This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user.
Don't take it too hard
Just try to remember that drive-by commenting on a user's talkpage in a conversation in which you aren't involved looks the same there as it is in the real world (which is why I generally try to avoid doing so). Plus Poo Lit is Poo Lit. If we make exceptions there for one user, pretty soon there are no rules at all. Do you know what happens then? Anarchy! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Vroom vroom! —SirSysRq (talk) 21:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes, Anarchy! Break the chains of slavery! Abolish all authority! Seriously though, I understand why Sycamore said all that stuff, even though he had no right to talk to me like that. He has no insight into my person whatsoever, so it's not up to him to judge my actions. I was just asking whether I could get some extra time or not. (The PLS page said something about entries being accepted late under certain conditions.) A simple "no" would have been sufficient. Anyway, you don't need to worry about me. I won't be gone for too long. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 15:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Understandably, you voted for my article for featuring. Although your "for" vote was not extraordinary, as the article's genius was beyond question, it is still appropriate to acknowledge your dutiful participation in the process.
So, in gratitude for your vote, I will dedicate my next coma to you. Thank you.
The following coma causes are available for this honor. Please indicate below this template which one you would like me to dedicate to your user name.
Hi Sock. You know in the rules at the top of VFD, where it says "Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD"? You see how everyone else does that? (Even if it's one word, in the case of a recent Asahatter nom). Can you do that? Thanks. --UU - natter12:58, Mar 25
Thanks. Now, there's this thing called "VFD flooding". - Don't completely fill it, leave room for others to add a nom or two - you'll be able to add the rest soon enough. Again, people (including me and MrN) have had to do this before. --UU - natter15:33, Mar 25
Obviously by Neil I mean 'I' cos you know that people who refer to themselves in the third person like that actually tend to be kinda narcissistic and I'm not - well I mean I wouldn't say I was - so from now on I'll say 'I', I just had to say Neil so you knew that it was me and not somebody else. So I came here to say thanks for advertising my daily torment I hope that now more people will have a greater understanding of why I'm so dysfunctional. Thanks, did I say that?
Also I hope you get back soon, you're cool. ~Orian57~~Talk~12:35 26 March 2009
Well if you don't consider it spam I guess... MrNFork you! 16:43, Mar 26
How in the world
Did you manage to edit conflict me on a little-used userspace template that hasn't been edited in two years? Seriously, how did you do that? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 23:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I just saw your talkpage pop up on RecentChanges, took a look, and saw a template messing things up. Sorry, no conspiracy here. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 23:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I guess you want to thank me for allowing you to read something by me. Unfortunately for you, I am currently having sex with your girlfriend. She says, "Hi <insert name here>!" Did I mention how she loves my cock. By the way, my penis is huge. Good bye, peasant! And I've got a huge cock.
Do you feel like nominating any dead elephants? I think I've totally poured over the sucker at this point in time and finished doing the tedious little checks and edits.-- 14:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
I only wish you could've tied with me. But, then again, that's RabbiTechno's job. So I guess this template is all I can do for you. Thanks again, dearest friend!
The Lewis Caroll comment I can live with, but the Lolita vibe is a bit creepy, dude... PS: Bless you for bringing closure to my sig btw. --Dame 23:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
You could've just reverted it to the previous version. It's just that the Jenny in that pic looks all distorted compared to the picture you got the face from. I tried my best to make it look better, though I'm aware that my colours didn't match. I'm sorry if you didn't like it. I'm really sorry about all of this. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 07:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
The Stench of Defeat
I'm glad you liked it. Do you think I should work on it some more, or send it to the mainspace and get it PEE'd? Saberwolf116 02:32, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, if you plan on getting it peed, you may want to wait 'til after the review and make some more improvements before moving it to mainspace. I like your rewrite the way it is now, but some may not share this view. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 07:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
I can get it reviewed in userspace? I thought it was just mainspace. Saberwolf116 13:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
hey sock, might you care to comment on the subject of the unsignpost story that i haven't started writing yet? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
You deserve it. I'm always seeing you trying to be helpful. Plus you give the impression that you don't take this place or yourself too seriously unlike some other users I could mention. I like that, so I like you. Wanna catch a movie? -OptyCSucks! CUN15:25, 9 Apr
Just saw that thing you put on my talk page, it really helped. Did you just make that or do you send it to every n00b that logs in for the first time? (Sorry if I'm acting like an uber n00b) Drunk Monkey 17:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I use it for multiple new users, but I really mean what I say in it, every time I post it. I'm glad it was helpful to you. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 17:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the friendly welcome indeed. :D --Quaazi 17:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I know it isn't your fault, but my dad saw the porn you posted somewhere above this. He was really pissed, I got banned from Uncyclopedia for a week or so. );Drunk Monkey 01:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
You shouldn't allow your parents to watch what you're doing on the computer. They'll be all paranoid about who knows what. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 15:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, my parents are pretty retarded. Thanks for all the help, by the way.-dRuNk MoNkEy
You guessed the code correctly. Hooray for you! –Spang
Actually I read what you wrote again and it's not quite right... it just gives the next day that doesn't have an article queued for featuring, in a way that means it doesn't have to be subst'd, like in {{nextfeatureslot}}. Close though. •Spang•☃•talk• 00:39, 10 Apr 2009
It's Naked Barbie Time!Times are tough out there but Barbie™ and all of her friends sure know how to show their appreciation for your generous vote to feature Economic Collapse Barbie™ They'll be seeing you in the bathtub later on tonight!
.....Try and promulgate your leftist "God Is Dead" philosophies on UncyclopediA! If you ever want to vent some steam just look that guy up and give him a holler'. I bet he'd argue with you for days. Thanks for the gumball Socky!-- 11:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there Socky. Seeing as you're all active and stuff, and seem to have enough time on your hands, fancy a responsibility? I've been looking after the HowTo page for a while, but as you may have noticed, I've been IRL busy as fuck recently and have had limited time to do proper Uncyc stuff. So would you like to give me a hand with the page? If you're interested, I'll let you know what to do. --UU - natter09:38, Apr 11
It's not actually that much, TBH, the main thing is changing the featured HowTo every thursday. As you'll see if you look at the history of the feature page, I haven't been on the case that much recently. Just skim through the recent HowTos on the main page, see if there's a half decent one that isn't on the recently featured list, and switch 'em over. Again, look at the featured page history to see how to change it over (it's not rocket science - I can do it!) Possibly tidy up any articles you feature, although it's not necessary. Usefully, there's never been a vote for featured HowTo, so you can just find one you think is good enough. If there are none on the recent list, find one from Category:HowTo. You don't even have to add a template to featured HowTos, so it's pretty simple!
That's the main thing. If you ever find yourself bored, you could always find good tips from HowTo articles and add them to Template:HowTo:TotD (again, look through the history). Particularly ones on Special:Lonelypages - this then gives them a link and removes them from that list, which is handy.
That really is it. Not a lot to do, but it would be a big help to me. Whaddaya say? --UU - natter09:56, Apr 11
Remember this? Just askin', as it's been a fortnight since you last changed the feature. Are you really bothered about doing this, or do I take it back? --UU - natter11:47, May 1
Wow. Sorry man. I forgot to do it this week. I decided I'd do it every two weeks (every week would probably be a bit too often, since last week I had trouble finding a good HowTo and decided on two weeks). But I forgot to do it last Thursday, it must have slipped my mind. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM11:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Where...
Hi Sockpuppet -
I restarted painting, and also got fed up with people not grasping the concept of satire here. I'm not sure if I'm going to write anything much but will be around to kill time now and then. --StyleGuide 18:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Understandably, you voted for my article for featuring. Although your "for" vote was not extraordinary, as the article's genius was beyond question, it is still appropriate to acknowledge your dutiful participation in the process.
So, in gratitude for your vote, I will dedicate my next common typographical error to you. Thank you.
The following common typographical errors are available for this honor. Please indicate below this template which one you would like me to dedicate to your user name.
I just noted that "indicate below this template" stuff. I'd like some confusing "Dr. Spock" and "Mr. Spock". Despite my comment on that one forum topic, I still think Star Trek was a great series, though it had its flaws. Plink.—SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 19:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Phenomenomen
...which just means ominous phenomenons. Anyway. Would you be interested in co-writing a condescending scientific article about something? I have the means of producing mind-bogglingly boring "scientific" images and, as you know, text that beats the scale of those images in myndboggling boring-being. --StyleGuide 12:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
OK... too bad since the IRC way is really good - but OK, we can work it out some other way. Does it suck so hard we couldn't decide on the subject and some outlines in there and then go on otherwise? --StyleGuide 12:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Your assumption that your gazillion edits grant you some sort of immunity and/or allow you to go around the place pocking into each and every conversation and/or telling admins how to run around managing the site is wrong. So here is the deal: I don't want to see you telling any admin what to do or quoting the "rules" again. Understand? We have been here long enough to understand how this place work without your help. Also, you will start checking who you welcome, I'm tired with you welcoming obvious vandals for the sake of sig spamming.
And just to be clear, this is not an advice. ~ 18:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
It is not my assumption that a large amount of edits grant any of those things.
However, I am 'known' to a considerable amount of users, so at times I leave some helpful advice or somekind of humorous comment. And sometimes, believe it or not, I just want to talk about something with the respective user.
I did not mean to "quote" any rules. What I meant to do was share what had been my observation of such things thus far. I did not intend to be a smartass or anything of the like.
I normally do check the edits of who I welcome.
The particular user you are talking about, Uncyclopedialicksballs, had 1 edit, which I superficially checked. I started reading the changes he made "It was at one point banned for containing ..." and I didn't read any further because I thought like "Wow. I had expected something like SUCK MY PENIS UNCYCLOPEDIA, but this actually looks like decent English. I guess he's good enough to be welcomed, despite his funny name." If I had read the full edit, I would've reverted it and probably wouldn't have welcomed him. In the future, I'll make sure to check more thoroughly in such cases.
I do not do anything of such kind. Sig 'spamming' as you like to call it, is a mere side effect of me wanting to contribute to this site.
How dare you call me an obvious vandal. You little @$!&#. I was glad he welcomed me. Check my edits, I haven't vandalized anything. Don't make an assumption based on one idiot. Starting out isn't easy, but Sockpuppet felt kind enough to help me out with more than a few things. Leave this guy alone, he's actually pretty nice.Drunk Monkey 20:51, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
WTF SOAUU?
WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU'RE DOING!?!?
Do you realize that by supporting HowTo:Get Over Jenny, you are supporting insane, demented, homicidal stalkers everywhere? You should be ashamed.
--CheddarBBQ
I'm writing a little article on userspace, and, seeing as how you've offered me advice in the past, was wondering what you have to say that might help. =)Saberwolf116 00:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I like what's there now. Maybe you could expand the concept from YouTube to other sites as well. Didn't we have this copyright vandal over recently? So far, you've done a good job with it. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 08:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Ahh, thanks=) well, i'm not sure what other sites do it, does Metacafe have to deal with those claims? Saberwolf116 12:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Maybe Wikipedia? They're rather strict as far as licences go. You could say something like "Sometimes they end up on other sites. Usually they quickly die out, though they seem to flourish quite well on Wikipedia-related sites." —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 12:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Can I have some help with the Phail article I made.It's.....epic phail right now (The irony is disturbing).User talk:Bad Shroom
If Uncyclopedia is there to be edited then why can't I? I was not vandelising, and since you won't let me reply to your stupid little e-mail I've had to edit again. Unfairly this time yes, but thats your fault. "Hidden Page"? What are you - 5!? Just try and calm down. I'm editing, not "vandelising." jammyHA. :)
Yeah, but seriously.."Hidden Page" !? Its not hidden if you scroll down and its there! J.x
Do you know what a talkpage is? It's where people talk about stuff and such. Those titles describe the subjects. It is about a "Hidden Page" (which I managed to find) and not in itself a hidden page. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM 00:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, obv. If you didn't find it I'd be worried. It would be better if it was like "Hidden Page" and that paragraph didn't exist. If you like this so much then why are you a "SOAUU"? Why arn't you registered? J.x
Huh!? What don't I get? Whats an "SOACC" then!? J.x
Sometimes people just don't get it. Heh heh heh. Hail Hitler!...( not, am not a Nazi :) )
I think this page should startover... none of that other crap!
Edit conflict!
What is going on up there! I can hear you boys!-- 01:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Pardon? J.x
Isachia! Sockathese! Keep it down up there or I'm going to come up there with my belt! And start signing your posts with four tildas for gaddsakes!-- 01:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Btw, that's your greek philosopher identity-- 01:29, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
I planned to make Yoshi look more high by putting cheap vibrant paint lines, but I thought it would just be, sloppy.--Bad Shroom 19:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
you have written about as MUCH as a MAN with NO ARMS SOEVERWHAT. andicanbarely stomach stomach stomach stomach your insolence. i hate seeeeeeing non-article writing memoirs on my diary. there is no juice left now.
no juice left
no juice left
no juice left
no juice left
chilling chilling chilling chilling chilling chilling, chilling in the microwave. 60 second heat coffin, all ready meals. all ready eating, 60 seconds now. libellous ad-lib ad-lib ab-lib. lib-ad!
oh won't you take me soon tkae you soon tkae you take you soon oh won't you you you you you oh won't take you soon. oh won't
I realise the full futility of this message. Franz Ferdinand. Archduke of Gloucester. Of Gloucester.
i have no further further questjuns. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
I like talking like that. It releases fumes. Nah, I never mean what I say when I'm being silly. I like you, man. LET'S BUY SOFAS. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 11:29, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
You must be wakin' up in the middle of the night and shitting in his dead granny's master bedroom. Why do you get to stay there in that nice house anyway, when his uncle had to move out & get his own place? It's just a bedsit, not very comfortable for an unmarried 54 year old man. Sell your bungalow and buy a flat for your mate's relative. Then you can Live On The Beach! Sherry Fitzgerald --noamshouseparty 18:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank You!
The doctor will see you now
Oh, by the way, before we begin todays session, I'd like to thank you for supporting my recent featured article. Now, tell me about your childhood.--You know what the music means...Our time is up.
Hey, thanks for sorting out the title on my UnNews article! I realised I had messed it up but didn't have a clue how to fix it. Hope you're well. ImNotASunbeam 13:05, 25 April 2009 (UTC)