User talk:THE/arkive fourf

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

My fellow American

Remember how a long time ago, I asked if you'd support American (species) in a VFH vote? And you said yes?

Well, MY FELLOW AMERICAN, the time has come! TOO LONG have America-related articles LANGUISHED in mediocrity! JOIN WITH ME, and together we shall see AMERICANS step forth into a GOLDEN FUTURE!

Unless, of course, you're British. But I'll take my chances on that. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 00:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I gave it my vote. Good luck!!!!!!!!!1111111 --THE 00:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

American (species)

Your spelling is somewhat superior, too. Changing 'described' to 'descibed'...pah! :) RabbiTechno 19:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

At least I didn't change it to "deskribed." --THE 19:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


Doesed you has He Who Writes Labs of Burning Candles? I need know what the hell I be doing. --Polystyrene Man 22:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

I is snedded it. --THE 19:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I has an e-qustion

Ok, I was looking through your pages last pages your pages and I couldn't could rememember what you were talking about when you said something about talking like this... um, no it was somesomething to do with that man... the really hot mom that is mine. Weellll, the point is that I have two hairy molars, and they're all coming on to me. And I have Mexican skin, but my heart is Polish.

Ummmmmmmm Hummmmmm kick the cackling cracker to the pavement.


kthxbai -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 23:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Is Dan on crack? Or just laxatives? Again? --Polystyrene Man 23:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Either that, or somebody knows his password... --THE 23:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

<Unrelated discussion censored>

I censord the diskussion below as it was unrlated to uncyklopeedia.



BITCH IS BITCH A IS. --Polystyrene Man 00:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

OH MY GOD, it is. I've been working on it for an obscenely long time, and took a break to write an unnews, which I'm working on as we speak. Hoo, yah, I'll be sleeping tonight! AAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH.
P.S. My discussion page now looks extremely ugly. Thank you. :D --THE 00:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I've gots me 11 pages and while being naught but halfway through. FUCKS A ME. WHY DID I WAIT SO LONG TO DO THIS... Ahlso: do we need a citations PAGE or do the in-text citations count? (The ones with the parenthesis- (Spang,"A Fabulous Poem!")
Yeah, do we need a whole bibliography pages BASICXALYL? --Polystyrene Man 01:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I has 10 pages. You is ahead of me. I too, am not nearly finished.
And yes, you can indeed use in-page citations. But still...FUCKING FUCK. --THE 01:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
No but wait. What I meant is can you ONLY use in-page citations if'n you want? --Polystyrene Man 01:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Ooooooh...dammit. That's a good question. It doesn't say in the description, so I'm at a loss. You might want to include a citations page at the end just to be on the safe side, but on the other hand, that could be an unbelievable pain in the ass, especially considering the huge volume of work we'd be listing out. I, personally, am going to stick with JUST using in-page citations out of laziness, and hope it's good enough. Hopefully Leoispotter will come on tonight and help us out (though knowing him, he probably hasn't started yet) --THE 01:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Ahahaha, Dano? He's not going to do it until tomorrow at 2pm. But anyways, I've asked around and no one can give me an answer about the citation. It be mighty tempting to not do a citations page. I'm sure most people WON'T, and O'Neil pretty lax about that kind of stuff if a lot of people fuck up. Ayuh. --Polystyrene Man 02:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm not doing a seperate citations page. Considering how much time it would take and the fact that she indeed be mellow, I'll skip that part. Oh, and I'm almost on to my eleventh page now. Yeehaw! At this rate, I should be finished by...two? --THE 02:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Alright then, I won't do another page... Mmmmhmmm, page 13 as of nows. I have diction and imagery completely finished, all of the definitions in place. I just need quotes/analprobing for syntax and tone. Yay, bed before 3. --Polystyrene Man 02:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
MMkay, what was the name of the E.E. Cummings poem we analprobed? I don't have that packet, but I wants to look it up on my interweb browsing utility device. --Polystyrene Man 02:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
You mean "Me up at does"? --THE 02:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Many spanks, that'd be it. Page 14.
I'm losing my head mind. --Polystyrene Man 02:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Page 13. You's still ahead of moi. AAAAAAARRRRGH. --THE 03:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Who are you using for extra poets? I've got Thom Yorke, Steve Howe, George Harrison, Paul McCartney, Roger Waters, David Gilmour, Syd Barret... aaah, she better not have a problem with that --Polystyrene Man 03:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
SHIT! Alas, I only just remembered her enabling us to use external poetic sources. Indeed, I shall have to try and infuse some into the remaining ten sections that remain blasphemously un-completed by me. I'll have to include Thom Yorke, possibly R.E.M. if I can think of any way of making their bizarre lyrics relevent to anything...well, I suppose "Aluminum tastes like fear" is a simile...and Pink Floyd lyrics for sure. I'd love to throw "YOU FUCKED UP OLD HAG" in there just to get a reaction... --THE 03:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
DO IT. I used "I'm a reasonable man get off my case get off my case get off my case" under repetition. So good, soo good. You has 10 sections left??? I gots 14. Basically, the rest of "Tone". Everything else (diction, imagery, syntax) is flippin-a-tit done. --Polystyrene Man 03:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I's been jumping around randomly, so I gots roughly half of tone, and some of imagery, and one syntax.Have you commenced commencement of French thing? I hasn't, and will likely be up again tomorrow doing that. Procrastination, be not proud! --THE 03:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Eyah, we had something to do in Francais? Was it big? 15 pages. --Polystyrene Man 03:41, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Les Choristes thingymajig, pour...Tuesday, whatever le mot pour Tuesday is. 14. --THE 03:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Oh yeah, well we have double study hall tomorrow anyways. --Polystyrene Man 03:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I forgot about the double, how woooonderful. Alas, the floor next to my desk is covered in poems that I unceremoniously shredded out of the book. I is hoping we won't need it any further, or I'll need some tape, or something :/ --THE 04:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't know. At this point, I don't care what happens to the poems. I had to miss game 4 of the world series for this stupid assignment. I be pissed. 16 pàgés. --Polystyrene Man 04:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, this is quite maddening. It seems as if no matter how long I spend working on this thing, there's still an endless expanse of work ahead. Beaucoups. Or is it pronounced Bow Cups? Anywho. My biggest fear now is that exhaustion will set in and I'll no longer be able to coherently think of sentences, not to mention in-depth ANALysis. That would be trés SUCKY. --THE 04:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I coherent stopped ago long making sentences. WHY DON'T ANY OF THESE POEMS HAVE END RHYMES??? Tell me if you find one, k? :

I guess I'll throw my two cents into this already long dead conversation and say: THAT ENGLISH ASSIGNMENT WAS A FUCKING NIGHTMARE!!!!!-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Excellent voting

Copyright question mark
Thank you!
For voting for Books never written!
Cainad thinks you deserve no less than a beige, green-bordered thank-you note for your support.
So that is what you get.

Seriously though, thanks. Leaving the article un-featured as a gimmick seemed... silly.

--The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 02:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Two things

1. I cast my vote across the seas in positive outlook for you.

2. I need know the Francework again. --Polystyrene Man 21:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Go. Away.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Le devoir in FRANCe was pg 33F and 41C en pacquet. And pg 72 A+B in bOOOK. Oh, and thanks for the vote :) --THE 18:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Most Haunted

Yeah, I just read your comment you left on the talk page, and I hereby give you permission to to so. -Razorflame 18:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Also, view User:Razorflame/Ideas and tell me what you think of them. -Razorflame 18:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I'll edit it in a few minutes. The ideas look promising :). --THE 23:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I went through and edited it. I toned down the informal tone a bit and made it sound a bit more like a wikipedia article. I tried not to alter it too drastically, but if you think I did, you can revert my editz if you want. Oh, and by the way, I've never watched that show before in my life :). --THE 00:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I changed only one thing that you did: the number of episodes....I decided to change it to 14 or so-Razorflame Flame war (contributions) Talk 01:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, kool. --THE 01:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Go ahead and re-review this again if you want. I've added in quite a bit of information since you last took a look at it, so I'm wondering if you could recheck it again? -Razorflame Flame war (contributions) Talk 22:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

You mean edit it again or pee review it? --THE 22:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Let's get another Pee Review...I'll make the page shortly.

Again, thanks for the pee review:

GoldenShower Rejoice, THE! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
and also thanks for the suggestions, but I've decided to take out the episode list I think. Do you think that that was a good idea? -Razorflame Flame war (contributions) Talk 17:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I think it was a good choice. After all, the article was a bit long; by removing that section you took out its weakest link, and the "failed attempts" section does basically the same thing as the episode list, but is more concise and is funnier. Thanks for the award! :) --THE 17:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem. -Razorflame Flame war (contributions) Talk 19:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Pee Review

I'll review one of your articles if you review one of mine? -Razorflame Flame war (contributions) Talk 01:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Are any of my articles even on pee review right now? XD. Okay. --THE 01:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I have 3 articles waiting for review's up to the users to review them...-Razorflame Flame war (contributions) Talk 01:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Is it okay if I do it tomorrow? I'm in a moderately lazy mood tonight. --THE 01:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Meh...3 articles is a lot, but that is OK! Go ahead and wait until tomorrow :) I'm patient :) -Razorflame Flame war (contributions) Talk 01:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Oops! Sorry d00d! Yesterday I was swamped with real-world obligations and didn't have enough time to do your review :(. Oh well, I'm glad you got your three articles reviewed, anyway! --THE 14:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for voting for Cancer

Fuckyeah2 Aaawww...
THE/arkive fourf has been diagnosed with cancer.
frontal lobe cancer. Yeah. Incurable.

Have a weird little user template! --  Le Cejak <-> 22:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Woooohooo! :) --THE 14:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
GLAD YOU LIKED IT!   Le Cejak <-> 21:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Artistic Chemistry

GoldenShower Rejoice, THE! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

I'm really glad that you liked it. I hope you noticed that the headers translated into words, which is the reason for the notebook ("Carbon, Radium, Wildcardium (Z), Yttrium" = "CRAZY", etc.). The workbook is awkward, I know, but it's there so that people can translate the headers. I don't know what pics to add, but I did flesh out the introduction like you said. I liked your review, THE. When I fix it up, would you be willing to help me some more? --  Le Cejak <-> 21:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, yes, I can see the word translations now, and the need for the workbook section makes a little more sense :D. Yeah, then I'd work on just adding some more "comments" for each of the elements, so it will look a little less barren. And I'd be glad to help out with the article, just say the word. --THE 22:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Definitely help with the workbook section: I can't think of 120 one liners. If you can think of anything to add to the main part, post it on the talk page. Thank you very much for the review, again, and for the help! --  Le Cejak <-> 22:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
lol, nice so far!   Le Cejak <-> 23:58, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks :). I'll probably add some more tonight, and I'll also try and think of some pics you could use... --THE 00:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Very welcome! As far as the pics go, I could just throw in some explosion pics in there...   Le Cejak <-> 00:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I think this one might work particularly well, especially with a nice, absurd kaption. --THE 00:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
This project is like the one-liner 500, isn't it?   Le Cejak <-> 00:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Yah! It's almost ridiculously fun though...and no edit conflicts (at least on my end)! --THE 00:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
lol I FEEL ALIVE. *SSNIIIIFFF* RIDICULOUSLY ALIVE. No edit conflicts yet...   Le Cejak <-> 00:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Arright! I'll probably add some more tomorrow (if I can think of anything else)... --THE 01:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the help! See ya tomorrow   Le Cejak <-> 01:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Feel the power of science!!

ScienceFair The Led Balloon has awarded with the gift of sciencey knowledge, because he can already tell that you are smarter than that asshat judge was.
Thanks for voting, and remember, magic science is all around us!

Thanks for the vote, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:23, Nov 12


OHHH! Haha, wow! >__< Go me!

Well, still. My articles keep getting huffed. Shut up. I have my reasons. The Village Dump article is good. Shhh. Heck no techno

Main page on UnNews

How do articles get there? F9T 20:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

You add a blurb for your news article here. --THE 20:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah but i put mine there and it dissapeared. F9T 16:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey, haven't I seen you somewhere before?

Oh yeah, that Illogical place. Anyway, glad you liked Age of Umpires. Like your work, man. -- Hindleyite Converse 21:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!! Yeah, love Age of Umpires and the other articles you wrote on here. You should consider writing again on uncyclopedia as well as illogicopedia (if you're not too busy...mmm...running that other site :D). --THE 21:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


Har gar he -- 13:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

The villains begrudgingly thank you

Thanks for the votes! Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

It just ain't that funny...unless it's an in-joke

Your explanation is disengenuous, I believe. The page, is after all, by your own admission, typically closed minded pro-AGW. It's more than likely that this page is part of your feudal fiefdom and you can't stand it being touched by anyone who gives the slightest hint that the furore around AGW IS rediculous nonesense. I think the Third World Coastal Poverty thesis is excellent - and, sadly, accurate in every detail. Overall, the page, as it stands is fairly unsubtle, and not very sharp in it's self-parody, probably because you are unconsciously committed to the truth of what you are being told in the media, and probably the self-deception that you have an original idea, or that your ideas are your own. By the way, it's the intellectual climate we should all be worried about. And when was the last time UN turned out something which reflects human reality? It's the weak minded who ally themselves with an organization because it matches their emotional attachment to an issue. The UN is a brutal organization responsible directly or indirectly for millions of deaths world-wide, run by brutal militaristic nations themselves also directly responsible for a swathe of misery world-wide. And this organization is then seen as the vehicle for salvation?! wtf?! Emotional self-deception by the most comfortable people in the world, happy to have their agenda on top of the world for their own gratification and finger wagging, while people who know a very real brutal reality every day have no voice and watch as the world economy carries on with it's systematic selective delivery of economic wellbeing to the 'right people' Yeah, I'm sure the UN's got it right. Well, they've got you right where they want you. It's a bit like smoking, who's the sucker on the end in this case?

Because you are gracious...

Personal tools