That is an intrawiki link. This is an intrawiki link. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 14:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Zombie, i'm unable to understand this thing about layers and PNG - if you could help me get the hang of it. if PNG imgs do not have any background, i.e. they have a transparent background, then why does the background appear blue? when will the background appear white? -- mowgli 04:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay. So Ill try and explain this real simple like. So there's this program called "Photoshop", or "Potatochop" as we like to call it here. Within it you can set the background of an image to be transparant (it has black and white boxes like a chess board). And then you can earse things on the bottom layer and it will appear transparant on the internet. So, for example, our Uncyclopedia logo has transparancy and that is why we can see the grey wiki background instead a white background. Now if you see Image:wiki.png you will not see any "blue background" or any background for that matter, cause its transparant. Now ".png" is a file format, and it allows transparancy. GIMP also allows tranceparant .pngs I think. Any other questions? --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 14:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Probably the most important thing is that you go and vote FOR my image on VFP. Nothing else really matters. Thanks! -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
i yum still not understanding this black & blue. i feel like a zombie. gimme a fortnight to respond to all what you said. i need to go back to the beginning (and actually read photoshop's "help" menus). but, hah!, make no mistake, i will be back with a smarter question within a fortnight that you may or may not be able to answer. till then...*poof*-- mowgli 17:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)