User talk:Under user/Archive 7

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit I smell fresh meat.

RAEP!
Sir Manticore progress-wheel.gif 09:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Man, a page can't maintain its innocence for longer than 3 minutes on this site. What's the world coming to? Actually, I think this is the first time you've graced my page Manticore. Welcome! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:40, Apr 11
It's got colors. Colors of a gray, depressing sky! YAY! - CC Blah / Pee Dizzymilky
Well, I don't want to encourage any frivolity on my talk page. This is serious! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
How serious? - CC Blah / Pee Dizzymilky
Serious! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
(CHANGING TOPIC TO CORRESPOND WITH LEVEL OF SERIOUSNESS)
WHO DO YOU CONSIDER THE FOREMOST PHILOSOPHER OF OUR AGE? THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION. -   ~  CAJEK. THIS LINKS TO MY TALK PAGE.
Hmm, toughie. One has to consider the intellectual claims of Chomsky, for example, and his considerable contributions to the sum of human knowledge. 4.252.99.182 also makes a strong claim for the title with his profoundly insightful comments on existence. But on reflection, I'd side with Lavigne, for her assertion that "Uh huh, life's like this, Uh huh, uh huh, that's the way it is". Elegant and profound - what more is there to say? -- Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
IF (1) LIFE IS LIKE A BOX OF CHOCOLATES, AND (2) EAT SHIT FUCKERS!!!, THEN AREN'T WE ALL JUST SHIT IN THE BIG SCHEME OF THINGS?   ~  CAJEK. THIS LINKS TO MY TALK PAGE.
That makes no allowances for the other things contained in a box of chocolates, such as moulded plastic trays, ridged cardboard separators, little maps and warnings about possible nut content. Truly, you never know what you're gonna get... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
That is indeed the shit we are to consume... Also don't take my chocolates! You'll get icky stains all over my articles >:( --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 13:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I AGREE WITH DJ IRREVERENT. I WOULD CONCEDE THE POINT, IF NOT FOR THE FACT THAT I EAT MOLDED PLASTIC TRAYS ALONG WITH THE CHOCOLATES. I, UH, HAVE AN EATING PROBLEM.   ~  CAJEK. THIS LINKS TO MY TALK PAGE.
Consider also that boxes of chocolate also contain air, which can't be "eaten" by conventional means, and also very occasionally dead flies missed by the hygiene processes, which can and are delicious. I see myself as the 0.0000087 % of the air that is Xenon. So not shit, in other words. You may have some self-images issues which you are trying to suppress with your packaging-eating. Have you considered seeing a doctor? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
EVERY TIME I SEE THAT DOCTOR, I GET BANNED, AND THEN I CAN'T SEE HIM ANYMORE. CONSIDER THIS STATEMENT AND WRITE A 500 WORD ESSAY TO THE EFFECT. USE THE MARGINS PROVIDED.   ~  CAJEK. THIS LINKS TO MY TALK PAGE.
Why d'you think I suggested you see him? That's the kind of forward-thinking treatment that we need. If more people were banned, there would be no worldwide moulded packaging shortage due to over-consumption. And I can't count. -- Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks guys, I needed that. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:41, Apr 12
:D   Le Cejak <Apr 12, 2008 [13:19]>

edit Serious Criticism And Bandwagons

I liked the old page bettah... but I like riding bandwagons even more! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 13:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

In which case, where's your serious sig? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I kinda misinterpreted that... Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Heart_anim.gif 13:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
That's a definition of serious I'm unfamiliar with. Please wash your hands on your way out. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

edit Reward!

Tank0 With warm regards...
Javascap has decided that, somehow, you are a rightfully friendly fellow, and has decided to throw this colourful template onto your page.
REJOICE Under user! </div>

For the great job you have been doing, and because I want to hand this fresh reward to SOMEONE. Cheers! Warm Regards, Javascap

edit yay! thanks for the delete vote!

--Moonzeppelin MUN 13:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, this is new... (Also, did I? I can't remember?) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:53, Apr 13

edit Blah

Vote, blah, vote, blah. DO YOU EVER DO ANYTHING WITH FEELING, MAN?!~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 21:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

How's about this from my contribs log: "09:28, 31 March 2008 (hist) (diff) m User:YesTimeToEdit/SigBook‎ (it says everybody feel free to sign, and I'm one of everybody, so I Feel Free. Hmm, good song actually, time to listen to Cream again...)" That was only a couple of weeks ago, what do you want, blood? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:16, Apr 14
That would be nice. Otherwise, I have to find another sacrifice, and waiting makes Grendel displeased.-~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 22:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

edit Tanks

Campaign Leaflet thanks you for the vote.
Selloutleaflet
Selloutleaflet

Unfortunately Campaign Leaflet can not keep any of the promises it made campaigning as the $10 offered by the Pizza place down the street was just too good an offer not to fold for. But still, $5 Pizza - thats tonights dinner for YOU![1]

  1. This is still not a discount coupon.

--Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 07:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

edit Hey thanks.

I appreciate the second opinion. I hope I can take the fact you've gotten around to it to mean your Gran's feeling better. I've got a couple of follow up questions. 1. It's funny you mentioned VFD as I was a little concerned that it might come accross as too negative. I don't want to give the impression that we're a bunch of complete asshats. I'd like to also give the impression that there's fun to be found as well, but it's difficult to do in something like this. Got any suggestions? 2. I don't know if you're the right person to ask, but is there somewhere where all the helpful pages are collected? I'd like to link to them all in this article (in the spirit of helping noobs and all) but I'm sure there's several I don't even know exist. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN 00:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


edit Hey

I got a few things to say to you. 1) Im surprised you have friends. 2) Your friend cant even spell rape right 3) You need quit meddling in friends buissness The preceding unsigned comment was added by SasukeUchiha (talk • contribs)

Really? Here are a few replies for you:
  1. I surprise people regularly.
  2. You can't even spell "I'm", or "business" right.
  3. You can't wikiformat either.
  4. I try to help out around here - generally, the stuff I revert is vandalism, and nothing more.
  5. If you have a problem with somethink I've done, let me know what it was - I do a lot around here. If I fucked something up, I apologise. Although judging by your manner, I'm not sure that's the case.
  6. SIGN YOUR POSTS. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:58, Apr 16

edit Hey you, I've got a bone to pick with you

What's up with you and reverting vandalism on my userpage? People work hard on that vandalism, you know! What kind of asshole are you?

And furthermore, you were editing my talk page! The insult! The horror! The dreadfulness!

And what's up with you editing the wiki?? Stop pressing "edit", you bastard!

GOD!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  formspring) 17:20 Apr 16, 2008

I know, and I didn't even have the courtesy to vandalise your userpage during Lent. I know you may never forgive me, but I'd like you to at least try! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:43, Apr 16
UU - Should I ban the vandal? ~Jewriken.GIF 18:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Mordillo - I think he secretly enjoys it, much better not to give him what he really wants... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:43, Apr 16
I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING! Oh wait, ban who?   Le Cejak <Apr 16, 2008 [23:00]>

edit Tell me where you hid the body.

Heinous Dan Movie Poster

Hey, Punk!

You voted to get the UnScript featuring the most violent detective in the world to the front page to blow some heads clean off a few newbie shoulders. I'll keep this brief considering that I've been sitting on my ass for the last minute talking to you instead of carving holes into that punk Dexter.

So thanks for the vote.

I probably wouldn't have made this if I hadn't seen average cop. So, an extra thanks. ~ Tophatsig 17/04/2008 @ 03:04
Really? Hey, that's cool - an extra thanks to you for an enjoyable read! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:27, Apr 17

edit No Shouting

No Shouting?   Le Cejak <Apr 17, 2008 [13:28]>

No. No shouting in the maintenance library. Naughty boys like Javascap who shout their name will get detention and miss recess. Or possibly a stern and disapproving UU glare. Either is bad. Also, do you prefer this lovely colo(u)r talk page to the gr(a/e)y? Crikey, this transatlantic spelling thing is tricky! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:33, Apr 17
I remember when you glared at me that one time... yikes. Well, let me say first: CAJEK!. Let me say second: YOU WANNA REVIEW SOMETHING I WROTE? Let me say third: I like this better, because it reminds me of MY talk page (which has been quiet lately). THANK YOU, SINCERELY CAJEK.   Le Cejak <Apr 17, 2008 [13:37]>
...I hope whoring was allowed...   Le Cejak <Apr 17, 2008 [13:57]>
That's not whoring, that's a review request - that's a different kettle of stuff you put in a kettle. I may well take a look at that later. I'm on another one of those days when I can do little bits here and there, but finding a block of time to concentrate on a review is a bit harder. I'll see what happens when I get home. Also, I'm not watching your faves page, but I did see you change it on RC - does that mean you're glaring at me? What the hell will happen if we get crossed glares? I'm feeling sparks build up as I type... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:00, Apr 17
I have found that two people glaring at each other over the internet isn't like glaring in real life. Glaring is made of tougher stuff than this internets, although I can almost feel your glare from over here.
If you do review it, UU, thanks! I'm rewriting pages I find after going through special:random. Have you noticed that my last five VFH'd articles have been about animals? What does this mean?   Le Cejak <Apr 17, 2008 [14:09]>
Rightyho, I've got a good few minutes spare, here we... wait a minute, it's been done already, by The Improver. Well, there's a thing. Well, here's the deal: I'll give a second opinion if you want, but only if you want - so let me know. And yes, I've noticed you're able to say "my last 5 features". I have to talk about "my 5 features". *sob*. I'm sure I mentioned somewhere about you being too funny... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:42, Apr 17
Second opinion would be appreciated, although I have to give improver credit: although he didn't get the article, he gave an extensive review and stuck with it. Thank you, UU! ...sorry about being funny. Here, have my brains.   Le Cejak <Apr 18, 2008 [2:24]>

edit Picture request?

Hey UU, remember when I found that picture for your article? Could you do me a favor and touch up this image I made? Make it look like an actual post 9/11 mindset color coded alert system, if you can. You got time to do it, or should I come back later? it's for UnNews:Something Wicked This Way Comes.   Le Cejak <Apr 18, 2008 [5:47]>

I'll have a go - does the text reflect the colo(u)r you'd like in each bit, or is the black part of the joke, and you just want it touching up to look more professional? With this and the review, I hope to get to sorting it in a matter of a few short hours - after my dinner. Food must come first, as I am Lee Marvin. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:33, Apr 18
The "blackness" of each section is part of the joke, and I trust you to find a way to include it. If you can think of a really funny/interesting 7th box to throw in there, that would be fine, too. Looking forward to your review! That was for the cute puppy, right? ...I just realized why you don't have more features: Your jokes are British! :D   Le Cejak <Apr 18, 2008 [16:03]>

Wow, you've done so much for me UU: U rock. I'm going to update the list...   Le Cejak <Apr 19, 2008 [13:17]>

Oh, okay, you guys already did it! ...damn that was fast. Anyway, thank you again, UU!   Le Cejak <Apr 19, 2008 [13:19]>

Is it possible to request another picture for Mordor Jalapeno? You did so good on that last one that I presumed...  Le Cejak <Apr 23, 2008 [0:54]>

Oh bugger, I've been so caught up in other stuff I totally didn't notice this request - if it still stands, let me know what you want and I'll give it my best shot tomorrow. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:41, Apr 23

edit I Nearly Killed Myself

Here, I want you to have this:

Damcatsittingonacar

Oh shit! Dude, I'm so sorry. Was that your car?   Le Cejak <Apr 24, 2008 [22:47]>

edit Pee Stuff

Hey UU, I happened to be on your talk page when I remembered noting that the Pee Review for User:VGDictator/secret/secret appears to have been moved to the "Reviewed" list, but it hasn't been reviewed. I originally said I'd take it on but quickly relised there was a lot of work to do and I didn't have time to do it there and then, so i jsut offered up what I would have put in the review for the "Prose and Formatting" section... Anyway that was a bit of a ramble, what I'm saying is that this game hasn't been reviewed but is in the reviewed list!! I really did make a meal of explaining that, oh well... - 03:39 26 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

I apologise it was entirely my fault, Heerenveen has corrected it! - 03:46 26 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!


hello, than you very much for your review, im not sure how to use chat on this site. Your comments were very helpful and i will look into making the changes you recommended. If you have any more comments, please let me know!!! ---gamestud The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gamestud (talk • contribs)

edit Dude you adopted

Thanks so much. :)

So I have one thing that's really nagging at me. I see pictures on articles like the one at the top of Biffy Clyro, and I would really like to know how to use/create/access those. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Darthmat (talk • contribs)

Pics eh? Good: we start with something I know a little about! First off though, what are you referring to on the Biffy Clyro page? The Scottish template at the very top, or the pic of the personable young lady just below it? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:11, Apr 28

Scottish thingy at the top. I know how to use an image and put a caption like the girl. (I have one of those on my user page.) -(Darthmat) 15:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC) (Also, as you can see, my sig. reeks of phailure. Any tips?)

Did I phail? (Edit at the top of the page.) Ignorance Also, on the top of this page, the image keeps on changing. How do I do that? -(Darthmat) 15:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Darthmat/signature - How did I do? -(Darthmat) 16:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

"ow you need to pop it in a page by itself, then go to your preferences page, and in the "nickname" box add User:Darthmat/sigpagename. Tick the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box, and you're done! Use the 4-tildes or signature button (Image:Button sig.png) to use your saved signature." I didn't do all that. I just copied and pasted the code, and this is what I got. (Exactly what I wanted.) -- Darthmat RIP (talk to me) 20:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Uh huh - but you'll find it quickly becomes really tiresome copying and pasting the code every time! Still, it's up to you man, it's just a suggestion... Nighty night, anyway! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:57, Apr 28

I just realized, the time stamp is really ugly. Advice?

Oh 'eck - well, here's the code I use for mine: <small><font color="navy"><i>{{subst:CURRENTTIME}}, {{subst:CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{subst:CURRENTDAY}}</i></font></small> - play around with the substituted bits in that and you should be OK. If you do go down the preferences route for your sig (which I heartily recommend), then you simply add the code after the {{User:Darthmat/sigpagename}} bit, and it should work fine (although then you have to remember to sign with three tildes instead of the usual 4). G'night! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:02, Apr 28

Thanks! Will play around with it.-- Darthmat RIP (talk to me) 21:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

So now we have this issue. This issue is as follows. Darthmat asked me to adopt him. I agreed. Darthmat announce to you that you adopted him. You agreed. So, should I ban him, you, both of you, or simply ask you out for a dual? Or a date? Whatdaya think UU? ~Jewriken.GIF 20:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh blimey - I didn't know about any of that. Er, how about you ban the date, and we forget the whole thing. I'd be tempted to recommend if there's any confusion that he go with his original request as you're a far better parent than me, and I haven't really got a clue what I'm doing! But if you're, y'know, busy being an admin and all, I'll do my best to help him instead. Seems a decent sort, and all that. And now if you excuse me, I've said g'night twice already on this page, and I am going to log out. In a minute. Honest! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:11, Apr 28
Just kidding, you're actually a better option than me, I'm out of time at the moment. Darthmat, I will be seeing you around eh? nudge nudge wink wink ~Jewriken.GIF 21:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Darthmat/signature Finished. (And with some help from Jacques Pirat) - Darthmat RIP (talk to me) 21:49, Apr 28

edit Dude, you adopted?

I'm still under the thumb of my adopter.   Le Cejak <Apr 28, 2008 [21:26]>

I was never under the thumb of my adopter :P --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 12:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Your adopter was a free spirit: a spirit who was free and unhindered and yadda yadda! You can't expect him to be responsible!   Le Cejak <Apr 29, 2008 [13:14]>
<old fart> In my time we didn't even have adopters </old fart> ~Jewriken.GIF 13:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Did you have audios for unnews? :D   Le Cejak <Apr 29, 2008 [13:25]>
<reckless fool>In my time we had adopters. Good ones. I just decided not to bother with one.</reckless fool> And look at how I turned out - a shining advertisement for why we need good adopters! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:27, Apr 29

edit Pee?

If you have the time I would love you to review User:DJ Irreverent/Pre-Market Economy, right now it is in the finished writing down everything I can think of, needs cleaning up stage. I will go over it later to and give it more of a serious economic tone, cutting down and better intro. A lot of the humor is subtle and metaphorical and I am /trying/ to compare the market with children playing. Maybe I'm trying too much at once? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 15:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Yep, I would agree. That's a good way to put it.   Le Cejak <Apr 28, 2008 [15:59]>
I'll try to have a look later - I'm off home now! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:09, Apr 28
Sorry DJ, not right now - I've been tinkering with Uncyc while doing other stuff tonight (real life important stuff, unfortunately), and I'm not going to have the time to give your article the attention it deserves until at least Wednesday now. I'll see what I can do then though - and I will add it to my memory to show I'm serious! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:47, Apr 28
Yeah thats good actually. I'm still fine tuning it to awesomeness so that is perfect for reviewing. Please understand that I have put tonnnnes of effort into this and kinda underestimated the difficulty of it with such an arcane topic. Oh congrats on UotM :) --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 12:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

It is ready save making the story sound more like a typical kids book at the end --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Rightyho, there you go, one review. I took a lot of time over that, as I wanted to make sure I respected the effort that's gone into its creation. I don't think you have much more to do, although the prose tweaks are needed, and you might want to consider the future of the big business section (I find it incredibly hard to cut anything from my own stuff, and that bit is quite funny, so I'll understand you leaving it in though). All told, a very good job indeed. As to your UotM comment above - there is still time left for that to change, although I'll concede it's unlikely. And while I'm obviously flattered by the votes and comments and the like, I'm slightly gutted not to be setting a brand new "4 noms without a win" UotM record, and also gutted not to see it going to Heerenveen, who I think really deserves it. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:19, Apr 30

Nom it if you like. I feel it is about 96% right, I just want to change the end of the story a bit but inspiration isn't coming even after reading it again. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 16:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

edit thx

FurbyOnFire FOOM

Thanks for voting for Why?:Burn a Furby? on VFH.

Now get out there and incinerate some of those suckers!

 Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  formspring) 19:13 Apr 28, 2008

Oh yeah - I meant to do one of those for RPMTT - better get to it. Once this Furby is completely torched - there's still some hair left! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:20, Apr 28

edit Do you know...

That that picture you use is one of a Merkava tank? The whole story behind that is quite famous in my parts of the world...:) ~Jewriken.GIF 19:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, one tank looks much like another to me... But you're not getting one on your page, you not-voting-for-it swine! (The fact that I think you were away when it ripped through VFH pleasingly quickly is neither here nor there!) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:18, Apr 28
DAMN YOU ! I DEMAND A PICTURE OF TANK WITH SOME WORDS ON MY PAGE! ~Jewriken.GIF 20:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

edit Thanks

1925945 Well, well, well. I never would have guessed that Under user was stupid enough to vote for this tripe! Goes to show you never can tell.
Thanks for voting!

And an extra big helping of thank you for making that picture for me. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN23:58, 29 Apr

edit UotM

Haha! NERD!   Le Cejak <May 01, 2008 [13:18]>

Your point being? That's practically my job description. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:25, May 1
Ha... haha... yer a... a nerd... Dammit! Beating up nerds is no fun when they don't fight back.   Le Cejak <May 01, 2008 [13:27]>
Shitbags man, you'll have to do better than that - I have a t-shirt that declared my nerdness to the world! Besides, isn't it, like, a requirement of contributing to Uncyc that you're a nerd? Besides besides, you created the list... doesn't that make you a geek? Besides besides besides, one of the biggest spiders I've seen in a while (remember: I live in the UK, where big, dangerous spiders can only be found in pet shops) ran across the office and freaked all the girls out, what was I saying? Oh yes, three Southern Comfort and Cokes please barman. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:41, May 1
I deny ever creating the list and you can't prove anything and you're a nerd and a geek shut up! Anyway here's a list:
  1. There is no alcohol in England. You people are too uptight for that.
  2. There are no spiders in England, for the same reason.
  3. "Barmen" don't exist, unless it's a new group of superheros I've never heard of. They're called "Bar Tenders".
  4. There is no England. Well, at least no England with a Cajek in it.
  Le Cejak <May 01, 2008 [14:36]>
  1. We're only uptight when we can't get alcohol, like when we go to California age 20, for example (sassenrassenfrassen stoopid drinking age laws)
  2. You try telling my girlfriend that - she's convinced anything vaguely arachnid with a body larger than a bit of pocket lint is a tarantula
  3. I thought it was us who was supposed to use extra letters where they're not needed? Bar tender? Sounds like a gardener to me
  4. There'll always be an England, Cajek or... __NOCAJEK__ --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:35, May 1

Dude! I was going through old featured articles and didn't expect to see this page. If that had been written nowadays, it might've even gone to VFD.   Le Cejak <May 01, 2008 [14:46]>

Dude that was when the place was like 4 days old or something and there were like 1.5 people here, one of them STM /me runs off and crys. Nostradamus is just as bad. PS. I just looked at the Featured version, HOLY CRAP was that bad and name droppy. It would be VFD nowadays as you said. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Oh jeez, you're right! I didn't know that Mr. Wilde was already an overused meme @ 4 days old! Jeez. These old features should be reexamined. (SIDE NOTE: I just rated Under User's talkpage as "poor")   Le Cejak <May 01, 2008 [15:04]>
SIDE NOTE: lend it some money then. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:35, May 1

edit Thankies


Congrats on UotM, too - I might be seeing you on 4 noms soon enough! Thanks yet again. –—Hv (talk) 1/05 16:00

edit Nomination

Peeing dog Thank you, Under user, for voting Orian57 your Reviewer of the Month. However the egotistical beast that you have now unleashed is not grateful and meagrely expected the vote but would like to give you a condescending pat on the head.
Good girl/boy
Thanks for voting!

Although you nominated and didn't vote, the point still stands. Thanks I apreciate it. Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog|Icons-flag-gbOrian57Orian57 17:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

edit nomnomnomnomnom

You have been selected by the Grand Master General Lord Dame Knight Sir Me as a potential criminal for the crime of being awesomely awesome. You have 3 days to take out the washing OR ELSE (I like it in paper, preferably unmarked) :> --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 10:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and nommed Pre-Market Economy. I love it, and expect to see it storm the voting shortly! Now, what's this? WotM? No chance! Thanks for the nom - very flattering and all, but there's just no way I've written anywhere near enough - I spend too much time on pee and RC! I think that, given a little time and a few more articles, you'll have a very good shot at it one day - better than me anyway. Still, I'll enjoy having the voteWotM template on my userpage for a month. I just hope it doesn't feel like it's slumming it! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:00, May 2
I'd say you have a good shot next month :) 6 features is nothing to sneeze at. Me? WotM? ahh give it time, I'm just nigh on 3 months here writing seriously --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 12:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

edit NotM - Thanks

SHIZZLE DIZZLE!

Under user, you there? Come out where I can see you, I come bearing gifts! There you are! You are a VERY clever person. Why? Because you voted for me and helped me become NotM! Well done. Give yourself a pat on the back.

To reward you, I'm giving you a YTTE goodie-bag. It is a collection of YTTE memorabilia I've just pulled out of my pocket...That's one scrumpled piece of paper, a dead slug, three unidentified hairs, a strain of the bird flu virus, a morally ambiguous Olympic torch, two cows and various assorted, unexpected items. Enjoy!

YTTE would also remind you that he's still got a few miracle toothbrushes left. Toothbrushes have so many uses, and these miracles ones are great! Buy one now for a massively reduced price and enjoy their increased ease-of-use feel. 98% of the people studied said their teeth were saved by these total protection tooth brushes! Get your hands on one now!

P.S. Sorry that was so long and rambling, sorry there's no picture. You'll just have to imagine that this is a short, concise, beautiful thank you template. Also I'm hoping I'm not breaking any unspoken rule or etiquette of Uncyclopedia by giving you this thank you template!

from YTTE.

Thank you!! - 16:11 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Awesome - that has to be the single largest template I've every had on this page - good work YTTE! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:09, May 2

edit New Pic Request?

Instead of using the old header, I'll start a new one. Could you modify Image:Mordor2.jpg to include a small, white picket fence in the foreground? Just big enough to see would be nice. Maybe some flowers. And a shrubbery. Does that sound doable, or are you too busy or something? Anyway, thank you UU!   Le Cejak <May 02, 2008 [16:34]>

I don't see why not - tomorrow OK with you? I'm out tonight at my football soccer team's end-of-season awards drinkathon... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 17:29, May 2
Yeah, do what you gotta do. Thanks, dude!   Le Cejak <May 02, 2008 [21:13]>

Uncyclopedia:VFP/Image:Mordor fence.jpg. Plus, take a look at its article and see if that picture adds anything! I believe it does.   Le Cejak <May 02, 2008 [23:32]>

Aw thanks, man, glad you like it. However, I had to vote against - while it does work in the article (and on another read, I'm thinking I was in a bad mood when I only gave that a weak for on VFH), it doesn't really work by itself. I would like to get a featured pic one day, but that one is not going to be it! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 07:31, May 3

edit Sorwwy!

Sorwwy about jumping over that there gun, I thought there was some restriction about that...I'll just go repent to the Gods of Pee. - 14:42 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Ah, I wouldn't sweat it - as a misdemeanor it's not exactly up there with page blanking! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:47, May 3
Oh that's slightly disappointing that's good to know. - 15:45 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

edit Really really really really really really late thanks

I felt like making one after all those months --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 12:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

edit How do I work this crazy thing?!

Well, I went on a walk over to User:Cajek/Pee to try to update the list of recent reviews... and I have no clue how the hell I am supposed to do anything! Would you kindly enlighten me on the ancient art of updating the Review page? Warm Regards, Javascap

Well, to quote Cajek on SysRq's talk page: "tonight's story is about the maintenance box and the score averages. You have to only cross out (<s>) the pee review name and the author, not your own thoughts on it. Then you must find their names down in the other sections and update them. That includes, for EACH USER WHO DID A REVIEW, their total # of reviews, # of in-depth reviews, the {{%|X|Y}} thing, their scores, the last review that person did on which date, the average # of reviews down below, the average # of in-depth reviews, the average scores and the last review checked overall. It's actually pretty easy once you see it. Jeez, when I write it all out like that it sounds insane". I think that mentions most of it, but I'd suggest the best plan is to look through the history at the last few edits and see what gets done. As Cajek says, a few edits and it starts to make sense. (Then Cajek adds another section or bit to confuse you all over again!) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:35, May 6

edit Thanks for voting

Thanks for voting for that article about the sun, or something. Yeah, so I was too lazy to make a template. That doesn't make this message any less generic though. -RAHB 08:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

edit Ugh

On that depression news thingy article on VFH I am absolutely positive I am missing something because I just didn't laugh once despite reading it twice. What was the gag behind it? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 09:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah, as always, it's a subjective thing, nothing more. There's more than one feature I failed to see any funny in (Hodgepodge springs instantly to mind). For me, it's a no-talent hack with a massively inflated sense of his own writing ability, and of the importance of his utterly insignificant newspaper column, who is (only partly of his own accord) spiralling into psychosis and mania in the misguided belief that it will render him a genius. Plus the casual misanthropy and increasing paranoia and so forth help. I find it absurd, and I love it. But there you go man, that's the way things work - just occasionally, something misses your funny bone and hits someone else's. C'est la vie! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:44, May 6

edit Thanks

Lemonadestand
Thank you for voting

You have been awarded majority shareholding in DJ's Worms and Drinkies by way of thanks for voting Pre-Market Economy onto the main page. Just hold on tight, those kids bite...
Lemonadestand

--Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 10:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

edit UnSignpost: May 8th, 2008

User:Fnoodle/UnSignpost/05-08-08 ~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

edit Gah

Watching you update the list on RC reminds me I haven't done a review in like fifteen days – I think the RotM curse sort of happened! Combine that with writer's block (not that I'm a decent writer anyway ;)), and Uncyc gets a whole lot plainer for some reason. Like digestive biscuits. And now, because of my obsession with the preview button, I've completely forgotten why I came here in the first place. Damn button. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 9/05 20:57

It hits you man, it seems to take us all! Look at SysRq - not half the peeing force he used to be recently. OEJ's only just returning... I have to admit, I haven't done a review in over a week, which is so unlike me I'm tempted to declare myself an impostor and try to remove my own mask in slightly surreal Scooby Doo fashion. Oh, and you are just way too modest, while we're here - you totally deserved RotM, you totally deserve UotM (you deserved it last month - when I'm keeping half an eye on RC while at work, I only bother until I see you pop up and QVFD something, after which I know there's not really much point! ;-)) And you're a good writer, and getting better. Features will head your way my friend, I'm sure of that. And now, if you'll excuse me, I have an incredibly strong urge for a Rich Tea biscuit to dunk in my cup o' char, so I must away to the kitchen. G'night! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:08, May 9
Gahh, you're right. I haven't been reviewing much. I've been too busy trying to get me one more feature soz I can make it into the Hall. But alas. I must refocus. I must reinvent myself. I must quit my job soz I have more time to devote to Uncyc. No, I probably won't do that. But I'll still review more, dammit! And HV, you're awesome. You're twice the reviewer I am, and three times the writer. People tend to drift in and out of Uncyc for various reasons. I've noticed that this is a very low time of the year, because some people have exams and whatnot. Don't feel bad, if anything, you've been working more than any of us and the rest of us have been slacking. And with that, I'm gonna throw this pizza in the oven, go get my Vitamin Water that I left in the car, and get to reviewing. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 21:22 May 9
I'm a bit late with this (exams, not that you'd know it) but, anyway. I'll address both of your points here.
UU: RotM, yeah it is true, and it's very slightly annoying, especially when you put something on the queue, it makes you feel guilty a bit. I don't feel overly modest really, I just feel that Lj/Led/Manti deserve UotM more than I do. They've done a lot more for this place than I have (put it this way - I left for half a year and this place didn't miss a beat. Imagine if that was Lj?), and that's what I think UotM's core foundation is - rewarding those who've put in lots of hard work for the place. Besides, all I do here is watch RC a bit really. Don't get me wrong, I'm not declining the nom or anything (if I was going to do that, I'd have the class to do it on the first before everyone had voted), but I just feel that they've been far more instrumental to Uncyc's success (yes, despite the doom mongering, I feel this place is actually getting better quality and noob-wise, look at a guy like Hyperbole for instance) than me. And that biscuit made me hungry, but we only have hob-nobs. Damn.
SysRq: Coming from someone who's nommed for WotM, that's a bit of lofty praise, don't you think? It is quite a low time, especially compared to now last year, which I think is a bit down to this new "experienced user" structure, but it'll shake itself eventually. Personally, I feel I actually worked better last year, when no-one knew me, sort of in a MadMax-before-he-got-famous kind of way, but no chance of that now obviously. And don't review too much, I want to still be able to catch you ;).
Anyways, I'm out. RE mock exam and stuff tomorrow, so I'll probably not be active. Yawn. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 11/05 21:48

edit Collab w/ Cajek?

I just put two new ideas on my idea board: The Old Country and Spear 2.0. Do those look interesting at all, or should I come back later?   Le Cejak <May 10, 2008 [2:46]>

Maybe take a look at the other crap I've got there, too, just in case one of them tickles your idea box.   Le Cejak <May 10, 2008 [2:55]>
Hmm, I like the sound of The Old Country, although that may be because I've just re-watched No Country For Old Men. A collab sounds like fun - I've not tried one of those before. I guess when I get time spare from these wedding invites I have to put together this weekend, I might have a good old think about it. Good luck with the essays 'n' shit! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:18, May 10
My input would say write The Old Country describing modern society like the good old days or something - break the cliche maaaaaaaaaaann --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 09:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

edit UnSignpost Sunday Edition: May 11th, 2008

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 04:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

edit Ping

Your crappy microwave dinner is ready! - Very nice article that, I should have given it more credit for how well rounded it was (thats why I don't often do Pees) --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 13:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, very handy. I'll have another look soon and administer tweakage as necessary. One thing though: an unwritten but generally adhered to rule of thumb for article spellings is that if they start in British or US English, they should stick to the same one throughout. So none of this "civilization" rubbish, there's a good chap! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:42, May 12
Blame windows. As an Aussie we just pick and choose, like our humorouror --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Heh, I blame Windoze for everything I can... Ah, good old Oz: in just a few months, I'll be in ur country, swimmin ur reef - the thought's getting me through so many hours of tedium at work at the moment! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:12, May 12
The UK suxxorz. Sincerely, Cajek. 14:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
It took over 30 minutes to get that from you? Mr Jek, you disappoint me. And those that disappoint me rarely get a chance to do so a second time. Have fun disposing of the ruthless Morris Dancing hit squad I have dispatched, Mr Jek. /me strokes cat reflectively. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:22, May 12
The US and UK both suck equally. Happy? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:23, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
No way! We so suck more than they do! It's one of the few things we're still a world force at! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:28, May 12
Don't worry, Under user, you're the biopic of the week in the next unsignpost. THEN we'll see who's laughing! /me strokes giraffe reflectively   Le Cejak <May 12, 2008 [14:31]>
That's if my crack team of Gloucestershire Cheese-Rolling Ninjas don't get to you first, Meester Jek. /me strokes reflective mongoose. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:49, May 12
That's only if my crack team of tractor pull specialists don't get to you first, Meester Under. /me squeezes stress rat reflectively   Le Cejak <May 12, 2008 [14:58]>
If I were you, I'd be far more worried about my trained stealth Bog Snorkelling heavies, Meester Jek. (Seriously, watch that video). Your feeble American quirks are no match for our full blown British Eccentricities! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:14, May 12
/me drops stress rat What in the... no wonder we won the American Revolution! And here I was thinking English accents made people look sophisticated.   Le Cejak <May 12, 2008 [15:22]>

edit Long-delayed thankings

Guyonfire Err...
Hey, sorry I'm, uhh, a little bit late on the thanks for this thing... I've been really, really, busy. Anyways, thanks for voting, and, with any luck, those delusional fools will let me out of this hell-hole soon.
I'm going to burn you all!

Hey, absence makes the heart grow fonder, amirite? - Don Leddy the Crunch Fedora (Nyah, see, nyah!) 23:54, May 12

edit Charles Sumner VFH=

Yeah, I know you're trying to be helpful. Please don't construe my comment as mean-spirited. I haven't submitted anything to Pee Review for years since a couple articles I submitted when I was a n00b were completely ignored there.

I'll bite the bullet on this one and give the ol' Pee Review another chance. I'll submit Charlie Sumner for review and see if anybody "gets it" there.

I'm very skeptical, though. Feedback is only helpful in comedy if the reviewer "gets" why it's funny. YouFang 18:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This is true, very true. Funny is such a subjective thing. On the other hand, sometimes, if enough people don't "get" why an article is funny, maybe it's an indicator that it's not as funny as you thought - it's happened to me often enough! I think you'll find it gets picked up quite quickly on review this time - there are a few really good reviewers out there at the moment, and the queue is moving quite well. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:02, May 14

edit UnSignpost: May 15th, 2008

User:Fnoodle/UnSignpost/05-15-08 ~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 01:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

edit Re.:Pee Review: UnNews: US Govt. encourages Perverts!

Something on here will not allow me to upload any pixes to that article at all. Can you handle this matter? 65.163.112.181 04:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

To upload images, you need an account. Get a username - it can't be much worse than mine! Alternatively, if you put in a request at UN:PIC, some kind soul may create and upload one for you (I'm a tad busy at present, see my below chat with Cajek). Or you could find an image you like on another article and use that one. There are ways around it, or you can join up - what's the worst that can happen? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 17:24, May 15
The bit about Hillary Clinton in the article is in reference to the sudden occurrence of teachers in both high school and junior high school actually having SEX with students, and THAT is STILL GOING ON right now. This has been in the news for several years, and reported on various news outlets. Where the hell were teachers like that when I was in school? 65.163.112.181 00:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

edit the LIST

Man, UU, thank you for keeping up the list! I would give you a template, but I don't know what to give you. Oh I know!


There you go!   Le Cejak <May 15, 2008 [13:59]>

Oh wow! I mean, most people give me nothing every day, but hardly anyone every does it pr-actively like that! Anywhat, I find the list useful, so I happily take a look at it most days as part of my routine "requires less thought than writing so I can fit it in between bits of actual work" maintenance stuff. The way work is going, I may actually have some time free to look at that collab you suggested some time in 2011. Maybe a wednesday? We'll see what my "creative" approach to deadlines opens up... Also, some advice: never get married. I have an evening of sorting out invitations to relatives I really don't want to come to my wedding to look forward to tonight. Maybe that's why I'm still at work late. Whoever, I'd better finish up and stuff, good evening! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 17:20, May 15


edit FUCK YEAH!

Genericband FUCK YEAH!

Congratulations for voting for Washed Up 70's Rock Band! We know all of our fans out there appreciate us, and wish for us to continue making music! Also, each and everyone of you will be receiving a free copy* of our new album, Last Chance to Make Money Before We Die!

*Not actually free. Or an album. You'll be lucky if you even get half a song.

Thanks for the vote - UnIdiot | GUN | Talk | Contribs - 19:01, May 15

Views
Personal tools
Navigation
Community
Participate
Toolbox
projects