User talk:Sycamore/Archive 13

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Defiled again

It's an evil deed. You should hunt down the culprit or something. --UU - natter UU Manhole 14:53, May 15

I'll let it slide, and let time slowly erode the culprit until the stage where he can bitterly weep his wangs inability to defile...--Sycamore (Talk) 14:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

It's funny. Robert Mugabe is the opposite of those things. He was an asshole. It's a lie. It adds to the lies and good portrayal. Stop reverting it. It isn't Irony and that's what the page is. Zimbabwe editor who you reverted today

UnSignpost May 14th

Hand-delivered by Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

The IP was right

I am a whore! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, you seem to be getting a quite bit of vandalism, I'll keep an eye out if I'm around, and worry about the health effects of doing that later:)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


Hi, Sycamore. Was that little piece I added to Nunavut really not funny? I actually thought it was about the only thing in that article that was. Let me know, please. Clemens177 22:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, I've fixed it up to include the stuff you've added and added kept all the language links etc form the older version, looks a lot better:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Sycamore! --Clemens177 18:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


You seem to know what's what around here. If it's not too much trouble, could you click on my name, which will take you to a list of my articles, then tell me if I have any hope around here?


Clemens177 01:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, your stuff looks good, I've come across it a few times whilst I'm around, probabaly not an idea to sign your articles, but other than that they're very nice additions to the place:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Clemens177 15:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


Ankh smite Thou art bless'd by Ra for thou hath voted at the sacred temple for thy Zheliel.

The la Zhel
D The la Zhel 09:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks:)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Newb Article: Plumage

Greetings and Salutations Sycamore! You commented on my work (added a fix tag) so I've come back for revenge for you to adopt me; maybe? I'd like some feedbacks & stuffs if you please. (Basically wanted to know what you thought needed to be fixed other than the low quantity of funny.) Was the page too snarky? Needing of less humour and more humor? I even made a discussion page for it here. Thanks!  Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  01:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I've taken the fix off, looking a lot better now, needs moar links and pics. When you're at a good stage check out our Pee Review where you can get some tips to make it better. I'm not taking on any new adoptees for a little while as I am very busy and I would not make a good adopter for a newbie at the moment. Hope this helps:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Hell's Yeah it helps a lot! Links are a good suggestion; I was hoping someone else would do it, but... *sigh* I CAN DO IT! *grin* I KNOW it needs more pics, but I have no idea what other than a jumble of plumage, vinyl siding and muscle cars. Maybeish a good question for Pee Reviewers? Oh, it has been said that there are too many racism links now & I agree; provided there are a lack of other categories/references to soften the blow. What do you think? 'S ok you not taking adoptables right now. My real parents might be sad; like a sad, sad clown. Thanks Again! p.s. (I'll miss "Tim" as a type of mage but I guess no article really needs a Monty Python reference ... let alone two.) Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  02:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Cool:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 22:15, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Question Regarding NHL Article

Hello and thanks for the greeting you gave me a while back when I registered on Uncyclopedia. Along with some other creative users, I've been making edits to improve the NHL article. It now has a 5 star rating (and no, I definitely wasn't the only one who rated it!) and a lot of good content. However, there have been some stupid edits made to the article -- and almost all of them have been made by unregistered users (or at least users who did not log in when making the edits), because only the IP addresses are given next to those edits in the article's history. By stupid edits, I'm referring to people making completely irrelevant and unfunny remarks in the article and failing to edit images correctly so that they end up being replaced by incomplete "code" for images. Is there a way to semi-protect the article by restricting edits to registered users who have signed on? I think this will help protect the article against stupid edits. DAK4Blizzard 04:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that can easily be done, but I lack the awesomeness. Try Under user or Mordillo and they should be able to help you with that:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Pages can easily be protected in that fashion, but we generally only do it in the case of persistent vandalism. What you mention isn't really vandalism, it's more good faith edits by people who don't really know what they're doing, or who haven't got up to speed with "funny" properly. So I'm inclined not to semi-protect it right now. If the IP edits get worse and become a serious problem, let me know, I'll be happy to protect it in a jiffy, but right now I'm not seeing enough reason to. Fair? --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:04, May 19
If life was fair, I'd be wreaking Trica Helfer, instead I'm stuck in a small room the no windows editing.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
All life is 6/4 against. --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:23, May 19
Good thing I'm lucky--Sycamore (Talk) 11:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for taking a look at the issue, Sycamore and UU. I really appreciate the quick response. DAK4Blizzard 05:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Ha! My SLA is shorter by twenty minutes. I also give stickers and lollipops. But that's fine, stick with the cheap admin. See if I care. ~Jewriken.GIF 06:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
whats an SLA? Also, lets eat hummus. UU, sycamore, and that polite guy are invited too. And no, it wont slip rat poison or viagra or anything in anybody's hummus :) Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 06:43, May, 20 '09
You have the hummus, I'll have a nice paté, and we can all be happy. --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:48, May 20
yeah, then we do acid and be really happy :) Also, what is an SLA? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 10:53, May, 20 '09
/me gets ready for some Hasid House--Sycamore (Talk) 10:55, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
SLA. --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:58, May 20
tl;dr Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 11:02, May, 20 '09
The intro line tells you all you need to know. Honestly, you kids and your ADD. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:04, May 20
whats an ADD? :p Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 11:12, May, 20 '09
Someone who has too much energy, and not enough oulets. I like to open my outlets often. I also like to paddle Modusoperandi's scrotum, but thats another matter entirely.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thats ok. I like to kiss my own ass too Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 11:18, May, 20 '09
I can only imagine that must be as satisfying as kissing your own elbow--Sycamore (Talk) 22:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
actually, no. Kissing your elbow is physically impossible unless you are gay, which you arent. On the other hand (the left one) kissing one's ass is very common and highly satisfactory. Wikipedia says so Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 22:29, May, 20 '09

You've got some shit to shuffle.

Modus has gone on a VFD spree. Just thought ya' should know. Saberwolf116 01:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Family Guy

No, you don't. You don't have ANY feelings toward your fellow Uncyclopedians. Because (once again) you overprotect the article and leave only the stuff that YOU think is funny, not what everyone thinks is. Many funny references could've been made, if it wasn't for your uniformity of humour. And this has already been discussed, Sycamore. I'm not walking down the same plank again with you. Revert, if you wish... be an asshole in someone's eyes. Sincerely, Shadiac 22:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost May 21st

Brought to you by Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

UnBooks:Diary of a washed up hack

Nice looking book. The writing style fits well, although it could use more pointless references to old memes and Wilde. Perfect choice of picture. Have some cheese --Concernedresident 15:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

High School Girl

Hey, I've been here much longer than you have, don't tell me how the site works, also, I happen to have written that article, so I would like to maintain it being not shit. If you see the current version, you will undoubtedly notice many useless asides, such as an entire paragraph talking about boots. No satire, no jokes, just about boots. Completely unacceptable. So instead of doggedly undoing a GOOD ARTICLE, why not actually reading it first and see which is better and more coherent. Also, the list of quotes is fun. It stays.

(User since Jan. 2006)

--Kanaku kun 17:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

My mistake, as you were...--Sycamore (Talk) 17:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry if that came off harsh, but I just wanted the problem resolved in a speedy manner. I understand that you were probably looking for a malicious edit, lol.

Sure yeah, pub lunch always gets me tipsy, paticulalry later in the day:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Syc, you should place a sign on your userpage: EST. 2007. ~Jewriken.GIF 18:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't get it.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Famous Sycamore's, Established 2007. This is me using a metaphor of you being a pub and murdering the joke dead. Oh well. ~Jewriken.GIF 18:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Oh yeah I see that. That's almost quite funny;)--Sycamore (Talk) 18:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Peanuts and beer don't count as a pub lunch, at least not in this messed-up world. Damn the future! --Concernedresident 23:13, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Damned Admins

  • (If I was an admin I would add a check template to a single report, just to annoy an over zealous anal poopsmith.)

Just saving my place, seeing as Uncyc is just one of a number of things I'm doing today. And honestly, ranked by importance, it's dead last.  :) --T. (talk) 15:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Don't try and pretend you're 'too cool' for uncyc, I've seen you about;)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Heh. I have kids, so coolness has little to do with it.  :) But I suppose I'm pretty anal myself, having to bite my knuckles while watching you write Diary of a washed up hack in exasperated, sputtering degrees. My inner poopsmith desperately wanted to school you in the use of the preview button, and the minor edit checkbox. ;) --T. (talk) 16:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Yeah I know my methods can be questionable, but the results speak for themselves...--Sycamore (Talk) 16:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
For certain. :) You wouldn't be in the Hall of Shame otherwise. I was really just amused by the candor and self-awareness of your comment, and wanted to respond. We're wired alike in some respects. Hopefully this is good for mutual understanding, rather than just driving each other nuts. ^_^ --T. (talk) 17:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I drive everyone nuts, it's contagious so soon no one will be able to tell the difference. I'm glad you like that little one, I hopefully captured the whole ego of the feeling and it reminds me not to take myself too seriously:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Dearest Sycamore:

Upon remembering that you requested that I, your most loyal servant, read a page of yours and lend my humble hand should it be required, I did so. In addition I plan to do so more should, should the opportunity arise at my place of work. Forgive this scribe if he should incorrectly recall any of the details of the book and film in question, as it has been many years since he has seen either.
Your mumblingest mumblings,
Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

You seem to have found it, though you have failed to find the 'clitoris of doom'. Also is it true that you only sleep one hour a night and have facial reconstructive surgery every two years?--Sycamore (Talk) 11:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I've only just started messing it up, and it's two years a night and every one hour. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


You signed it some time ago and I've finally made a template =D

The one and only plastic spoon Well, you signed my guestbook! You deserve a beautifully made ugly template dedicated in your honour.

The la Zhel 04:59, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks there:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


Umm... what do you mean, it needs to be expanded? It links to Portal:Science (sorry it doesn't but something links to it), and will be expanded when scientific news become available, and/or when I/someone else digs them up somewhere and twists them. It's mostly a dump for the newspieces that don't fit on the portal page. Will be, to be exact. Now it has part of what the Portal page has. By the way, the Hack article looked good, I had a look when I spotted reference to it in Mordillo's talk page. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 12:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Cool, sorry I did not realize it was part of that, if you could add categories to all the subpages of these it would be helpful. I can create one for you, with any title you like. Thanks I'm glad you like my hack article, I felt that if I wrote about being a hack, it could not follow that I was one. I now realize how wrong I was;)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:37, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-if you could add categories to all the subpages of these it would be helpful <- you lost me with that one.
  • You must be one of the 5 people here I haven't asked about co-writing. I'll ask now. How about it? I have about 17 ideas and 17.500 half-finished articles, but I can just as easily work on someone else's ideas. For me, it's somehow far more fun to work with others - I do a lot of stuff alone so it's change for me. Also, I've always made my best stuff with others. It's the instant feedback. Also also, it's the quickest way to get to see how others think, which is interesting. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 18:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

First bit: articles like this for your portals come up: Portal:Science/Promotion. It's helpful for all articles to be categorized at some level. Having pages sorted tends to improve content and keeps topics defined and hopefully a larger scale of imprvement can being as opposed to pockets of good stuff. It is also helpful in many other ways in catching vandals (though much less so now as there are many more active admins). I would be gratful if you and the whole portal project could help with this.

For collab, I like it. I'll be on holiday for a week from Saterday, but I think any stuff could be looked at now if you like:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 21:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

OK, I got that - I did earlier but I thought you meant something else. Is it OK to have templates as just Template:thisandthat? they're not often hit randomly I think.
On collab, OK, let's start. I would like chat first because it's so quick for feedback. Did a few with Mhaille, with good results. What's your time zone? Mine's CET +2 I think - anyway, Helsinki, Riga, Tallinn - and it's now 10:35 here. I'll check chat, say, on every two hours today, on the hour, starting at 11:00. Is your username the same there? -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 07:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm on British time, I tend to come onto the IRC later in the day, I've a few articles in the pipeline whcih I don't want to get blown off. I was thinking this one could be quite a nice collab: User:Sycamore/L’Étranger? when I've dusted off the one I'm doing with Modus (if he stops being a lazy arse). What do you think?--Sycamore (Talk) 12:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Its been long since I read The Stranger. I might be able to provide something but how about we write a nonsense biography of Camus? I think parts of the book work better as excerpts in these Uncyc articles. Let's twist this about in chat later, I'll be in there during evening.-- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 14:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


Erm, as your adoptee, I would just like to ask a question. How do I get my hands of VFP? I just can't resist not nominating some images like Ruboko.jpg Wiki.png etc. Help? (P.S. I don't want to be like Kakun. The la Zhel 11:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Well I would not nominate stuff that nobody (sensible) is going to vote for, and only nominate something you actually believe could be a successful nomination. I think this answers your question?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Yep, thanks The la Zhel 10:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

a question mark

there is a whole article about " how to beat your wife" so why do you not accept that i write a part 

about beating jennifer love hewitt in the article about her ?Www 13:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Maybe have a read of this, HTBFANJS.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost! May 28th, 2009

The only newspaper to be delivered by MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 19:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

This wiki is wonderful!

You guys are too funny. You have too much time on your hands (which means I want to play too but may not be funny enough).

Thanks:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:49, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


SavingPrivateElmo I just came by to thank all you.

Because you did something I like to see in this newer generation, and that's appreciating those of us on the wrong side of 50. These days, getting featured isn't as easy as it used to be. Why, back in my day any ol' whippersnapper could throw something together and put it on the front page. Not anymore, not anymore at all. So I am glad to see myself on the front page of the good ol' wiki before I die. I guess its nothing big, but oh well. Anyways, I got to get back to helping Elmo now, so I better get going (he thinks his dresser is trying to kill him again.)

   Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   17:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey, question

How did you become a poopsmith? And if I wanted to become one, what would you recommend? Saberwolf116 00:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, forgive the late reply... well... ummm... I think maybe you are asking a question that would be out of my place to answer. With admins, poopsmiths etc, I would always personally favour candidates that are highly active contributors in terms of high quality articles (RabbiTechno, Gerrycheevers), as this affects attitude and performance in such roles. I was chosen by Mordillo, after UU and MrN9000 were opped. To be frank it's just a glorified archiving job, and it's not really anything special. As a bit of wisdom, I would avoid this aspect of the site, the sorts who contribute a lot to these pages can often be misleading as to what this place is about, and VFD has become more of a hindrance as it (in my view) puts people off as it sets up a scenario that is progressively prohibitive to new creative article contributors. If you value my opinion I would stick to writing articles and avoid trying to be a 'maintenance user' - it's just a cheap front for people to say that they don't come to a wiki to write articles and they can win award templates. The way to look at it is that if you are unhappy with your current efforts, you've got everything to play for. As you go along and win some of the awards the pressure for your work to be gold goes up, and to some extent stops contributors from writing as much. Although discouraging of your current aims, I hope this helps - also congrats on RoTM:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Essentially what I said, only in much better wording. ~Jewriken.GIF 10:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
I can be eloquent in the same way I can be course, as above, so below. Also after going on Uncyc facebook group I saw many of the contributors... all I will say is a certain 1970s detective beginning with K;)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Good old Talli. A shame he died really. I was fond of him O_O ~Jewriken.GIF 13:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
He can't die, mark my words, he's just on a sabbatical from his life. Also bought final season of Galactica! Woo!--Sycamore (Talk) 14:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, Syc. I appreciate it, but I think my problem is that I simply cannot write good articles. I like reviewing them, as it's sort of practice to be a film/game critic when i'm an adult, but I don't have much talent for creating them. So I think i'll stick to dominating PR, and forget the whole poopsmith thing. And seeing as how we're never gonna have another VFS, i'll forget that too. Appreciate the help, Syc. Saberwolf116 17:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Saber, if you never try you'll never write! Now stop being a pussy and write something! ~Jewriken.GIF 19:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost June 4th, 2009

Delievered by Saberwolf116 02:01, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


Here's the link: User:Multiliteralist/The_only_true_heteros. I have been thinking about Albert Camus but I have trouble coming up with anything funny about a real person, barring nonsense. I think satire works easier if the angle is shifted a bit more. If you have other ideas you want to co-write, I'll participate. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 11:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

I've started on the only true hetros one - obviously anything that you don't like, just change or remove. i'm hunting down an image or two, looks like it might by quite a tidy little aritcle we could have.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
I read it through - what if we used more scientific language instead of "buggery" and so forth? Otherwise looks good, the start is complicated enough to throw the reader off track a bit, and then the punchline just lands out of nowhere. Could be slightly more coherent but let's not force that, vague is quite OK too. I couldn't yet find a good link for the Dr. Beverley reference - I guess we'll just have to leave it for the reader to remember. I have the DVD, if I have the guts I'll watch it some day and find out which song it is where he delivers his immortal wisdom. He's such a sorry sight that the video is not very amusing though. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 18:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Also what would be funny in this kind of thing: let's write the bit I started with in Sir Humphrey Appleby style: first with really long, complex sentences etc. and then in ordinary language. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 19:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
I came up with stuff, I put it on the talk page. Tell me what you think before we go there, it's a slight twist of direction. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 05:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Footnotes could be the vehicle if done right - check the talk page again when you have time. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 15:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

May I ask why?

Forest Whitaker's Lazy Eye. It has had a Pee Review on it, then fixed up and made better. Got a decent enough score on it as well. Can you help me understand why you placed a fix-up tag on it? Woody On Fire! Wood burningTalking Woody Stalking Woody 17:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I added it on the basis that it seemed to be below par, it does not really parody or make fun of Forest Whitaker, it just a mentally challenged splurge about his eye. I'm sure you can put more effort into your work than this. Uncyclopedia is funny and not just stupid. I hope there can be mutual agreement on this, and I'm sure you'll agree this material would fit better on a wiki whose intention was to be solely random or defamatory. In answer to your first question yes you may, and I hope I have made my reasons clear.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes, your reasons are clear. I do, however, disagree. I find this piece quite funny. It is nothing that I would expect to get VFH'd. It is, as you put it, too random for that. I do, however, find it as a perfectly good, comedic piece on this site. However, I will do my best to answer your qualms.
  1. "it does not really parody or make fun of Forest Whitaker, it just a mentally challenged splurge about his eye."
    Somehow, I doubt you could get past the first section of this article if you truly think this piece is just about the eye. The piece is meant to be a parody of two things. One: Old school uncyc, with its penchant for vandalism and saying very very stupid stuff about something, in this case Mr. Whitaker's eye, which, as I mention in the piece, is actually a genetic condition. Second, it is a parody of Whitaker and actors in general. The Forest that I created for this piece is well spoken and down to earth, which stands in stark contrast to the idiots from section 1, but at the same time a little cocky and self-important. However, it would seem that when he wrote this, his knowledge of the site goes far enough as to link to his real page. Here, he sees a problem. There is not an actual page on this site for "Forest Whitaker". (Herein lies another joke. Whitaker is very very self-important and assured of his importance, then sees that this website doesn't even have an article on him, and that his lazy eye is more famous around here. This does come as a shock to him. For someone who thinks that they are so important, but finds out that they are not really important at all, this would be ironic.) Finally, as Gerry said in his review of the article, which can be found on the talk page, this article is "punchline article". The "Suck it douche bags" line is a parody of Whitaker's earlier lines, which are so eloquent and well spoken. His line instead falls into the idiotic ramblings of those found in section one, which it seems that he himself crossed out. This, too, I feel is ironic. Whether or not the piece is, as you put it, "mentally challenged", I do not know nor care. I would, however, ask of you to think twice before again telling a person that their writing is, to paraphrase, retarded. You see, because someone could take offense to this one day, and to them I would place no blame.
  2. "I'm sure you can put more effort into your work than this."
    About this, I could not disagree with you more. I have worked on this piece. The effort was put forward. As I hope I helped you understand the comedy that I find in this piece explains, there is more to the piece than meets the eye upon the first glance. This was all quite purposeful, and did not happen overnight. I worked on the piece, crafted it to a point, and put it up for pee review while it was still in my userspace to help me understand if the comedy was understood (and my writing sound) and if people understood it for what it was as a parody piece. Here, as I said earlier, I got a review from Gerry. (as a side note, I was afraid that whomever reviewed my article would review it as just an idiot piece, but I cannot give enough credit to Gerry for his review. I know it was not any easy one to do, and I still am impressed. If nothing else is understood from this message, please let it be what a fantastic reviewer Gerry is.) Using his help, I fixed and shaped it more, before finally being pleased with the shape it was in, and placing it where it is now. I beg of you to please not question the effort I put into any of my articles again. Though some of them may be seemingly random, or not as well-worded as others, I promise you that none of them leave my userspace without my crafting and until I am pleased with the outcome, or if I start them in mainspace, the {{WIP}} template does not come off until I am satisfied with where the article is at, and can be proud of it.
  3. "Uncyclopedia is funny and not just stupid. I hope there can be mutual agreement on this..."
    Yes. I agree. But I feel that your wording is important here. "Uncyclopedia is funny and not just stupid." Just. Simple word, but because of that word, I agree with you. If this article were purely about stupid, than of course it would make no sense to stay. But according to your words, it would only be wrong if it were simply "just stupid" and had no "funny" behind it. Therefore, I take from it that an article can be stupid, so long as it is funny too. I, too, believe that this article has comedy in it. As explained in the section about parody, I hope you understand where this comedy stems from, and why one may find it funny. Where in our many many rules does it say that an article must be high-brow, and cannot be stupid? Though stupid humor is often looked down upon, it is no less an adequate form of comedy than high-brow. However, I do not consider this article "stupid humor." Perhaps not high-brow, but it does not fall perfectly into the "stupid humor" sub domain. The first section obviously does, but it does not stay there.
  4. "...and I'm sure you'll agree this material would fit better on a wiki whose intention was to be solely random or defamatory."
    No. And, here, I may ask then if you understood the article at all. The intent here was never to be defamatory. The first section may be construed that way, but it is meant to be from the hands of vandals and idiots, and sets the stage for the second and third section. There is a reason why section one is crossed out. The last two sections I do not see as defamatory at all, and have a hard time understanding how one could.
I hope I have helped you understand the jokes and the reasoning behind all of my decisions regarding the article. I therefor ask, here and now, that you take a second look. Woody On Fire! Wood burningTalking Woody Stalking Woody 23:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll think about it.--Sycamore (Talk) 07:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Jumping in, I wouldn't put a Fix tag on an article by a well established writer, even if you don't like it. I read the article, it's a bit bizarre but I wouldn't classify it as "...and I'm sure you'll agree this material would fit better on a wiki whose intention was to be solely random or defamatory." I'm going to remove the tag. ~Jewriken.GIF 07:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
I'd rather not have any drama, remove it - I'm sure it's great work.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


why did ya remove the "kifflom" and "kimchi" categories from my article? sure it is completely unused and stuff..but still. I don't get it. ~ルーミア Rumia チルノ Cirno ChinaICONorth KoreaICOJapan 05:32, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Fucked with a knife

I'm hardcore Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 14:32 June 9 '09

Yay! My first real rape!! Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 14:33 June 9 '09
You should treasure this moment. And clean the knife and put it back in the drawer.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
and you should call an ambulance Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 14:41 June 9 '09
Seriously, It's ok, I can put it all back in (I can be very gross, continue baiting me at your own peril);)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Man, one's first rape is a very special moment. Also, you sure you dont need an ambulance? :) Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 14:46 June 9 '09
Yes it is special, you can tell your grandchildren about it. As far as the ambulance is concerned a series of plasters and straps will suffice for the anal cunt. Plus I'll use give myself a transfusion from the blood samples Olipro sends me in a creepy fashion with flowers. I can only hope I don't get Aids, or worse, become a Tory.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:51, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
dude, I think it should be anal cut not anal cunt :) Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 16:12 June 9 '09


No probs, you should have got it ages ago:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


I don't know if it's been done but my footnotes are almost at the foaming stage already. "Buttocks" seems to be the keyword. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 18:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Articel starts looking good to me. If you want to add/adjust something, do so, and otherwise if you want to, move it to main space. UnNews might be the best spot since it's on front page. Title? I cannot come up with anything right now. I'm off for a vacation trip for a week or so now, see you later. The mainspacing can just as well wait until then by me. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 08:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Yeah sure, I'll keep at it, I'll see if I can come up with a good title idea, See you in a week or so:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost June 11th/12th/whatever

I think I'm going crazy. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


Wha? What's that? The la Zhel 10:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

It's an online project where some of your computer's CPU is used by a university to solve the worlds problems, to my understanding. It has some stuff on the page. A lot of people seem to be doing it, so if you fancy I'm sure its an alright thing to get involved with:)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Ooh, okay. The la Zhel 07:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

A For! A real For!

Thanks for the nod on WotM, and for your kind words. I won't mind losing this month. Not a bit.  :) --T. (talk) 15:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I think you deserve a second nod - some cracking articles:)--Sycamore (Talk) 18:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


I did the same as you - was going to revert, then changed my mind to see where he was going with it. Anyway - he's just been on irc asking us to have a look at his rewrite, so I assume he believes himself done with it - what d'you reckon? Give it a bit more time or revert? Over to you... Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 07:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I've done things, if he's still about on irc, tell him he can go crazy with it. Also good morning:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Good good. Don't know what happened on irc, as mah ISP she is made of fail. And a very good morning to yourself. :-) Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 09:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Tea anyone? ~Jewriken.GIF 09:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Sure, could we invent the "Irish Tea" today though?--Sycamore (Talk) 09:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost! June 18th/19th!

You'd think I'd learn that this isn't fun to do... Oh well. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 19:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Sex, sex, sex. Is it all we ever think about? Consciously, yes.

I think the article is just about ready. Isn't it "damning blow" though? I made a couple really minor adjustments to language. Uh. The header? I haven't any ideas as yet, do you? -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 12:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, looks good, I'd say the footnotes aren't right for an unnews - A title has not come to me either. Anyhoo, I've got to run:)--Sycamore (Talk) 06:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
It works as a "normal" article as well. How about something half-abstract for title, like Study XE385(2) about who we are and who we should be? -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 18:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


You long enough! -- 00:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Why do you desire this attention? Go outside and get some attention if you're THAT great. This place sucks. --Bald dude Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Bald dude 00:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I'll have you know I get plenty of attention "outside" RDB. It's just nice to come down here for a laugh every now and then, even if it is at your expense. -- 17:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay, perhaps I went a little too far. Sorry. I have nothing left to say on this subject. Do as you please, it ain't my problem. --Bald dude Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Bald dude 17:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Pee'd Fight Club for ya

Just thought you should know. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll take a look at that shortly:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Unsignpost! June 25th or 30th

We're not late you're just high!    Orian57    Talk   Union pink 14:31 30 June 2009

UnSignpost: July 2nd, 2009

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 19:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


Hi Syc, thanks for the latest, and see my forum on SPIN. I don't know if such organizing is your thing but you'll certainly have loose ideas it could use. -- Style Oranssiviiva Guide 06:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost 9th July 2009

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png MrNCyber.JPG 22:46, Jul 9

Princess Di

Ive just put the Diana article in for Pee review. I thoguht since you made some helpful edits during my rewrite you might like to look at it and see what you think. Calindreams 10:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

I'll have look, if I can, I think full review would be an idea at UN:PEE though:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, this has stopped being funny

What? You're planning the next Scottish revolt? Is Orian in as well? Where the fuck are you? ~Jewriken.GIF 16:03, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't want independance! It's a stupid idea! I don't know why but theres just something that tells me Great Britain wouldn't be great if Scotland wasn't part of it. And Scotland would be worse off it was on it's own. I don't want to have to get a passport to leave! It's just ridiculiuse. And if not plain by now that I don't what I'm talking about then... I don't know.    Orian57    Talk   Union pink 16:07 16 July 2009
If you being gone has absolutely anything to do with me being a complete and total dickbag (a mix between dick, and douche bag) to you a little while back, then stop it. I was the dickbag. I think I never said sorry for that. I appologise. I disagreed with you putting that template on that page, but there were SO MANY better ways of going about it then how I did. Again, I'm sorry. I really don't have any excuses for how I acted. I hope you forgive me. Also, come back. Woody On Fire! Wood burningTalking Woody Stalking Woody 16:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm not dead, just very busy these days, I should be back a bit more, but work etc is taking up my time a little. Hope to see you guys about more soon:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Long live the Scottish Revolution! ~Jewriken.GIF 20:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
You're fast, I just wrote that, and I've only just managed to call MrN9000 a tit...--Sycamore (Talk) 20:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost: July 16nd, 2009

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 22:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh there you are

Good to see your tartan presence, however busy you may be! --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:13, Jul 20

UU, Morning there, nice to see you kicking ass and stopping the place from falling apart:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Nice to see you writing as well. I look forward to reading it on completion. --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:26, Jul 20

UnSignpost: July 23rd, 2009

This edition is on time, and anyone who tells you differently is lying! THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 03:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools