User talk:Thekillerfroggy/archive

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Hey there you pansy ass bitch. Thanks for deleting my page for Xioalin Candysticks. Just who the hell do you think you are, deleting pages?! Fuck you. Piece of shit. So would you send me some sample stuff? cuz i dont like know how to send a message or anything...and this is about the best i could think of to contact....soo..just delete it if im not supposed to do this, but i need help on how to learn how to do all this shit.


  • ....................../´¯/)
  • ....................,/¯../
  • .................../..../
  • ............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`•¸
  • ........../'/.../...../......./¨¯\
  • ........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
  • .........\.................'...../
  • .............\.......... _.•´
  • ............\..............(
  • ..............\.............\...
Your page? Look here, it was deleted because Repairmanman (the guy who actually started the page, meaning not you) requested that it be deleted. Who's the piece of shit now? Enjoy your day long ban! --Roman Dog Bird 00:03, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Yay! Ban!User:Airhogs777/sig 00:54, February 4, 2011 (UTC)


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Wow. This is priceless Jackofspades (talk) 23:33, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
No seriously, this is the most fucking funny thing I have ever read. I really hope you don't get banned again. Jackofspades (talk) 23:44, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Easy for you to say, fucking year long ban. Seriously, just take the ban off if you can. If you can, or if you can't and you apologize, then I am happy that you got so much entertainment out of my rage-fueled rant. No seriously, if you prove to me that you're not a dick, I'll accept it. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Powermad80 (talk • contribs)

edit Concrats your being cratified!

May your life as a 'crat be long and fulfilling. --Tophat headless 01:20, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

What he said. Also, can I have rollback now? Because rcmurphy never did get around to giving us rollback... 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 01:22, 2 July 2011

edit Dude Where's My Crat?

  • Hey man here's that image you requested a little while ago. Congrats on becoming a bureaucrat. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:40, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

edit Patronising

Ehm...any revert with thanks and then "fuck up" is so patronising to begin with, but then, its not your article anyways TKF...and ive been picking at that off and on for the last three months. You are super harsh and border-line dick sometimes. --ShabiDOO 04:06, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about that. You really drove the whole ebonics thing into overkill, though, whereas that wasn't even what the style of the article was about. I'm sorry if I found you edits to one of my favorite articles to be detrimental. Maybe "fuck up" was too harsh, but you shouldn't fix what isn't broke. I did like the Brother thinking about shit image though. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 04:19, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
TKF...ive been picking away at that for three months...thinking about it...trying to add a sentence or two...section or two...image or two...ive added...edited...taken away...moved...and then you just revert it with a "thanks for your little try but you fucked it up" sort of revert comment which is both condescending and brutal at the same time. Its just patronising to have someone unilateraly give you the finger like that after all the work you put into it. I get where you are comming from...maybe my edits arent necessary but really...putting that in the discussion page would be a little more constructive. Its one of my favourites to man, but its not done either. --ShabiDOO 04:30, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
I'm not saying all your edits were completely bad. You had some great ideas for expansion there, but the execution was very misdirected. I'm not trying to be mean here, just honest. Deadass. Don't stop editing it, just take it from me and follow these two guidelines for rewriting:
  • If something's there and it works, don't change it. Being and Nothingness is great because it's so boiled down, unnecessary padding is unnecessary and dilutes the strength of the original.
  • Beware of Tonal Uncanny Valley. Changing the tone works when the rewrite is complete, but slight tonal alterations and exaggerations seem clumsy. Your error was to make the ghettospeak much, much more exaggerated. You even tossed in a thing about J-Lo's ass. Brevity is, and gratuitous pop culture references suit no one.
Again, I'm really not trying to be mean, honest. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 04:35, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
Okay. Doesnt matter. Yuz just a nigga that don't know shit anyways. Yes...I was VERY aware that the black talk was over done...and I planned on making lots of changes...lots! If you are super serious about being VERY happy with the way the article is.....Ill start a new one along similar lines. Ill make one that is a thousand times FRICKIN years! Honest is good. In the future TFK...I LOVE it when people give serious advice, direct advice, but with examples and reasons like you did finally in the end. I wish people would do that more often. A lot more often. The only reason Im here is because its making me a better writer, and there is lots of feed back, im keeping my coloquial english and there are some really funny and nice people behind the scenes. --ShabiDOO 04:51, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
So...I guess in the end...I should admit that I love I love my uncles tax assistant, and I maybe sort of kind of probably shouldnt have suggested that you can appear border-line dick some times. --ShabiDOO 05:23, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

edit ICU

Ok I have fixed up ICUs placed by you twice, can you please remember to include a timestamp when placing them. It needs to be:

{{ICU|~~~~~|fix=<message here>|sub=<icu type here>}}

To yeah, don't forget the timestamp... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 21:44, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

All due respect, but don't lecture me on placing ICU's. That damn "Tag" function up top's got me all screwed up. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:40, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
Excuse me, but wtf are you doing??? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 01:18, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
It's funny because you did the redirect wrong Jackofspades (talk) 01:21, 5 July 2011
Hahaha hilarz, now change it back. Run along now. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 01:21, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
I also find it ironic, you made a broken redirect... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 01:22, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
I find it hilarious that you grasped that irony as well! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:17, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

edit Your articles

They leave me with a terrible rage that is only subsided by punching multiple babies and/or puppies in a row. I think you should feel bad about yourself. Jackofspades (talk) 04:03, 5 July 2011

edit Zana Dark

Since it was over a month since you banned Zana, has there been any re-consideration on the length of the exile imposed on her? For a featured writer and long standing contributor, I don't personally see her in the same category as an out-and-out vandal. Admittedly, her last contributions were eccentric and I had considered if this was related to RL issues. If Zana does come back and does the same again then I will suggest the ban remains as originally imposed. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:38, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

I would agree with this assessment, free the Zana 1.... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
I disagree with this assessment. Zana has been banned and then given a second chance and unbanned far too many times already. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:05, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
Deja vu. What's that quote? Something about the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 18:07 Jul 05, 2011
If so, why isn't her ban infinite? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:50, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
Good point. Better?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 20:02, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
Aw dang --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:12, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
I disagree with Romartus. She already has a one year punishment, why should it be increased? Give her a year and hopefully she'll change by then, know the errors of her ways, and avoid future conflict. Plus it's not fair to turn it to a infinite ban after a ban has already been place.--Iwillkillyou 333 TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 20:14, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
Whatever the case may be, don't bring it up now. Bring it up in another 5 months. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:16, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
Keep the ban until a year. That way,i'll be the best at creating sigs! MOOWHAHAHA!! --Purple mini lolly Lollipop Purple mini lolly - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 20:54, 5 July 2011
Wait, it's infinite! Hurrah! That means i'm the number one active sigmaker around! I'll even offer to change all the signatures that Zana made. --Purple mini lolly Lollipop Purple mini lolly - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 20:59, 5 July 2011
You are indeed such a gobshite. The ban is now set at infinite. Until God releases a sequel to Time, there's no more discussion to be had, ever. Sorry for the notification, TKF.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 21:26, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
Well that just sucks. --Iwillkillyou 333 TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 21:40, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
Just to make this clear, am I correct in understanding Ljlejo's last comment overrules TKF's about renewing this discussion in five months time? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:31, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
Sure. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:34, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

edit It's free and it always will be; it's the UnSignpost!

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:19, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

edit  !HFV no etov ruoy rof sknahT

.segassem nataS wollof lanimilbus yna dragersid esaelP !sdrawkcab ti daer uoy ,yeH !sdrawkcab egassem siht daer ton oD !sdrawkcab egassem siht daer ton oD


Sir Roger 00:50, July 9, 2011 (UTC)

edit Why was Jackass Day huffed?

Was there even a VFD entry about the article?

If not, please restore the article as the deletion entry says it was funny.

I want it submitted to Pee(r) Review.

edit 40th Thanks

edit Pauly Shore

Yeah, really good job getting Uh oh over the finish line there TKF. What happened, man? You had a real fallow period there for a while, but now you're back, just hitting it out of the park with article after article. Did someone return your lucky rabbit's foot or something? --UU - natter UU Manhole 19:48, Jul 9

I dunno. I go in and out like that. Really just depends on if I got any ideas or not, simple as that. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:31, July 9, 2011 (UTC)

edit This is not spam...

Do consider participating instead Froggy :) CHECK IT OUT. --ShabiDOO 19:12, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

edit Guidelines for Contest

Hey TKF.... Shabi asked me to agreed that I might ASKED ME TO pass this message around, which I created with his approval.

Judging will be held every two weeks, for weeks 1-2, and 3-4. The max score possible for a team to get is 40.83, and the lowest being 2.45. The first two weeks, all teams write 2 articles, and at the end of the weeks, whoever we (TKF, Iwillkillyou333, and A (Ruins)) vote to be the two top teams will advance to the finals, which will be held during weeks 3-4. The winner of that is The Champion, and will probably get a nice badge or something. Because we all have to add up our votes, I will pass around a little rubric for that when I figure out what the max and min scores are. Look forward to Judging, A (Ruins) 23:28, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

NOTE!!!! I got it: Max score for teams is 122.49, and min score is 7.35. (That means scores will be presented like this: ?/122.49) A (Ruins) 23:28, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

edit The UnSignpost: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger!

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:19, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

edit 2386794765873

Perhaps you could give me a more reasonable number of reasons why you did delete3 it? Seijana 02:56, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Okay. Since I love a challenge, I'm going to try to come up with 9 reasons:
  1. It's been done to death. AAAAAAAA!, Binary, and all those other ones everyone knows about.
  2. It isn't a novel spin on the tired concept. A bunch of random numbers? Eh.
  3. So it isn't original, and the spin is random, but is it funny? The answer is "nah."
  4. It probably took a little effort to type in all those numbers, but that's all the effort it took.
  5. Pictures were a nice addition, but they weren't enough to save the article (see above)
  6. The formatting was pretty clunky
  7. You should be compelled to create more useful articles, like those on UN:REQ
  8. Damn, it's getting hard to think of more reasons now.
  9. But really those are all the reasons you need.
So yeah, that's why. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:19, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

edit Shitty One-liner

Thanks for helping with that one, but to be honest I reckon what you added wasn't retarded enough. What we need to appear on that page needs to be:

  1. More mentally challenged
  2. Look less well thought-out
  3. Lez wel zpeld
  4. M0r3 1337
  5. Mooore stoopid
  6. More crufty
  7. Less original
  8. Yeah, that's just about it.

Also, could you please move my big string of numbers page to my userspace? I'd like to see whether its' funny to those not exposed to the AAAAAAA! meme. Seijana 09:58, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

The point of my addition was that it was especially out of place among the other choices, actually, so you're right on the money with that complaint. On the other hand, you missed the point, so, uh, oh well, it's your article I guess. Also, I'll do that other thing. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 16:09, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

edit Hall Of Shame

haha, I get your drill my friend. I hope I proved I am trustworthy here, and you were my mentor (Heaven's Gate). At that time, I didn't even know there was a vote to feature things. I saw your unscript fade away recently, I was rather surprised. It got one hell of a start but as I said on the most recent article on VFH, featuring is a bitch and not really worth the effort. Having fun in writing is. Please if you vote against it, don't be an ass. The author has autism, I know people who have that illness and it's not that bad of an article. Be constructive. Snowflake mini Mattsnow 21:29, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Indeed...I think the best thing you can do for anyone is say something concrete like...rethink the concept, cut out stuff, add humour, get rid of the swear words, needs to be more adult humour etc... rather than: I dont like it, its not featurable, its cruft, I wiped my ass with it, my kid could write better. --ShabiDOO 21:34, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
Wow, what's going on? I don't get it, what did I do? Snowflake mini Mattsnow 21:39, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
I don't really know what's going on either, but I think you want me to vote against an autistic kid's articles? Is that what's going on? --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:43, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
Im NOT talking about you or anyone specicially Mattsnow. Some peoples comments are much more helpful, useful and constructive than others. I haven't looked at VFD in months cause it nauseates me sometimes to see the pleasure people get out of making fun of others creativity even though some pages are awful. The same goes for forum pages and VFH in my opinion. In the same amount of words, you can make a neutural (or negative) sounding explanation/critique become constructive and helpful. --ShabiDOO 21:47, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
Well this article, which I have done the Pee Review of, is never gonna make it, but the guy told me he suffers from autism, so if you like it, vote for, if you're a nice guy, vote against and have a nice word, if you're an asshole, vote against and well, you know... Snowflake mini Mattsnow 22:50, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

edit House Neopowell Saultes You

Many thanks for the help and the vote for Game Of Thrones. Front page feature here we come, beehatches. Holy Shit It's Neonazi powell 09:05, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

edit The UnSignpost: Avoid all contact with eyes.

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:22, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

edit Why?:Abortion is FUN

Could you tell me what's wrong with Why?:Abortion is FUN? Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:45, 23 July 2011

All it does is point to a medical diary and tries to tell us "Hey, this is horrible, but it's funny because it's horrible!" That idea in itself is pretty funny when done right, but the article just felt really off for me. It was more like "This is horrible, so it's AWESOME! Right, men??" way, which falls flat, and is in bad taste without much comic redemption. I've got nothing against its brevity, but right now it seems like something a 13 year old trying to impress his friends would write after discovering what an abortion is, as opposed to an effective example of "horror humor," which it could be with a little fixing. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 17:51, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
Hmm, what little fixing did you have in mind? Should I remove the stuff at the bottom Mnbvcxz added? Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:03, 23 July 2011
Something so simple as just adding one more line as preface might work. There's two directions you can take this: you can make it drier, with the violence of the picture contrasting the brief narration that abortion is an "excellent pastime" for pregnant women "bored of their labor," or something to that degree; "or you can take it further over the top, inject a deadly mix of Axe Body Spray and Five-Hour Energy straight into the article, making the picture feel right at home in a sea of satirical douchebaggery. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:51, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
How about this? Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:35, 24 July 2011

edit Unpoetia:The Stain

Dear sir, I humbly implore you to reconsider the huffing of the above. Yours et-cetera Shakespeare --Untalented 23:45, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

edit :)

Why did you put Ffw on european borders. Please remove it. --ShabiDOO 01:20, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

I changed the tag to a Fix. The article still has problems: not enough pictures, poor grammar and awkward prose in patches, particularly evident from the concept-setting first sentence. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:35, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. --ShabiDOO 01:35, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

edit More class than 9000 schools: It's the UnSignpost!

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:22, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

edit Fuck you, and fuck the corpses of your dead children.

Hi! Top of the morning to you, sir. Bizzeebeever, here. When you huffed it, you seemed perplexed as to how House of Reprehensibles garnered seven Symbol delete vote delete votes on UN:VFD. I figured I'd be neighborly and take the time to clear that up for you: it's because ... they hadn't seen the improvements I made to it. In fact, TheSlyFox was the only one who voted "delete" after I began fixing it. (But it's not your fault, I'm sure you didn't notice the dates and times on those silly comments.)

Also, I wanted to give you a quick thanks for not moving it to my userspace, even though I asked in bold lettering. I'm quite sure that's not your fault, and it's no big deal, anyway, so just pretend I didn't say anything!

Once again, have a wonderful morning, and I hope everything turns up roses for you today. Cheers! ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver Icons-flag-us (gabble) 12:54, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, never mind any of that, after all. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver Icons-flag-us (gabble) 13:55, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
P.S. I hope your children are well.
There, there, Bizzeebeever. No need to get upset. I'm pretty sure TKF doesn't have any kids yet, though. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:35, 1 August 2011
Nope. Three miscarriages and still no luck. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:40, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

edit Hey TKF!

I go on IRC more often these days, and I never cross your path. It'd be cool to chat with my welcoming mentor once in a while, but I realize IRC is time-consuming (and not productive for a lot of users), anyway, when you see I'm on, give it a try!

But the purpose of my call was not that, I'd like to know if you still want somebody to flood Peter Dinklage with piss. I'd gladly do it if you do, I have an urgent need! It seems it's sitting there since May 0.o. Want me to do it? (at a leizure pace, a couple of days at least since I'll finish the article(s) for the competition, for the deadline is the 7th (included I hope) and mt team is kinda idle. I have a lot of time on my hands since I am on workstop thanks to a nasty cycling spill that rearraged my facial features for awhile, but I'll be ok since the Mds told me it would hardly leave a scar. I would provide you with pics I took before going to the ER, but Internet privacy and such... I only share them on Facebook lol, a bit gory. Snowflake mini Mattsnow 03:41, August 5, 2011 (UTC)

Damn, sorry about the accident! Why the hell are offering to pee on articles when you should be out scoring right now? Chicks dig huge, mangled scars! But yeah, go ahead and do the pee. Though it's kind of nice to be the king of undone pee reviews and all, I've been waiting passively since May, so it's about time I think. And I've, conincidentally, been coming onto IRC less these days, so maybe we'll cross once or twice, I should hope. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:56, August 5, 2011 (UTC)

edit ChiefjusticeDS is a lazy sod and has paid the ultimate price... an UnSignpost Coup

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:19, August 6, 2011 (UTC)

edit What's wrong with you

Dude!You delete like, everything. You even the dumb and dumber vote for highlite page when the score was 4.5 to 5! You need to learn alesson, so i'm going to do your worst nightmare:Hint, Fire, Castrophic, copy and paste.

People: If you think he deserves the heat click delete

I reverted you, Mr. IP --Purple mini lolly Lollipop Purple mini lolly - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 02:02, 7 August 2011
A valiant protest, but quite frankly you gotta try at least three times as hard. Or less hard. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 08:13, August 7, 2011 (UTC)

edit Not drunk at all

Nice little drunken message I left Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Peter Dinklage. I like the cohesion, not confusing at all LOL! What I was trying to say is it's gonna take some time to do the Pee, but I'll do it (Because I want to, nice article at first glance). You (admins) should revoke that silly text to the effect that a Pee Review should be done 24 hours after somebody says he'll do it. It sure will take some time since I'm busy, but I'd rather have a guy taking a week to piss in-depth than a 1,000 bytes shit I've been expecting like a diuretic for 2 months (in this case!) Cheers! Don't drink and drive! I don't! (But I sure drink a lot! :D)Snowflake mini Mattsnow 14:38, August 7, 2011 (UTC)

It's fine as long as you let the writer know. As you have. Carry on. --Black Flamingo 15:04, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
And TKF, this guy (<High_General_Aim>) (Aimsplode) is bugging me on IRC for you to PLEEEEAAAASE unban him, since he wants to pick a guy for the football team. Since I am so nice.... Here you go. Snowflake mini Mattsnow 15:24, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
I just took a piss on Peter Dinklage! Snowflake mini Mattsnow 16:11, August 9, 2011 (UTC)

edit Voting time is NOW!

OK, it's time to do the voting round. Round 1 has finished already! So please hop over to the forum and cast your votes! GiratinaOriginForme |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill 800px-Flag of the Philippines svg | 09:06, August 9, 2011 (UTC)

You are Judge 2, just so you know which line to put your scores under. A (Ruins) 01:53, August 10, 2011 (UTC)

edit More rubbish Australian Prose because ChiefjusticeDS got stabbed in the buttocks by a rioter with a felt-tip pen

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:18, August 11, 2011 (UTC)

edit New Ending

Dear Froggie, thanks for voting for Morning Dew. Could you please look at the new ending I wrote, its just the last few sentences. I set up the link to show you the difference in the history section. If you dont mind I would apreciate it :) [[1]] --ShabiDOO 11:47, August 12, 2011 (UTC)

edit Air horn

You should get someone to make a "speaking article" out of that. ;) MadMax 04:49, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

edit Idea for a future project?

I've been working on another proposed project and I was wondering if I could get your opinion on it? It's a more simplified version of Wikipedia's Operation Great War Centennial which attempts to compile a general list of "basic" encyclopedic topics and bringing them to featured status. It focuses on improving existing articles on the list, as well as creating new entries, with a 3-year deadline ending in 2015. I'm not sure how workable it would be in real life but it would be nice to always have a "core group" of articles for the site. So do you think its worth floating it around on the forums? MadMax 17:31, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

edit Quick question

Didn't we used to protect featured articles while they're being featured? -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN19:26, 13 Aug

Only semiprotected. Also yeah we still do that. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:27, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
K, I couldn't remember for sure. I haven't been around for a while. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN19:28, 13 Aug

edit Chicks

Yeah I understand, sorry for calling you a dick. You did a good job rewriting the article completely and I understand how you feel about it since it's featured. It's still a Wiki though. Hardly anyone except the staff has authority on the content. Most especially, it's a small addition of my own craft that doesn't shadow your writing.

Did you read the paragraph I made the pun on? It is not about baby hens; I don't like the cliche myself. it's about sesame chicken. You did make the pun between "Sesame chicken" and "Sesame chicks" yourself first and to me that was a naturally occuring set up, which is rare. That added to the coincidence of having a "Sesame Street's big bird" exist to make the pun, the latter to me being so awful yet so incidental it becomes ironically funny. I'll let go of my end of the string without it keeping me up at night, but I find it disappointing to see that huge, obvious set up stand here without its punch line. To me, it is for comedy's sake. --DoctorRainCloud 20:13, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

Oh shit, I'm pretty thick, I didn't even pick up on that. Huh, that's pretty good actually. I'll re-add it, if you don't mind me toying with the caption. Still, if you can find a hot chick in a big bird costume, it'd be even greater. Actually, that gives me an idea. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:56, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
You're a good man, Froggy Brown. No need to insult yourself. I'll be delicate with featured articles from now on. --DoctorRainCloud 22:34, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

edit Unobtanium

Much thanks for your vote from Shabidoo and Funnybony. Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 16:19, Aug 14

edit Colab

Dear Froggy, if you ahve a chance can you take a look at Inter-Lights Inc. and tell me if youll help me polish it up and make it great? Chars. --ShabiDOO 18:25, August 14, 2011 (UTC)

Will do! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:58, August 14, 2011 (UTC)

edit The Wire

It looks great. Thanks for letting me help out. I had fun working on it with you. MadMax 02:05, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

The pleasure was all mine! You can't understand how happy I was, after running around the site trying to find a single user who loved The Wire as much as me, only to discover the Bunk to my McNulty was MadMax himself. Also, I do like your idea about the "core article" group thing that you inexplicably removed from my talk page. Seemingly a bit unfeasible, knowing this userbase and their attention spans, but I do really like it a lot. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:24, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I was hoping you hadn't read that yet. I've actually been having second thoughts about that once I went over the numbers. It was pretty awesome to see one of my favorite tv shows get an article. I don't know, I guess I've found myself a little intimidated when someone who regularly writes features, say like MrN or Funnybony, asks me to contribute. The last thing I want is to ruin an article with an awful one-liner or even something a little more subtle. The irony is that I really do enjoy writing, though more in the sci-fi vein, so I'm grateful to get the opportunity from a great writer. MadMax 04:20, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

You've actually got some damn good prose, all you gotta do is work on implanting a few jokes in there! No offense. But seriously, great prose. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 12:17, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

edit Forum:Accountability

It appears that Lyrithya posted in that topic. If the agenda-pushing bitchfest conversation is going to continue, the forum should probably be unprotected so that non-admins can participate in blowing their petty squabbles out of proportion the discussion. --Mn-z 02:31, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

Considering where some of the non-admin input it has received so far has taken it, and how this primarily concerns admins, it may be best to leave it protected regardless, though. But up to you, man. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 02:46, 15 August 2011
What she said. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:48, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

edit Two Things

One, I would like to apologize for edit-warring with you. Two, the max score for the USE contest is 42.83, and you put a 46 somewhere. Please check your scores and make sure their right.


A (Ruins) 22:21, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

Okay. You can just count that score as whatever number you said than, officially. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:30, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

edit Vote

edit Now it only wants you gone; it's the UnSignpost!

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:20, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

edit Congrats

Congrats on Peter Dinklage. Good one!!! Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 08:43, Aug 21

edit Sun

Froggy Brown, I need some 'cratly wisdom... and all the wise 'crats are unreachable. Kidding, you're the best. Anyway, what are your thoughts on our Sun rewrite replacing the original article? In light of that similar article you dug up would you have any qualms with this? --Black Flamingo 16:01, August 23, 2011 (UTC)

Just noticed you're not here, I'm going to go ahead and be italic. Still, nice talking to you. --Black Flamingo 12:02, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

edit Wonko tiddlybum-post

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:19, August 25, 2011 (UTC)

edit Fruits

I just finished another rewrite. Any better? --Tophat headless 20:13, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

*Cough* --Tophat headless 02:51, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
*Cough, cough* --Tophat headless 16:32, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

edit Archiving.

I think you should archive your talk page.

  • You're an admin
  • It has 48+ sections

KTHXBAI. Hi! BVI 17:10, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Hi there Feck. Hi! BVI 21:11, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

edit Mailman's here! Lock up your daughters and horny middle-aged Wives!

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:19, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

edit Sun

I'm now happy with it, so here's your heads up, right here. Feel free to change your vote or whatever. See you later crocodile. --Black Flamingo 13:36, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

edit BUTT POOP!!!!

If you haven't noticed, Hype, under a drunk sockpuppet, created a new article on BUTT POOP!!!!. It was eventually placed on VFD, but survived VFD by a vote of 8 keep to 7 delete. Category:BUTT POOP!!!! was nominated a similar time and survived with a vote of 7 keep to 5 delete. Therefore, that might put Forum:Should Template:BUTT POOP!!!! be restored to full health? in a different context. --Mn-z 21:49, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

Christ, Mnb, if you devoted half the energy you devote to that flippin' thing to writing articles, you'd be top of the HoS by now... --UU - natter UU Manhole 07:26, Sep 2
And 90% of our featured articles would be about pregnancies. :-/ Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:15, 2 September 2011

edit Perhaps you might have an answer

What is drama? 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 03:13, 2 September 2011

Drama is when you need two gats to go to sleep. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 07:02, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

edit Colorless green ideas sleep furiously

Colorless green ideas sleep furiously

You voted for Colorless green ideas sleep furiously on VFH. Maybe now us ideas will be a little less furious.

Thank you! --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 11:44, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

edit Um...

Completely unnecessarily dramatic edit summary much? Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:50, 6 September 2011

Yeah, basically. Just feel like I should point out my grandstanding when I'm doing it. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:52, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
Weird how you imply that I'm putting on an act, though. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:57, 6 September 2011
Not putting on an act, just acting in certain ways. I mean, there you go again. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:59, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
Hey, sorry dude, I had the impression that's what you implied. If you didn't mean it that way, I take it all back. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:06, 6 September 2011
It's okay, too. I'm sorry too. Like I way saying before, I knew some bad stuff was gonna happen out of this, but geez. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:08, September 6, 2011 (UTC)

edit This UnSignpost brought to you by... uh... fairy dust? Hmm, we seem to have run out of sponsors.

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 01:20, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

edit Olympian Thanks

edit The UnSignpost: Now with free bacon!

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:19, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

edit I hate to whore, but...

I followed your sage advice on HowTo:Train to look awesome! and did a major tweaking, and I think the article improved. Thanks for the constructive criticism. Snowflake mini Mattsnow 04:51, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

edit Perhaps you can tell me...

Why was Craig Kielburger deleted? Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:25, 21 September 2011

It looks like cyberbullying. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 00:30, 21 September 2011
Yeah. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:39, September 21, 2011 (UTC)
I was hoping for a little more elaboration, though. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:03, 21 September 2011

edit Brought to you by Lion Bars! It's the UnSignpost!

--ChiefjusticePSX 07:10, September 22, 2011 (UTC)

edit What

did you say on 00:49, September 18, 2011 (UTC)? Me not understanding Hi! BVI 23:13, September 22, 2011 (UTC)

I have no idea. Could you maybe quote what I said instead of just telling me the time? --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:43, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
"If lyrithya says no vote rigging this month, then no rigging. So yeah dont do that? -- T​K​F​ 00:49, September 18, 2011 (UTC) Hi! BVI 16:16, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
You voted for a guy and against another guy. That's two votes. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 16:33, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
So you can vote only once, I guess? Hi! BVI 22:18, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
uh. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:23, September 23, 2011 (UTC)

edit "Oh, God! But the balls?"

edit Hold onto your wage packets! It's the UnSignpost!

--Tophat headless 01:21, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

edit Update Request on Zana Dark

I believe for Zana Dark's original offence she was given a three month ban by you at the end of May which was then extended unilaterally for a year by the other admins in a subsequent exchange on these talk pages. I understand the arguments that Zana had apparent 'form' for previous bans which is why I have waited until now to bring this subject back. Four months is long enough in my view for what went on in May. If Zana comes back and returns to the same issues that got her a ban in the first place then I will let this matter drop. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:45, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

OK..I will ask again next month. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:06, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
Ouch. I just realised that she really is infinite banned! I thought that was just postering . Ouch. Do you really think she will never change? --ShabiDOO 15:56, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
The original ban was extended to six months by TKF. That is the original starting point in my view, not one year or infinite.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:11, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
Yes...that seems a little out of proceedure. Do you really think Zana is going to change? --ShabiDOO 19:23, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
Personally, I don't think it should be set at infinite. She was a helpful user, she reverted a lot of spam, she was made rollback shortly before her ban...we need to vote on this. --Evildemon PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 17 October 2011, at 20:03
My bad for glazing over this, but yeah, it's not a question until the definite 6 months are up. Really, she's been given a dozen chances before and squandered all of them, so it shouldn't be a question at all. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:33, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I will return to this topic at the end of next month. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:30, October 17, 2011 (UTC)

edit A day late, because ChiefjusticeDS got lazy: The UnSignPost!

~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 02:27, October 7, 2011 (UTC)

edit You voted for Subliminal stimuli, which got featured!

A million thanks! --Tophat headless 03:42, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

edit User:Siddhartha-Wolf/Albrecht Durer

Does it look finished enough now? Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:03, 10 October 2011

Sure. It holds together about as well as the Kubrick-Spielberg dividing line in A.I., but it certainly is finished now. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:08, October 10, 2011 (UTC)

edit UnNews:Goal sparks soccer riot

Granted the article's a pretty piss poor offering, but I found your comment "mundane conceit" interesting. Are you saying the article is boring due to it's ridiculousness or are you saying it's arrogant, or something else? Just curious. I understand and I wish to continue. HauntedUndies2. 09:51, October 15, 2011 (UTC)

As I read it, it's another one of those "basic thing leads to ridiculous thing" articles that, when pushed to the limits, can definitely be funny but are often not featurable. The description of events was done well (the drainage pit bit was great), but the only twist (about FIFA making technology to prevent goals) came too late into the story and wasn't fleshed out enough to make it seem fresh. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:27, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. Could you please use your evil powers to take it off VFH then, seeing as it's a lost cause and all? I understand and I wish to continue. HauntedUndies2. 06:25, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
If you insist. Don't give up on it though, because it does have some greatness in it, I think. It just takes too long to really find a solid concept. It isn't ever too late to improve an article, even an UnNews. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 07:20, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

edit Borderless collie...*snicker*

that article really shoulda at least made some mention of Colleys Sans Frontières. :D :D :D  ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usWed, Oct 19 '11 2:30 (UTC)

edit Assplode

In his defence, the reason he was having a go at Lollipop on-wiki was largely due to the fact that Lollipop was antagonising him on IRC. Fucking Children eh. -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 15:20, October 19, 2011 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, did the IRC stuff have anything to do with Lollipop's... on-wiki thing? Just what happened there? 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 15:30, 19 October 2011
I didn't know much of the situation beyond what I saw in the block logs and was able to minimally catch-up on in IRC. Aim was being an unproductive dick, apparently, got banned as he always does for whenever he was being an unproductive dick (always), then ban evaded on top of that. He negotiated with RAHB, who let him off the hook with a severe warning. No more than 20 minutes after, he posts his comment on Lollipop's forum, clearly having learned nothing in the X years since we've been banning him for being a dick. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:54, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
As for whatever got Lollipop's goat, I can only not care enough to guess. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:25, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
Lame killer froggy....very lame re: Lollipop.
In any case, you are the man of the day. You managed to dramatically ban someone...and yet cause absolutely no drama in the process! WOOHOO!!! Three cheers for TKF!!! UOM!!! UOY!!! --ShabiDOO 21:31, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
I'm just saying it wouldn't be much of my time to go trolling through whatever action or psychology motivated Lollipop to do whatever he did, especially since whatever he did still isn't clear at all? What did he or didn't he not do? In any case, yes, past is past, don't care, Aimsplode's finally gone, let's let it go. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:40, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
The answer to my apparent leaving if the fact that i'm the perrenial punching bag for many admins, including Lyrithya and Olipro. Lyrithya lacks a satrical sense of humour, I have failed to understand any of her articles, her sort of humour belongs on Illogicopedia. Yet, she goes about having everyone kiss her toes because she says so. She often abuses her ops, including indefbanning me because I said she should be deopped as a joke. I feel likei'm being harrassed and attacked at these things, especially the bans and insults. Aslong as these go on, not only am I gone, but you're scaring away many new users, and eventually no one will want to be around socially awkward people who like to insult and ban users. Also, regarding what Olipro said, I never antagonized Aimsplode on IRC for no reason, it was more of him constantly bothering me, calling me a female and calling me a homosexual, and finding every single way to put me down. Fortunately, this issue has been resolved with the indefbanning of Aimsplode. Until this torture and insulting decreases, I will remain to be away from this wiki. --Evildemon PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 19 October 2011, at 21:55
Lollipop, if you sincerely believe that, perhaps some time off would do you good, especially since you keep insisting that you're going to leave anyway (diva is a word for it). Also, for the record, when someone points out some flaw with what you are doing or some such, there actually is a chance they are in fact not going out of their way to pick on you, and instead just want you to stop doing whatever it is.
TKF, only reason I care is because he seems to want me deopped for some reason and I'm still not entirely sure why. I don't think I tend to or am here saying anything that hasn't been said before, either, but... eh. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 22:59, 19 October 2011
The main problem here is that both of you are caught in an endless feedback loop of taking things far, far too personally. So take a step back from your situations a bit and try to see the other person's perspective before launching into more tirades and such. The way I see it: Lollipop is taking criticism on his whatever too personally and doesn't like being banned, and as a result wants Lyrithya deopped; Lyrithya is taking this reaction too personally and is now biased towards Lollipop, which begins the cycle. So yeah. Both y'all chill because that ain't good. There's some growin' to do. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:06, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
In response to Lyrithya, banning a user because the banee did something wrong shows a sort of sense that the banner is either 1. too lazy to resolve the issue with the user by contacting the user and explaining it to them, and understanding they may not realize what is wrong or 2. has a dislike and annoyance of the user and wants to look like the good guy in the situation. In fact, I never said anywhere "i'm leaving", I did however say that if I continue to be insulted and made to be the villain, then I may as well stay away from editing here (notice how I didn't use 'leaving'). --Evildemon PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 20 October 2011, at 00:07
I'm chill, mon. That's just how it is: Lollipop's been threatening to leave and complaining about me for months over various things, except bringing that up is apparently picking on him. Trying to defend myself is of course picking on him as well, and ignoring him is also picking on him. Asking him to not do things that only make more work in the long run, why, that's picking on him, too. Now, if this were all it were, whatever - I don't get along with plenty of folks, but he's been stirring up a fair bit of drama in the process and some of the things he keeps doing despite being repeatedly asked not to (picked on about) do go into the realm of disruptive, which is a bit of a problem.
Remember back when you'd just ban people who did stupid stuff for several days and it'd be final? I'm starting to see the appeal. Certainly trying to take into consideration intent and adjusting the length accordingly doesn't help matters, since when I gave him a short block for an actual reason and explained to him that reason on IRC, that apparently somehow led to him starting a forum saying I should be deopped. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 01:14, 20 October 2011
I may have overreacted several times, but at several points, you seem to deliberately go out of your way to do something stupid and make me seem like the villain and whiny bad guy in the situation. I'll even be kind enough to give one example:
  • 02:51, October 3, 2011 Lyrithya (Talk | contribs) blocked Lollipop (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite ‎ (Wanted me deopped... )
That was from earlier this month, when I said on IRC that Lyrithya should be deopped and banned as a joke. She seemed to have taken that seriously and banned me infinite. She then threatened that if I do it again, she will do it again and refuse to unban me. Things like this often scare off users, and if this is the approach Lyrithya is giving to users who are unintentionally doing things that may upset other users, banning them is not a good outlet. This is where I began to feel that Lyrithya was abusing her given op powers, not taking them seriously, and becoming a control freak. Of course, all users (even Lyrithya) have their faults. Lyrithya has taken this to a larger extent and taken my faults and instead of improving them, often showboating and projecting them to the wiki. Even though this is a satrical wiki, insulting and taunting are two things that have no place here. --Evildemon PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 20 October 2011, at 01:48
  • I'd just like to say that I fully support the ban you guys are talking about. Congrats on a job well done TKF. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:41, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
    Jus' doin mah job --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:15, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

edit Allah/God/Yahweh (pick one) thanks you for your VFH vote

...on that UnNews piece I did. Also, you're more like a MildlyInjuriousSalamander. Carry on.  ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usSat, Oct 22 '11 12:08 (UTC)

edit &%&%&%&%&%&%&

Mr. TKF, I'm sure you are busy. Remember Inter-Lights Inc. ... Ive been working on it...but the two funniest lines are still...the two edits you made ;) If you have a chance do you think you could make some cuts and polish a line or two? It would be very much appreciated! --ShabiDOO 19:11, October 22, 2011 (UTC)

edit Dinky Dinklage

Just saw a rathergood film called The Station Agent and thought of you... Another astounding performance from one of the best child actors of our generation. --Black Flamingo 22:15, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

He really is a remarkable actor. I just hope he never grows up! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:02, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

edit Generic UnSignpost header

~ Pointy I am Haydrahlienne, I am a bot, and I have no feelings. 03:17, 27 October 2011

edit Never let them hear you sweat

Wake & Bake with
Dr Strange
Thursdays, 6 -10am
KFJC 89.7fm
Radio devil.color.741x600

Truth is (Dr) stranger than fiction. Thanks for the vote on College DJ!--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  14:07, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

edit WotM

Thumbs up guy You Voted for Me for Writer of the Month!

Good job!

Thank you very, very much. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:29, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

edit Generic UnSignpost header

~ Pointy I am Haydrahlienne, I am a bot, and I have no feelings. 02:01, 3 November 2011

edit FANKS