This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:Zombiebaron.
Did you send an email to that guy that owns Uncyclopedia.com? If so, did here respond? If so, what did he say? If so, thanks. -- 20:57, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
As apparently some users are too dense to click on a link and read part of an article, could you be a dear and swap out the Creating a signature template section on UN:SIG with the contents of this for me? That way, instead of just linking to the relevant section, it'll also transclude it right onto the page. It might prove... easier for people to find, that way. *shifty eyes* 1234~05:24, 4 April 2011
He saw this, decided to implement it himself, implemented it wrong... er. Could you add the line about where it's from to the thingy? Or am I just making it more convoluted? 1234~00:53, 5 April 2011
That guy's horrible. He actually fixed it this time, and now I feel even more silly for trying to bother you about it... Although you might have gotten it right in the first place, had you been given the chance... ah, bugger. 1234~04:34, 5 April 2011
Upon noticing the history of BP is basicly experienced users reverting IP's over and over, could you please lock the page, to avoid this in the future? - Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB
The difference is that these pages were voted for deletion on VFD. Also, I think it's funny that you use Internet Explorer. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 08:31, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
Yes well when I clicked save, nothing happend and then it came up as a double edit... - Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB 08:36, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
'ello, please ban
Hi Zombiebaron. Please don't scold me, I've gotten enough of that on the IRC. I understand that it's not allowed now. Could you please ban this user, which is my other account? I would appreciate it. Thanks. --- [talk] 13:46, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
Just thought you should know that since Chief decided he doesn't like us anymore for a week it doesn't look like anyone has checked WiP or NRV. Please to fix? (talk)08:12, 10 April 2011
I'm not an idiot. The article was deleted because it's {{NRV}} tag expired. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 20:11, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
I only love you for your admininess.
As such, could you be a dear and update the feature queue if it still needs it whenever you next pop by? And possibly put in a support for my bot to get proper flags, since apparently sannse wants admins supporting that... *kitty eyes* 1234~22:04, 10 April 2011
Dexter is insisting upon removing {{NSFWimage}} from this image simply because he put the template on VFD, I don't wish to start an edit war. Simply resolve this debate calmly and peacefully, preferable with me saying "Hate to say I told you so." - Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB 03:04, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
First off, come discuss it with me, not an admin. Secondly, that image shows absolutely no nudity, so the template doesn't apply. Thirdly, you have the wrong template. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 03:07, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
"Another persons opinion" seems to equate to "run to the nearest admin and get him to side with me against another user rather than engage with the user I disagree with in a civil manner." You have provided no cause for that template to be on that image other than you wanting it to be there. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 03:12, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Fine, you have the template on VFD. Its up to the vote now. As for putting the template on that page, I saw no reason to remove it as it had been there long before you came along and removed it, so its not like other users wanted it gone. i just hope we don't piss off Zombiebaron with us arguing here... - Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB 03:16, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
After studying the image, and studying it some more, it seems perfectly fine with regards to clothing. A towel covers lots of the fun parts. She should remove the towel. But seems safe for anywhere. Aleister 3:18 11-4-'11
Frosty, I don't know where you work, but that image is clearly not Not Safe For Work. If you are worried about accidentally viewing pictures of sexy women at work, perhaps it is best that you stay off of the internet (or at least Uncyclopedia) while at work. In the future please try to work out such arguments without involving an administrator. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:48, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Question...
With regards to VFS, I noticed I received nomination even though my chances are, well next to zero, are we allowed to vote for ourselves, when voting begins? It didn't say we could or couldn't on the page and I don't want to anger anybody... - Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB 07:11, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
There are, of course, no guarantees on how we will view you if you don't.Spıke¬ 12:30 13-Apr-11
:)
Mr Baron sir,
I just moved a page for the first time. I dont understand what the whole redirect thing is and the page linked doesnt explain it. What am i supposed to do to avoid redirect stuff (not that i understand it at all) !!!??? Yours truly --ShabiDOO 08:00, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
Shabidoo, when you give a page a new name, the old name turns into a redirect, so anyone typing the old name gets sent to the page they wanted.
Deleting the redirect makes the old name no longer work. Add a line to the day's listing in UN:QVFD of the form:
{{Redirect|old name}}
This calls it to the attention of an admin. As that admin is doing a dozen at a time, it's more efficient than bugging an admin directly.
You must find anywhere that used the old name and change them to the new name, otherwise they will become double-hops (or, when the redirect is deleted, they will become red-links). Spıke¬ 12:55 12-Apr-11
Ey, mon... hate to say this, but the notion of leaving the things up so folks see the comments... well, users often don't check back, is the problem. Especially when using the auto-banpatrol script, folks never even need to look at the page itself, you know?
Perhaps a notice on the page itself might work better, and someone can go pester the people in question about it on their talkpages if they do, but... yeah.
Also, UU archived it this time, not me. 1234~20:23, 12 April 2011
Yeah I saw. I guess this is futile and I should just ignore dumb BP reports. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 23:42, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
Or you could keep commenting and I could just relay the comments to the folks directly when I archive the dealy, all as part of my grand plan to make everyone feel bad about themselves. 1234~15:38, 13 April 2011
Hello. I had linked "Foolish mortals" to a couple of pages, and saw that you huffed it. I can't say I ever actually looked at the page, but liked the name. Was it pretty bad? Thanks. Aleister 16:26 14-4-'11
Yeah it was pretty much just a list. That's why I deleted it. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 16:35, April 14, 2011 (UTC)