User talk:Zombiebaron/archive21

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Zombiebaron
Revision as of 17:02, July 12, 2008 by Zombiebaron (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Sienna Miller

"Total crap" - you are right. However, it was still funnier and less crap than a number of live articles on Uncyclopedia. Please can you reinstate it? It can and should be regarded as valid commentary on this rather pointless lady who claims to be a famous actress. For me, the answer to 'I'm Sienna Miller the famous actress', will always be 'I'm Dan Kovacs and I'm for real.' Phosgene 00:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Despite the fact that you appear to agree that the page was "complete crap" (not "total"), I have nevertheless recreated it for you where nobody else will (hopefully) find it. As to your point about other "live articles": I suggest that you list all such pages here (under your own heading), and I will individually deal with every article that you list. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Zombiebaron, that's much appreciated. I did restore the content, with a minor edit or two, as -- and I gather I do not see eye-to-eye with some people on this site -- it seems to me that humour is very subjective. One man's poison, etc., which is why I am not planning on drawing up a list of pages. Some people might think such pages are brilliant. In Wikiland, it is for the audience to decide, isn't it, and then edit to make better if that seems appropriate? If that's not the not the reality, I can't see the point as that is the stated aim! Phosgene 01:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Oh, of course. Its just that sometimes when I ask people to draw up such a list, they actually find some terrible pages that somehow slipped by our quality control team. As this is a wiki, we would like everybody's input on such matters. That's why we have VFD (and VFH and VFP, for that matter). And yes, humour is very subjective - in the eye of the beholder and all that - and if you feel that something is funny and has been wrongfully deleted, make sure that you speak up and make sure your opinion on the matter is heard (as you did in order to get Sienna Miller saved). -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Nice job killing my list of VFD candidates.

Here's to "vigilance"! They would've all been killed anyway. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 20:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

It's the Snowball Clause, my dear lad. "If a page has not a snowball's chance in hell of making it through a voting process, don't bother with the voting". -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
That's why you're one of my favourite admins. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 20:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Invisibility?

Trying to sneak up on us eh? MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 19:57, Jul 3

Didn't notice it until you pointed out to me. I guess this is the closest I'll get to bot status (despite me frequent requests for such status). -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
God damn it you gave me a scare there! ~Jewriken.GIF 20:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Link to article

SPON The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darth Lithuania (talk • contribs)

Alright. I've brought the article back. It does, however, still require some...work. Its rather ugly. Therefore, I have placed a {{ugly}} tag on the article. When you feel that the article is no longer painful to look at remove the {{ugly}} yourself. If you don't remove the tag, and the page goes unedited for 30 days, the article may be deleted again. And by "may", I mean "will". -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Bring back?

Heya i understand that you huffed the article SPON. Could ya please bring it back?I mean i worked hard on it and it progressed from having a few sentances and nothing to a tiny article that had some value to it...Also i thought that we where supposed to wait for the ICU time to expire so it could be approved...Not huffed. In otherwords i worked very hard on this article so can you bring it back please? The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darth Lithuania (talk • contribs)

You'll need to link me to the article. You can create links by typing something like "[[User:Zombiebaron]]" (except, of course, you'd put the name of your article that you want me to bring back inside the square brackets). -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Adam and Eve

I'm in an edit war with someone who won, "Wanker of the Month" over my article, Adam and Eve. Please sort this out before one or both of us gets banned under the 3 reverts rule. I'm not eating vanilla ice cream. If I were I wouldn't admit it. Proxima Centauri

See my post at User talk:Jack Phoenix for my reasoning. To Zombiebaron, please see this and this. Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 17:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I've consolidated everything under the article talk page, since these two posted this all over the place. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:45, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I have no idea what you're talking about, but I think that Mordillo probably sorted it out. And if he didn't, he will. So there. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

A nice thing

So yeah, I don't check the WotM page every day, and nipped in there today as I was passing, and I see several vote comments, but the one that catches my eye is yours. I dunno why, but it felt kinda unexpected in a good way, you know what I mean? I don't normally thank people for ...otM votes, what with one thing and another, but that really cheered me up when I was in a stinkingly foul mood this morning, and so for that and many other reasons, I give you a template to go with the many others placed upon this talk page over the years. Cheers, man! --UU - natter UU Manhole 20:33, Jun 23

UUpartay Woo!
Yay, go you! Under User has decided that you are "quite a decent sort",
which is apparently one of his highest terms of praise!
This is therefore a good thing, and in accordance with this,
he's throwing a party down the manhole to celebrate. Look at him go!

You're not invited though. Don't take it personally.
Oh, no need to thank me really. You should be thanking yourself for doing all the nice and good things that allowed me to feel justified in my vote. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 12:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Wait, no! Bring it back!

I know it might seem odd to say this, but I am requesting that the article Charmander be bought back from the grave. It was deleted for, as I understand, having No Redeeming Value, a label I strongly contest. Aside from the fact that it was, from my point of view, a good article, (and one that has been submitted to Pee Review, and is being reviewed by me), I did laugh at quite a heaping of the jokes in it, and feel that Charmander is a worthwile addition to this site. Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀19:17 June 22 2008

I have undeleted it, removed the {{ICU}} (which is not really the same thing as what an {{NRV}} was), and replaced it with an {{ugly}}. As you go about reviewing it, keep in mind that vast swaths of people do not find the concept of Pokémon being inserted into the real world (which is, as far as I can tell, most of where I'm supposed to laugh at in that article) funny in the slightest bit. Also, its very ugly (that's why there's now an {{ugly}}...). Someone should fix that. Good luck. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: June 19th, 2008

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 00:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Bl4nker

Mass blanker on teh loose my good sir. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 15:49, Jun 20

hmm. Or maybe not. Ta. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 15:50, Jun 20
Well...umm...goodbye then... -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
You say goodbye, I say hello. Hello, hello! Don't know why you say goodbye, I say hello. Bin doing exams eh? Ah, I remember my exams back in the day... Actually, I don't. What's my name again? Did you see my slippers? MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:04, Jun 20
Exams? Dude, that was two weeks ago. You've really got to keep more up to date with the stalky details of my life. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Stalking ya? Now if I was stalking you I would be armed with a floppy hat with a pants article on the top, and would he carrying a large rifle um bazooka no... Intercontinental Ballistic Missile... It's good to see ya around a bit more anyway. :) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:51, Jun 22

UnSignpost: June 12th, 2008

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 16:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

YOU STOLE MY WELCOME!

[1]. Meany! Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 04:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

That has happened before in the past. One of the troubles with people making edits at the exact same time and whatnot. In the future, feel free to just revert any similar shenanigans yourself. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

PAY A VISIT

Hello! I wanted to visit my good friend Zombie Baron just to say hi. You actually might not remember me, but I know you never liked me much. Now that I am welcome here (Well I don't know if I would call it welcome, but not banished) I have decided to come every now and then. I wanted to tell you that I am not as worthless as some would think, and I have gotten 7 features at illogicopedia! You should check out my stuff sometime over in the free land of illogicopedia. I see famine is dead. That makes me happy. I never liked him. Well, until next time, farewell. --Muhduckmuhduck|Fonchezzz| Quacking|Muhduckmuhduck2 20:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. I'm so glad you still remember me! I remember you! Bring back Leoispotter, you annoying little boy! Also, no, no, and still no. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks be to you sir

Newcookie User:RAHB has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

I want to make it perfectly clear that while I was defending you, I would have defended anyone else in that situation, so it's certainly not favoritism. Some of my words seem to be coming back at me, which is fine with me, as I said them in the interest of principle. I'll gladly withstand the arrows and....slings and....whatever the fuck it is, it's part of that To Be Or Not To Be speech. Anyways, you take a slight special interest in this manner of topic though, considering you're constantly under criticism for it, and therefore I decide to give you a cookie as well. Ugh, man. I need a shower to wash the mushy Uncyclopedia emotions off of myself. -RAHB 20:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I understand. We must all stand up for what we believe in. While I prefer to just ignore the slings and arrows (for various reasons, including an aversion towards large arguments) and carry on doing what I volunteer to do here, I do understand that others see it differently. I do also understand that those who may defend me do not do so necessarily in order to "get on my good side", but to stay on the good side of their own ethical and/or moral pathways. I enjoy hearing that you, RAHB, enjoy my constructive criticisms, and I bemoan the fact that some view those same criticisms as the narrow minded ramblings of a bitter man. But, alas, I am rambling. In anycase, thanks for the cookie and congratulations on the featured image! -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Word. -RAHB 21:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: June 5th, 2008

User:Fnoodle/UnSignpost/05-36-08 THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 05:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me

Could you pop onto IRC for a moment please? -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN01:03, 4 Jun

I'm on my way... -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
<sheepishly> thank you Zombie. I'm sorry I've been cranky, it's been a weird week for me.   Le Cejak <2:53, 04 Jun 2008>
Sure. Whatever. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Top3

Can you add this to VFH? I went on IRC, but there was no one there. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

It is so. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Hurrah! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: May 29nd, 2008

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 03:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: May 22nd, 2008

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 20:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


Hey! I was working on that!

You recently huffed the page Movie Of Lady Who's Ankle Is Showing for the reason of "A poor abandoned work in progress.". The article still being worked on by 2 people and the last edit was made the day it was huffed, it was not abandoned.

Please return the page to it's original state.

--MeatLoafFan 21:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Actually, the last edit was on the 10th, it was huffed on the 18th. Pages with a WIP tag get one week usually. I restored it, but if you want to make sure it doesn't get huffed again, you might want to move it to your userspace i.e. User:MeatLoafFan/Movie.... Spang talk 22:29, 20 May 2008
Yup. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks --MeatLoafFan 02:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Late Thanking of some variety

I was going through my things, and I noticed something. My old article Why?:Remove Your Penis had a term at the bottom consistent with persistent vandalism that article obtains. I said to myself "how did that happen and I didn't know it?" Well, then I looked at the history, and apparently a month ago the article took on a large load of shitty editing from stupid users/IPs, and somehow it did not come to my watchlist attention. Then I looked up and realized that for some reason the page was not watched. For some reason that page has a nasty habit of doing that.

Anyways, thank you for reverting those idiotic edits, almost a month ago. I'm glad those sections weren't sitting there, tarnishing my writing name for all that time. Though I do wonder why it's always that particular article that falls off my watchlist. If the same thing happens again, I think I'll take it up with Spang or something.

Anyways, rambling aside, thanks. -RAHB 06:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, I happened to be wandering past, and as the interrupting type that I am, thought I would mention that the same think keeps happening to me with Gay. I think it's when a revert is done, but I keep having to add it back to my watchlist, and hell knows why. It's a bit gay actually. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:50, May 19
Your welcome. I'd write some sappy shit about how thankless reverting et cetra is, and how it warms my cockles every once in awhile when somebody takes the time to let me know that they appreciate it. But I won't. Because that's a choice I made. Instead, I'll just create the idea of my writing such a comment in your minds, and let you fill in all the sappy sappy words. Its best this way, darling. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
/me hugs Zombiebaron, thanks him for whatever it was I should have been thanking him for and nips off to add Gay back to my watchlist again... Also, Dude... It sounds to me like you're suffering from a bit of the old Uncyc blues. It's been going around a lot of late, and I thought you might have been coming down with it. I hope that you don't feel that you are un-appreciated. I think that most people would agree that you are easily one of the most useful guys we have around this crazy place. My vote for you in Uncyclopedian of the year last year was not intended as a joke. I meant it. Although I have not always agreed with everything you ever did on here, you generally operate from such a bold position that you are bound to ruffle a few feathers from time to time. The fact is that we need this. With Famine now completely gone, you're the guy who makes a lot of the difficult decisions which perhaps some of the other admins might not be willing to make... Hmm, this is all getting a bit pants, maybe I will try translating that to English for you... "Chin up old bean! It's a bright and sunny day outside. We need Zombiebaron." MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 22:22, May 20
Yeah. I'm actaully not sure how to respond to that, MrN9000. But, as usual, its always a pleasure to receive such a lauding from someone who has established themselves as a pillar of this community. I'm not really very good at reciprocating such sentiment in words and stuff, and this whole section of my talkpage probably already looks like a giant panzy lovefest, but, ummmm, thanks you guys. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
/me stumbles in three days late Yeah, I agree with MrN. You've always been the guy who had the balls more than anyone to get controversial shit done around here (aka all the shit I said on VFP a while back). It's bound to get some idiots sided against you, but as is the curse of all us who fight for what's right. I think I speak for a lot of people though when I say you're heavily respected for a lot of the work you do around here, and you're definitely instrumental to the continued activity of the site. Man, this sure is a pansy-fest alright. WHO WANTS HUGS! I GOT HUGS HERE REAL CHEAP! -RAHB 05:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
/me BURSTS IN... Right enough of all this! Everyone knows that Zombiebaron is a right brain eating bastard, and that everyone hates him... Wow, hopefully that has restored order to the universe, people across the internet were starting to vomit all over their keyboards... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 08:22, May 24

Best of

Can you update the template on VFH? Best of for this month is closed. I'd go on IRC and ask an admin, but I'm in a place where such an action would be frowned upon. That's right, I'm at the circus. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I think I've done it properly. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
It appears that you have. Kudos! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: May 15th, 2008

User:Fnoodle/UnSignpost/05-15-08 ~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 01:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

</me moves this section up from the bottom of the page> You missed the door... -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Back early

Codeine ubanned me early because someone pretending to be me on IRC made a heartful plea and apologized. Does that invalidate our agreement? -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 13:58, May. 13, 2008

I heard you're not around Uncyclopedia as much anymore. When you come back I'll be more than willing to go through the rest of my ban sentence. Honestly, it's really improved me. I think before I act, I've learn to control my anger, and I don't have the urge to piss off admins anymore. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 11:52, May. 15, 2008
Yeah. Ummm. That's weird. Well, you do sound like you learned the lesson that we (that's you and me! us!) were trying to teach you with the ban. So, it looks like whichever person was "pretending to be [you]" bought you a Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free Card, so use it. Use it well. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
That's the thing. I feel like I'm getting another free pass like I always do. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 14:00, May. 16, 2008
C'mon Kip, stay.   Le Cejak <May 16, 2008 [14:05]>
Well Kip, its up to you really. If you'd like to discuss this further, feel free to email me, but, just as with the ban, I'll leave a rebanning up to you. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Vanity Template

How do Zombiebaron - quick question: does that "Vanity for Deletion" template you created still exist, and if so, where do I find it? Would have used it today but couldn't remember what the hell it was. Ta! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:03, May 13

That would be {{Vanity2}}. ~Jewriken.GIF 10:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Now you see, if you'd have said that when I asked about it on your page, I wouldn't have had to draw the Zombie's attention in my direction. He's aware I'm here now. And me without my can of Zombie repellent. This could get dangerous... Maybe writing something about Vanilla Ice Cream will distract him while I make good my escape... (Thx Mordillo, sorry to bother you ZB). --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:10, May 13
Oh right, I just realized I missed that part. Feel free to eat my brain ZB. ~Jewriken.GIF 10:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Yup. Sounds good. Zip-idy-doo-dah-day. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Lord Voldemort (Harry Potter)

I demand that you revert your edit to the Lord Voldemort (Harry Potter) article. He deserves an article which is why I had created one for him and it had great potential. I had just finished cleaning it up and making it incredibly hilarious when I got into an edit conflict because you were busy reverting it to that contemptably ridiculous, You Are Dead article. --86.134.153.111 19:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I would have redirected it to Lord Voldemort (an article that I wrote, back in 2006), however, there was a decission made to redirect that article to You Are Dead. I didn't want to make a double redirect. Also, I demand that you never make demands again. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Well that was an idiotic decision. I demand that you don't demand that I don't make demands. So there. --86.134.153.111 15:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost Sunday Edition: May 11th, 2008

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 04:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

"I never once called you a "moron" in so many words"

/me waits, expecting apology. Seriously. So now I can't nominate what I want to?   Le Cejak <May 03, 2008 [2:50]>

What the hell are you talking about? Why would I apologize for "never...call[ing] you a 'moron'"? Go ahead. Nominate whatever you want. Then, if I vote against it, realize that my vote has nothing to do with your nomination, and everything to do with what you nominated. You'll be waiting for that apology for a long time. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Category:Copyright templates

Now that Fnoodle's finished with the {{welcome}} templates, I was wondering if it might be a good idea to subst the old copyright templates (new uploads always contain subst'd templates). These are probably even more widespread than {{welcome}}. Good idea? Or no?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 20:04 May 02, 2008

Do it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Bot for THEDUDEMAN

I get the feeling you already know of my intentions, but I'm getting a bot status account to run AWB on like DrS and Fnoodle. Just making sure you're ok with this. --THEDUDEBOT 02:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Do I really look that dense? I edited your bot's talkpage for crying out loud. Yeah. Go ahead. Please. Do it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote

Cheers for voting Tony Visconti, it means a lot to me as its hopefully the first of many featured articles. I would give you hug but Zombies have weeping open sores, so I brought some the the aforementioned Vannila icecream which you like.:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 21:56, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I love the confidence of that last bit. You don't care if I really like. No. You'll tell me what I like. Also, it was not problem. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects