This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user.
Guess what
You're Belgian. That is all. --BlackFlamingo 17:35, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Could I prevail upon you to do me a very small favor, and move a picture I recently uploaded to the proper spelling? I would be most obliged. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 19 '11 11:01 (UTC)
That is a pretty bad article. If it lost the last paragraph it would be a marginal keep in my view. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:27, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
I got to Zaventem last night and was VERY LUCKY and caught the last train out. Im now listening to Music-for-life on studio brussels ... aparantly is the last year they will do it. It doesnt feel like christmas without it. hahaha. --ShabiDOO 17:29, December 22, 2011 (UTC)
Hahaha. Yeah...I got the very last train and I pretty much jumped on board as the doors were closing. I didnt have 100 euros for a taxi and I didnt feel like sleeping in the elevator. --ShabiDOO 18:35, December 22, 2011 (UTC)
UnNews
Should I stop nominating them on VFD? lol, maybe they have passed a test before that I don't know about , maybe I'm trying to do overtime? (Not that I want to, at all) Mattsnow 22:53, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
Well, it's your call. If you think they're of sufficiently bad quality, go ahead and nom them. Just don't overdo it either. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM03:53, 24 December 2011
Holding Pages
I haven't checked how you are doing with Lindsay Lohan but I did come across Snoop Dogg which it total crap. It occurred to me before when working on the Amy Winehouse article to cut out the stupid abuse that often perhaps there should be a 'basic' article in the space. i.e some text and a few photos. These would be stubs to start off but perhaps they will attract people to improve them. My own view that when a user creates an article and starts off with a rubbish Star Wars/Pokemon theme - the usual junk - it discourages others to improve it as the article would have to be scrapped and started over again. Would be interested in what you think and - Merry Christmas BTW! . --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:46, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
OK I will suggest this in the Village Dump soon to get a view from other users. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:56, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
The Article Whisperer
Hi, Sockpupper of an unregistered user. I'm Featured User. What are you doing for the upcoming 2nd Annual The Article Whisperer? 18:58, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
Hey Sock, you've got admin superpowers, haven't you? I was reading through my works, as I sometimes do in moments of ego, and realised I'd missed an obvious joke in my Debussy article. Only problem is the thing's protected. Any chance you could let me in? --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 12:41, December 26, 2011 (UTC)
Hello Sockolicious. This is a note to lots of people, asking them to join into a Walk into a bar collab (and if Iz missed you, you are more than welcome to "Walk into a bar" too!). If you want to join in, make up your best "Walk into a bar" jokes and we will have the bestest "Walk into a bar" page on the innernests! Aleister 16:00 28-12-'11
Ewwwwww. I just walked into the bar and into the bathroom and saw the little something you left. And I also just logged onto the contest and found a similar article listed, so I signed it up for the collab if it can be moved to that category. Scary. Aleister 22:25 27-12-'11
Sockity, can you unhuff Prohibition, which was huffed in the Great Purge of '011. If I recall the page it's one I worked on and was going to do more on, with a very large photo at the bottom. Appreciated and joyful. Thanks. Aleister 1:39 28-12-'11
You are as fast as I am "pleasing" a woman. Thanks! Been a long time since I've seen that page, and I know I planned to do lots of work on it. You are God's answer to Japan being a dick. Aleister 1:49 28-12-'11
Hi there. Aleister was interested in reading my huffed articles and wants them opened again, published on my userspace. I'd like to see them again, too.
If there's any way to reopen them/unhuff them, that would be nice. I am thinking about rreposting them after some editing and suggestions.
--Izbeenoneweek 13:13, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
As one Jewish taxidermist said to the other when he realized they'd mounted a moose buttocks, "Vell, I tink we stahted wit da wrong end!" Should I have made my "keep" vote the beginning of the article, and gone from there, instead of the way I actually did it? After some sleep, the ending feels sorta blatantly obvious. Too obvious. Also, if you've got any advice, I'm all ears. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jan 3 '12 18:37 (UTC)
(Also, it's quite clear you're fond of me. But I have to say...we should probably let our romance cool off for a while. People are starting to talk.)
Once again, thank you, and my apologies for not thanking you sooner. This impersonal, auto-generated message will self-destruct in 5 seconds. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 4 '12 11:39 (UTC)
Ah, thanks for blowing me away with such an exuberant giving of thanks. I'll make sure to put myself back together to do other things you can thank me for later on. ;) —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM16:30, 4 January 2012
Greetings
I have gone through my records and it appears as though you may have voted for me for some award, supported one or more of my articles on VFH, or supported one or more of my images on VFP, in the past year or so. If this is not the case, then please ignore this message. Otherwise, thank you for your support. May you have a long and fruitful life, and have many parasites. 1234~18:57, 6 January 2012
What's the point? It's easily doable, but a redirect is there for technical purposes only. They're supposed to be a content-less page. The categorisation should go on the article redirected to. Pup 03:19 07 Jan '12
I just left Leuven today ... my god this year was the warmest winter ever! And did you notice that train conductors are friendly these days? Oh...and did you know that you have the first gay prime minister since the Roman Ages? So many changes in a confusing globalizing world! If only Jesus was here to explain it all to us. --ShabiDOO 03:40, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
...a few shiftless articles which were cast into the world and abandoned, and which are now ICU'd and in danger of being shuffled off this mortal coil with no due process:
Zork: The Opera, My Dog Has Fleas and Bathtub are short, and have a few spelling errors and pimples of stupidity, but I think they're potentially brilliant and should be saved. Diatribe was a 2006 PLS entry, although I'm not sure about its quality, now that I've read it a second time. All of these articles have one particular failing in common: they lack images.
Is there any chance you could hook them up with some images, and maybe add a bit of prose to them? I'll do the grammar and stupidity-excisions. It's just that I'm up to my neck in unfinished articles right now, and looking for/creating images is a huge time suck when you've got 56.6 kbps internet service. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 14:36 (UTC)
I see what you mean, as I have quite a pile of unfinished articles as well. Regardless of which, I'll see what I can do to help out with the articles you mentioned. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM19:39, 8 January 2012
Don't be angry...I decided to steal Zork: The Opera from you...I couldn't resist. --ShabiDOO 02:19, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to bug you yet again, but it's getting tiresome applying VFDs manually, so I thought I'd debug the issue with Lyr's tags.js. I was wondering if you could point me to some more instances of this happening (you know, content disappearing because of a bug in the script). Thank ye. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 11 '12 14:11 (UTC)
Lookin' for a pattern. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 11 '12 15:24 (UTC)
Well, the pattern seems to be that pages with an amount of bytes exceeding a particular limit lose a portion of their content. Also, it might be something browser-specific. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM15:27, 11 January 2012
Those pages were truncated to the following character lengths: 4116 4151 4113 4110 4111 4111 Looks like a pattern to me. Thanks for the links! Oh, and do you happen to know which browser Romartus uses? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 11 '12 15:37 (UTC)
It's not exactly a bug in the script so much as just the way the entire thing is implemented, which depends on the javascript engines using big enough variables because it tries to shove the entire article into one. Now in theory, javascript uses untyped, unsized variables, so that should work, even if it isn't terribly elegant, but what do you know, we live in a real world and they really are sized. And in some javascript engines *coughfirefoxcough*, they are sized too small and they don't even check if they need to be resized. Really, the entire script structure needs a rewrite; it's actually quite old, using legacy code that was kept just to keep from breaking stuff still using it, but since jquery is included with mediawiki now, it should provide more than enough for anyone who has some idea of what they're doing to do far better. 1234~17:10, 11 January 2012
Firefox 4 plus was the problem (on a mac). I switched to Opera as suggested by Black Flamingo. Not had the same problem. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:22, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
Romartus: thanks! Lyrithya: I suspect it might not be variable sizing, but an issue with how much data can be sent using application/x-url-encoded data. Would be better to use multipart/form-data. There could also be a bug in Mozilla's encodeURIComponent which truncates (or chokes on) variables with strings over 4000 bytes in length. I'm putting a script together that includes error-checking — something to test the amount of data being sent and received. Dunno how long I'll take. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jan 12 '12 0:28 (UTC)
If you mean you're going to write a new script entirely that won't have the bugs and whatnot, good. Nevermind the bugs in whatever it is, we need to move away from this yahoo stuff, especially since we won't have it anymore sooner or later. 1234~16:45, 12 January 2012
Yeah, I'm writing one from scratch. Should be done in a few days. Also, thanks, Mr. Sock, for letting us use your talk page like a cheap condom. :D ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jan 13 '12 0:00 (UTC)
Should probably start with the qvfd gadget, actually, since I'm pretty sure the others were just made from that, tacking on more and more crap. And yes, thank you for being a veritable sock, sock. 1234~11:12, 13 January 2012
Thanks for the vote for uoty which will put me on a positive and ultimately winning track (oh, wait, IP's can't vote on these anymore. Never mind.). Hate you for removing the VFH template from Animals with feet war with animals with no feet. It should always have that template on it, until the wonderful day that the main page hosts the war, a war which I can only say about: as generals gathered in their masses, just like "witches at black masses". So thank you and fuck you, very very much. Aleister 12:07 12-1-'12
It's more slimming than a white mass. Pup 12:37 12 Jan '12
How does the page look? Enough? You guys, please add to it. Your upsizing was scary, and made me piss my floor, dog, DVD player and food. Aleister 12:39 12-1-'12
Seemed like a good idea at the time (see Sister Dora on VFD, and Roman's talk page). It has a nice balance now, so keeping the balance, or maybe it's done. You can feature it if you'd like. Both generals and witches have cold tits in real life. Aleister 12:46 12-1-'12
A user read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Then, another user read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Next, a different read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Then, another user read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Next, a different read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Then, another user read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Next, a different read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Then, another user read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Next, a different read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Then, another user read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Next, a different read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Then, another user read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Next, a different read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Then, another user read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Next, a different read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Then, another user read my article, went to VFH, and voted. Next, a different read my article, went to VFH, and voted. By now, the article was featured.
Ah, I see what happened there. I, too, had that rubby breasty thing on my user page, but no one stopped me and I finally took it off after more than a year. It was down on the page, so maybe nobody who cared looked that far down. Put a bra on it!! Anyway, I came here to ask, since you know the wiki inside and out there, to, if you have some time all set to waste, help add pages and pics into Category:Bestiality which I put up this afternoon. The first four letters say it all. Thanks. Aleister 23:00 13-1-'12
I thought it existed too, but I went looking for evidence that it was deleted and couldn't find it. Should have thought of it when I was categorizing my Skunk article. Well, fuck a duck. Aleister 23:07 13-1-'12
... om een plezant artikel te leveren aan de Oncyclopedie. Wij zijn gewoon benieuwd hoe je het er bij ons vanaf zou brengen, omdat we denken dat Oncyclopedia en Uncyclopedia toch echt wel fundamenteel van elkaar verschillen qua humorstijl. Ik heb plannen om op Uncyclopedia zelf een artikel te maken om eens te zien waar ik ergens sta met mijn humor en mijn Engels hier (als het al door VFD raakt ben ik blij...). We hebben nog nooit iets van je gezien op de oncy, wat ik een beetje spijtig vind (omdat er nu toch een Nederlandstalige wiki is). We hebben ook nog zoveel te schrijven en we kunnen je hulp zeker gebruiken (al was het maar voor 1 artikel). Zo. Genoeg gepalaverd. A vos plumes et auf siederwehn! Cartoonist | You're nuts? Don't worry... Me too! | 01:19, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Well, I'd love to try it some time. I'm hellishly busy right now, though. Maybe I'll translate something of mine that got featured here. Though you're probably right about the difference in style between the English and the Dutch wikis. For some reason I tend to predominantly visit English sites when surfing the web, so it'll be an interesting experience when I give writing articles at Oncyclopedia a shot. Also, writing in Dutch on an English wiki seems awkward to me, so I hope you don't mind my reply being in English. ;) —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM02:58, 15 January 2012
Feature que
This blackout thing will affect the feature, but a perfect solution for your consideration. Why not leave Twilight up for the duration, and move the article "Thank God It's Friday" to.....wait for it....Friday, which is open for a feature. Although the que could flip if it isn't moved by 00:00:00:00. Aleister 22:10 17-1-'12
We're Uncyclopedia, though. Featuring something on a day that seems appropriate for it is a very quaint concept around here. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM22:16, 17 January 2012
You use big words like "quaint", they confuse me. Speaking of tiny words, have you read my new unnews on Gingrich? Only reason I'm asking is that I'm quite proud of this one and its polishing, and haven't asked anyone to read it (except Mattsnow, who doesn't read and I fear illiteracy runs in his family). And you, of course, can catch any stupid spalling misteaks. Thanks if you have the time, and the temperment, or let me know if money will rent your eyes. Aleister 22:25 17-1-'12
He's illiterate? So that's why he answers in non-sequiturs all the time. Your UnNews is pretty nice and it's even better now that I've caught and butchered the spelling mistakes that were sneakingly hiding within it. And why are Americans even voting for the guy? His name alone is off-putting. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM22:35, 17 January 2012
Thanks for the fixes! Perfecto mudendo. Your random article has huge potential, so it doesn't make a difference if it's user or main space imnho. A great start. And voting for which one? Gingrich or Romney each have such large faultlines that Obama is going to once again win on luck alone. Not to mention his billion dollar campaign war chest (literally). After a Socky run-through of the page, now I can rest easy and actually have dinner. Later, gator, tater. Aleister 22:44 17-1-'12
I went over to William McKinley to do some grammatical clean-ups here 'n' there, but I got carried away, and changed a few paragraphs. Now I'm afraid to hit "save", because that article is Romartus' (and VladimirL's) baby. It's already gotten VFH votes in its present state. What should I do? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jan 20 '12 13:25 (UTC)
Well, that mainly depends on whether your changes constitute a major improvement or are more of the eh-I-like-it-better-this-way kind. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM13:28, 20 January 2012
Yeah...but with my stuff, I can never tell the difference, until I've pissed someone off. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jan 20 '12 13:30 (UTC)
Maybe saving your edit with an edit summary like (Romartus: Feel free to revert any changes you disagree with.) would be a solution to your dilemma. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM13:28, 20 January 2012
Meh, somebody just reverted some much-more-minor edits I made on a different article, so I think I'm going to just...not bother. Simpler. Sorry to bother ya. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jan 20 '12 13:41 (UTC)
That's like saying all English are Chavs. And BB - at least you now know that your efforts are appreciated so much that I'm happy to take the credit for them. Pup 02:22 20 Jan '12
Forum missing
Hello. I just made on edit on your forum about zapping pages with Fix tags, etc., on them, but the forum itself isn't being shown on, well, forums (where it used to live). Did it get taken out back and shot itself? Are we like under martial law here or something? /looks behind shoulder as he types Do you need protection? Tap once for yes, twice for no. Or put a classified ad in the Gazette this Sunday, reading "Tapping once for yes" or "Tapping twice for no." I wasn't here. Aleister 10:14 22-1-'12
It was a Category:Ministry of Love rather than a Category:Village Dump forum, so it wouldn't show where most of the forums usually sit. I've added te second cat to it so it will show in both forum lists now. (I'm assuming that's what you were talkings about.) Pup 10:56 22 Jan '12
I found it there too, as well as other things. Hence my edit conflict post to socky which follows. Thanks for finding it. Aleister 11:03
This is really old news, but I was gone and missed the entire thing (except for one edit saying that I had no time to read the whole thing). I'm not afraid, well, yes, I am afraid, to admit that I'm tearing up a little, for the first time on uncyclopedia, unless you count that time that I saw that Butt Poop had been huffed. I just read the admin forum where L. and some others tried to get you deopped. I had heard of it, and apparantly posted on the user forum once, but thought it was a joke. But it was serious and they were really mad. Apparantly you, one of the best admins here, were a voice in the wilderness for some of the things which are best about the site. This is old news, although it's new to me, and so I wanted you to know how much I appreciate you and electronically have your electronic back if you have to go to the wall for something or other, at least have your back for a few minutes or until lunch, whatever comes first. Aleister 11:00 22-1-'12
Be the first to sign-up. If you are the first five people to sign up...I will add .5 to your score :) here. Happy Monkeyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy !! --ShabiDOO 16:24, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
I have been beginning to rethink my stance on this. I've never been one to cry out for more admins - partially because I have no desire to become one myself. But the role of admins is not that different from long term user. True - I can't delete or restore huffed pages directly, but I can through QVFD/VFD/maintenance tag channels, and I can always request a restore. I can't ban directly, but other than joke bans if There was a reason to ban I could out it through BP or simply ask an admin, which I have done before. So having said that, there is no real reason why users who have been around for a while shouldn't have admin status. Going back a year or so I would have (and did) recommend Chief, Lyrithya, yourself and Romartus become admin for exactly that reason. There are users who have been around a while who I wouldn't recommend becoming admin, but by the same token I'd still suggest that admin rights go through a community vote prior to being given, much the same as I feel it should be community decision as to an admin being de-opped (again, never seen a need for that myself).
So while I see no relevant argument against it, I can see strong arguments for. It would mean that there are more admins around who can tackle the current issues with the tags issue, more responsiveness in relationship to banning vandals and bullies. In short it would mean the work load of an admin - something that I have avoided - could be shared around more. I'm not saying this for my sake, as I'm still unsure if I would want admin responsibility, which is the downside to admin rights, but because I like this site and I think that having less pressure on those who can make the big calls would be a good thing. Especially when you look at what happens to the writing quality of those that become admin - too much focus on mundanity and not enough opportunity for creativity. And after all, that's really what we stayed here for. Pup 05:55 24 Jan '12
I'm not one to be absolutely opposed to having new admins, but last I checked their was a clear consensus amongst the admins that there were plenty to go around at the moment and there's no need for any new ones. I tend to agree with that consensus. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM16:51, 24 January 2012
Damn...I am seriously unoriginal. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 13:49 (UTC)
Thanks for the spelling fixes. Again. I should get a template to give you. When I look at your edits the fix is so obvious sometimes. Leters mising! Things my eyes must skim over and not register to my various lobes wherever they happen to be playing. Thanks again, you keep me from even more embearassmint of stoopid! Aleister 13:05 25-1-'12
It's a tasty woodland candy, found mainly on the ground but sometimes on a tree trunk, which enhances the flavor. That was done on purpose, by the way, I'm not that stewpid. Aliesteer 13:13 25-1-'12
Not very filling if they're only an em in size. At least the candy coated chocolate is 2 em. Pup 01:54 25 Jan '12
Limit on VFH votes
OK, I would like to propose a new strategy to get people voting for VFH and not VFD. I suggest that for people that put up more than 20 VFH votes, they get banned for one day. |Si PlebiusDato' (Sir)Joeang GiratinaCUN|ICKill| 11:50, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
My brain no understand
Why haven't you ever made a category for Bettie Page? I went to look at it and it was not there. I still want to look at it, to see all of Bettie in one place beside the Page page. But it is not there. Woe. Aleister 1:36 30-1-'12
That your mind has slipped is no surprise. Thanks for the vote on James Bevel. Do you have any UnSerious suggestions for the page? On the category for a person, I remember starting two, on Abe Lincoln and Marilyn Monroe--two people who are usually associated with each other. I found some more pics for the Bestiality category earlier, that seems to be in good shape. The site floats on stormy seas, or is that just the alcohol? Al 00:04 the next day after 30-1-'12
Again, brain no understand, tries to stand on its own brainstem but topples over on its brain-side. The question: why was Shuffle! VFD'ed? What is wrong with people? That's two questions. Why don't we (we:Puppy and you) give it an edit sweep, get rid of the quotes at the front which just add seconds onto getting to the pictures, and mainspacing it again. Why is the sky blue sometimes and then turns blacker or whiter, depending on what's up there and what time it is? Al 11:57 1-2-'12
Hey how are things? I was in class and someone mentioned a sockpuppet which naturally brought me back to thoughts of my favorite sockpuppet on the entire internet! You still on here I see. How do you consistently remain and do things daily...I never could. Tagstit talk contribs awards 07:48, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
Well, my activity has dwindled recently, having been busy with other things. Having a lot of free time is the main condition for being able to edit Uncyclopedia regularly. In other news, hi Tagstit! Long time no see! —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM22:41, 10 February 2012
Ya, too busy lately. I was really surprised you were still here...most of the OGs have left :( Tagstit talk contribs awards 21:58, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
I just found your Bettie pic on the Abominable Snowman page. Category for Bettie? Pleaseeeeee. I want to see her all in one place, sitting there in all her glory. And then there's this.Aleister 13:30 11-2-'12
Okay, but you write and illustrate the intro, which could be a feature in itself. Bettie! Alkster 13:06 11-2-'12
Write an intro? Hmm, it's hard to think of stuff when you're being mesmerized by Bettie's extravagant looks. I'll see if I can come up with something, though. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM14:52, 11 February 2012
I brought you a couple new ones! Aleister 00:37 13-2-'12
There are some turds clogging the bowl that have the requisite 5 kill votes and 48 hours. Could you ...uh... grab a plunger, or poke somebody else important into taking care of 'em? :D Thank you! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Feb 20 '12 18:10 (UTC)
Also, I {{VFD}}d a page you spent some time editing, so I thought I'd give you a belated heads-up, if you wanna improve it or vote on it or whatever. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Feb 20 '12 18:22 (UTC)
You are wrong. He is not registered. Your logic is to be left at the door and then removed before your find it. And how about this guy? Good day, sir. Aleister 2:33 I said good day. 3-3-'12
Problem is that you have forgotten Socratic law of logic II.
Any argument that is concluded with the letters QED is the argument of an individual attempting to prove intellectual superiority, and not to determine veracity of said argument. Anyone using this is not primarily interested in obtaining the truth. Any deviation from the truth is false. So anyone who concludes an argument with QED is lying, and therefore wrong. QED.
Rough translation. My koine Greek is a little rusty. Pup 04:57 03 Mar '12
Well technically you'd still be blocked because your old account was blocked. And some admin who found out would block the new account. 68.173.113.106 21:09, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
Well done, Qzekrom. It took a while before anyone took notice of the paradox in my username. Consider yourself awarded with a virtual pat on the back. Now you can start arguing about the existence or non-existence of virtual pats on the back. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM13:34, 4 March 2012
Is that like a virtual rubbing off against your thigh? Pup 09:18 04 Mar '12
And it doesn't work for the article I just started too.. User:Mattsnow/The Great Elephant Revolt of 2011. I hope it's not just me and that it'll get fixed. Sorry I can't be of much help at all here. Mattsnow 23:39, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
Nope, just did the hard refresh as they said, holding ctrl while doing it and it still sucks. Maybe it'll be ok when I restart the pc... Mattsnow 00:19, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Well, I wasn't seeing the images before either, but now they're showing up, so restarting the computer should fix the problem for you. What browser are you using, by the way? —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM00:22, 7 March 2012
Hey it just worked!!! by holdin shift + ctrl + R !! Great!!! But how come you also couldn't see the new pics on the UnNews template???? Browser:Chrome Mattsnow 00:24, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Well, Wikia screwed something up that caused some of the newer images not to show up, but they fixed it and I refreshed my cache sooner than you, I guess. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM00:27, 7 March 2012
Damn!
Finally managed to teach my phone to not add apostrophes to its and to change itms to it's. I jump on my computer and guess what happens there now. Pup 06:36 07 Mar '12
Praise be to allah who was huffed my page here. Great is Allah's name, may his wisdom and ever knowingness live on. Can you please now undo what Allah did please? Thanks. --ShabiDOO 16:53, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
I wish my might was as great as Allah's, but seeing as Allah erased every trace of the page's existence, there's nothing I can do. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM17:30, 10 March 2012
Socky...do you have any idea what happened? Does the whole thing seem fishy...or did it just dissapear? --ShabiDOO 17:39, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
The thing is...I have no idea when it dissapeared. Whats totally strange about it, is, so did the entries on my contributions list disapear. And the images I used for them (except the one that Aleister used in one of his articles or something). Is that what happens when an article is huffed? The entries in my contribution list is also huffed? The images are also huffed? The huff log also doesn't show it...is that normal? Allah is very mysterious indeed. Priase be his name. --ShabiDOO 18:07, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, sounds like a page that vanished when Wikia officialized some of our namespaces. Probably because of something weird in the title of your page. The images were probably huffed for being unused after the page vanished. If you'd spotted this sooner, we could've recuperated the page from mirror.uncyc.org, but I'm afraid it's too late for that now. Probably the best thing you can do is contact Wikia and ask if they can recuperate the data somehow. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM18:16, 10 March 2012
Praise be to Allah. Allah is kind and murciful. That you live a long and healthy life, Allah willing! --ShabiDOO 18:19, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your vote on Oz, now you can eat in the mess hall and not get hassled. Did you see the series, or any of it, or have you heard of it? My friend who tied me into it says it was a soap opera for guys. Aleister 23:28 Ides of March Boxing Day '12
To be honest, I've never seen it or heard of it before. The article was nice, though. —SirSocky