User talk:Under user/Archive 12

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Purity must be despoiled

Urinates on U.U's talk page. again I might add. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 12:08 12 September 2008

edit what?

australia? october? kangaroos? nuts!

watch out for drop bears, UU. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I second that notion. Be careful of boomerangs too. And watch out for serial killers if you visit the outback. And spiders! Those highly poisonous ones. And -- oh god -- the scorpions! Have a great time U.U.! SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 13:22 12 September 2008
Did you steal a lady's handkerchief and get shipped out here? Be warned there is this thing called the /sun/ down here, we got it in exchange for our water supply some time back. Also, statistically, Australia is safer in terms of the murder rate than the UK anyway (blame the damn chavs and their knives) and all the venomous animals have anti-venoms... except Germaine Greer. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 13:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Yeah but you've got more serial killers that rape and torture using venomous animals. And not all chavs are bad. Just misled by the other chavs. I blame the parents. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 13:35 12 September 2008
Don't be so cruel to your parents! It is not their fault you can't spell... sign here to accept my owning of you ___SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM___ --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 13:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Ouch: SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 13:45 12 September 2008
Sign it... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 13:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Like that? SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 13:52 12 September 2008
Close enough weren't I? SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 13:58 12 September 2008
Hey! Now I own you! I'll get you to do something really out there... uh... um... have a regular straight marriage with an average looking woman. Suck on that (actually you can't now :P) --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Nooooooooooooooooooo! Yuck, I tried the straight thing for a few hours last week. It's pants. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 14:14 12 September 2008
What's it like on your side of the fence */me hops over* hey it's not so bad, my eyes are probably permanently damaged, but nothing alcoholism won't fix... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Damaged eyes? You're meant to close them before he cums on your face. It does really sting but just make sure to wash it all out. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 14:21 12 September 2008
o_O That would've been helpful advice if I hadn't jumped back over the fence the moment I heard musical theater playing. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Musical theatre hurts your eyes? SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 14:34 12 September 2008
Where do you think 99% of the world's sequins go then? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Drag Queens. Duh, you seen those girls! They're shiny! SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 14:37 12 September 2008

I Look forward to your mods to User:Under user/Fish Puns‎ when you return. Have fun. :-) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:09, Sep 14

edit Thanks

Blue ranger Blue Power Ranger thanks you for voting!

So you liked my tale of displeasure, huh? That's nice. Hey, maybe I could write a book about it! Before long I'll be outselling Pelzer!

Your vote did too make a difference! Of one. And that one made the total score 21 which has a far better ring to it than 20. Also what was it you liked about it? I'm asking cos I want to see if I can ever get the same effect again. And I was at a wedding today. It was fun. I want one. Enjoy your honeymoon too! And as the above, watch out for killers! SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 02:54 13 September 2008

edit UnSignpost: September 11th, 2008

MantiBot Icons-flag-au.png Owner 11:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

edit UU in my country? It's More Likely Then You Think!

You... In Oz?

Well, I suppose it's time someone cleaned the Sewers. Make sure you get a taste of proper beer, and get to a proper beach. All's well that ends at a beach or pub. Enjoy your stay in the Land Down Under. Don't get yourself lost, and follow Rule 2.

I got to Whitehaven Beach - can't much properer than that, right? As to "proper" beer - I wouldn't know one if it was poured all over me. I'm a whisky man. I did stumble my way to the top of the Harbour Bridge, and generally had a great time. The bad news is: I'm planning on coming back one day! --UU - natter UU Manhole 14:57, Oct 6

edit So, is it done?

Are you lost to millions of hopeful females? ~Jewriken.GIF 12:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Heh, if you want to put it that way... --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:14, Oct 5

edit I saw that...

Thank God you're back — Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Hea! Hope the trip was great, and married life has started well... Oh... All hell has broken loose. Pop into IRC if you fancy. I'm in there now. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:37, Oct 3

you're back! sick. i've been checking the pee, so cajek/pee doesn't reek too bad. although i haven't checked my own in, so it still has that slightly earthy aroma that we've all grown fond of. now break out that UU tea mug and get back to work, you now-monogamous sewer-dweller! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Yay!!! Your back! I'd like to second MrN's sentiments of hoping married life is going well (man that was an crap sentence). SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 19:08 3 October 2008

I dunno, you make one edit before bed, and everyone thinks you're back... I'm easing my way back in folks, but it's good to see you all around. Also good to come home to some good old-fashioned non-stop British drizzle. All that sun was starting to bore the hell out of me! --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:14, Oct 5

edit UnSignpost: October 3rd, 2008

-- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 23:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

edit Top of the mornin to ya UU

It's been a while. How you your ring finger? ~Jewriken.GIF 09:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Morning Mr Dillo, how's Mrs Dillo? I'm easing my way back here, as I have a stack of emails and work to catch up with, but I can't let the important stuff (ie Uncyc) fester... The ring finger is fine - it's the ones either side of it that feel odd. How's you? Got used to referring to Mrs Dillo as "the wife" yet? --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:33, Oct 6
Fish Puns! Fish Puns! Fish Puns! Fish Puns! Fish Puns! ... Sincerely... MrN9000 :-)
Not really, I'm more into Yes Ma`am, no ma`am" at the moment :). Now starting to plan the honeymoon. Did you actually go down under? ~Jewriken.GIF 09:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
The evidence is on Facebook for your perusal if you're that bored. Yes, we went, and it was everything I had hoped for. A magical 3 weeks. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:50, Oct 6
Say UU, how busy are you at the moment, I'd like your opinion about an article I'm playing with? ~Jewriken.GIF 14:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Right at this very moment, I have time for tinkering but no more. However, Mrs UU will be watching America's Next Top Model this evening, so I'll have at least an hour spare to devote to taking a really good squint. In other words, happy to take a look in a few hours, if that's OK? --UU - natter UU Manhole 14:49, Oct 6
Sure is. This one. I wrote everything until 3. I'm currently wondering if I should write these parts as well (which are currently sporked from the original one in Wikipedia) or just end it at this point. ~Jewriken.GIF 14:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I see some people got married. Hope you enjoyed your life of freedom, suckers. I mean hi, UU! Haven't seen you in a while!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 15:14 Oct 06, 2008
Afternoon Skullthumper, good to see you about. And freedom's overrated anyway. --UU - natter UU Manhole 15:19, Oct 6

edit Official Urination Request

I've placed the revised Rashomon version in the Pee queue. If you have the time, I got the money! ~Jewriken.GIF 13:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

P.S., I'm in London next week in case you're in the area. ~Jewriken.GIF 13:04, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Well, I've got a bit of a rush on at work today, and then football training tonight, so if you can wait until tomorrow evening, I'll happily take a look then. As to Lahndan - I'm rarely in that area, to be honest. Would be good to have a pint with you one day, but next week will not be it! --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:33, Oct 8
`Tis a shame indeed! And regarding the pee, take yer time. Whenever you can. ~Jewriken.GIF 13:38, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

edit Thanks for the vote

Art-Nouveau-Metro-Chateau-dEau-Sign-Paris-France-Photographic-Print-C12897178 Thanks for the vote on
Now let's go strike again!

Thanks there:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

edit You're back, doing things!

Ah, my favorite "Under" themed user! Too bad I'm not doing as much as I used to around here, but rest assured: Uncyc is a firefox tab that's always open, no matter where else on the web I go. So, stop worrying! Stop it! Stop worrying!! There. Nice to see you again, UU   Le Cejak <13:11 Oct 09, 2008>

I let other people worry on my behalf. Seriously. It's a full-time job for several people, but it keeps my face worry-line-free for a very reasonable rate. I just hope they never join/form a Union... Also, I'm still not writing and reviewing as much as I'd like these days, as they seem to be expecting me to "work" at the moment. Damn them. So all I'm really doing is stuff I can fit in in between worky things. Hey ho, it's the way it goes. Nice as ever to see you around Meester Jek. Do you reckon you'll manage that coveted 100th ban before Christmas? --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:17, Oct 9
Those them are big ol' jerks! They are making me "work" too, damn bastards. As for getting banned, I have a "ban plan" that'll get me banned BIG time! It involves vandalism, sockpuppetry, cussing, name-calling, vanity, AND denial afterwards! They'll never catch me! ...oh wait: They'll never catch me!   Le Cejak <13:32 Oct 09, 2008>
I've been eavesdropping. I want to become part of this conversation. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 13:33 9 October 2008
So your ban plan is: impersonate NXWave? (The "classic" version - ignoring any disagreed-over more recent incarnations). ;-) (And if I ignore Orian, what effect do you think it will have on his fragile self-esteem?) --UU - natter UU Manhole 14:08, Oct 9
<crying in almost a physical pain> No body loves me :( Everybody hates me :( I think I'll go and shag men. :) </crying in almost a physical pain> SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 14:14 9 October 2008

edit Ah!

You've put some very good points in your scented urination, and I'll certainly change it accordingly. Best point is with the baby. Thing is, I know the film so well, I didn't notice that it wasn't placed in context for someone who doesn't know the film. Much obliged!

~Jewriken.GIF 15:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

And thankyou for another good read! --UU - natter UU Manhole 15:01, Oct 10

edit UnSignpost: October 10th 2008

Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

edit Thanks!

Here, have this:

GoldenShower Rejoice, Under user! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

For your wunnerful review of my terrible article! Extra thanks for the good writer comment. It made my day. Take that, Sycamore! Bye! Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:29, Oct 11

edit Rashōmon

Got a face lift. I think I managed to incorporate most of what you mentioned in your review. Mind take a look? Mainly - you think the formatting is reasonable? ~Jewriken.GIF 22:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I like it. Reads better, and I don't think the formatting is a problem at all. I like the "headache" one particularly. I'd say it's good to go. --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:00, Oct 13
Thank god for that, only took two years :O). Cheers as always! ~Jewriken.GIF 12:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

edit Pee

How can I get 100% on User:Cajek/Pee? — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

the equation (in-depth pees)/(total pees) must equal 0.995 or greater. seeing as you have 2 non-in-depth pees, you will achieve 100% the moment you complete your 398th in-depth pee. good luck! (don't fret, i need to do 2587 before i get to 100% :) ) SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
OMG cool! SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 18:40 13 October 2008
What Gerry said. Only possibly less mathy, as I studied linguistics. --UU - natter UU Manhole 20:09, Oct 13
i can do other statistics, too. i once calculated that sycamore averages one edit on uncyc every twenty-seven minutes. other pleas for attention include handstands and feigning seizures. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
You remind me of the missus, she has a BA in statistics for some reason. Scary stuff. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
FACT: assuming Mordillo's jew star is a wheel that has been spinning since his first edit, and assuming a pixel-to-centimeter conversion factor of 20:1, mordillo's jew star could have traveled to the moon and back three times. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
I dunno if that's true or not but it sounds true. Shear brilliance! SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 20:40 13 October 2008
Thanks there guys. Wow Gerry - my attention whoring can be statisticly measured /me Handstands:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 07:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

edit Grawp

Grawp cums in front of a computer. He tries to keep the cum off the computer keys. I'm not sure if he can cum with a human being. If he weren't such a prick it would be sad. Proxima Centauri 20:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Ummm, wow. That's poetic. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 20:28 14 October 2008
Amen to that. - [20:47 14 October] Sir FSt Don MafiaHatBlack.gif Yettie
Let's see if we can improve Grawp's cumming standing here. See Grawp. It links to Harry Potter. It’s late here. I my look for ways to improve it all tomorrow. Proxima Centauri 02:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Is that a reference to that quote on my userpage? I pity the poor thing, whatever it is, and I hope it reaches puberty soon. But mentioning it in links or articles on here will only encourage it. Don't feed the trolls! --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:23, Oct 15

edit You're a true American hero

Despite the fact that, given the chance, you'd probably blow us all to hell! ...anyway, thanks for archiving my talk page thing. If I had an award, it would be really awesome and you could show your friends and you would finally be respected!! But I don't. Thanks, UU!   Le Cejak <13:18 Oct 15, 2008>

I'm pretty sure you archived it, I just linked to it. Anyway, it'll take more than non-existent awards on an online comedy wiki to make my friends respect me. First, I'd have to make some friends. I saw a movie about that recently, Weird Science, I think it was. I'll be following their methods closely. Then I'll work on the respect... And as to blowing you all to hell, that'll have to wait until I've done my Great American Road Trip across the place. I plan to do that some time during my second mid-life crisis, so you've got, ooh, weeks at least. Probably. (You're welcome). --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:23, Oct 15

edit Urination

Thanks for the compliment on my pee review efforts...I don't seek out recognition, though. People put templates on my talk page -- in appreciation, I guess -- but it's just that once I get writing about an article a sort of motor-mouth thing gets going and I end up writing quite a lot. It's not an ego-trip; the review just kind of grows like a mushroom. Maggots and all. But it's very, very difficult to really affect someone's writing style, I think. It's too personal. It's like offering advice on the way they chew. Or on their style of kissing. I suspect that the best an advisor can hope for is that if the writer keeps working then a few years later one small bit of your advice will be marginally helpful. In the matter of personal creativity one can only really wish the writer good luck. ----OEJ 01:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

edit Dude!

Hey guy, could I be so bold to have you look over Jesus Christ, who brought that guitar? and provide me with some informal feedback or editorial help? Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Would love to. But possibly not soon enough - I have a very busy weekend piled up in front of me. I'm grabbing a quick ten minutes of laptop time while Mrs UU goes through her ablutions, and then all hell will break loose! (DIY, furniture shopping, in-laws over for dinner, utterly riveting weekend, need I say more?) So I'll get back to you when I have half an hour to call my own, if that's cool? That said, I did have a quick look through and utterly, utterly love the idea. One quick question: which is worse, the phrase "here's one you all know and love", or the phrase "I'd like to play something I've been writing myself"? Anyhow, must dash! --UU - natter UU Manhole 08:57, Oct 18
I'd like to awkwardly pop in and say that "I'd like to play something I've been writing myself" is considerably worse. Because then you feel bad when it's terrible and you're pretending not to grimace in pain. --Mr. Monkey Sockmonkey Pant-hoot here. 19:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

edit Consume this cookie!

Newcookie Modusoperandi has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

For your moderately fast reaction to a vandal. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

A cookie from Modus. That makes me happy. I'm moving slowly but surely through the list of people I'd like to get templates from. Well, I would be if I had such a list. And if I had such a list, you'd probably be on it Modus, so yeah, good things. --UU - natter UU Manhole 08:27, Oct 20
I try to avoid making lists. Too listy. This greatly simplifies shopping for groceries. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
I remember when I used to get attention from Modus. Now all I hear is I'm too busy with work. This is why I go to Florida: to forget. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:25, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
I got attention from modus once. That was a good day. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 13:48 20 October 2008
You two should count yourselves lucky. I get attention from me all the time. If I'm not quick enough with the mace, I'm all over myself. I'm an animal. Think I'm lying, do you? Well, just ask the other people in the checkout line at the grocery store. They'll back me up. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
XD you have something against masturbation? SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 18:20 20 October 2008
I didn't before. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Geeze are you that bad? SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 18:30 20 October 2008
Yes. Terrible. You'd think that, like a fine wine, I'd improve with time. Instead, I improve with time like raw chicken. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:25, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Left out on the bacteria laden warm counter in a Chinese restaurant kitchen where the employees don't wash their hands after using the bathroom?/ Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
You and your filthy mouth. Who's a dirty girl? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

edit You're being a HUGE ASS. JUST THIS HUUUUUGE ASS!!!


UU's Ass.

It's true! Anyway, I've gotten a new idea on how to do reviews. Observe how I review Proxima Centauri's article: Proxima Centauri and the aliens of Porrila/review.   Le Cejak <21:19 Oct 19, 2008>

Watching, ready to learn. --UU - natter UU Manhole 21:23, Oct 19
What the! /me spies MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 21:26, Oct 19

When I'm done, you guys could add comments too! It could be a collaboration/review!   Le Cejak <21:35 Oct 19, 2008>

Is <comment> a real HTML tag? <comment>I wonder...</comment>  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 21:36 Oct 19, 2008
Nope, apparently it isn't. To the sandbox!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 21:37 Oct 19, 2008
JESUS CHRIST! STOP BEING A HUGE ASS!!!!!!!!!!   Le Cejak <21:41 Oct 19, 2008>
My ass will do what it wants, and there's nothing you can do about it. And my huge ass is one of my best features... --UU - natter UU Manhole 21:44, Oct 19
<sings> I like big butts and I cannot lie... </sings> /leaves SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 21:46 19 October 2008

This is a fascinating idea. I'd like to extend this idea a bit by suggesting that a new CSS class be created called "comment" or whatever. It would be invisible to everyone except users with a certain addition to their CSS or JS, and one could click a "show/hide comments" button. This wouldn't just be a tool for reviewers but for anyone stopping by who wants to leave a comment. Therefore it would allow non-pee-reviewers to leave comments about what works and what doesn't (perhaps in different colors) and it allows pee reviewers to do a completely in-depth review!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 21:44 Oct 19, 2008

That would be the next step in revolutionizing reviews. So far, I really prefer just leaving comments on a seperate page, but if you can figure out how to add comments somehow... yeah...   Le Cejak <21:49 Oct 19, 2008>
It is a very interesting idea. I think it would only work for some articles - formatting-intensive ones, those with multiple pages, ones with multiple random lines (can't think who'd write ones like that) and so forth might not work so well. But for some articles it could work very well. Certainly a good addition to a pee-er's armoury though. Mind, it'd be a bitch to check, but that's not important! --UU - natter UU Manhole 21:51, Oct 19
Maybe I should be more specific.
Normal viewers: Would see nothing.
Users with a special line of JS in their JS: Would see a show/hide button in the upper left of a page, they would not see the comments or anything.
After clicking show/hide: They would see the comments. Cajek, I don't see why you couldn't still do it on a separate page - if you prefer that then sure, but this will also save you a bit of a headache with your template. But if we implement this, anyone from in-depth reviewers to casual readers could add comments really simply, and no one would see them unless they pressed a specific button, thus not breaking formatting or anything.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 21:55 Oct 19, 2008
I know where you're coming from Skull, and I like that idea. May work well in conjunction with a "normal" review as well. Gives us an extra option for trying to help people, which is always a good thing. Until someone finds a way to abuse it... --UU - natter UU Manhole 21:58, Oct 19
Whoa, that would be awesome... Could it be idiot proof, like that awesome VFH autovote template?   Le Cejak <21:59 Oct 19, 2008>
I guess part of the issue here is why we do reviews... It's probably easier to just change the text to how you think it should be and leave a comment to the effect of why. I guess with this it's kinda more a way to teach people... Obviously whatever is done it would need to be quick to do. A button like the <nowiki></nowiki> button would be handy... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 22:00, Oct 19
There is probably something to be said for doing this type of thing in the actual article rather than a copy... I think it makes sense and is quicker to actually change small things in the actual article... Spellings, typos and the like. Rather than tying "delete this word" - just do it... You could also add new text in. I think this commenting style is useful for giving general comments or a wider scale... Such as a suggestion for something new, or how a whole section could be re-worked... If there are two copies kicking around, people might get confused as to what was what... What happens if the author does not come back for a week and the original gets edited? You can't compare diffs between different pages very easily... But... If there was only 1 copy, people who don't have the .js might not understand what is going in if they edit and see the code. In conclusion... Um... Hell knows! MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 23:02, Oct 19
I considered the possibility of people messing up, but then again, that's a chance you take no matter what you're doing, where or when, on a wiki. If someone messes up... revert. And yes Cajek, there's got to be a way to make this idiot-proof.
I think it really makes a good use of the wiki system, which, as a site, we mainly don't. Other than the occasional collaborations it's mainly one user editing one page, but with this, we really could make use of being able to edit everything... by leaving comments!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 23:19 Oct 19, 2008 =Skullthumper suxz donkeys dingles.
Hmm, who left that coloured message above? Maybe it needs a sig in there, or some kind of way of saying who left the comment... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 23:26, Oct 19

edit UnSignpost: 21 October 2008

--Sycamore (Talk) 09:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

edit VFH thanks

Costume-grim-reaper-clipart ***You Are Dead***

Necropaxx's soul-felt thanks go with you for the For vote on Grim Reaper.

Remember, Grim's just a normal guy with the greatest job in the world.

Thanks for a much-welcomed vote on Grim Reaper. Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:14, Oct 21

Wow, is that a proper, old-fashioned VFH thankies template? Why, I haven't seen one of those in months! Could it be to do with the weather, do you think? --UU - natter UU Manhole 15:16, Oct 21
Scuse me, five weeks. I gave you one for my power rangers article. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 18:02 21 October 2008
Yeah, well, I was sort of a little busy then, what with the wedding and all. I'm still grateful for it, honest... --UU - natter UU Manhole 18:05, Oct 21
You forgot about it! D: How could you!? What, was it not colourful enough!? SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 18:07 21 October 2008

edit Radiohead revert

I see you recently reverted a bizarre edit on the Radiohead page. Your comment was "What? Why?" or something like that. I think what happened is somebody ran the whole article through some sort of translator that was supposed to render everything into leet. Some symbols and concepts didn't translate very well, hence all the "undefined"s.

Yes, folks. It's a new way for anonymous users to vandalize pages. Rejoice! YouFang 18:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I got that much, the "What? Why?" was at 1. the fact it hadn't worked too well, and 2. the idea that someone would waste their time doing that in the first place. It's a whole new way to prove you have no life and no girlfriend. Woo! --UU - natter UU Manhole 18:14, Oct 21
I don't have a girlfriend (technically neither do you as it happens) that doesn't make me want to vandalise. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 18:17 21 October 2008

edit IRC

Now.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 15:33 Oct 23, 2008

edit Manly Thankyous

Thank you for the Noob of the Month nom. I even blurted this out whilst chewing on meat during dinner with my family. Thank you for giving me the status of Fresh Stain (blurted this one out whilst on the toilet). Thank you for your encouragement and advice towards PEE reviews (I blurted this out during English. Teacher responded with "what."). And thank you for your review on Golf War (blurting this one out now). The comments were very helpful and I intend to implement your suggestions, but for the next 8 days I'm in China, so I'll do all that when I get back. Anyway, the things you mentioned were good points; when I was writing the article I was unsure of whether it would be entirely golf related, or a mixture of the two and getting away with talking about the actual combat procedures. There were a few typos, I should do better to notice them next time (then again, my school essays are usually highly populated with misspellings). I also saw what you meant by the "Golf War II" thing. Frankly, I was torn between which conflict to parody, since the current fun and games is more commonly known as the Iraq War and etc. However, the Bush Sr, war occurred in the very early 90's, a time when I was too busy being bored. I was also afraid of people thinking they could milk the humour by making a prequel of their own for my work, but whatever they want to do I guess. But you're right, I could've used the first conflict somehow in the article. I should also change words like 'tyrant' to 'golfing maverick', I should've thought about that! I would go on, but that'd result in a needless wall of text. Thanks again! --Nachlader 19:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, no problem, it's nice to get people joining who seem to want to do things the right way! Have fun around here. and don't worry about the typos - I'm a very, very finicky bastard (I've just corrected the spelling on my talk page while posting this reply, for instance) and could probably find flaws in perfection. That said, I really do like the article, and your style in general, so carry on doing what you are doing, and as I say, let me know when you're done, as I'd love to take another look at it! --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:44, Oct 24
Personal tools