User talk:Un-Supergeeky1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 09:27, January 7, 2013 by Romartus (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search


Sexy girls

I'm sure you will like it here!

Hello, Supergeeky1, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. You seem to have a sense of humor, but to be sure that it corresponds to the kind humor that is accepted on this site I suggest checking out the following links:

  • Beginner's Guide - A massive guide about how to be the best you can be at Uncyclopedia. I've honestly never read the whole thing in one sitting myself, but it is very useful if you're looking for help on a specific issue.
  • Our Vanity Policies - This page details why we don't care about your friends, your school, your gay fourth period math teacher, or the homework he has you do, and in-jokes. DO NOT violate this policy.
  • How to be funny and not just stupid - Our flagship link. This will tell you how to not get booed off the metaphorical stage that is Uncyclopedia. I STRONGLY suggest reading the entire thing through, perhaps more than once.
  • Uncyclopedia:Best of - For a bit of inspiration. These are our featured articles. This is the kind of stuff we like to read around here.

Now that that's out of the way, take a look to your right, and you'll notice some more links, these ones are about help in general:

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but I do recommend it, it can be quite enjoyable, and it's a good chance to let others take notice of your writing. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Supergeeky1/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian, and remember: Have fun with it. We're all here to have a good time and a good laugh. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button_sig.png) above the edit box. Again, welcome!

-Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Andre Bauer chop

Nice work! Thanks --Globaltourniquet GlobalTourniquetUnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 06:25, February 1, 2010 (UTC)


You know, it would be more helpful if your Change Summaries stated what the change was, rather than all read, Geekyfication--which I interpret as "Hey, everybody! it's me!!!" It is sometimes necessary to go back into the history to find something, and this tendency makes finding something difficult. Cheers. Spıke Ѧ 22:21 4-Jan-13

I thank you for your concern, except that's precisely what I'm attempting to do: trying to let everyone know that I am saying hey, and that I it is me, only the most super of the geeks. How else will the good people of Uncyclopedia know that I've descended from my throne? This is how it's been done for many years prior, and how it will be done for many years in the future. I can only look forward to my eventual sons, all named Junior, leaving this exact "Geekyfication" change summary and continuing the tradition that my father set before me, and his father before him. However, I do understand the tribulations one might experience while trying to sort through my edits, so I will make an addendum to my beloved change summary that I believe will retain its geekyness while being more descriptive, and more importantly, will please both parties. I hope you have a very Geeky Day, and I look forward to talking with you in the future. Keep on Geekin'! And stuff. SG1 [citation needed] 18:23, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
So you'll do it. Yes? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:36, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
Also can you link your talk page to your signature? Thanks. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:37, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
Supergeeky1 stop being a douche, that behaviour may fly on Darthipedia but that doesn't mean that it has a snowballs chance in hell with our uncyclopedia brethern. Madclaw @ talk 19:05, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
I would appreciate that if you didn't call another user a 'douche' Madclaw. Thanks. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:33, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
Well if he would stop acting like one people wouldn't call him that, But I wouldn't hold your breath on that since he is practically begging to be called a douche on his userpage right here. Also since when did the word "douche" become the textual "nipple" on uncyclopedia? much love Madclaw @ talk 22:44, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid to admit that Madclaw is right about this one, Romartus. Ya'see, I don't consider the word "douche" to be offensive. As a matter of fact, I consider it to be a term of endearment. Now if Madclaw had called me... say, a "tumorous homosexual", then perhaps I would take offense. Mainly because I am not, in fact, tumorous, nor am I a homosexual. I can think of many worse things to be called than an item inserted into the vagina. Why anyone would think I would take offense to being called such an honorful word simply baffles to me. Are you to tell me that if I were to call Spike a douche, you would take offense? More importantly, if I were to say that I think of you, Romartus, as being no less than the biggest douche on my talk page, would you seriously object to this? Now, as far as your concerns about me personally go...
"So you'll do it. Yes?"
If you'd kindly take a look at the edit summary I wrote in response to Spike, you'd see that I already updated my standard summary to reflect Spike's wishes. Alternatively, you can look at the summary I'm using to make this very edit in my talk page's history.
Also can you link your talk page to your signature? Thanks.
Now this is where I'm gonna start doing some explaining. Do you see this letter?
This is the letter G, as in Goober, Gooch, and Gargantuan Gimp. More importantly, it's also the first letter in the word Geek. Clicking the letter G in my signature leads to my talk page. This link has always been in my signature, and likely always will be.
Now that we have all that out of the way, I'm not sure what more you want me to do about my trivial edit summaries/signature, but I'm certain I'll be hearing a lot more about them from you in the future. In the meantime, feel free to send anymore personal critiques about my editing style to the magical land of Narnia. From one douche to another, I thank you once again for your concerns. Cheers. SG1 [citation needed] 00:11, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
The word for this is dickery Supergeeky1. And you know what happens next. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 00:02, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
So I understand your sig does link to your talk page. Matter resolved and you are unbanned. So now we start afresh. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:27, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
Personal tools