User talk:Surreal Hamster

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

For no reason (actually, for your username) --IconSir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)[citation needed] 06:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Frikkin' Sweet! I assume I have the right to put this on my user page, I'm putting it there.--Surreal Hamster 02:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

edit On UnMeta VFD

It was Iain, not Lain. Just thought I'd let you know. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Figured that out after the red linkage, I then changed it, then realized you had already put it up for speedy deletion and removed it. - Surreal Hamster 19:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

edit UnMeta Vandalization

Alright, all wrapped up, thanks for your help though, I know it's hard when you don't have all those sweet sysop powers, but you did a good job holding them off. Anyway... I figured you deserved some compensation... so here:

Newcookie Tompkins has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Thanks again! Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Yay, templates! - Surreal Hamster 14:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Waaaah, your signature!!

All you have to do is go to your preferences, change {{SUBST:User:Surreal Hamster/sig}} with {{SUBST:nosubst|User:Surreal Hamster/sig}}. ^_^ --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|CUNT|+S 19:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)



YOU ARE IN THE LEAGUE OF BENSON! Benson 21:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Awesome. - - Sir Real Hamster {la} {talk} {contribs} 00:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
And ty for helping with Gameboy Micro. Benson 00:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

edit UnNews:Denver man binge-watches new House of Cards season twice

Welcome back to the website! After only six years! With apologies, I'll pass on your perfectly coded UnNews for a Front Page graphic; it has a funny concept, but no real hook to real-life news, is written in the first person, dwells on the travails of the news-gatherer, and I cannot tell how much is vanity or even cyberbullying. You might improve these points, invite other editors to do so, or move on to another subject. Hurry back! Spıke Ѧ 12:42 28-Feb-15

Thanks for the warm welcome. I understand your reasoning fully. I rewrote it so it's not in first person, which I hope fixed the problem with it dwelling on the "travails of the news-gatherer" as you put it. I'd argue the real-world news is the release of House of Cards itself and as for the vanity/cyberbullying, well I don't know what to tell you. It's neither, you'll have to take my word I guess. I also wanted to shorten the headline, but I was afraid moving it to a new page would make it show up twice in the headline template on UnNews, which I didn't want to do so I just left it unwieldily long. - Sir Real Hamster {la} {talk} {contribs} 00:32, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

Renaming it will not do so, as the old name will become a redirect, which the DPL code ignores. If you had taken a week to fix it up, you might copypaste it to a new article and list the old one on QVFD, but that won't be necessary in this case.

One change would be a hyphen in binge-watch. I appreciate your edits and, as the weekend has been slow, it might go up. (Can you find any article on a "real" news website to use as the Source, for foreign readers who aren't familiar with House of Cards at all?) The newest UnNews is mine and it's more allegory than yucks, so it won't be featured. One more thing you might do is tighten up the start of the fourth paragraph; this too is the "news-gatherer" describing his own feelings on the phone with the interviewee. Cheers! Spıke Ѧ 00:38 2-Mar-15

PS--If you use your Move button to change the headline, please list the old name on QVFD (using {{Redirect}} as it instructs so that no one follows the redirect and deletes the new page by mistake). Spıke Ѧ 00:40 2-Mar-15

Cool, I'll handle that in a bit. Just wanted to say that the comment about him being delirious was meant to lead into the Godzilla remark, so it'd be clear that that was a hallucination on his part and not just surrealist nonsense. I'm not sure how to accomplish that otherwise, or if that even is clear as it's currently written. - Sir Real Hamster {la} {talk} {contribs} 00:44, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

No problem with "delirious"; it is the other stuff. I have taken a hack at the 4th paragraph to illustrate. Also added a Category, and you might think of other appropriate ones. Spıke Ѧ 00:52 2-Mar-15

I can't put it above Spock, for Chrissake! But your article is on the Front Page, renamed slightly as shown above. Spıke Ѧ 01:18 2-Mar-15

Obviously he can't go above Spock! Totally get that. But yeah, thanks a bunch, all around. You've been a big help. - Sir Real Hamster {la} {talk} {contribs} 01:22, March 2, 2015 (UTC)
Personal tools