I see by your contribs that you are really ancient, but have been absent for longer than I have been present; about which I can only say that I hope prison taught you a lesson. Your contributions have been some of the day's funnier. Regarding "new factoids," though, keep in mind that our business is producing pages that hang together, so don't pursue free-association without occasionally returning to the page's overall theme. Long lists are currently more out of favor than they used to be in "your day," mostly because they convince Mr. I.P. Anon that he has something to add (that is, yet another list item), then we have a mess to clean up in the morning. Happy editing!
By the way, something's effect may effect a change, which may affect other things. Spıke¬ 23:46 25-Mar-13
I'm glad you found my contribution funny -- yes, prison certainly whipped me into shape. Thank you for the tips and for fixing the grammar issue, for which I apparently need a shock collar (at least today). Have a good one! --Timthe3nchanter (talk) 00:01, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
You ask on your user page why this article is gone...but I can find no evidence that it ever existed. Spıke¬ 01:08 26-Mar-13
Luckily, I wasn't asking it in seriousness, but I'm glad you pointed that out because it clearly doesn't read the way I intended it, and according to my contribs page, it never existed, sooo... I must have been planning to write it at one time and never got 'round to it, and thank God I never did. Then I included it in the new edit because I saw it in the old.
Please don't correct grammar in other users' spaces. It is thankless, and endless. Spıke¬ 10:41 28-Mar-13
Ooh! Since it dealt with tips on writing for Uncyclopedia, it slipped my mind that it was another user's page--how rude of me. I'll be more careful, then.--Timthe3nchanter (talk) 00:54, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
I am not an official adopter, but I am watching over you (in the sense of reviewing a lot of changes and biting my fingernails). No, just kidding. Actually, last night's Undictionary entry struck me as at least an article whose name no one will ever type, and at worst an example of Typing Under the Influence. Whereas Xamralco has withdrawn from this website and is unlikely to adopt you. It seems you know what you are doing on the Did-You-Know suggestions and it would not land us in court if you became the editor of that corner of the main page. However, the main page is not mine. If you are interested in this assignment, I'll ask on your behalf. Spıke¬ 17:02 2-Apr-13
Thank you, I would be interested in the assignment for sure, especially since I don't currently have the time to birth a full-fledged article (out of curiosity, what do you think of the starter material in my WiPs subpage?) but I still would like something to do. Thanks!
As for "thin titmouse", all I can say is that it was outrageously funny at one in the morning...unfortunately, it's pretty disjoint. Oh well; perhaps I or someone else will save it. Timthe3nchanter (talk) 19:36, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
Administrator Romartus is your man and I have put in a recommendation for you at the position (though you may of course also introduce yourself). The job is an ideal match as all it requires is periodic rotation with new material. Spıke¬ 22:55 2-Apr-13
It has been noted recently that there has been a huge decrease in the number of pee reviews made each week. Before some hard-work pissing a few days ago there were still pee reviews from November 2012 left to review. This has made many uncyclopedians unhappy that their work isn't being pissed on by other more experienced and toilet trained uncyclopedians.
Remember that if you want to have your article reviewed then you must first review someone elses. There has been an influx of noobs joining these last five months and many of them would love help on how to improve their articles and help on how to make them funny. Many noobs such as Dannyboy and Anton199 have been struggling to produce good-quality articles and have required information from admins and a few others that their articles are bad or not funny but they are not being told the specifics and how to improve the articles.
The general message that Uncyclopedia and Unsignpost want to put out is stop day dreaming and start "pissing about." Get on the pee review page and write a few reviews every week. Even upload some articles to be reviewed. By doing this we can turn the Pee Review page from a stagnant wasteland of tripe into a growing community with bonds of friendship being made between the reviewers and the writers (yeah right!).
The same situation applies to the Votes For Highlight page which sees its usual voters ever week however the number of regular visitors and contributors to the VFH page is not enough for the articles there to get high enough votes to either fail or pass being features. When you visit that page please try to vote for and/or against on as many articles as you can so that everyday can have a new article featured.
Nobody is writing this article this week as nobody has contributed. Apparently somebody's excuse for not contributing was that nobody had done it already which really isn't a valid excuse. Somebody encourages others to write in this space the next time UnSignpost is released so that nobody doesn't have to do it again. Nobody has been writing the last three month's UnSignposts after all.
Anyway back to the point. Nobody would like to point out that recent events in the news such as the war against the other uncyclopedia websites with the April Fools prank which admitedly nobody knows anything about but somebody may be able to tell you more on that story. Also Magaret Thatcher, the role model, has died so Uncyclopedia is looking for someone to write a funeral song for her to be played at that glorius moment. I mean glorious in that we can celebrate her awful policies in politics - awfully good policies that is. The last and only entry we have received so far was, UnTunes:Ding, Dong the Witch is Dead however sadly this was banned and deleted by wikia authorities before we got the chance to hear it.
Biopic of the Week
Dannyboy1209, might be new and a bit mischievous, but he is a really nice guy and knows a thing or two about computers and might even be an admin one day. He started recently and wants to try and be a bit of a success.
He has had trouble with his first few articles in creating a humour element to them but is working harder now than he ever has before and with the help of a few admins he is going to be producing dozens of featured pages by the week.
Thanks to the recent scandal that UnSignpost has been involved in where half our editors and journalists were sacked after they were accused of hacking into other people's Uncyclopedia accounts we have been left short staffed. Please help in the future by contributing articles to make sure that this newspaper can exist in the quality that it is already in. Thanks you.
Please check out the main page of UnSignpost as there is new information there about a change in editors.