User talk:Starnestommy/Ct

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Starnestommy
Revision as of 22:35, March 22, 2011 by DJ Mixerr (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the funniest thing I have ever read to date! --General Insineratehymn 01:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

The critics are saying "No! Bad article! Scat! Self-indulgent. In-jokey. Leet-ridden", but we disagree! --Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 02:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

My version's better! :P --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

If anyone cares the talk page is archived Here --~ Tophatsig 02:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Best article since [[Fisher Price]] and [[Redundant]]. DJ Mixerr 22:35, March 22, 2011 (UTC) DJMIXERR (talk)(contributions)

edit Ct

Vote: Ct

Score: -4 penus in the mouf of teh vote0rz!!!!11Opjveroliprobmoi23

Nomination: Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 01:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 6
  1. Nom and For - Contents, the second coming! Feature!!! --Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 01:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. I support, even though I didn't think you were genuinely serious about featuring. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Are you talking to me? --THINKER 01:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Are you talking to me? --~ Tophatsig 01:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Yes, please. --General Insineratehymn 01:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. Feature! It angered me with its existence earlier, but now that it's up here, it should sooo be featured.--Andorin Kato 02:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 10
  1. you can't slam a bunch of keys and call it an article --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 01:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. No. This article is a piece of junk. Brianrein 01:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. I was going to vote "For" as a joke... but then I realized it might actually get featured. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey or was it a giant monster or a robot? 01:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. No. You're being stupid. Stop being stupid. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. <Garison>"Well I don't know, Starnestommy, did you ask Mr. Hat?" <Mr. Hat>"NO! You go to Hell! You go to Hell and YOU DIE!"--Sir Shandon 02:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. No Stupider than the original Contents. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 02:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Against - Stupid & NRV'ed. Famine approved. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Against. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 02:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. Strong Against 1. because its rubbish. 2. because the ranting on IRC about it made me leave the room. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:21, 29 May 2007
  10. No! Bad article! Scat! Self-indulgent. In-jokey. Leet-ridden. YouFang 02:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Uh.. in-jokey? --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
"Go eat shit fuckers" --~ Tophatsig 02:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment Come on, think of the reskinning possibilities! This is worth featuring just for the amazingly long quote --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • i'm sorry, go back to the pub, that's where drunk people belong --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 01:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects