User talk:Why do I need to provide this?/archive2

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Pee reviewer of the month award Nominated Reviewer of the Month
This user has been nominated for Reviewer of the Month—you can vote for them or nominate any helpful reviewers at Reviewer of the Month.

(2 Sept. 2009 - 1 October 2009)

edit My Lirrle Boy Has Graduated!

You've graduated, Sonny! You're NotM, so you aren't a noob anymore. I changed your user page and updated the vandalism number. Now you're grown there's no more diapers for you! Unless you really want to wear them! ;) Mommy Miley loves you! Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:13, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for graduating me! Now what do I get as a graduation present? Love ya. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 02:28, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
I'll find something special for you. ;) Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:26, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Also your talk page is getting long. Might be time to archive it! If you don't know how, just ask me! Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:15, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks you're right. I learned how to move a page after I goofed on moving one before. I hope. If I don't do it right, I'll be asking your help. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 02:32, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
I think I did it right. If anyone knows otherwise, feel free to let me know. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 02:40, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
You did fine Why?! Also I added you to Order of Uncyclopedia! You can add your flag for your country if you want. Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:25, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll go there now. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 03:29, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

edit Archery cont'd

I made some more edits to Archery, so have a look and tell me what you think. Last time we spoke of it you said that you didn't know where to go with it, so until you figure out, Imma keep on truckin'. Also, I attempted to reread the Sun Bee article, but I'm going to wait until I'm in a better position to view potentially NSFW material. I liked the top half, though. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:38, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't think of it as NSFW. It shows the top portion of a women's breast (no nipple), the side of a breast or two (no nipples) and some people's butts. I've seen stronger stuff than this in churches--but I guess it all depends where you work. I'll check out Archery after I finish a Pee Review. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 03:48, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
I'm not saying you need to flag it as {{NSFW}}, I'm just saying that it might not be a good idea to have butts on my screen right now. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:51, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
All right. I certainly don't want to cause anybody a problem. And really, you don't want butts on your screen because they leave butt marks. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 03:54, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
Also, do let me know if you want to say anything about how archery must be between a bow and an arrow, and everything else is verboten. I know you have rather specific tastes about gay jokes, so you ought to be on top of this, right? --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:58, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
I like to penetrate to the bottom of humor. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 04:05, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

The article's "finished" in that I don't have anything more to add to it. Want to look at it/revise it/have it reviewed/review it? --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 02:55, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

edit The Who (again)

Another thorough review which I have to say i agree with entirely. I'll fix up what's left of it soon. Thanks. --Sog1970 09:34, October 3, 2009 (UTC)


Done, I think. BTW The High Numbers was aparently Kit Lambert's idea, abandoned when the singles they released bombed. The phone number is (probably) ficticious but 01 is the old dialling code for London and I tried to keep the number short, as the've been getting longer since I was a kid.

I felt a bit mean not assigning Tom Baker a bigger role, since he was my favourite doctor - but I had a lot of them to kill quickly. Thanks for the review again, you have a knack for them, I think. I'm glad there were fewer typos on this one. --Sog1970 15:55, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

I'm glad I could help. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 00:37, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

edit Pee Review

Hi there, thank you for reviewing my article. It was very constructive and useful, and I will begin implementing the suggested changes soon, although it will be fairly sporadic. Additionally, thank you for the suggested picture. Fahrenheit 14:34, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

You're certainly welcome. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 00:37, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

edit My talk page

Was ruthlessly assassinated by you. My talk page is something like a forum, so it should be easy. [/zh] 10:24 October 5

(easy to write messages.) [/zh] 10:25 October 5
I posted an apology on your talk page, although I'm not exactly sure what I'm apologizing for. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 18:06, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
Umm... you didn't really assassinate my talk page. It's a hyperbole. or maybe it is a hyperbolean thing. I don't know. And I'm zheliel by the way. [/zh] 10:35 October 6

edit I didn't ask, you delivered anyway

Thanks for helping out this weekend with a pee or two. As I'm thanking those I asked to chip in and help, it would be churlish not to thank someone else who helped as well. Have a beer! --UU - natter UU Manhole 20:52, Oct 5

Beerpint Under user has bought you a beer!
Remember though, you're getting the next round.


Thank you for the beer! But I'll warn you, I'm very particular about the beer I drink. If it comes in a can, it doesn't come in my mouth. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:54, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

edit God bless

GOD BLESS YOU for reviewing my world domination article. I was giving up on it, and finally accepting nobody would give a shit...then bam! You come along. Thank you, and congrats for being noob of the month.-Almost Sir Random Crap

You're welcome. I'm just sorry you had to wait so long. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:51, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

edit Finsh'd

I finished HowTo:Achieve World Domination in a Recession according to your tips. If you want to nom it, feel free.-Almost Sir Random Crap

Thanks for letting me know. But after you waited nearly a month for a second Pee Review, I would suggest you wait a bit longer before nicely suggesting a nom (and I don't at all mind you suggesting it, as I hinted that I was thinking about nomming it if improved). I'd give yourself at least 24 hours, probably longer, to think about your article. Also while you certainly are under no obligation to follow all or even any of my suggestions, which are of course nothing more than my opinion, I really think you'd have a better chance getting this featured if you'd look over my Pee Review once again and look over your article a few more times before trying to get it nommed. You might want to know that so far every article I've voted for VFH has won, including one that had the lowest score of any current VFH-nommed article when I voted for it. Another article I reviewed was changed as per my suggestions, and won. I reviewed another article and suggested the author work some more on it, but he didn't make the changes and self-nommed. It didn't make it. That doesn't mean I'm right this time, but I would suggest giving it a little more time and a little more work. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:15, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
Okay, sure. Just make sure to vote for me once the time comes! -Almost Sir Random Crap
Again, I certainly don't expect you to slavishly follow my suggestions. But as it is, I wouldn't vote for or against it as VFH. If you make a significant number of improvements (yes, based on my opinion, but it's the only one I got), I will happily vote for. And if you improve it as much as I think you can, I'll happily nom and for. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:21, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

edit Are you still having trouble with welcoming people?

If so, all you have to do is {{SUBST:Welcome}} MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 22:32, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

But I see now that you already figured that out... Um... Just ignore me. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 22:34, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
I don't like to ignore people who try to help me. I either pat them on the head if they're helpful, or kick them in the shins in they're not. Pat on the head. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:36, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
Symbol for vote For.[/zh] 10:35 October 6

edit Baby Boomers

Dude! Great review. I'll go through all your suggestions and fix the whole thing as you describe. But one thing is the Viet Nam Draft was a Baby Boomer's motherfucking night mare..and a lot of them never woke up ever again. I lost my music career as a result and spent 12 years in India as a fugitive just to outsmart goddamn uncle Sam. Now it's a novel, and possibly a feature film. "Like, Misunderstood" on amazon.com

I'm sorry about your personal experience; I'm glad a U.S. President pardoned all the U. S. dodgers. And thanks for you thanks; I find it hard to thank someone who gives me crticism even if I think it is useful. As for the Vietnam War, American combat units weren't deployed until 1965, the strong awareness of the problem didn't begin until a year or three after that, and the American draft was over in 1973. It wasn't as much of a factor for those born before 1947 and not at all for those born after 1955, and most of the early Baby Boomers who went to Vietnam were already in the military before the Vietnam War had a major focus. (A friend of mine born in the mid 1950s was in the draft lottery, and his birthday came out as number 365). Over half of all Baby Boomers didn't face the draft if we're talking only about men. If we're talking about females, then less than 25 percent faced the possibility of being drafted. In fact one thing I didn't mention but should have is that your article is very male-oriented--in fact all the pics are males. The war was a major thing, sure, but the two Vietnam War quotes at the beginning make it seem like that war defines the Baby Boomer. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:25, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

After corrections can I ask you to take another look, please? Your opinion is most valued.--Funnybony 22:07, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

Sure! Don't expect a full review, but I'll be happy to look it over. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:26, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
Dude! I needed to know what was wrong with the article, and you took a lot of time to explain. So of course thanks! Double thanks!!! I'll be back to see you soon. You think we need a female!? Hubba hubba!! Who should it be? Most of the girls turned into men (like my three sisters) which reminds me of the TRUTH: Q: Why do sumo wrestlers shave their legs? A: So they won't be taken as feminists. That's why I like Thailand, because girls act like girls!--Funnybony 23:18, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
Dude! I really cleaned up Baby Boomers. I think is OK, except that I can't think of a single female to represent BB ?? Any suggestions. Jane Fonda??--Funnybony 19:33, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
I'd suggest you go to Wikipedia, and check the various categories such as female heads of government and Grammy, Emmy, Oscar award winners. Or go to Madonna and look at her categories and you'll see lots of lots of them, or Hillary Rodham Clinton and look at her categories, or Oprah Winfrey and look at her categories, or look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_of_the_Year , etc. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:05, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Also Jane Fonda was born December 21, 1937; Baby Boomers started 1946. I learned her birthdate in less than a minute by checking online. That's why I suggested you do your research. Let me know when you feel your article's ready for another look. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:08, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Man, I'm learning a lot here. I always thought Jane Fonda was my age group. I guess for me, being a BB is based on what I saw and experienced. So thanks for the clues. Hillary will be perfect. I think Madonna is quite younger than me (I'm 62). For me, Vietnam defined the whole Swinging Sixties, flower power, cultural situation, just as WWII defined my parents world view. Since WWI-Korea it was just non-stop war, barbaric people. But my generation said, "Hey, Vietnam ain't no enemy of mine! They're NOT attacking USA, and they have every right to have whatever form of govt they liked. Just as VN has become now. So what was the use of 1,100,000 VN deaths, and 60,000 US kids deaths? It was total BS. And I wasn't about to be a stooge-puppet in any goddamn Chess Game army. And if I'm forced - then WHERE is my so-called freedom? So I told Uncle Sam where to stick it, took off, Lived in an Ashram in India for 12 years, waited for the pardon (after USA realized how they FUCKED UP). Their pardon was no gift, it was an apology. Anyway thanks for the help, and I'll be back, because I want to get it good enough to feature, or at least good enough for NOM (which is almost as good).--Funnybony 17:17, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
Good luck with the article; I'm glad I could help. Sorry about the troubles you went through because of a wrong-headed government. What made the war even worse was that until 1971 you could be drafted at age 18 but couldn't vote until 21--you could be dead before you'd have any say. I think that's terrible. I once asked a friend of mine who's virtually a military expert if there was any war America began that wasn't for the coffers of American businesses--he immediately said "no." And by the way, you may have heard a rumor that Jane Fonda spit on returning GIs. From what I've read, that's a myth. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 18:10, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

edit For the record...

You don't own IC. Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 05:58, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

Wait... he doesn't?[MODUzOPERANDI, teh] 08:03 October 9
No he doesn't IC is actually mine. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:19, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Oh. I thought you co-owned it. [MODUzOPERANDI, teh] 08:25 October 9
That's just a front, it's really all me, pulling strings from behind the scenes. I'm a ghost in the IC machine. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:28, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Ah. No wonder. [MODUzOPERANDI, teh] 08:55 October 9
I don't know what you mean by I don't own IC. If you're referring to my edits of the IC Transformers, three people edited in one direction, another supported it, and one person reverted it. I tried putting it together. If the one overrules the four, maybe that person owns IC. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:26, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
One, because the idea is offensive and unfunny. Two, the present idea has been discussed and agreed upon on IRC. Three, it's being postponed until the end of PLS, as both me and Opty are judging. Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 21:53, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

edit Also...

Welcome to IC. Feel free to add the appropriate template to your usepage or something. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN17:18, 9 Oct

"Thank you for the welcome," said the young mouse to the snake. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:50, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

edit From the desk of ChiefjusticeDS

In response to your enquiry as to my revert on the PEE review page for Pedobear, I have left you a longer message on my talk page detailing my reasons for performing the revert and have restored the comment to the more appropriate forum of the Pedobear article talk page. I hope you find this to be an acceptable compromise. If not then I give you my full permission to put it back on the PEE review page. Thanks for asking me. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:26, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

I commented on your user page. Thanks for your help. (Maybe we should form the Uncyclopedia Society for Politeness). WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 18:12, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
What an absolutely capital idea, you must dine at my club sometime. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:28, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

edit Sun Bee is VFH!

I nommed and voted for Sun Bee. You did a lot of work on it and it's great and I know you made most of the pics too! Remember you can vote for your own article everybody does it! :) Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 16:27, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

I really appreciate your nomination and your help with the article. It's not a problem for me on this, but in the future would you mind posting a note on my talk page asking me if I plan to do more edits before you nom? I would really appreciate it. I'm basically done with the article so that's fine. Thanks for all your help. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 18:15, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
SunBeeSlippers

Huh.

Thought the image at right may be mildly interesting to you—MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[01:11 11 Oct 2009]
Thanks (I said more on your talk page). WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 00:26, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

edit OK...

Yeah...your mother, Dame Miley Spears, told me you could help with HowTo:Achieve World Domination in a Recession because it needed to be improved in small parts (so did your Pee Review). I did the best I could, and it is currently up for nomination again as you see. Just please help, nobody's helped with this.-Almost Sir Random Crap

I'll respond on your talk page. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 18:56, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

edit Baby Boomers

Dude! I worked a ton on this. It's really about the "Swinging Sixties Baby Boomers" - so perhaps I should change the title? But Baby Boomer and Swinging Sixties go hand in hand in most people's minds. So maybe just keep it Baby Boomer, and I have clarified in the first sentence. And NO quotes. I think it's ready for you. I think it's pretty good right now and people will enjoy it, with all your help and considerations. If you think so, could you re NOM? Best wishes--Funnybony 23:07, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately I don't have time to look it over right now, but will get to it in the next day or two. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 03:50, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks in advance. I think it is much better after the pee. I hope we can renom--I'm using a phone so I'm not logged in. This is funnybony at your service--203.144.180.65 15:05, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
BTW: In your review you asked who was this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owsley_Stanley--Funnybony 18:35, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
This guy is really interesting. Thanks. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 00:31, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

edit I tried

  1. to fix up the things you pointed out about this. Does it look any better? Does it need to be even more subtle? Is it ready for mainspace or even VFH?
  2. to get what you were hinting at with 39.5. I give up. Care to tell? MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[05:42 11 Oct 2009]
  3. to remember to give you this, but obviously forgot to the first time around:
GoldenShower Rejoice, Why do I need to provide this?! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Thanks and cheers—MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[05:44 11 Oct 2009]

Hey, thanks for the award! Yes, my 39.5 is so subtle. What does a score of 40+ mean? Hmm. I have to get off computer land right now, and won't be back for about a day. I've got another Pee Review I've got to do in 24 minus hours, and about four or five people have asked me to look over their articles, etc....All right, I just briefly glanced at 2001. I haven't had a chance to go through it all yet, but what I saw I liked. I'll look over it in detail within 36 hours. (In the meantime, if you wanted to link the word "archer" in "The film retells the story of The Odyssey, except in space" to the article Archery, I wouldn't complain.) comment slighted edited after response WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:54, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Why,[1] the idea hadn't occurred to me! Will do and will stand by. Thanks! MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[05:59 11 Oct 2009]
following appended after edit after response Ah-ha! So that's why! That whole page looks rather unfamiliar to me ... might have to read that later. Thanks again! MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[06:11 11 Oct 2009]
  1. Note the clever double meaning of that expression.
I just had to jump back and forth between revisions of this in order to follow the plot of this conversation. It was almost like a Kubrick movie it was so convoluted. Pup t 08:39, 11/10/2009
First we confuse you, then we hit you with the mind control ray. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 14:06, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

edit You sir...

Are a funny guy. I laughed a lot at this edit. Cheers! Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 22:56, Oct 11

You mean somebody other than me actually read that whole thing? Thanks. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 00:21, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
Oh, bravo sir! Pup t 00:36, 12/10/2009
Puppy of the flashing self-advertising signature, has anyone ever called you an attention whore? But somehow, when you do it, it's funny. (Can you teach me your trick?) WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 01:19, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

edit Just curious:

Do you ever plan on writing Why?:Do I need to provide this? As I said, just curious. MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[00:00 12 Oct 2009]

Never thought of it. Hmm. I could actually get away with naming an article after myself. Got any ideas? WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 00:22, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
Personally: I think you could perhaps focus on why "I" need to provide personal information to some website(s)—perhaps satirise the lack of privacy on the Internet. Beyond that, not many ideas—it's a thought, though.
The increasing lack of privacy is one of my hotbed issues. You may have an idea I could use there. Thanks. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 01:17, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
Also, thanks for the cookie, and I also look forward to those Star Trek articles! MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[01:13 12 Oct 2009]
Yeah, me too. Right now they're on hold (my first beginning sucks) while I work on something else. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 01:17, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

edit Pissing pot

User:POTR/Template:PEEd - It is one of the templates that I do like. Of course, I did make it. Pup t 04:38, 12/10/2009

I knew I saw that template somewhere. Cool. I'm ripping you off beginning right now. Thanks! Also I hate to ask, but I really want to have an unscored introduction/meet the reviewer section at the beginning of my Pee Reviews. I like to let the reviewee know something about me if they don't know me, and also my expertise (or lack thereof) on the subject being reviewed. You think that would be easy to do? WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 04:43, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
User:PuppyOnTheRadio/Template:PCHIM Pee Review Table is my template for PEE reviews that I created when I realised that I usually started reviewing the writing style and the spelling before anything else, and much like Boomer I like to look at concept before humour, as the humour derives from the concept, not the other way around. (Boomer's template is User:Boomer/Template:Updated Pee Review Table.) The truth is looking at the code it can be done but... I would just write a blurb in the free text area at the start before you start on the actual review proper. Odds are that it probably won't be read anyway. Pup t 05:01, 12/10/2009
I'll check those out, thanks. I put my self-intro first so they will read it. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:16, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

edit Punji Stick

Guts

GUTS!!! - Use with caution around adults

Dude! Once again I must thank you (with the astounding sight of this wave) for all the useful tips (no pun intended), everyone of which I will follow. Thanks for taking the time and effort to help this article. Best wishes--Funnybony 19:29, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

Sure. Glad I could make a few sharp points. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 19:43, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
If you like surfing then you might GET this http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Laird_Hamilton
I'll check it out later. Right now I'm running on deadline for a Pee Review, and am supposed to making comments for somebody on something. (But damn that's a big wave. I don't board surf but sometimes body surf, so would completely chicken out and run like hell to get away from something that big). WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:01, October 12, 2009 (UTC

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Laird_Hamilton is not for review or anything other than the laughs you'll get. The guy actually IS the greatest living Surfer alive today. He rides waves so damn big that if it's double-size this picture it a "lull" for Laird Hamilton. It also has a mind-bending super-human sights of man v/s natures most dynamic moment. YouTube shows his surfing HUGE fucking suicidal waves - that would drown a million life-guards at Jaws, filmed from a helecopter. He has to get pulled into the huge waves using a jet sky. And I'm with you. A wave that big and I ain't gonna paddle out fo sho (unless Laird Hamilton tells me the North Shore is the South Shore). Enjoy it. Surfing is also a Baby Boomer thing that took off from the sixties--Funnybony 22:57, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

unFACT: Laird Hamilton wishes Mount Everest was made of warm water.

Personal tools
projects