User talk:Sycamore/Archive4

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Sycamore
Revision as of 12:09, September 11, 2008 by Sycamore (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

GANG RAPE!

Suit you well! ~Jewriken.GIF 16:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Suit you Sir:)— Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Room for one more? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Always sweetheart— Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Categories/quote spam (so called)

I added an ingenious category of my own invention "Things Amy Winehouse has smoked" referring to Amy Winehous's drug-problem to two articles : Sherlock Holmes, (due to the fact that he has a drug problem), Everything (implying that she has smoked, quite literally, everything) and Category:Over 9000, implying that she has smoked over 900 things. I also added two rather amusing quotes to the Over 9000 category, including one by Oscar Wilde which suggested that it would take over 9000 Goku's to screw in a lightbulb, a reference to Goku's lack of intelligence and one by the arch-villain, Freeza which suggested that Oscar Wilde would "screw" over 9000 people, a reference to Oscar Wilde's promiscuity. The joke also implied that Freeza would like to screw Oscar Wilde, a nod to Freeza's somewhat effeminate nature. --Narcissus Black 13:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Ingenious!Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, I know. --Narcissus Black 16:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
WhooshSir Sycamore (talk) 16:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Erm, yes quite. --Narcissus Black 19:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: August 21st, 2008

MantiBot Icons-flag-au.png Owner 12:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Jaffa Cakes

Thanks for the Jaffa Cakes. They were awesome. Here's a cake that's sure to put a smile on your face. [[1]] (Not Mine)

No problem:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the greeting

Thank you for the warm greeting, Sir Sycamore and for the Jaffa Cakes (Eats one). The greeting itself felt more welcoming (Example: Make yourself at home). This site is much more impressive and interesting than Wikipedia (In fact the site itself was boring), and definitely more funnier. I'll be glad to use your helpful advice for future references.

I also hope to get to know more about the people here and everything else about the site. And who knows maybe I'll meet more friendly faces like you.

'Till later, see you next crime and thanks again for the greeting.

- Black Death
No problem, feel free to come round for help in future:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

SkanMan is an Admitted Noob

The SkanMan, an admitted noob has just joined the world of misinformation thusly dubbed "Uncyclopedia" and as such is thouroughly confused by the editing of user pages. In large Bold letters uncyclopedia admins warn and rewarn users against making a page about them their freinds their teachers etc... so making a user page doesnt make sense, or maybe it does...can someone tell me?The preceding unsigned comment was added by SkanMan (talk • contribs)

It is perfectly fine to make your own userpage, if you click on my signature you can see mine (It's just a car) - however it is correct that you should not make pages outside of your userpage about yourself or friends:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


good looking out, appreciate it, seriously, i really like all the new user info as well, some really good tips and im sure i will be an active member of the uncyclopedia community for a long time, forgive me if i ask too many questions though because i'm sure i will have more

oh...and how did you reply so fast? it was only like two minuites later i got a responseThe preceding unsigned comment was added by SkanMan (talk • contribs)

I was around and about at the time:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


Throwball

Thanks for your interest in the most deadly sport on earth throwball I have deleted the ICU tag after adding pictures and fixing links. thanks ThunderJaemin 02:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC) THUNDER

Thats looking pretty good, well done;) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 09:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Chairman, "David Foster Wallace"

Thanks for helping (if you did!) =) Chairman 10:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and also - are you interested in Wallace Stevens? {{User:Chairman/2}} 03:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

And also...what's wrong with the sig? Thanks for helping {{User:Chairman/2}} 03:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

sig

Hi there Chairman, signatures are a bit fiddly, basically create User:Chairman/sig. Now a lot of people make quite complex ones but they tend to look a little silly – the best code for a new user that easy to make is

[[User:Chairman|Chairman]] <small>(</small>[[User Talk:Chairman|<small>t</small>]]<small>)</small>

You can fiddle with it till you get something you like though (you can steal bits off other peoples to get the sort of effect you’re after). Be sure to use preview though if you alter a lot as some codes will spill over and make the page look weird.

To set it as your signature go into your preferences, and you if you look own there's a bit that says signature add this: {{SUBST:nosubst|user:chairman/sig}} in the box and click to add it as your sig, save this and anytime you click the four tildes or the sig box on the edit bar your signature should come up. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Trial...hope this works. {{SUBST:nosubst|user:chairman/sig}} 15:40, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

...awkward? Chairman of the Soviet Republicks (Keep Talking) (that was inputted manually)

At the very top right theres a icon which says "my preferences". in there and add {{SUBST:nosubst|user:chairman/sig}} into the signature bit (about a quater down, click the Raw Signaure thats says that you want to use it as your signature and then click save at the bottom:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Test. Chairman of the Soviet Republicks (Keep Talking) 08:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Yess! YESS! IT WORKZZ! NOW I GO FOR WORRLLDD DOMINATTTIION!

GOLDEN SHOWER GET!

GoldenShower Rejoice, Sycamore! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Thanks :D Chairman of the Soviet Republicks (Keep Talking) 08:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh thanks there:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
btw, i love Battleship Potemptkin :D Chairman of the Soviet Republicks (Keep Talking) 10:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, it's one of my personal favorites of the ones i've done - Wallace is looking good as well — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Thx, what sections do you think I can add? And I can't think of a funny image. Chairman of the Soviet Republicks (Keep Talking) 15:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
You can request images here - With regards on what to add, I'm a little unsure to be honest, although I've heard of Wallace and his literary style I could'nt say I had read any of his books; My advise would be just to continue as you are with it:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

"I can take about an hour on the tower of power...

"as long as I gets a little golden shower!"

GoldenShower Rejoice, Sycamore! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
GoldenShower2
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Thanks for the review. Incredibly helpful, as always. I'll be adding lots of the suggestions in the coming weeks :) -RAHB 21:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

OH GOD I AM THE AMERICAN DREAM... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:01, Aug 24
Thanks, I've never had one of those:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 07:59, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, he sure ain't a miserable sonofabitch. --Knucmo2 09:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Nikola Tesla

Hi! I saw you reverted my change on Nikola Tesla, so I would like to ask you if you could please give me an explanation. I removed the sentence not because I don't personally like it or its meaning but because I actually found it meaningless (it didn't even have a dot in the end of the sentence) so I even put the comment ("wtf does this mean?") when removing it. The sentence was "He is big local-patriot called Ustaša". I mean, he was a Serb (whereas the Ustaša were Croats), he was located in USA (with USA citizenship) all the time he worked as a scientist, and Croatia didn't even exist then (it was Austro-Hungary at the time). So not only the sentence is hard to understand but also, I think, belongs to the "Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid" section. Thank you. --Ml01172 22:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

I've reverted your edits back - apologies for the confusion:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Supervillainy

So yeah, I finally got a spare lunch break to spend some quality time with HowTo:Be A Supervillain and make some tweaks based on your review. I haven't added anything more unconventional, because I enjoy the feeling that supervillains stick to a few cookie-cutter template ideas. But that's just me. The rest, I tried to work on. The ending's been cut back, the tip's gone, the template's been shifted, there's a couple of tweaks to the pacing and a little more. What do you think? Better? Or not enough? Really value your opinion man. --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:53, Sep 5

Looks great to me, obviously I would proabably do the odd thing here and there a little differently, but these foibles don't detract from the article. In fact feels like its ready for VFH, thats if you feel it's ready? — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Well with the way things are going at the moment, it ain't gonna get much readier! Thanks again, amigo. --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:36, Sep 5

UnSignpost: September 4th, 2008

―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 5/09 16:54
Thanks there Hv — Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Religion

Sir. I have many times warned you what is the consequences of your action in Buddhism topics. I tried very hard to control myself not to "vandalise" (in my word). It is unacceptable to me and too billions of people. You have to have faith. Heaven, hell, merits and sins are all REAL. So don't make fun of it. Do not ever use picture of Buddha in your writing again, nor faking photograph of Dalai Lama. Punishments for despising monks in hells are very hard and tough, yet it could be prolong if you continue these actions. With good faith I warned you, and tried very hard for not allowing you to sin more nor letting this website to make fun of real religion. I have told you that you could make up a religion, and by not refer to any exist religion.

For these reasons, if you still commit sins and write more, I will have no choice but vandalise all offensive articles you have written. So rethink again please, and consider to continue it or not. For that you may not fall in hell after you die.

Last Good Faith Warning and do have faith,

--118.173.88.124 12:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

P.S. Consider how my IP changes.

I respect that you are upset by my artcile - contrary to your comments I am not wholly twisted by evil either - however this is a satirical website, not a religious forum. I am also under the impression that karma cannot be directed at the indavidual action as it (the indvaidual) is transitory, and as such I think I may avoid the hellfire of which you speak. Neither is Buddha a deity, but a man - you yourself have made an idol prohibited by Buddhism. Such argumnet however is pointless, I hope you reconsider your stance on my articles which are not intended to hurt people, but rather to make myself and others laugh a little in a world so filled with suffering. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Kick off your humiliate words and beliefs. Anyone who does anything must receive good or bad consequences. According to Buddhist teachings, even if that person doesn't mean to do so, he must receive consequences unacceptably. So, you will have to accept consequences of your karma. Buddha is not an ordinary man, so stop calling him just a man. He is not to be despised or humiliated. And from now, sir, I think I better make your karma comes faster. If you don't delete humiliate words within 48 hours, I will consider to delete it myself or not. So that you may realise consequences of "didn't mean to" karma. --203.147.0.48 07:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

You have twisted the teachings of Buddha, and you are wrong. With regard to your actions against the article I will see to it that your proxies are infibanned, should you try any more of this nonsense - I politely urge you to reconsider your stance against me and the site as a whole.
Sir Sycamore (talk) 08:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

DO NOT ever say such a most disgraceful word again! If you can't accept or refuse fruits of your karma then stop doing it! Even Autistic child that causes problems to others must eventually receive the consequences of their karma. Mean to or not mean to. Whether you are force to or not force to. You must finally receive fruits of your karma - just it would be bad or good, it will be at what did you do. Have you ever meditate? If you haven't and you are not Buddhism then don't say a word who is right who is wrong. You can't just accept it because you are to "not mean to". But it must come one day. When other Buddhists come among. You shall bear it at that moment.

You can't criticise or make fun of any religion at all. You will never. No matter what website it is you must not make fun. It is inappropriate, evil, wicked, devil, bad, shameful, disgraceful, sinful, despising, offensive, humiliating and lots more! This is not nonsense but it is a common sense that a person must have. You cannot make fun of anyone beliefs. And that's not enough.

Refusing about Buddha's teachings are shameness. Embarrasing. Moreover, disrespecting others badly without any "sorry" word from the mouth nor refusing to listen to other people will cause you into a disaster. Shall you not delete those "nonsense" articles, I will delete it myself.

Again, religion is not something you can make fun at. Some uncyclopedia don't make fun of religion - so as this uncyclopedia. Should you not listen to other people, I will make other people make you listen to them.

LAST WARNING: Fruits of karma is truth. You don't believe? You will find it yourself. I give you only 5 minutes after this to delete it all or face catrastrophe.

--203.147.0.48 08:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Drive-by: "You cannot make fun of anyone beliefs". Ha. Ha ha. Ha hah ahhahhaahhhaaa.... This is a pretty good wind-up, right? Still, if you do think these punishments and hells are all real, then why not leave it to the religious figurehead of your choice to deal with it? I, for one don't believe that "Heaven, hell, merits and sins are all REAL" (and have accepted that if I'm wrong, I'll have a very long time to regret that). I don't have many beliefs, but feel free as you like to make fun of them. A few jokes never changed my mind about what I believe, and never stopped those things from existing, so what exactly are you worried a few jokes will do? --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:03, Sep 8

As I said before, this is a satirical website intended to amuse and entertian. Pause to consider your actions, you persoanly have acted in a way that is far more offensive to the doctrine/philosophy you claim to defend, than a silly article I wrote. The Buddhism article which upsets you is not intended to offend you or others;. It's a just a comedic look at Buddhism though satire. Once again, you'll be running out of proxies and running out of road to keep this up, I hope you re-think your view on this matter. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Hea! I wish I would get arguments like this on my talk page NO FAIR! Mr IP: Firstly, we are just joking. If you can't handle a joke there is something wrong with the way you are looking at the world. Also, um, Buddha was a man. He said so, and so did everyone else at the time. Also, Also... If you want someone to preach your religious views to, try typing "encyclopediadramatica Buddha" into google and go to that page. Those guys will be far more interested in your views... Have fun. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 14:38, Sep 8
I'm with you MrN, Why can't I get the religious zealots? Also I noticed that your talk page is one of the most editied on the site so I'm afraid I'm going to boycott it for a while while I spell-check mine. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 14:49 8 September 2008
I was just waiting for you to turn up!:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Oh damn now I'm predictable? No it's just cos MrN said something I thought I'd take the chance to say hi (Hi MrN *waves*), You know the boycotte and everything. I do wonder why it's always you that get's this sort of madness though. Just good Karma I suppose (or bad depending on your view). Also why does It say you're not here to October? You cant leave! Without you and gerry PEEING will fall apart and I'll have to go back to doing stuff. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 14:57 8 September 2008
Jeez, when did Buddhists have their sense of humour removed. I'm pretty convinced the laughing Buddha would be pissing himself over this article, as would the Dali Lama. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • In your dream! Buddha enters Nivarna already. Also, Buddhism taught that the very really successful monks, followers, or Buddha himself would not be in good or bad emotion. This means not laughing at any jokes, not happy at anything, not sorrowful for anything. Before the Buddha enters state of Nivarna (which is not same as Christ! Nivarna is not heaven!), he made himself to the state the do not know anything, basically cutting the 5 senses and from any emotion at all. Buddhism taught to only the fact, that you are to receive your fruits of karma. Don't think it yourself if you don't know anything. Start to respect Buddhism and stop making fun of other people. Changing faces of the Dalai Lama may goes into the disrespecting criteria, and would affects you to be re-born in hell. Moreover, my point is not that I am aware of other people misunderstanding - I understand that this website is where you could make fun of anything. But making have limits! And making fun of religion is not accepted! Be aware of the closing of this site in UK, guess what? --125.24.11.41 10:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
"Be aware of the closing of this site in UK" What? In the UK (and the rest of the civilised world) we have something called Free Speach. Means we can say whatever the hell we like. By the way, I just love your accent! It's cute. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag RotM 12:01 11 September 2008
To Orian - I have a problem, and any free moment seems to lead back here, I think I get the religious types becasue I've written quite a couple of my "best" articles in that area of things, people who have taken an uncertain cousre always want to argue with someone about it and how it's right.
To Mhaille, I'm sure that anybody of any sense and reason would find my little crappy article quite amusing, perhaps even featuabele were it not for the rewrite curse:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Cannot you understand a polite language and requesting language, mister? Do I have to intimidate or terrorise you? Joking or satirical itself has limited. There's certain things you could not possibly make fun or make joke of. Children under 7 years old even understand what I am saying. So, do you choose to be younger than 7? Politics could possibly be joked. But not the religion as you are doing in this. It is, again, SINNING. So do you want to meet hellfire? Joking is a good thing to make people laugh. But there is limitation. And this, you have walk over the line for too much. You must step backwards and re-think about how Uncyclopedia would be cursed, likewise Malaysian issue. Religion must not be joked. Where, when, how, who or what is no matter at all. What's matter is that you must not make fun of a religion, as you do not know that other people's religion is true (Until you meet one like me, so you start to thinking about fruits of karma).

I have warned you and warned again. Most children know where is limitation, but unfortunately some well-educated adult do not. What a pity with UKer! I thought they would be more educated in religion, limitation, respects, manners, beliefs, conservation and how to behave nicely more than Americans. O! This is far worse than some Americans! I cannot possibly believe this, but I must believe some British doesn't know how to respect other people nicely and that spoils all of the nation. I can classify so I myself know all British aren't like that.

Warning doesn't work. As they say "If you do not see the coffin you will never cry". And it's true! I will make you know how that feels. Destroying progress starts now!

Heh. Why? Why is it acceptable to mock politics but not religion? Some people are as passionate about their politics as others are about their religion. I was a pretty devout christian at one point, but I'd still have fought for the right of people to make jokes about christianity. If your faith is going to be changed or destroyed by a few jokes, you've got to wonder how strong a faith it is in the first place! --UU - natter UU Manhole 08:30, Sep 9
I sometimes think the problem with organised religions is that they spend far too long sabre-rattling and not enough time following the tenets of the very religion they profess to represent. For example, if you stopped wasting time arguing with people on a satire website and went out into the community and utilised your time and energy in doing something for the good of others. Religion itself, and by religion I mean the personal and individual relationship with divinity, is something that is very difficult to ridicule or to make fun of, however you seem to be mixing it up with organised religion which is something very different. If I ridicule the excesses of the Catholic Church I am not attacking religion, I am attacking a man made ediface that continues to exploit the masses, as it has for the last 1500 years. Thats not to deny that individuals who walk that specific path are not good people. Indeed many organised religions have used satire and comedic tales to get a message of spirituality across. Laughter is a gift of the Gods, please don't fall into another "trap of the heart". -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Quote

Hi,

I've tried adding a quote but I can't add it to the others

Hi,

I'm poniesinashed btw, asking you about adding quotes.

Try here, just copy my one below, with your own content first and then I'll see if theres something up:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
This

{{Q|Sycamore writes stuff|Mhaille on why Sycamore is ruining the site}}

Comes out like
“Sycamore writes stuff”
~ Mhaille on why Sycamore is ruining the site
Personal tools
projects