User talk:Zombiebaron/archive1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Zombiebaron(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "User talk:Zombiebaron/archive1": Archive [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
 

Latest revision as of 16:48, February 3, 2007

Vote for Mindsunwound

100px-MindsunwoundVoteorDie
Useless Gobshite of the Month

Hmmm...very nice angle yah got there...I already voted chum. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Poo Lit Demise

Greetings, User:Zombiebaron! Thank you for your submission(s) to Poo Lit Surprise! Are you proud of yourself for having made 3 article(s)? One for each category? ^_^

If so, I advise you to have have another look at this Best Illustrated Article extract:

Topic guidelines: your article must meet the same conditions set for the "Best Article" or "Best Rewrite" category. It must also include A MINIMUM OF 2 ORIGINAL* AND RELEVANT IMAGES.

* images that you created for the purpose of the article.

And just in case you didn't read the small print:

ORIGINAL IMAGES: IMAGES THAT YOU CREATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE ARTICLE.

Good luck fixing that and take care! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|VFP|+S 22:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes, and...you have 8 hours and 5 minutes. --—rc (t) 22:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on creating the first disqualification in Poo Lit Surprise ever... And to think we weren't even being strict... --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|VFP|+S 09:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I Humbly exept my disqualifacation. I merely spun of that subbmission so that I might have a chance at each category, guess I should have read those small print thingies, eh? It's not like I could have made good original pictures anyway, as a quick look at the pictures section of my userpage will clearly show. To bad I wasn't around last night to get your messages, but thats a story for anouther time, eh? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Captains

As far as I can tell, you and I are the only two here who claim the rank of captain. There are more Majors! Woah! Anyhow, I'm (maybe) going to create a Babel template for it, just for kicks. --CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown06:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! (belated)

Thou art welcome. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Spotted Owl

Pretty quick on the trigger, ain't cha, Tex? Anyway, my bad, I intended to make a sub-page off my user space to work on it but clicked on a red link instead. I'll try to get it fleshed out within 7 days. Zaui 22:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Heh, quick is what they pay me for *cough* I wish *cough*. Anywho, you don't really have to tell me about it, just get it done, tell someone powerful who is around, and then get the NRV off that sucka. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Shameless Plug

Vicioustamponofdoom
VOTE FOR HIGHLIGHT NOW!!

I know you like it, but with a singular further step you can be part of a bigger purpose (i.e., earning your friend Simmy bigger balls). So please, VOTE NOW on Uncyclopedia:VFP!!

This propaganda brought to you by CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown08:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Cool Hand Luke

Isn't a list... did you read it? It's a "mathematical proof." Well, not really, but that's the idea. Check it again and tell me if it looks like a list to you. XGodx 19:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Acctually it is a list. It is a list of "facts" in an order disgnied to confuse, and prove that there is no god, and at the same time having very little to do with the movie at hand, although it does mention one event of the movie (Cold Hands' death), and it deserves the template, and forthcoming deletion. Oh yah, and I always read articles that I nominate for huffing. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:48, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Double redirects

Since you moved the page, it is your job to clean up the 48 or so double redirects you created: Special:DoubleRedirects. Rar! --Splaka 08:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Acctually I moved Metal assed hamster to IHamster, and then MoneySign deleted Metal assed hamster. I protested on IRC, because someone would have to go around changing all the links to Metal assed hamster. Money recreated the page, and all of these redirects were born. I pointed the double redirects out to him, and he has done nothing. However, if you look at the double redirect page, it appears to say this: Metal assed hamster will redirect you too: Metal assed hamster witch will intern redirect you to: A list of 58 pages which include EVERY SINGLE PAGE THAT LINKS TO Metal Assed hamster. This entire thing seems confusing, and quite simpily fucked up. How can a page redirect to its self? How come when you go to Metal assed hamster it takes you to iHamster? And, dear Splaka, how am I supposted to "clean up the 48 or so double redirects", I hardly have admin status enough to delete them. However, I am going to change every link to Metal assed hamster so that it points to iHamster, thus, hopefully, fixing the problem. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Ok, here is what happened I think, quoted from IRC: "I think the problem is that iHamster was originaly a redirect, and now that I moved Metal assed hamsters on top of it, it redirects to its self, as seen in the doubleredirects page". Dawg deleted Metal assed hamster, the double redirects are gone, and I don't think there are any ramifacations, exept all the links to it in my previous comment have turned red. Hope you are happy Spak --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:12, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

If they are gone and I don't have to ban you.... Then I AM NOT HAPPY! *cries* --Splaka 04:59, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I saw all of those redirects yesterday and for the life of me, couldn't figure out how to get rid of them. It was a sort of A => A => 58 different articles thing, totally bizarre. I've seen the problem before though, and I think that it's caused by a caching issue and not actually the fault of whosoever performed the move. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Newcookie Villahj_Ideeut has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

For the largest ego on the face of the planet. -- Village IdiotKUN Free Speech 17:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks (from all of us)

The title iPregnant looks much better now. I'll assume you fixed all the other's as well so this is a group thanks. Nice job! -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Sir Tito Ree Mahoney  00:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Yes. I went through an entire category leaving only Userpages, and pages whose "wrongtitle" templates were jokes untouched. Your welcome. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:33, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Got Mail!

[Deutschland Talk] - and now please take Hinoa's hint.

Hmmm...Hinoa has never edited that page...nor do I think he has ever given me a hint of any kind...although I may be wrong...and I have only posted the nazi flag and coat of arms on the german page twice, once when the flag and coat of arms there were the real flag and coat of arms of germany, and then once again when someone had blanked the flag and coat of arms, and I couldn't simply revert it due to the fact that I would erase other edits...so what exactally is Hinoa's hint, Mr. Anonymous IP whoes only contribution is to my talk page, and who didn't even bother to sign it! --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

"Mr. Anonymous IP" - eh. Nice name, I'll take it. Don't you know your own user talk page anymore? Anyways, happens. However it's nice to know that most of North Americans are still only able to see those "big bad Nazis who tried to conquer our land while we were shitting on the toilet" in Germans, and also fail to keep their trap shut about this opinion while posting a symbol at a place where it is totally misguided and not only an insult to any in some degree rational thinking person but also a sovereign contempt of about 50 million people who died in this war. Have you ever seen the pictures of Auschwitz or any other concentration camp? I don't think so. You probably do not even know where the swastika came from in the first place. But wait - maybe I just wanted to call your attention to a comment given on this so called "Nazification"? But that doesn't mean it was me who made this comment. I'm just, forever and ever, sincerely yours -- Mr. Anonymous IP 22:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, sir, as you may not know, as I do not flaunt that fact with a fancy ass userbox on my user page, I am jewish. My grandfather and grandmother both escaped Poland, through all manner of hardship, and my grandfather, who narrowly escaped going to Aushwitz himself do to an error by a train driver, was so traumatized by the events of World War II that he rarely speaks of them, and is afraid to fly in a plane. I am well aware of where the swasika comes from, most notebly a holy symbol in Hinduisim, and I am well aware of where it comes from. However, I am of the belife that everyone should be able to laugh at them selves (even on such serious matters as these) and Germans and Jews are no exeption. This is a house of laughter, and laughter is the greatest medicine of all. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Then I overshot my last comment, sorry for that. However you should know that in other parts of this world the swastika still causes really sensitive emotions. And as the article .is. about Germany, it would be a whole lot better if you had thought about that. We do are able to laugh about ourselves, but ever since the day we were born we were shown what those Nazis did to our land and especially in the Shoa (and the Porajmos), with always having the swastika standing on top of that as the ultimate symbol for this evil. It .really. has its reasons why the swastika was banned from non-educational use by the German penal code and is seen as anticonstitutional, not just because we think it carries the danger of glorification when used improper but for there are (and sadly will always be) dumb people following Hitler's sick ideology. So when you put the swastika as coat of arms of Germany, even if it is meant sarcastic, you are playing exactly into the hands of those people, unconscious or not. Therefore when I, being a member of the second postwar generation, see this, I am unable to recognize anything but a slight of all the efforts Germany took to reappraise its past. As I said, I'm fine with making fun of Nazis, but not by using the swastika in this way. There are other articles like the ones about Hitler, the German Empire and the Third Reich for that. -- Mr. Anonymous IP 13:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

As I have said before, I was only making sure the flag and coat of arms were not the real flag and coat of arms, as this is uncyclopedia not wikipedia, however I, having very little creativity, chose the swastika meaning it to be joke something like "Heh after all the hard work by the german people to distance themselves from the imense evil of Hitler and his Third Reich, according to this completly unfactual source, their flag still contains a swastika...guess they over looked that, as they passed legislation to outlaw the swastika, eh?". To me that is sort of funny, not very but still sort of, however to people like you it seems that it is not funny at all, and I respect that. However that is all in the past now, exept for the coat of arms witch I guess someone (you) should change to something less offensive to you.--Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Done. Not very inventive, but should be enough. --Attaboy 5 March 2006

Acctaully I like it...I like it alot. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Sport

That was entirely delightful, dear friend. I found out excursion into the cold "other-spaces" quiet entertaining. Granted, I doubt I should request to repeat the hunt any soon. Such things are naught but special occaisons, and too much repetition could cause serious danger. Nevertheless, despite our preys' unfortunately prominent advantage, we gave them quite a show. Perhaps in one far off time, what we did today will be remember as a landmark in progress. More than likely it won't, but such is not what's important. 'Twas the enjoyment we got from the experience, and that can never be...reverted? Har har har har.

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown04:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I just hope twas as good for you as twas for me. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 11:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

It's not all over. Remember that night on IRC the ideas you and chron gave me? Well, here are the results! the Spork Game CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown22:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Ehrich said that I had to visit this site and say Hello to you. I don't know why. But I am doing it anyway. (Ehrich, are you happy?). 20:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC).

Where did I go? Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm...Who is this Ehrich? I don't think I know anyone named Ehrich, unless I know them by some other name. And why this Ehrich would instruct you to say hello unto me...I haven't a clue. But Hello, looking at your contributions list you appear to be rather new to Uncyclopedia. I hope to see you flourish like a buetiful Ucyclopedia flower, or something like that. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

...for your vote on Richard M. Stallman. I regret the mixup over your recent ban. My only advice is to beware of the dog from now on.  :) ~ T. (talk) 17:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh its all right, the only pain left from that ban is the pain of not having my Uncyc fix. I was right in the middle of going through the days newpages, when BAM I was banned. Oh and your welcome for the vote, it totally deserves it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 05:17, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Sir_Alec_Dow,_Anagrammatist

You have been invited to add an anagram to the Uncyclopedians section of Sir Alec's page. Please see the small list of potential anagrams you may find appealing (likely not!). Also, just above that is an anagram of The Zombiebaron you may want to use. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Sir Tito Ree Mahoney  07:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind and think of something. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Es:Dinero

You have placed the template for deletion in this article: Es:Dinero. Please, instead of that, move it to Babel:Es/Dinero, the spanish area where it belongs. Tnaks.

You obviously can move it your self, and have wasted both my and your time by complaining here. Aswell, I placed the template because it was so short. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

QVFD

You don't really need to sign things you put on QVFD. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:53, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Well yes, but then how would you know whom to thank/spank? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:15, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Astrazeneca

Does it work now?--Suresh 23:44, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

As aposed to what? the article it was like...4 days ago...before you edited it? Aswell as an improviser by trade, let me point out that you blocked (saying no, and thus blocking the developement of a scene) yourself and challenged reality (presenting facts, and then saying that they are untrue) in the exact same kinda short article...I dunno...kinda got a problem with that sorta thing....but that's just me --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:35, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I do not really get you. I have seen and edited this article once - today.--Suresh 01:40, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm....let me address these issues one at a time using a fancy system of numbers and letters
1. ok so, you found an article, edited it, and then checked with me if it "worked"?
2. Why?
3. I have never given you me, and thus i'm not suprised that you never recived a large box of cocaine from me on your doorstep.
4. Did you know that Game Boy?

--Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:45, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

A: I thought it was you that had NRV-tagged it - saw later it vas Volte.--Suresh 01:54, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

AA: Okay glad we spent alot of time disscussing something that didn't matter in the end. :) --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:55, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Constructive Help asked

OK, You hate the image of the Our Gang of Four. I'm asking for constructive help with this - what about the image is so awful that it received the comment from you that it did. I'm serious, its satiric, its timely, but evidently it doesn't cut it. So I'm asking in all honestly whats wrong with it. Prettiestpretty 02:19, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Fuck I had like a fucking long responce, filled with wit and Led Zeppelin refrences!!! but then fucking safari crashed! anywho...Ill try to reconstruct it below, but shorter.

Point A. It's the same old same old "hey im gonna use the lassoo tool to copy faces onto unrealted bodies!"...witch has been done zillion (the number greater then a billion in Zombieland) times on the internet, it is thus an alright picture for comedic porposes, but not really front page material

Point B. Er...there is no point b...however bee's have points, and if I think of something else later Ill put it here.

--Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:17, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

OK, I'll buy that. But what a lasso tool? Prettiestpretty 00:38, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

The tool in paint and other such programs that lets you selct a user defined area...--Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:13, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)


Semprini award winner

Because of your heroic effort in putting up Sgt Peppers, I award you the Semprini award for outstanding excellence in the field of recieveing awards without templates. --Joachim22 05:59, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Wow thanks --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:31, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Untitled

I think the redirect on United States of America (to United_States_of_Armenia) should be left as is. The page was moved from there, and several dozen pages link through there. Other redirect pages that link to United_States_of_Armenia: United States, The United States, Usa, U.S. ... If you'd like to create a new page about the US, you should probably choose an unused name. --Splaka 00:12, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Sorry sir. --Zombiebaron 17:03, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Rrs

Re: Rrs, stop creating things like that for a clipboard. Geez! We have to delete it whenever you blank it or move it (creates a redirect) and that is annoying. Use the sandbox, or better yet, just use [show preview] --Splaka 01:52, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Wow that was pretty fucking fast. Sorry again. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:53, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The "all seeing eye" is always watching........ -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 01:54, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

...wow you guys are fast...--Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:56, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Mac User

yah...sorry in advance for the pages I made and whatever...it started off so well...then stuff didn't work...and as i fixed it i made more pages and what not...--Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:54, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

So which category do you want deleted? Btw, categories in templates are special. See this. --Splaka 23:58, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I guess the one without the space...and some how i got added to UKer User page...dunno how...yah the one with no space--Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:00, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

wait no the one with the space...the other one works...--Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:05, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Heh, three minutes too late. However, both will work after a null edit (see the above link to meta), and anyhow the category with the space looks better. --Splaka 00:11, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Anyhow...I think ive fixed the template...I followed your above advice about using the sandbox...yah thanks for the link and all...sorry for making work for you...--Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:16, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Judenmouse

User:Splaka already removed the NRV tag. Why did you add it back on? --Chomu 10:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
I put it back on because I thought it was neccassary, and didn't see that Splaka had removed it already. Feel free to remove it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:52, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

VietKorea

Hey Zombie, I realize that VietKorea sucks, but it's not done. It will still suck when finished, but I believe I've earned some leeway as a previously highlighted author. This in addition to the fact that I'm awesome.--Sir Slackerboya CUN VFH (talk) 01:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Stöp picking ön my wörk!

Why dö yöu add {{NRV}} tö such pötentially gööd articles as Ö? Yes, I knöw it's shöcking, and a stub that cöuld use söme möre cöntent, but sömeöne whö has möre ideas will find it and add such cöntent if they care aböut anything öther than applying {{NRV}} tags! Seahen 21:04, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm...So what you are saying is that it is alright to add crappy articles to Uncyclopedia because "Someone who has more ideas will find it and add such content"...I am not an admin, but I at least try to uphold a certain level humor on this site through adding NRV tags to pages that: a) aren't funny.
b) are less then 10 long sentences long.
c) are racist or in someother way offensive to people other then the fucking FCC.
d) are more then one of the above.

Now, for instance Ö is short (although it is longer then 10 sentences) and it is not funny. Why isn't it funny? Well because it looks like some child who broke is keyboard, so that it typed ö instead of o spent five minutes writing an article about how shocking it is to put an accent atop a letter. You then go on to make a list, something that even a monkey could make, to illustrate your point.

Wait. I just checked out the page history. How can you claim this as your work? The page was started by an IP, and I added the NRV before you even edited it. Meh. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

It's my IP, but your software keeps logging me out. Can I at least have the article restöred as a user subpage? (Put it on the IP's user subpage if you don't believe it was me; I'll find it.) Seahen 02:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
PS. Nö, I dön't believe a mönkey cöuld have written that article, even if his typewriter had an umlaut key.
Ok, this is the part where you should talk to an admin.. I can niether restore pages nor can I fix your typewriter. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 11:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations, I guess

Traffic You have angered Hinoa, and therefore he/she decrees that you should go play in traffic. Specifically, a inner-city freeway during rush hour.


Awarded for making Brad and I go on a wild goose hunt for an Uncyc IRC client. You bastard. :D --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 06:28, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Eh?

You seem to have just gone through everything I wrote last night and added delete notices to them. Why on Earth have you done this? Maybe thinking one or two are pointless- fine, but just blankly marking all mine for deletion? You don't seem to understand that the point of the inconsistancy article is its inconsistant like redundancy is redundant. It could use more inconsistant information though I think its otherwise a perfectly sound idea for a article. And the gerbil article? How can the encyclopedia not have an article on gerbils! --Boris 15:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Do not worry, kind sir, I did not mery go through articles created by you, as you appear to insinuate, but however I went through the list of newpages, and added NRV tags to all the articles which I found lacked in substance. I perform this act on a daily basis, and if you care to take a look at my contributions, you cans validate that fact. As for the articles them selves, I found them to be short. All you need to do is lengthen them, maybe add anouther paragraph at the least, and all will be fine. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:26, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Im here!

Can you endorse my userpage? ~~Swish!! --MarksWeep 13:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't belive that I "endorse" userpages. It is not one of the services witch I currently offer, please clarify your demands. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

The Vid Mask

_Why did you put the Vid Mask as an article for deletion. Isn't it funny?Abc85 14:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

  • No it is not funny. Well that is a lie...there was one funny part, the part about it being a sex symbol. Other then that one sentence it was not funny. Aswell, it is short. If it were longer, no one would be able to acctually read it, and thus no one would be able to, unbiastly, tell you wether or not it was funny. So if you can expand it, add a picture, and maybe write a section about how it's sex symbolness (maybe it appeared in porn movies, for example) then it would no longer be worthy of deletion. Work fast, you have less then a week! --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

reply

Thanks for the message. I did add some photos, which made me register. Before I registered I did some minor editing on the Coach Z and RuPaul article. I also made up a new article called Hedism

Personal tools
projects