User talk:Tagstit/Archive1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

DO NOT EDIT

Welcome!

Hello, Tagstit, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you:

If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but it certainly is a fun and easy way to express your creativity. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Tagstit/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If you want to write and don't know where to begin, browse our rewrite and idea categories. We have lots of articles just sitting around for someone to improve, so don't be afraid - dive right in!

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. Again, welcome!  — Sir Sycamore (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Reviews

Hey there Tagstit, just thought I'd pop over and say thanks for helping out and doing a bunch of reviews - it is noticed and much appreciated when people give their time to help others in this way. If you plan on carrying on, you might want to give a thought to joining PEEING - if you're interested, pop a request on the page, and I'll do the rest.

Hope you keep going - it's always good to have useful new users around! --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:08, Jan 15

Noob of the Month

You've been nominated for it. --Docile hippopotamus 11:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Your Review

Thanks for your review. I've been pacing around my place for a few hours waiting for a review. As for your criticism it is noted indeed. I do agree with you that I should try and focus more on a theme. I think I'll try to go with the "this game is awesome" thing (in a smart and witty way of course). As for your comments on the "swedish and french" inputs I do concur with the fact that they are a bit random and farfetched. That said I must reveal that my 2 native languages are swedish and french so I wanted that to show in a subtle way. I'll think about changing/removing that part but may be reluctant considering I like that personal touch it has. About the historical part I hope you got the Monty Python references; but I agree I should develop it a bit because as you said there is more potential there. Thanks for the + on formatting. And thanks again for the review =) When I get a bit more experienced I'll take a peek at your work as well. Cheers --kit 17:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Just edited the headlines as you said and took a look at moving one or several pictures to the left or other spots, but it just looked weird, as if one tried to hard to make it look good so i'll let them stay where they are. As for the other updates I'll do them later, gotta go get drunk and celebrate my friends birthday ;) Cheers--kit 17:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Alright man, remember everything I say is merely advice, not saying what you should do. It is your article do what you think is necessary! I am sure it will come out great! Good luck! --Tagstit 17:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey Tagstit, I read your review and you said something about capitalising words in headers. This is bad, unless the thing you are talking about has a proper name or needs proper capitals to turn it from a thing into a Thing. In some articles the proper capitals thing works really well: Scary Movie, for example, which I didn't tell you about in my review because I feel that stream of consciousness articles can sort of be formatted any way that makes sense, and the capitalisation seemed to have a purpose. Under normal circumstances, however, we use the Wikipedia convention of saying "Early career" rather than "Early Career", or "See also" rather than "See Also". Basically, what I'm saying is: don't tell someone that again, and that I am a grammar Nazi.
Aaaanyway... I'm glad Scary Movie is looking so good and doing so well, and well done on being nominated for NotM. If SysRq cares about you, you know you've made a great start. IronLung 08:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey

I'm SysRq. Welcome to Uncyc. I usually make a habit of formally introducing myself to notable noobs so that I may offer my assistance, and yet it seems you already know what's going on around here so I guess I'll bugger off. Good luck over at NotM. Oh, and do you have an adopter yet? Sir SysRq (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

So, I'm back. Get back on IRC if you can. I still have much wisdom to impart. Sir SysRq (talk) 02:38, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Lesson No. 2: Always respond to messages on the same page that the conversation was initiated on. I started on your page, therefore you respond here instead of on my page. Sir SysRq (talk) 03:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay how do you know when I write though? --Tagstit 03:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
My watchlist. I'm getting off now, we'll pick this up tomorrow. Sir SysRq (talk) 03:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Alright later dude! --Tagstit 03:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Can't really agree this time aorund

Hi, thanks for your review. Nice to know its being read at least.As for the review itself I can't really agree. First of I checked out my spelling and only found I had the 3 error you found (the weird sentence I rephrased, the word therefore I corrected) but the word panicking is spelled with a k (at least in other sources i've checked). So I don't think I deserved something as low as a 3 there.

You were also quite harsh with my humour commenting how I stay descriptive instead of satirical and how the article wasnt deep, well thought and long enough. First off; in my opinion the whole article is one giant satire. Facts are really distorted and I keep accentuating how the cop who actually did everything wrong did nothing wrong and vice versa. I quite like my way of writing it as if the whole article sounds short and descriptive although its one huge aberration (although it did happen). And I did spend 2 hours writing and rewriting different drafts to keep it short and concise, yet funny. I find that its short lengt makes it feel as if this is just a small report degrading its importance; thus making it even more satirical. So there again I dont agree with your views and low note. As for the comment to the thumb, I thought about it for 20mins and couldnt think of anything better in that time and still think its quite funny. If you can think of any better plz let me know ;)

In short; I corrected the spelling errors you discovered but I dont agree with your opinions about my way of writing this article and how its not funny. That doesn't mean I don't appreciate you review! As I said i'm real glad you took your time to read it and even more I appreciate you wrote a review. It gives me your point of view which I value. I just didn't agree so much with it on as many points as I did on your other review =P Thanks though! I hope i dont sound to harsh or unthankful. Cheers --kit 15:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Glad we are =) Cheers again ;) --kit 15:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I've reread my UnNews article over and over today and it has slowly crept up on me. I guess i start to agree with you. Damn! I still think you were harsh on some points but it could definitely be better. Is there a way I can remove it from the VFH nomination so I dont get too embarassed? (No need to get it trashed =P). Cheers --85.226.181.123 20:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Ya, ask Under User about taking it off, he is pretty knowledgeable on that stuff, or in the comment secion put I withdraw my nomination, that'll work too and someone might take it off for you.--Tagstit 21:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
{{vfh failed|sig=~~~|stamp=~~~~~|comment=Removed per author's request.}} Sir SysRq (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again Tag and thx SysRq for removing it. Appreciated =) Cheers! --kit 14:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Ahoy, friend!

You have been cordially invited to IRC at now-oclock on todaysterday. Please RSVP by five minutes ago. Hope to see you there! Sir SysRq (talk) 19:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey! Sorry but this computer doesn't do the IRC, I am still fiddling with it but isnt working yet. There are some things I need to ask you though if your available. Thanks!--Tagstit 19:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
I am indeed available. Also, are you using Firefox? Sir SysRq (talk) 19:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
No I am actually using my school computer and they block most of this so I am trying to get to it through other methods, but with little success =( --Tagstit 19:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Aha. But you have Firefox at home, right? CZ should be much more stable for you. Sir SysRq (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Ya, it is starting to work, takes forever to load though, I don't think it'll work, I will go on my home one when I can. --Tagstit 19:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, definitely get CZ for when you get home, it's way more stable than the web client. Also, try getting Skype and talking to me there, we can text chat there or you could hook up a mic if you wanted. But I do have a few things I wanted to go over with you today. Sir SysRq (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Wait by text chat do you mean through phone or just computer? And I will definitely try that. What did you want to go over? --Tagstit 19:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Text chat meaning just like IRC only using Skype. It's like instant messaging. I wanted to talk to you some about basic wiki skills, like how to make the contributions page and your watchlist work for you. Sir SysRq (talk) 20:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I am still quite unfamiliar with the contribution page, but I have been using the watchlist for a few days now and it has really helped me out. --Tagstit 20:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Cool, the watchlist is valuable indeed. You should be able to add pages to your watchlist without editing them, remove pages from your watchlist, and control what pages you see on your watchlist (seeing your own edits and whatnot). Now, as for the contribs page, that is very useful when it comes to dealing with other users. If I look at your contributions and see that you have edited in the last ten minutes, I can assume that you are online. However, if I look at Chronarion's edits and see that his last edit was in October of 2008, then I can assume that he is inactive (which he is). There are a ton of practical applications for the contribs page. Sir SysRq (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I will start messing with that then I didn't know it was so helpful. Thanks! --Tagstit 20:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

The deed

It is done. Sir SysRq (talk) 22:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Awesome! I read it all, the score went down though! That isn't good! Well, I will try to make it more enyclopedic, if you have any specific areas you would change you may do so, its cool to change it without asking. Thanks for the review!--Tagstit 22:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
I usually don't look at the other review when I do a second opinion. Looking at it now, I see that the reviewer isn't necessarily an experienced reviewer, no offense to him. Experienced reviewers tend to grade things a little more harshly as a general rule. Sir SysRq (talk) 22:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I revised the areas that put in "you". For example, if the article ever directly says "YOU need this," or "YOU could customize it in these amazing ways", it has been changed. I think I am ready for it to be nominated now!--Tagstit 22:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
One more thing I forgot to tell you: except for special cases, you should avoid the word "you" in encyclopedic articles. Damn edit conflict, you already figured that out. Let me look it over. Sir SysRq (talk) 22:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Haha alright --Tagstit 22:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
I've made a few changes, let me know if you have any major problems with anything I've done. I just had a few minor details that weren't worth going into in the review that I figured I better just fix myself. Feel free to revert anything I've done. If you have no further objections, though, I'll nominate it. Sir SysRq (talk) 22:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Nope, everything seems great thanks alot!--Tagstit 23:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
No problem. Sir SysRq (talk) 23:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

O.K

I gladly accept your offer for help on my article. I don't really know how to "bulk it up" so I might need some help with that. Let's try to go for VFH!--Snake7 00:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Snake7

Fixes to Poetry article on VFH

The poetry article has been re-worked some by the author. Although there is still some rambling in it, the editing definably cut it back some. You might want to re-consider your against vote. I'm not saying that you necessarily should change your vote; what you and I consider "rambling" might be different things. And, I could see how someone could think its still a rambling or hard to follow. --Mnbvcxz 05:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh wow ya I didn't know it was reworked thanks for the heads up. It doesn't have my vote but it certainly doesn't have my against anymore. Thanks alot!--Tagstit 05:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Article Help

I looked over the changes you made and it seems pretty good.--Snake7 16:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Snake7

Alright, you can edit my page of it if you want to take out anything you don't want, or add anything you do want. No need to ask me about it before you do it just go ahead. --Tagstit 16:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Could you tell me when you're done editing HowTo:Fix the Economy? When its done I'm going to submit it to pee review (yet again) with a (quick) after it to see if people think its VFH worthy. Since you where the reviewer booth times it could use a secound opionon.--Snake7 01:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Snake7

Ya sure! Almost done, trying to make it more readable. Any input would be appreciated.--Tagstit 01:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Featured!

Congratz mate on your featured article. You barely classify as a n00b anymore ;) Cheers to you. --kit 09:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Haha, thanks alot! Pretty exciting! You need to get one now!--Tagstit 14:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Nice

Just read your review and this time around I do agree on almost everything. I'll do most of the changes you suggested tomorrow or next time I get some time but feel free to help me with the humour part. Making it less bias is smart indeed but not that easy. As for the fact that its a bit to "factual" (even invented facts) I found it hard to avoid even though I agree. There again if ya have any ideas your welcome to help =) I'll work myself on it a bit more for a few days or weeks and, who knows maybe Ill post it for featured later on. Anyway glad I could help with my review and that you appreciated it. Just cheked it again though and there is still one thing about the prose that seems weird to me. In your 2nd quote you write at some point "He also unexpectedly died." Imo it sounds weird, shouldn't it be "He also died unexpectedly". If not then my mistake but otherwise you should have a look at it ;)

Again, thx for your tips and feel free to edit in some inputs. Cheers =) --kit 23:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey I will help with your article, but I believe you are talking about Star Trek Online, and I didn't review that one, I was going to but never got it it. Another guy did. And I will definitely look at mine thanks.--Tagstit 23:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Haha, my bad. I thought I saw your signature saying you would do it and never actually checked who did the review. *embarassing =P --kit 10:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for helping with the economy article. Hope you win Noob of month.--Snake7 20:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Snake7

VFD

Hi Tag, please remember to place {{VFD}} on each article you place on VFD. Thanks. ~Jewriken.GIF 12:38, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that, Ill definitely do that for now on.--Tagstit 19:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Believe it or not...

Some of the minor edits I made to Scary Movie were, in fact, prescribed in its second Pee Review. Don't you want your articles to have the best grammar possible? –72.193.236.89 05:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh I forgot to say

I did the review! Hope you find it helpfull. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 14:08 24 January 2009

Thanks for your review. The economy article is still in pee review, though. A couple days ago I saw that it was dropping down on the request list, so I edited it to get it up there again. Now I think people might see you didn't make the last edit, so they will think it is about to be review by me. Could you make a quick edit to the request in case that happends?--Snake7 00:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Snake7

This

is for you:

~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF

You now have your very own pretty sig! Just check the Raw Signatures box under Preferences and mutter the following incantation:

{{subst:nosubst|User:Tagstit/sig}}

Issues? Complaints? Let me know. If you hate the sig, that's fine, I just want you to know how to make one. You can edit that sig however you want as long as it meets the requirements. And once you do that, just sign normally with four tildes. You should be all set. Congrats again on making feature! Oh, and I noticed you didn't promote yourself so I did it for you. In the future, feel free to promote yourself when you meet the requirements for the next rank. Cheers, Mr. Commander! Sir SysRq (talk) 03:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey thanks alot! I like it, how do you change it though, like for the future?--~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 16:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Just edit User:Tagstit/sig. Feel free to look at my old sigs or my current one for inspiration/code to steal. Also, if you just wanna make a new one, go to User:Tagstit/sig2 (or some other page, it doesn't matter if it says "sig" in it) and make it there. It's editable just like any other article or page on this site, it's basically a template. Sir SysRq (talk) 17:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey it's SysRq! ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 18:07 27 January 2009
Hey, it's Orian! Sir SysRq (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
*Hugs Sys and feels whole again* ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 18:14 27 January 2009
You are just so freaking gay. =] Sir SysRq (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
why thank you. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 19:02 27 January 2009
AHHH! Orian has stalked me all the way to my page!--~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 19:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Don't worry I won't stay in this slum for long. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 19:48 27 January 2009
Hey, this may be a slum but its my slum. Don't make fun of it.--~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 19:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, odds are he'll be back to my beautiful talk page within three minutes. Mine's a much prettier yellow than your boring white. Also, FU edit conflict. Sir SysRq (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Well, if my adopter would tell me how to create color on my talk page I wouldn't have a boring white! =P haha just messin.--~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 19:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
God damn UnDaddies. So unreliable. Would you seriously like some help with a userpage makeover? Take a look at my userpage and tell me that's not gorgeous. I do good work, I do good work. Sir SysRq (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Ya sure! I want it to be lookable. How do I do that?--~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 20:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Let's talk about tables then. Meet me at User:Tagstit/sandbox. Just start by adding whatever content you want, whether it be one word or a whole rant about how having a nigger president has made everyone's black girlfriend's father uncomfortable about her dating a white boy. Then gimme a shout out on the talk page and I'll be right with you. Sir SysRq (talk) 20:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Ok, well ill try to get started soon--~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 22:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hint: start signing with just four tildes without the "--", I included one tilde in your sig so that you don't have to do that. Or just remove the tilde. Whatever you want to do. When you wanna start working with tables and such, just edit that sandbox page and I'll be over in a jiffy. Sir SysRq (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good, ill get on it in a bit~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 22:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
alsoyoumaywanttoputaspacebetweenyourcommentandyoursigkthxbai Sir SysRq (talk) 22:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Have I ever told you that I'm gay? ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 22:49 27 January 2009
I was wondering what my penis was doing in your anus. Sir SysRq (talk) 23:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Your pee pee is where!? ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 00:09 28 January 2009
If by "where" you mean "anus" then yes. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
You're pee pee is anus? You mean like a girl? ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 00:13 28 January 2009
If by "girl" you mean "anus" then yes. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Eww no because anuses don't have cooties. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 00:19 28 January 2009
Yeah, just HIV. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Hang on, are we having the same conversation twice? ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 00:23 28 January 2009
If by "conversation" you mean "anus" then yes. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
If by "If by "conversation" you mean "anus" then yes. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)" you mean "anus" then yes. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 00:28 28 January 2009

Review Favor possibly?

Hey I'm the relatively new guy, You read my random babbling and reviewed my Homework article, I was wondering if you had the time if you could look over a new one I've recently completed. I think its more together, has pictures, more on a single topic, and based of a real event. Any criticism, advice, funny not funny, all comments are welcome. Thanks

--Volatile 07:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Ya of course, I will mark it and be done with it in a bit. --~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 18:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey, Thanks SO much for taking your time to review my new work. The advice is terrific! I have a bit of an ADD mind and when i find something funny like to branch off and sometimes dont stop until i realize i had no idea what i was talking about in the first place. I have gone over and edited my work again, removing some of the random garbage, new picture, new ending, etc. The formatting is still confusing for me.

If you get the chance here is the link

If you get the chance to take another look, and even just leave some comments it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks again for all you have already done!

--Volatile 18:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Review

Thanks for doing that so quickly. It was a piece I already had, which I will set about converting into a full article rather than a short script. It was originally an assignment limited to a thousand words so I had to end it quickly and cut out description. Still, I will get around to finishing it properly before lonf. Thanks - The Super Pope 12.54, 1st Febuary 2009

Thanks!

For voting Why?:Am I a Power Ranger? into the top ten articles of 2008! Have fun! ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 00:03 2 February 2009

Congrats

Congratulations on becoming Noob of the Month, son! I'm so proud... Sir SysRq (talk) 21:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Aww thanks pa, couldn't have done it without ya. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 21:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Now I don't believe that for a minute. Get your ass up to your room and think about what you just said to me. But walk slow, I wanna watch. Sir SysRq (talk) 21:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I HATE YOU! YOU DON'T EVEN CARE ABOUT ME! IM RUNNING AWAY AND NEVER COMING BACK! *cry* ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 22:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Hate it when you leave, love watching you go. =] Sir SysRq (talk) 23:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Just make sure you stay under the age of 10, I grew up and then I became useless. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 23:16 2 February 2009

RAAAWR

RAAAAAWR.

Gavin would like to thank you once more for sympathizing with him enough to vote for his book to be among the top ten books of 2008. Unless, of course, you happen to be a transsexual, in which case you are a freak and should not email him. Much love, Sir SysRq (talk) 21:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review!


Behold, the cyber ninjastar, unique in that I am the only one that awards them, being a keyboard key and all. Enjoy. Sir SysRq (talk) 23:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

WOOHOO! what do you do with ninja stars? Do I put it on my awards page? ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 23:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Aye, tis a minor award one user can give to another for just about any reason at all. They're nice to have. Oh, remember that you're allowed to give these too. You can also give cookies and other awards you think people deserve for all the nice things they do for you. Also, feel free to make up awards as you please. Just make a template in your userspace and drop one on someone's userpage. Sir SysRq (talk) 23:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh I need to make one for you Orian and UU! You guys have been awesome so far! ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 23:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, that's just part of my job description and part of Orian's creepiness. However, thank you templates are generally considered the polite thing to do whenever someone votes for you for something, whether it be an article or NotM, for example. For example, I just sent out my thank you templates for people that voted for UnBooks:My New Life as a T-Rex on Top 10. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I will try to make a few! When I am done tell me what you think! ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 00:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Cool. Oh, and your thank you templates don't have to look as pretty as mine. Mine are, after all, the most beautiful templates in the world and are not to be attempted. Sir SysRq (talk) 01:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

RE: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Neurotic

Firstly thanks you for your imput, I'm glad you liked it! :) Also about the prose confusing, ironically, I wasn't sure exactly what you meant. Was it things like I pointed out in your articles, like word choice/order? Or were you just compleatly unsure what was happening? Maybe there were some jokes you just simply didn't get and that can't always be helped, bear in mind I'm from the UK. If you coudl give me some examples though that'd be great!

You're point on images was bassically fine, my images are never earth shattering. But I do still like the first one because it's (or at least strongly gives the impression) written on a sticky note, it struck me as funny.

I'm sorry but I like the pooing thing too much to get rid of, it follows on from the breakfast scenario and I think helps tie the article together (along with the fuckathon) also wanted to create the impression that he'll probably think about it for the rest of his life.

Also I really don't see the title as a problem (though Hv mentioned it too) people are more likely to search for Neurotic than UnBooks:A day in teh life of a neurotic person man also about p00ing!, Insomnia was mine and was also first person, i don't remeber it getting the same problem. Also I just find the false information style very hard.

Thanks again though, If I go foreward to VFH with this can I count on your vote? ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 02:04 3 February 2009

I just meant like your ramble too much and it seems to go from funny to confusing in SOME parts. Others it works like a charm. And yes, some jokes I just don't get and so some jokes may not work for me at all but for everyone else. You can DEFINITELY count on my vote. In fact, when the time is right. I will even Nom this so you don't look like such a whore...just kinda a whore...unless you want to selfnom which works too ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 02:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Some bit's were meant to be circular and self-defeating like:
Cquote1 He’s exactly like me, he’s just as paranoid, depressed, angst-ridden and emotionally crippled as I am, I have to talk to him— but how? I hate it when people talk to me, trying to pick out sincerity from sarcasm is like picking carrots out of vomit. Best just to leave it. He’ll hate me slightly less if I do... Cquote2
was that maybe what you were meaning? Anyway I'm just having a look over it for expression stuff mostly and then I'll probably nom it, my last three features all came from self noms. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 02:25 3 February 2009
I meant more like little things throughout. Maybe the use of a few exclamation points good help for example, "I didn't mean to be racist. Relax the political correctness people can’t hear you inside your own head... Yet." Should maybe be "I didn't mean to be racist! Relax the political correctness people can’t hear you inside your own head... Yet." Kind of small and maybe dumb but just a suggestion. Alright I am also thinking about nominating my Why?:Be Emo?. Do you think it has a chance? Would it have your vote? I understand if not because I wrote it in like an hour. Might not be that great. But I liked it. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 02:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
NOM MAI ARTICKAL TOO PLOZ. Also, I am printing off both of your articles tonight for some before-bed reading. Any and all nightmares shall be blamed upon the two of you equally. Orian, as always, you can count on my vote. Your article looks great, I just wanna give it a good read now after skimming it earlier. And Tags, I look forward to reading yours in depth as well. When I skimmed over it, however, I noticed many grammatical errors. Perhaps I'll take my red pen with me to bed so I can mark it up and correct it tomorrow. Aye, I be the awful English teacher of Uncyc. Arrgh. I also apparently be a pie-rat. Sir SysRq (talk) 02:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Ya it isn't completely done yet remember! It needs a firm ending and a prologue...or an introduction. But I hope you like it! ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 02:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah actually your right about that! I'll sort that and then could you maybe go through it and see if you want to change any other small bits, they're very hard for authers to spot in tehir own writing, kind of why edditirs exist. also I already nommed it Uncyclopedia:VFH/Neurotic. Oh and you may also like this I wrote it ages ago but it never got much attention. Let me know what you think of that on it's talk page or whatever. Maybe it's crap. And I'll look into your articles momenterily. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 16:53 3 February 2009
I voted for it. And ya I will look over it for sure. If you want put it on Pee so I can full on review dat bitch. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 02:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh my god, I actually forgot to sign last night. I suck. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 16:53 3 February 2009

NISE ARTICKAL

Alright, I'm sure Orian will show up and read this too, so I won't bother going to his talk page. I read your article last night and really enjoyed it. It's a cute little narrative that has some real potential. It reminds me of UnBooks:My New Life as a T-Rex in a way, just as far as the style is and all. I'll give it a full Pee later, because I'd love to help you flush this out into a consice and final article that is presentable for VFH. Overall, though, I like it. It just needs to be finished.

Orian, your article is great as it is. It knocked me on my ass. It knocked my brother on his ass. It's a hit. Probably your best to date. I think this may top Insomnia. I'm off to vote for it now. Good job, queer. =]

Great job to both of you, those were some great articles. Happy writing! Sir SysRq (talk) 14:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Sys, I just finished the storyline so I need to definetily add some more jokes and do stuff to finalize it. So whenever you ready I want to get this worked on. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 15:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Rockin. Well, I'm at school now so I can't rightly do a full review, can I? As soon as I get home I'll have a review for you. Sir SysRq (talk) 15:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I will put it on Pee now and you can review it when you get home. I will say only you can review it. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 15:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I'll go tag it or whatever. Also, thanks for the nom, friend. =] Sir SysRq (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Of course! I am going to go nominate mine and Snake7's HowTo:Fix the Economy. I don't expect it to be killer, just wanna see how it does...would you vote for it? ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 15:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I'll take another look at it and see if anything has changed. If I think it's VFH ready, you have my vote. But I'm only going to vote for it if it deserves it. Sir SysRq (talk) 15:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Alright, if you don't like it, no hard feelings. It is my second worst to date anyways and I didn't really even write it. Just added a ton to it. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 15:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, really? Where's the original? Sir SysRq (talk) 15:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I really don't know. He changed em all to the version I made. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 15:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

You are a nice user

So...


And you are also good at peeing...


You

I've heard about you. You're cool. But anyway, the point I'm trying to make is COCKS. Phew, that's good to get it off my chest. - [19:48 4 February 2009] YYettie

See this kid, Yettie? This is my noob. =] Sir SysRq (talk) 20:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh! Yes I saw that. You got yourselfs a n00b. Nice choice of n00b, too. Very well built n00b, not a spindly, starving n00b, but a strong muscular n00b. How much would you sell him for? - [21:03 4 February 2009] YYettie
Eight eighthpence and that lovely straw you have been teasing me with for the last twenty minutes. Not a penny more. Please hurry, I'm hoping to separate him from his family in hopes that he will one day write a book and mention me. Sir SysRq (talk) 22:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Youd sell me! How dare you! And hey Yettie! Thanks for your brilliant point. By the way to everyone....my computer is down so it will be very hard for me to respond for a while. I have to use my ipod or friends computer. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 23:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
No worries, I'm actually doing that review now so if you want to get your skinny lil ass over there in like 20 minutes it should be done. Sir SysRq (talk) 23:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
I thought was a brilliant point too, ya know, Tagstit. - [07:42 5 February 2009] YYettie

BETRAYAL!

You bastard! You voted for some else as N00b of the Month! I hate you.

Actually I don't really care all that much I just thought it was funny that you mentioned it on the nomination page and then voted for the other guy. No hard feelings. Peace.

--Guildensternenstein 20:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

no hard feelings. Just putting my vote for my opinion of the better candidate and saying why. Sorry to disappoint ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 23:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Did I ever tell you...

That me and your dad used to be in a band? back in 2008 it was... ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 23:38 4 February 2009

Aye. I left after learning that Orian played no instruments and could not sing. Sir SysRq (talk) 23:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
I was there too, lurking in the shadows... -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
I voted for it you article whores. By the way thanks for the review pops! As soon as I can im gonna wrap that up. Thanks slot! ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 00:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Slot? Is that like some variant of slut? "Get on your knees, slot! Sock my dack, slot!" Sir SysRq (talk) 00:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Oviously that's not what he meant, and keep your fucking penis away from me! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
hey while we are whoring...anybody else wanna vote me for reviewer of the month??? If not then...ima be sad :( Also my cardboard box nomination!!!~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 00:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Oviously he is my noob and you need to mind your fucking business. I'll stick my dick wherever I damn well please. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Ya, anything that has a dick turns him on he just sticks his dick in it. I am thinking about putting a fake dick on a pencil sharpener to learn him one. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 01:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Oviously. Sir SysRq (talk) 02:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Obiously. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 02:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Ovsly. Sir SysRq (talk) 03:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Osly ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 04:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Oy Sir SysRq (talk) 15:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
O - [16:59 5 February 2009] YYettie
Sir SysRq (talk) 19:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
If by "" you mean "anus" then yes. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 19:58 5 February 2009

Ok, we should get ready to send it to VFH. Sorry about taking so long to respond, but I had other things to do.--Snake7 01:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Snake7

Diary of a Monkey Lover

I was looking at User:Tagstit/Unbooks:Dairy of a Monkey Lover. Good work, but you need to use other non-ape related images. --Docile hippopotamus 11:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Surely that's the point? Hence the title. Clever that. How the title links up with the contents of the article and the images in the article. It's like one big, nice, tied up bundle. - [14:05 7 February 2009] YYettie
Alright well I will see what I can do. I love suggestions and was thinking it needed maybe a jungle picture or something. Any other ideas you may have would be awesome. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 19:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I disagree. I liked that they were all similar images. It gave the article unity. But what the fuck do I know, I'm just some guy. Sir SysRq (talk) 20:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Well ya, I am open to all suggestions because I am just a new guy. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 20:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I think it might be done. Just one question, do you think the article looks better With the HowTo template at the middle or the bottom?--Snake7 15:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Snake7

Bottom for sure ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 19:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I'm done. Nominate the article. Right now. No more making improvements or waiting for a pee review. We're finally done.--Snake7 21:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Snake7

We have to wait for a spot to open up before we nominate it. Once one is thrown out or put on the main page we will put it on. Also, I think you should be the one to nominate it because it is mainly yours. I will vote and put in a very good word about it. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 22:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Just a suggestion. The images are good but none stand out to me. --Docile hippopotamus 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Tagstit, we have a problem

I finally got to reviewing your article, but it you look at it, you will see that none of the stuff is in a table! It is like the Pee review table is not working! Please help if you are online!

--Skate1168 (Talk) 00:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I fixed it for you. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh no, I saw that, then I tried putting my sig so it would show that I reviewed it, and now the table won't appear at all. Sorry :# ;(

--Skate1168 (Talk) 00:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind, he fixed it again! :D Oh, and you can see the review now! :D

P.S. I use too many smileys, don't I?

--Skate1168 (Talk) 00:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Haha sorry, I am not able to respond too quickly because my computer is down so I am forced to use other mean of talking. But I will take a look at it and thanks Sockpuppet for fixing that for me. And smileys are fun! Don't worry bout it ;) ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 00:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Okay thanks! I thought you were not even online!

--Skate1168 (Talk) 00:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I read your review, about thirty times better than the ones you used to do! I am glad you seemed to enjoy the article. About your critiquing though, you are good with compliments, but you need to work on saying what needs improvements. For example, I just did two more reviews and they were really low scores, but most of the time, low scores just means lots of room for improvement. Keep practicing reviewing and you will get a better eye for catching little mistakes. Thanks alot for the review though bud! If I nominate it for a feature you can vote for it if you want! =) I would like that. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I have to ask, how do you just vote for a article to be featured?

--Skate1168 (Talk) 01:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Skate, please NEVER sign a post underneath your comment. The four tildes go at the END of your comment. Thank you! Sir SysRq (talk) 01:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, ok. Skate1168 (Talk) 16:42, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Voting

Sorry but I decided to start a new section. To vote, go to the vote for hightlight page. From there click all nominations and you can see all the articles and votes. Then, you just press the vote button next to an article you like. From there just edit the page by looking at previous edits, and doing what they do. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 01:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

*sniff* They just grow up so fast... Sir SysRq (talk) 01:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Just tryin to make ya proud pops~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 02:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I nomanted the artical. Hooray.--Snake7 01:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Snake7
It is article, and I voted for it! Hope it does well! I will see if my many fatherly figures will go out and vote for it too. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 05:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Collaboration

Okay, Tags, here's another project for you. I want you to take part in a mass-collab that I am starting up with Yettie, Orian, and the gang. It's called The Zombie Uprising, and Other Funniest Apocalypses and so far it looks like it's gonna be a pretty good article. We're all taking our own little apocalypse stories, and I want you to do one. I want you to get some experience doing collabs with other users, because they're fun and will develop you as a writer. Dealing with other peoples' ideas can only help you create your own. Perhaps writing with a cool bunch will be just what you need.

Anyways, I'm anxious to get this going. I did that introduction already, and I've started my section. Just go ahead and start your own, follow the theme, and stay in communication. Talk to you tomorrow, buddy! Sir SysRq (talk) 02:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Sweet! I would love to do that! Thanks alot it really feels nice to be included in something with you guys besides unconsential sex. But anyways, thanks alot I will brainstorm a bit and start writing. I hope I don't screw it up! ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 05:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Eh, you'll be fine, kid. Remember that I'm gonna be working with you and correcting any mistakes you make so just Be italic and use this opportunity to grow as a writer. Don't worry about making mistakes or messing things up. Sir SysRq (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I'll mess up more than you. I bet you 500 English Ducats. - [16:47 11 February 2009] YYettie

Thanks for voting

And now, a special message from the President *pff...hehe* of the United States
BushAnnan My fellow Uncyclopedians,
This past vote on VFH has been an emotional one for our wiki. The people have spoken, and I am honorated to accept the privilegitude to servify the Uncyclopedia front page for another eight years.
What do you mean, articles are only featured for one day?
Thank you for voting. Much love, Sir SysRq (talk)

me

Hi, I am Bitchass441, the one who did that awful article, Bubblegum pop. I am super drunk right now, and that was my debut article. Since you are the top reviewer on this site, I am considering a total rewrite. tell me what you think about that. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bitchass441 (talk • contribs)

Top reviewer, 'eh? Rewrites are only worth doing if you have a new, fresh and most importantly funny idea. If you think you have that, then go for it. Be italic. No one will eat you. But I suggest you create it here, that way it won't be touched until you're finished writing it. - [12:12 15 February 2009] YYettie
Thanks Yettie. And yes, he is right, but before you rewrite anything, I STRONGLY suggest you take a look at what I suggested. Go to VFH and see what a few featured articles are to get an idea of what good is here. Then rewrite once you have a solid idea, like Yettie said. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 17:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Drive by: link ficks! ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 17:26 15 February 2009
Drive by: Top reviewer? Sir SysRq (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
You heard the man. Did he stutter? ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 18:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Eye Candy

Cicada molting animated-2

Nor can I stop looking at this. Sir SysRq (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

The eye candy article sounds pretty interesting. It also sounds delicious. An idea I have for it is that there would be a lemon flavor for eye candy. That would be pretty painful.--Snake7 00:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

It would be, Sysrq put some suggestions on the talkpage of that article if you want to take a look. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 00:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Especially after my suggestion of having eye candy be a brand of flavored eye drops. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Ya, are you gonna finish checking the last two of my new articles yet? ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 00:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Patience, grasshopper. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
How'd you know I was a grasshopper? ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 00:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
The legs gave it away. I can't stop looking at them. Sir SysRq (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Two things, buddy.

First of all: This talk page is getting long. You should consider archiving it.

Second of all: I'm having a little party and you're invited. Sign up, start voting and nominating, and help me test this bad boy. Participation is what's going to make it successful, and I'd be honored if a good writer such as yourself would come and help out. =] Sir SysRq (talk) 01:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Woo Hoo! I will go for sure. By the way, check out my new game I am making on my page. It is a bit bland right now but I am photshopping in a badass title. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 02:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Looks pretty groovy, my friend. Looking forward to seeing it finished. So far, looks like I can just tell it that I'm a boy and not much else. But I can't wait to see it done. Also, I can't wait to see how well IC goes! Thanks for joining, just stay tuned until Sunday when we actually get the test underway. Also, please feel free to link to IC using LOB (your current rank) as a suffix (like VFH, NotM, and the like). In fact, I'd like it if you did so there I said it. =D Sir SysRq (talk) 02:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Ya I am planning to feature a few of well known Uncyclopedia users in it too as special guests. Like for example, the first one is going to be if you want to go beat off in the bush, the bushes are going to be rustling and Orian is going to pop out and join you on your mission for a while. Do you think users will be offended by that? If so I wanna know quick. And I think this is a really good idea! I can see myself getting into this! Hope others do too! Also, I put it on my sig, as you can see here ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 02:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
I did see that, and thanks. This is kinda becoming my little project and I'm pretty invested in it at this point. The idea for the game seems fine. When it comes to parodying other users, we like to operate by our universal policy. Just do what you want and deal with pissy users later. Because you know us Uncyclopedians, never being able to take a joke and all. I hate just how serious we are all the time. We sure need to lighten up and get a sense of humor. Now, about archiving this talk page... Sir SysRq (talk) 03:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Could you go ahead and do it for me properly the first time so I know how to do it in the future? ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 03:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

You

are bombarding recentchanges. What's with you kids? Coming on Uncyc, all excited and doing stuff. Making the rest of us look bad, is what you're doing! Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, it is just a bad habit I have been trying to cut out. Do you like my new game???? It is pretty legit.~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 04:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
I haven't actually read it, mainly due to the seething rage I experience every time a new page is created, but it's definitely on my to-do list for tomorrow. For now, I'm just doing some lazy rc patrolling before I go to bed. In unrelated news, has anybody ever told that your talk page is long? Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Mhm...Sissy is supposed to fix that for me because I don't really know the best way to archive it. I apologize for his laziness. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 04:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
What most people do is create an archive page, like User talk:Tagstit/Archive1, and move all of their conversations older than a day or two there. You should totally do that, so I can initiate your talk page after it gets cleaned. Oh, and don't forget to put a link to your archive somewhere on the page so people can find it. Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh wow thanks bud! I will definitely do that thanks alot! ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 04:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects