User talk:Sycamore/Archive16

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Sycamore(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 105: Line 105:
 
Were you serious when you voted against [[Anal sex]] and wrote, ''"Against. - Ban this filth"''? I only ask because a vote on this basis for this article probably invalidates your vote. Cheers! {{User:Zim_ulator/sig}} 17:10, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 
Were you serious when you voted against [[Anal sex]] and wrote, ''"Against. - Ban this filth"''? I only ask because a vote on this basis for this article probably invalidates your vote. Cheers! {{User:Zim_ulator/sig}} 17:10, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 
:Tis' a joke - they are sometimes on here. No I thought that it would be pretty obvious - it's not a very funny article, plus I think the topic l does not lend itself to being that amusing, since there's less amusing and interesting angles to cover from anal sex. No problem then officer?--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 09:21, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
 
:Tis' a joke - they are sometimes on here. No I thought that it would be pretty obvious - it's not a very funny article, plus I think the topic l does not lend itself to being that amusing, since there's less amusing and interesting angles to cover from anal sex. No problem then officer?--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 09:21, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
[[File:Hellojaffacakes.jpg|thumb|centre|250px|Please take some before I scoff the entire packet]]
  +
  +
----
  +
  +
==SURPRISE!==
  +
... -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
  +
:Wee!--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 12:28, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Sexy? You mean Norman Lovett's Holly or Hattie Hayridge's Holly? ==
  +
  +
Don't worry, in either case, you're not alone. Thanks for the review; that was very generously scored (I mean, [[42]]?!), and you've definitely given me some sense of direction for improvement now. It's been a while since last I saw an episode, but I definitely remember the "no aliens" decision G&N made; I just didn't know how to fit it in with the hyperactive fan angle, which I guess is something I should tone down anyway, at least at the beginning and definitely in the synopsis before building up at the end to meet with the apology. That or maybe I just need to pick the right things to satirise. But I'm rambling. Starting to figure things out though, thanks to you. Lots of bells ringing. {{User:MacMania/sig}}<font face="Garamond"><small><nowiki>[</nowiki>12:39 19 Jul 2010<nowiki>]</nowiki></small></font>
  +
:Whoa and you made a bunch of edits. Thanks for that. {{User:MacMania/sig}}<font face="Garamond"><small><nowiki>[</nowiki>12:39 19 Jul 2010<nowiki>]</nowiki></small></font>
  +
::Either of them were sexier than Queeg... --{{User:Under_user/sig3}} <small><font color="navy"><i>12:41, Jul 19</i></font></small>
  +
:::So that's three personalities for one computer ... wow, Holly ''did'' have issues. {{User:MacMania/sig}}<font face="Garamond"><small><nowiki>[</nowiki>12:42 19 Jul 2010<nowiki>]</nowiki></small></font>
  +
::::I'm a [[Aspie|complex guy]], I don't mind a complex kinda of gal. Also Queeg = Mordillo?--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 13:05, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:::::About as likely as finding a poet from Liverpool called Craig... -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
  +
:::::I have no idea what you are on about. I assume its one of those 'long haired folks hemp products' speaking nonsense that you've been using. Cut their hair and tell them to get a fucking proper job is my view - poetry is for aids people;)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 19:34, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:Now here's something seemingly more inscrutable than Craig Charles being a poet or Holly having multiple personalities. Series 1, Episode 2, Lister says he's going into stasis so that he can wait out the three million years it would take to get back to Earth. I may be forgetting something, but ''what happened to that?!'' It seems like he just forgot about the stasis booth! But I'm rambling. {{User:MacMania/sig}}<font face="Garamond"><small><nowiki>[</nowiki>13:16 19 Jul 2010<nowiki>]</nowiki></small></font>
  +
:You are rambling, but you are welcome for the review, which is my first in a few million years...--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 19:30, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
  +
::Yeah, good to see a golden oldie reviewing again. :){{User:HELPME/sig2 (V2)}} <small><span style="color:blue;">On ''Tuesday, 02:20, July 20 2010 [[UTC]]''</span></small>
  +
:::Yeah, all I ned now is my walking stick and my tazer to go for a pint of milk...--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 09:13, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
[[Red Dwarf|Right, I did a medium-large overhaul.]] Probably still too superficial, and I think the fan POV might distract a bit, but I was going for content & variety for now. How looks it? {{User:MacMania/sig}}<font face="Garamond"><small><nowiki>[</nowiki>01:20 23 Jul 2010<nowiki>]</nowiki></small></font>
  +
:Looks good, lots of nice extras there. Much better than when I reviewed it:-)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 20:08, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
  +
::Hurrah! Looks like a good time for a second opinion, then. Thanks! {{User:MacMania/sig}}<font face="Garamond"><small><nowiki>[</nowiki>20:11 23 Jul 2010<nowiki>]</nowiki></small></font>
  +
  +
==The template that I'll never change==
  +
  +
{{box|
  +
bg=#FFFFFF|border=solid 3px #000000|Guildensternenstein.jpg|200px|
  +
[[Image:Guildy.jpg||right|150px|]]
  +
'''<b><big>FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN</big></b>'''|
  +
''Thank you for supporting my recently [[Red Sea|featured article]].''
  +
<br>
  +
<br>
  +
''I, like, appreciate your support, or something.''
  +
<br>
  +
<br>
  +
{{User:Guildensternenstein/sig2}} 01:42, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
  +
}}
  +
:Groovy:)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 09:13, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
  +
==Thanks==
  +
For your vote on Rolex, which pushed the "telling of time among humans" to the front page earlier. I'm glad you liked it. Appreciated. [[user:Aleister in Chains|'''Aleister''']] 3:17 21 7
  +
:What can I say, I was drunk and should of voted against;)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 09:13, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
==A Roman thank you==
  +
  +
Hi Sycamore. I appreciated your comments on TKF's page regards my three day lay off and Matt Lobster's two hour ban. I didn't personally think the punishments fitted the crimes committed there and three days for a misplaced * and not a # . It wasn't nice to be lumped in those who come here to deliberately vandalise but anyway, porridge has been served. I will keep a look out those ban logs in future to see if anyone else I know falls into disfavour and ask what has happened. Sometimes users just disappear and no one makes any notice or seem to care either. Well I will follow your lead and be ready to ask those all important '''Why?''' questions. --{{User:Romartus/sig}} 15:07, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:Hey, good to see you back. As for the ban, sadly there's little follow up. It is a grossly unfair and unjustified stance - its fine to lay into the 'soft' contribuiters who do little to add to the site, people like himself these days as a matter of fact. Hopefully you'll be left in peace by this character:)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 13:06, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
  +
==IRC==
  +
In there now, more or less (when baby isn't crying). {{User:Mordillo/sig3}} 18:14, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:I'll send an email, seems the days timetables for us both don't match up to well:)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 13:06, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
  +
==Thanks==
  +
  +
for the evolution of modern music pee. Think I'll try to arrange it chronologically, extend it a bit and remove some lyrics. Then I'll be curing cancer and seeing about world peace. --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] 07:24, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:Aye get it the fuck done, especially the last two;)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 13:06, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
==Bilderberg Group==
  +
I liked this when it first was mainspaced, and expected it to be VFH'ed almost as soon as it went up. It's been on pee review long enough, why don't you nom it under the 7-day rule. I'd review it but I'm not good at those, would be happy to do a brief edit sweep though just to see if there's anything to smooth out that author's miss. Nice work. [[user:Aleister in Chains|'''Aleister''']] 12:20 24 7
  +
:Hey thanks:) - Not too sure about self-nomming though, I prefer to let someone else to nominate my work where possible. We shall see...--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 18:22, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
==[[Why?:Does Mads Mikkelsen not speak one line of dialogue in Valhalla Rising?]]==
  +
  +
Interesting article. You have reminded me of another actor appearing in a film who
  +
has no line of dialogue - Pierce Brosnan as an IRA assassin in 'The Long Good Friday'. Since he is Irish - this cannot have been about the accent! --{{User:Romartus/sig}} 06:28, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:Pierce got rid of his Irish accent so he could get jobs in England, if you ever saw 'Evelyn', it quite amusing how his native accent seems forced. He just has abit of a twang now. Of course both actors are talentless which is a good reason for them to keep their mouths shut. Glad you like my article though:-)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 08:50, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Anal sex ==
  +
  +
Since the [[Uncyclopedia:VFH/Anal Sex|failed VFH nomination]] of [[anal sex]] in mid-July, I've taken to fixing up the page. ChiefjusticeDS [[Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Andorin Kato/Anal sex|got around to reviewing it]], scoring it 42/50 and making a number of recommendations. I've taken his suggestions to heart and improved the page in the areas he pointed out. The fact that it scored so well on Pee Review, combined with my personal opinion that it's a pretty good article, is causing me to ask: What made you vote against it? If there were any changes that could be made that would turn it into an article you could support, what would they be? --{{User:Andorin Kato/sig}} 18:58, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:I would say my against vote would have to stand. I just don't think it's that funny, some of the things you say are simply a bit too squeamish, like the obsession with hygiene etc. Primarily, and don't get me wrong, I have done and enjoyed doing this with girls, I just don't think its the kind of topic I want to see on the front page. There's just not enough humour or interest in the topic, that, and it sends a message out for the kind of articles we feature too much around here. You have written some very good articles before; I would have a go at something a little more challenging and worthy of your time than this. I hope you don't think I'm just mean, and I wish you well with your next article:-)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 11:32, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  +
::Don't be discouraged, Andorin. Along with Romartus, Sycamore is perhaps the hardest Uncyclopedian to get a "for" vote from. {{User:Hyperbole/sig}} 15:15, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:::Saw the anal sex meeting and had to drop in. The article seems fine as a topic, it's all about bodily hygiene regarding sex. The one sour note right at the start is the quote, which has nothing to do with the page and reinforces the old-school sterotype of anal sex as sex without being anal about it, that it's all about holes and stuff. [[user:Aleister in Chains|'''Aleister''']] 15:42 2 8
  +
::::I once had a friend who was working on a thesis about Anarchism. In the days before computers, he wrote it out in hand and gave the work to his dear old mum to type out. His thesis then read ''Analism in the Twentieth Century''. Had to get the entire work re-typed - and this is a true story. --{{User:Romartus/sig}} 19:04, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Did you know... ==
  +
  +
...that I'm ten days older than you? {{User:YesTimeToEdit/sig13}} <small><small><font color="#B61B10">[16:22 8 August 2010]</font></small></small>
  +
:That's because God wanted you to die slightly sooner.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 18:25, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
  +
::Hey, has God been talking to you behind my back? Again? {{User:YesTimeToEdit/sig13}} <small><small><font color="#B61B10">[20:23 8 August 2010]</font></small></small>
  +
:::It's not just her, Santa has also been talking... about the way your thong strap rides above your jeans--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 10:06, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  +
::::Oh ''what''! I thought I could trust that bitch! Well I know someone who isn't get a Christmas present list this year! {{User:YesTimeToEdit/sig13}} <small><small><font color="#B61B10">[11:55 9 August 2010]</font></small></small>
  +
  +
==Thanks!==
  +
{{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/Thanks4}}
  +
I am eternally grateful! {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''11:30, 10 August 2010''</small>
  +
  +
== A letter from Filmmakers for Lens Flare ==
  +
  +
<p align=center>[{{fullurl:User:MacMania/Flare}} http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100811194739/uncyclopedia/images/a/a6/LensFlareMadness.png]</p>
  +
  +
Thanks for supporting [[Lens flare]]! {{User:MacMania/sig}}<font face="Garamond"><small><nowiki>[</nowiki>19:59 11 Aug 2010<nowiki>]</nowiki></small></font>
  +
  +
==Das Experiment==
  +
  +
Looking good...... -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
  +
:Hey thanks, you deserve half credit for it though. Another savage polemic - will I ever be original:-)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 10:31, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Ninja star ==
  +
  +
Please can I have a celtic ninja star? I love ninjas and celts [[User:Gomphog|Gomphog]] 16:40, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:One day maybe... I award my special ninja star only to people who do outstanding stuff on my articles - i.e. make them better than I could ever hope to alone. Mhaille is a really awesome dude on here, not just for his articles but taking the time out to help other peoples. I also award it on images or things I could not do by myself:)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 19:30, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Bring me Chekhov's gun! No, not Pavel Chekov's phaser, you imbecile! ==
  +
  +
{{User:MacMania/Chekhov}}
  +
  +
Thanks for voting for Chekhov's gun! {{User:MacMania/sig}}<font face="Garamond"><small><nowiki>[</nowiki>17:13 16 Aug 2010<nowiki>]</nowiki></small></font>
  +
  +
==Russo-Japanese Thanks==
  +
  +
{{box|
  +
bg=#FFFFFF|border=solid 3px #000000|Guildensternenstein.jpg|200px|
  +
[[Image:Guildy.jpg||right|150px|]]
  +
'''<b><big>FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN</big></b>'''|
  +
''Thank you for supporting my recently [[Russo-Japanese War|featured article]].''
  +
<br>
  +
<br>
  +
''I'm considering changing this template, but it probably won't happen.''
  +
<br>
  +
<br>
  +
{{User:Guildensternenstein/sig2}} 14:56, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  +
}}
  +
  +
==Krav Maga==
  +
Thanks for your additions. I'm a bit uninspired at the moment, so do feel free to add anything else you think of. :-) {{User:RabbiTechno/sig}} 14:40, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:Yeah, it's one I'd really like to learn;)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 14:42, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Thank You ==
  +
  +
{{User:Sonic80/goodtemplate}}
  +
{{User:Sonic80/sig3}} 19:46, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Please.. ==
  +
don't devolve to the level of trying to "troll" me - it has been done so many times it loses all impact: if you don't like what you read do NOT read it. Now begone --[[User:Apostle Of Christ|Apostle Of Christ]] 17:44, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
  +
actually I should apologise to you a bit for that, you did add some useful things - I have a short-temper at times: feel free to erase my comment if you want (..I am aware I come of as a jerk but that's the price of strong faith) --[[User:Apostle Of Christ|Apostle Of Christ]] 17:53, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:Actually I would disagree with that, I have a strong faith, but I'm hopeful that I don't come off as a jerk. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
  +
:::As a tip, this site is not really religious or an appropriate place for religious debate. We tend to make fun of everyone without a point of view per se. It might be an idea to cool off on the religious stuff as a few people are probably quite offended. Check out [[BGBU]] with tips:)--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 18:02, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:30, September 7, 2010

PLS judging

I'm sending you this because you are signed up to judge the Poo Lit Surprise. If you no longer want to judge or are incapable of doing so, please tell me as soon as possible. If you're still good to go then here are the instructions:

First, read all of the articles in your specified category. Second, judge them. Judge how you like, as long as it's at least fair and based on merit (one suggestion would be to use the Pee Review format). Post your top 5 articles here. Hit me up on my talk page for questions, comments, if these rules are not cognizant within you, or of you don't know what the word "cognizant" means.

Thank you again for your valued participation in the balletic train wreck that is the Poo Lit Surprise! --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 12:55 May 24 2010

I shall judge tomorrow;)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:23, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

I am in the presence of greatness Ynis 16:45, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Why thank you:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:43, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Stalker

Noticed your edit to this. Nice to see a fellow Tarkovsky fan. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:03, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

A fan, fanny or a dirty whore?--Sycamore (Talk) 08:23, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
No idea what you're talking about, but Tarkovsky's pretty sweet. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 00:34, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Puritan Poetical Thanks


You can have this

John Lydon Don't Cry! John Lydon
thinks you did something good.

thanks for voting for me in the PLS competition

You're very welcome:)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:02, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Was passing

...and thought I'd drop in for spot of raep. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Hey, good to see you about, how are things. Oh, I think I added you (I think it's you) on facebook, but it may not have been yourself, just in case you were wondering who the four eyed Rambo dude was...--Sycamore (Talk) 10:03, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
I never get added on Facebook by Sycamore... :'( MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 10:04, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
That's because you are a cunt. Also why are you never on Facebook when I need to ask you something? Good to see you are still around, Syccy....we misses you.... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
I'm still about, but I tend to have some weeks where I get a lot of overtime, I also have a quite a stodgy final year at uni lined up so I'm not about as much.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:29, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
(to Mhaille) It's because I hate that site. For some reason, it uses more memory than having 10 YouTube videos playing at once. Facebook is gay. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 11:16, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Comment on my previous comment

U can take it personally, but in all honesty, I thinked u was some one else. sorry for any inconvience i have caused. Ynis 15:05, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Damm, back to Embracing Mediocrity again:(--Sycamore (Talk) 10:02, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
Always a bridesmaid, never a bride.  Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  24 Jun 2010 ~ 00:38 (UTC)
wanted happytimes to review how to drown but the filter won't let me leave a mes.   The* Lordarcadiansig (say shit) (My train wrecks) Π   ~  00:45, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
Damn filters! (Don't worry, that's how we've kept Syc out of the gene pool for so long.)  Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280 ~  02 Jul 2010 ~ 00:54 (UTC)
Actually I have two potential spawn abroad, though that's not to be discussed in the meat space... Giggity, giggity.... The lessons here is not to make the same mistake as Mordillo and UU did and use those strange balloons and always remember that it is possibly to anally conceive, two sore lessons have to be learned on that eventuality.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:02, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Better late than never

So yeah, your article. Hope you don't mind my tweaks. I'd suggest moving it to Why?:Does Mads Mikkelsen not speak one line of dialogue in Valhalla Rising? in order to make a more sensible title (it's a proper question, for one thing). Other than that, I think it's another good article, although it may be hamstrung by few people being aware of the film's existence. I'd try to surmount this by having a bit of a synopsis up front, where you can have a little fun explaining the plot of the film, such as it is. You can then segue from this into the burning question: why doesn't the bugger say a bloody word? That might make it more approachable to people. Apart from that, it's good to see you hard at work again - maybe I'll find time to sort out my contribution to the toff's guide properly soon! --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:42, Jul 1

Hey UU, thanks man, I'll take a look at those and get that article finished, its always good to have a second opinion, especially from you as you know what's what. As for the Toff one, I'll be getting that one sorted, I haven't forgotten about it!;)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:56, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Why, Hullo There!

I was passing and decided to come and whore my latest idea to you in the hope that you'll add some funny. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

I like it, I think something about Oscar Wilde's the Ballad of Reading Goal could be cool - I could try something with that? I also have two new articles, Why?:Does Mads Mikkelsen not speak one line of dialogue in Valhalla Rising? and Kettle bell. The first one is pretty much there, but I'm working on the second one now, it could do with some Mhaille magic...--Sycamore (Talk) 12:22, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
Read the first one last week and loved it. Class film too.. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Yeah, I really liked that film, it reminds me why I skipped T in the Park this year. So many memories...--Sycamore (Talk) 12:31, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Yet Another Worthless Award

Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 11:23, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

I think you're mistaken, I never vote for your articles based on my ideological purity (Plus you're one of "Them"). You must be desperate for attention and counting that at the sprightly age of 22 all of my brain cells have died out.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:14, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
You still had brain cells at 21...? Seriously wasted your teenage years. I was brain dead by 15. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 14:20, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
I breed mine though, then only destroy some of them.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:26, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
Are you able to increase desirable characteristics? You know, like fur colour and stuff? Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 14:33, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
The They can't form complex machines, guns and explosives have chemicals, moving parts, it doesn't work that way, but they can form solid metal shapes.
John Connor: Like what?
The Terminator: Knives and stabbing weapons.
Hopefully this entirely original and erudite response by myself covers the areas of your interest--Sycamore (Talk) 14:37, July 9, 2010 (UTC)


Thanks and...a question

Hi man. How do ya do ! Am kinda new on this Uncyclo, so will need some help. I am quite an Old hand on the Wikipedia, there when I create an article I need to give 3rd party references, meet notability guidelines and all that, how it is here. Do we need to follow those rules here too ? Jon Ascton 01:59, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
Dicks, LOL. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Hey welcome to Uncyc. Well, we don't need to source material or write them with an idea of being factual in any way whatsoever. We parody Wikipedia, therefore it is often the case that our articles seem very much like Wikipedia, being impartial and containing some level or real sourcing very much like an academic essay. Obviously this is simply appearence and all of our articles are filled with lies, or circular argument which leads no where. Some can be quite dumb, while some of our work is very intelligent and well thought out. I aim for the latter and this is generally considered more desirable then the memes and other stuff that has a tendency to acrue here at times. Good articles about us are these UN:R - our only rules, HTBFANJS - our guide to humour (roughly) and Uncyclopedia:About. Hope this helps, and if you need help don't be afraid to ask:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:58, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

We also consider boobies quite desirable. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 13:09, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
I like booty, with junk in the trunk--Sycamore (Talk) 13:10, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

An Apology

I was just checking back through my archives and I realised you welcomed me to this esteemed wiki. Thanks for the message. My apology for the 1 1/2 year delay from Dec 2008.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:35, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

And look how successful you are now... thanks to me.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:39, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, and. . .

Thanks for your vote on Rolex. Either a real one or a fake one is in the mail to you, I've got a drawful of them but mixed them up years ago and can't tell which is which anymore. A question on Marilyn Monroe, on my laptop the formatting seems fine. What are the problems you can see on your screen? Fixable, as is everything to do with Marilyn, back in the day. Thanks again. Aleister 19:17 14 7

I like the Rolex one, as Marilyn it was the images and their formatting, I dislike the way the top and bottom image are placed, also they are of unequal size which is a little bit too outside the box for someone like me. Otherwise it's a tidy article.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:25, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
Ah, an anal user. I'll explain. The top pic just let's Marilyn greet the readers when they come in. It was used on her PLAYBOY cover in 1955, which literally propelled her, PLAYBOY, and sex into a new realm of popularity. Very orderly, those three, and they all go together in a neat package of time and space alignment in the mid-'50s. So that pic symbolizes all those things for those "in the know" (wink wink, nudge nudge). The bottom pic is too fun to downsize it, so it makes a good ender to the page (see, it starts and end with larger pics, a unity, very desirable for anals, I mean, for careful readers). And it actually tells an entire story in itself, something honoring her after her death which occurs in the last section of the page. And being of unequal size is actually equal, because the equility of size must be addressed directly when confronted in equal proportion. There, I hope this explanation helps, and if Marilyn was alive she'd wave at you, so we provide the cyber experience! Aleister up in there, bro 19:42 14 7
Who is the woman on the extreme left in the Mount Rushmore spoof? Thought it was Veronica Lake but can't yet identify her. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:46, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
I thought it was Rita Hayworth, but Black Flamingo thinks the one on the extreme right is Hayworth. Lake would have the hair thing pictured if it were her, which would have been fun to see. There is talk that Mae West is either the second from the right or on the right, but I don't think any of them are Mae West--she started in pics quite old and those heads look too young. Jean Harlow has to be one of the right two too. So we just went with Eva Peron as one of them, for the funny, and that still makes me laugh. Aleister 20:01 14 7
Rita Hayworth is on the right. Not Eva Peron on the left but still a stumper all the same. Mae West is correct. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:14, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
I get you, also who let the riff raff liberals in here?--Sycamore (Talk) 08:17, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
Maybe it's Jane Russell on the far left, that's as close as I could come by doing some photo research. Does that seem right to everyone? Aleister 17:16 15 7

More stuff

Were you serious when you voted against Anal sex and wrote, "Against. - Ban this filth"? I only ask because a vote on this basis for this article probably invalidates your vote. Cheers! Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 17:10, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Tis' a joke - they are sometimes on here. No I thought that it would be pretty obvious - it's not a very funny article, plus I think the topic l does not lend itself to being that amusing, since there's less amusing and interesting angles to cover from anal sex. No problem then officer?--Sycamore (Talk) 09:21, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Hellojaffacakes
Please take some before I scoff the entire packet

SURPRISE!

... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Wee!--Sycamore (Talk) 12:28, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Sexy? You mean Norman Lovett's Holly or Hattie Hayridge's Holly?

Don't worry, in either case, you're not alone. Thanks for the review; that was very generously scored (I mean, 42?!), and you've definitely given me some sense of direction for improvement now. It's been a while since last I saw an episode, but I definitely remember the "no aliens" decision G&N made; I just didn't know how to fit it in with the hyperactive fan angle, which I guess is something I should tone down anyway, at least at the beginning and definitely in the synopsis before building up at the end to meet with the apology. That or maybe I just need to pick the right things to satirise. But I'm rambling. Starting to figure things out though, thanks to you. Lots of bells ringing. MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[12:39 19 Jul 2010]

Whoa and you made a bunch of edits. Thanks for that. MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[12:39 19 Jul 2010]
Either of them were sexier than Queeg... --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:41, Jul 19
So that's three personalities for one computer ... wow, Holly did have issues. MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[12:42 19 Jul 2010]
I'm a complex guy, I don't mind a complex kinda of gal. Also Queeg = Mordillo?--Sycamore (Talk) 13:05, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
About as likely as finding a poet from Liverpool called Craig... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
I have no idea what you are on about. I assume its one of those 'long haired folks hemp products' speaking nonsense that you've been using. Cut their hair and tell them to get a fucking proper job is my view - poetry is for aids people;)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:34, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Now here's something seemingly more inscrutable than Craig Charles being a poet or Holly having multiple personalities. Series 1, Episode 2, Lister says he's going into stasis so that he can wait out the three million years it would take to get back to Earth. I may be forgetting something, but what happened to that?! It seems like he just forgot about the stasis booth! But I'm rambling. MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[13:16 19 Jul 2010]
You are rambling, but you are welcome for the review, which is my first in a few million years...--Sycamore (Talk) 19:30, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, good to see a golden oldie reviewing again. :)--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Tuesday, 02:20, July 20 2010 UTC
Yeah, all I ned now is my walking stick and my tazer to go for a pint of milk...--Sycamore (Talk) 09:13, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Right, I did a medium-large overhaul. Probably still too superficial, and I think the fan POV might distract a bit, but I was going for content & variety for now. How looks it? MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[01:20 23 Jul 2010]

Looks good, lots of nice extras there. Much better than when I reviewed it:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:08, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
Hurrah! Looks like a good time for a second opinion, then. Thanks! MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[20:11 23 Jul 2010]

The template that I'll never change

Groovy:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:13, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For your vote on Rolex, which pushed the "telling of time among humans" to the front page earlier. I'm glad you liked it. Appreciated. Aleister 3:17 21 7

What can I say, I was drunk and should of voted against;)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:13, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

A Roman thank you

Hi Sycamore. I appreciated your comments on TKF's page regards my three day lay off and Matt Lobster's two hour ban. I didn't personally think the punishments fitted the crimes committed there and three days for a misplaced * and not a # . It wasn't nice to be lumped in those who come here to deliberately vandalise but anyway, porridge has been served. I will keep a look out those ban logs in future to see if anyone else I know falls into disfavour and ask what has happened. Sometimes users just disappear and no one makes any notice or seem to care either. Well I will follow your lead and be ready to ask those all important Why? questions. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:07, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, good to see you back. As for the ban, sadly there's little follow up. It is a grossly unfair and unjustified stance - its fine to lay into the 'soft' contribuiters who do little to add to the site, people like himself these days as a matter of fact. Hopefully you'll be left in peace by this character:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:06, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

IRC

In there now, more or less (when baby isn't crying). ~Jewriken.GIF 18:14, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

I'll send an email, seems the days timetables for us both don't match up to well:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:06, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

for the evolution of modern music pee. Think I'll try to arrange it chronologically, extend it a bit and remove some lyrics. Then I'll be curing cancer and seeing about world peace. --Sog1970 07:24, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Aye get it the fuck done, especially the last two;)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:06, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Bilderberg Group

I liked this when it first was mainspaced, and expected it to be VFH'ed almost as soon as it went up. It's been on pee review long enough, why don't you nom it under the 7-day rule. I'd review it but I'm not good at those, would be happy to do a brief edit sweep though just to see if there's anything to smooth out that author's miss. Nice work. Aleister 12:20 24 7

Hey thanks:) - Not too sure about self-nomming though, I prefer to let someone else to nominate my work where possible. We shall see...--Sycamore (Talk) 18:22, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Why?:Does Mads Mikkelsen not speak one line of dialogue in Valhalla Rising?

Interesting article. You have reminded me of another actor appearing in a film who has no line of dialogue - Pierce Brosnan as an IRA assassin in 'The Long Good Friday'. Since he is Irish - this cannot have been about the accent! --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:28, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Pierce got rid of his Irish accent so he could get jobs in England, if you ever saw 'Evelyn', it quite amusing how his native accent seems forced. He just has abit of a twang now. Of course both actors are talentless which is a good reason for them to keep their mouths shut. Glad you like my article though:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:50, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Anal sex

Since the failed VFH nomination of anal sex in mid-July, I've taken to fixing up the page. ChiefjusticeDS got around to reviewing it, scoring it 42/50 and making a number of recommendations. I've taken his suggestions to heart and improved the page in the areas he pointed out. The fact that it scored so well on Pee Review, combined with my personal opinion that it's a pretty good article, is causing me to ask: What made you vote against it? If there were any changes that could be made that would turn it into an article you could support, what would they be? --Andorin Kato 18:58, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

I would say my against vote would have to stand. I just don't think it's that funny, some of the things you say are simply a bit too squeamish, like the obsession with hygiene etc. Primarily, and don't get me wrong, I have done and enjoyed doing this with girls, I just don't think its the kind of topic I want to see on the front page. There's just not enough humour or interest in the topic, that, and it sends a message out for the kind of articles we feature too much around here. You have written some very good articles before; I would have a go at something a little more challenging and worthy of your time than this. I hope you don't think I'm just mean, and I wish you well with your next article:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:32, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
Don't be discouraged, Andorin. Along with Romartus, Sycamore is perhaps the hardest Uncyclopedian to get a "for" vote from. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 15:15, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
Saw the anal sex meeting and had to drop in. The article seems fine as a topic, it's all about bodily hygiene regarding sex. The one sour note right at the start is the quote, which has nothing to do with the page and reinforces the old-school sterotype of anal sex as sex without being anal about it, that it's all about holes and stuff. Aleister 15:42 2 8
I once had a friend who was working on a thesis about Anarchism. In the days before computers, he wrote it out in hand and gave the work to his dear old mum to type out. His thesis then read Analism in the Twentieth Century. Had to get the entire work re-typed - and this is a true story. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:04, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Did you know...

...that I'm ten days older than you? —DAMN WHORE MafiaHatBlack Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [16:22 8 August 2010]

That's because God wanted you to die slightly sooner.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:25, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
Hey, has God been talking to you behind my back? Again? —DAMN WHORE MafiaHatBlack Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [20:23 8 August 2010]
It's not just her, Santa has also been talking... about the way your thong strap rides above your jeans--Sycamore (Talk) 10:06, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
Oh what! I thought I could trust that bitch! Well I know someone who isn't get a Christmas present list this year! —DAMN WHORE MafiaHatBlack Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [11:55 9 August 2010]

Thanks!

I am eternally grateful! Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:30, 10 August 2010

A letter from Filmmakers for Lens Flare

LensFlareMadness.png

Thanks for supporting Lens flare! MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[19:59 11 Aug 2010]

Das Experiment

Looking good...... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Hey thanks, you deserve half credit for it though. Another savage polemic - will I ever be original:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:31, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Ninja star

Please can I have a celtic ninja star? I love ninjas and celts Gomphog 16:40, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

One day maybe... I award my special ninja star only to people who do outstanding stuff on my articles - i.e. make them better than I could ever hope to alone. Mhaille is a really awesome dude on here, not just for his articles but taking the time out to help other peoples. I also award it on images or things I could not do by myself:)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:30, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Bring me Chekhov's gun! No, not Pavel Chekov's phaser, you imbecile!

Thanks for voting for Chekhov's gun! MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[17:13 16 Aug 2010]

Russo-Japanese Thanks

Krav Maga

Thanks for your additions. I'm a bit uninspired at the moment, so do feel free to add anything else you think of. :-) Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 14:40, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's one I'd really like to learn;)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:42, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Thank You

Icons-flag-pi Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 19:46, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Please..

don't devolve to the level of trying to "troll" me - it has been done so many times it loses all impact: if you don't like what you read do NOT read it. Now begone --Apostle Of Christ 17:44, September 7, 2010 (UTC) actually I should apologise to you a bit for that, you did add some useful things - I have a short-temper at times: feel free to erase my comment if you want (..I am aware I come of as a jerk but that's the price of strong faith) --Apostle Of Christ 17:53, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Actually I would disagree with that, I have a strong faith, but I'm hopeful that I don't come off as a jerk. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
As a tip, this site is not really religious or an appropriate place for religious debate. We tend to make fun of everyone without a point of view per se. It might be an idea to cool off on the religious stuff as a few people are probably quite offended. Check out BGBU with tips:)--Sycamore (Talk) 18:02, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects