From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
You have twice now deleted an entire section of this article, and this time your change summary reads: Removed blatant stereotypes of the furry fandom.
The point of this article is not to reflect favorably on furries but to be funny. Because, you see, this is a humor wiki. Relying on trite stereotypes is not the best comedy, but some of us are not the best comedians, and it is well within limits. We are an equal-opportunity stereotyper of all groups and races.
If you had the skill to rewrite this so that it was gentler on furries but just as funny--and not only to youse--that would be a true contribution. But I see that you don't make many contributions at all, other than advertise that you are a furry. Consequently, I am not concerned that the accompanying ban will impede your contributions much. And it is not your first.10:52 11-Apr-13
No; today's edit didn't do it.09:34 4-May-13
Zana Dark undid your changes and had put a welcome here, inviting you to discuss things (presumably the undoing) on her talk page. You restored your own version, and this time, in a section on 4chan, included a personal nod to its moderator "moot".
- Uncyclopedia is for original comedy creations, not a place for you to develop the folklore of other websites that you visit.
- Several of us, here and in Change Summaries, have explained why we prefer the shorter version that neither glorifies fursuit-wearers nor calls them furfags. You have not explained anything about why you prefer the longer and ranty version.
Admin Simsilikesims, after a discussion with me, has banned you from the site for a month for edit warring. We work as a team to produce funny pages; you haven't been working with the team, perhaps don't care about what's in our encyclopedia, and perhaps don't care about making anyone laugh other than yourself. If you return after your ban, I hope you will strive to improve on these issues. 11:25 5-May-13