User talk:The fatgoat

NEW MESSAGE

Welcome!

Hello, The fatgoat, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

• Beginner's Guide
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
• Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or add the following: {{help}} to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Again, welcome!  goshzillacorrespondence 18:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)!

WIP move notice of Unicellular Organisms

Hey, your article that was called Unicellular Organisms has been moved to User:The fatgoat/Unicellular Organisms for further development. Feel free to move it back when you have done. Oh, and if you want to reply to this, please reply on my talk page (I do so many of these, I don't get to check them all). Thanks. —Braydie 22:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Sig

Hey, you sig seems to be spilling code. In the nicknames box you need to put "{{SUBST:nosubst|User:The fatgoat/sig}}". Without the ""s. If User:The fatgoat/sig is not where you keep your sig file, replace if appropriate. Then cross the Raw signatures box. If you need any more help ask me on my talk page. —Braydie 21:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes! It works! Thanks. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 21:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Great. :) (I was checking back to see if I had instructed you properly, nice and quick with the response :D ) —Braydie 21:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Ta.

	Thanks for voting for Uluru on VFH. Here's a rock.
	And a second one. Don't you feel special?

--El Zoof 08:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Yay rock! -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 08:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Help

I am in need of help. I need to know what content you are allowed to create articles on and what you're not. (Since it's different to so called mighty wikipedia). Molag bal 16:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, you can create articles on almost anything, except for things that have already been written about. It's probably best to see this for a guide on what not to write about. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 16:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Death Camps

I at first came to your user page to let you know that I reviewed ROFLWAFFLES, but then I read your death camp article and just had to let you know that it was the most warped, twisted, evil, and yet strangely, horribly amusing things I've ever seen. I'm torn between congragulating you on writing this horriffically entertaining masterpeice or vandalizing your user page for daring to actually write something so offensive. I guess I'll just do neither...anyway, on to what I originally came here to say: I reviewed ROFLWAFFLES. --THE 22:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm a professional at that, I'm told. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 19:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

You are in a bad mood, ain't you?

I was just waiting to see if you would vote for or against B&W Man. By the way, thank you, it's better having an against vote than seeing you article being ignored. -- herr doktor needsAbeam  [scream!] 17:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Does that mean you were watching me? -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 20:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I've been watching VFH and I saw you voting against almost everything, just it. -- herr doktor needsAbeam  [scream!] 20:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I noticed the same thing as NeedABrain, how come you shoot down everything? And by everything, I mean my article. I don't care about the rest. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't remember voting against that article... -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 22:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow, that's.....kinda creepy.......sleep denying? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe... I dunno... it looks sort of familiar. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 05:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Déjà vu

Thanks for your contribs  :) 90% of the edits there are people who just take the article and cut&paste it a few times, so it's nice to see someone making useful changes. -- Rei 17:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Weasel3689 would like to thank you for Lord of the Flies. Remember: Weasels Rule!

 Weasel 3689 05:57, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Global Cooling

In recognition of your contribution toward maintaining a humourous atmosphere on Uncyclopedia. Thank you for keeping Uncyclopedia cool.

- Sir Roger 06:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

	HEIL LJLEGO!
	Thanks for voting FOR Nazi in VFH. It's good to know where your priorities lie /me steps back and calls the police.

Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

thanks

User:THE... ...could not think of a creative "thank you" template for voting for HowTo:Turn Your Computer On. But thanks for voting anyway.

--THE 12:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Vulva

Thanks (well, sort of) for your vote... anything in particular you didn't like about the article? If you can think of some way to improve it, please let me know! I don't think it's anything even remotely resembling perfect, so any constructive criticism would be great! --El Zoof 21:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Eh, I just don't really like sexual articles that much. They seem too overdone. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 21:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Not trying to be rude (I manage that without trying, usually) but did you read the article, or is your abhorrence more directed to the title? If you honestly don't like the article because of it's sexual content, fair enough; I'm just a needy, picky bastard who seeks what little comfort I can from the meaningless admiration of my so-called peers. :) --El Zoof 00:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

I did read the article -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 00:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Apologies. Hope you find some of my other stuff entertaining! :) --El Zoof 04:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

THANK'D!!

<center>

REJOICE!
You have received the
Double-Douser's Award
for exemplary utilization of boiling, scorchingly hot water.

Thank you for helping make
Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?
the most strongly favored article in Uncyclopedia history!

Much appreciated!!! :) --THINKER 06:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

A slightly belated thank you

-- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Belated Thanks!

I'm not really good on making banners, so here's a little gift for voting for A Visit with your Psychopathic Grandmother:

User:Mr.Vib has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

User:Mr.Vib has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Thanks!--Mr.Vib 02:39, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Man

I'd like to think you for re-writing Fyodor Dostoevsky. I wrote that when I was a noob and it's been a stain on my record ever since, and I've always been too lazy to rework it. Thanks for making so deserving a topic a worthy page. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Congradulations on your Article

	Rejoice, The fatgoat! You have been entitled to the Golden Shower Award
	For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

For the article Paul Hindemith, Which I reviewed. Congrats!!! --NXWave 11:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

	WARNING!
	Since you voted for Blue Screen of Death on VFH, your user talk page has encountered a fatal addition of a template.
	To correct this problem, you must either: 1. Accept SRXT's sincere thanks, or 2. Go and buy a better PC, you cheap bugger. Select an option _

SRXT. 23/08 06.53pm

All hail!

--The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 09:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

UN:PR

Hey, dude. I read your reviews, Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Otto Weininger(rewrite) and Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?Knot?. They were very, very, very short and lame. If you don't have anything to say, good or bad, don't review it. If you don't have any advice to give, don't review it. If you don't want to read an article, don't review it. It's obvious from these two reviews that you don't take pee review seriously and that you probably didn't even read the articles you reviewed, much to the annoyance of the writers. Please just don't review anything again, or check with me or MrN9000 before you do. It's that simple.   Le Cejak • <Apr 12, 2008 [6:03]>

Award from UN:REQ

This user created The Great Collapsing Hrung Disaster, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us! (If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)

MadMax 19:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes! An award! =D -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 16:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

You know, you have a nice sig. Though I have no idea how this comment fits in with the section. zhel☃el 04:25 December 17