User talk:Shabidoo/archive8

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Fresh new talk page

As white and pure and loving as the Pope. --ShabiDOO 21:36, October 28, 2013 (UTC)

Larva. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 15:51, October 29, 2013 (UTC)

edit It's broken!

Something terrible has happened to your talk page! All those lovely moments are just gone!                               Puppy's talk page10:04 28 Oct 2013

Why can't I talkpagerape anyone when it is the right time to do it? I will develop an inferiority complex or something.

Anton (talk) 15:21, October 29, 2013 (UTC)

And they said vandalism was pointless... Anton (talk) 18:36, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
Nothing gets that flame in my heart roaring than some talk page rape. Straight up talk page raping! --ShabiDOO 22:38, October 29, 2013 (UTC)

edit A favor, and I will give you ice cream


Check it out!!!

Please do me a favor, and I will buy you ice cream and listen to your inane ramblings about why the sky is blue, or how people give head, or where the newest big thing used to be. I can't upload pics at the fork (don't know why, I've cleared my cache and all). Can you please transfer the pic on the right over to the forked place? If you can rename it cloudface3 it would fit in with the page without having to edit it, which I am too lazy do do. Thanks. Ok, your rat-feces flavored ice cream is melting now, is all over my hands, and the cockroaches are swimming in it. I call the big one Tennessee Two-Step. Aleister 11:48 17-12-13

Don't take this personally ... but I am slightly afraid of touching the kind of icecream you like to concume. It's not a judgement or anything ... I'm sure you enjoy that sort of icecream ... it's just ... I'm not into this icecream of yours. I hope you don't take it personally. It's just not for me. The image has been uploaded and it looks beautiful in it's new home. Now ... let's go have some of that icecream ... served ontop of Lyrithyas skinny legs??? hmm??? --ShabiDOO 12:49, December 17, 2013 (UTC)

Either the best ice cream ever or a cone filled with tiny colored pins. Thanks a nillion for the upload! With friends like you who needs enemas. Aleister literally minutes later

edit Application for burdenship

Hello, my name is 1zeroate er OMGwhatHaveIdone. And if I remember correctly a proper signature will confrim that I am doing it right. Because reasons. ANYWAYS! I am a newbie newb of a doob. I've known all this shtuff existed for years. Played with it. Got into trouble with it. learned it is all USA METADARPPA cultera gave a crap about the limited scope of things I could do about it, wanted to play and join in it...

MOre so than I am presently,

And In a nice fashun,.

Here I have a better idea (MAYBE) of how to behave but I wanna work on my polish first... as well as editing style, formating, understanding of wikiculture, the multiple metawikis, Is wikileaks Wiki or no? Or was it just once was? IDK.


I do know I could use a mentor guider person to hold my hand and clean up after my accidents cause problems for others.

Would you like to be such a daring risk taker :)

See I even try to remember to tild on discussion pagesOMGwhatHaveIdone (talk) 08:43, December 20, 2013 (UTC)

edit Top 10

Hi, Shabidoo! Nominate any 2013 featured page you want! Anton (talk) 19:15, December 23, 2013 (UTC)

By the way, you do not object to me moving your Best of page? That's just that I noticed that all the pages that corresponded to past years were under the same titles (Uncyclopedia:Best of/Year). Anton (talk) 20:05, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
Yes. Good idea. I'll do the pages for 2012 and 2011 over the holidays. It requires using excel and word and texteditor with macros and text to collums and concantate and search&replace and sorting etc in case any of you are interested in learning how it works. --ShabiDOO 20:11, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
Don't forget to do some voting! Thanks to both. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:03, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
Oh, sure. I began 2012 manually but you are welcome to take over it, because it will take me years to finish it. Thank you very much! By the way, did you want to vote on the articles you nominated or just nominate them? Anton (talk) 21:05, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
I'll be happy to do it. If you like...I can show you how to do it all quite quickly (it's useful to know how to use these tools for data manipulation). --ShabiDOO 21:09, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
I'll vote in a day or two (to see what other users nominate first). We can change our votes as I'm not in any big hurry. --ShabiDOO 21:09, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
That would be great! Anton (talk) 21:11, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
Do you have open office installed on your computer (writer and calc?) --ShabiDOO 21:13, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
I'm outside of the loop here. What are you trying to achieve via data manipulation?                               Puppy's talk page09:31 pm 23 Dec 2013
Converting the list of featured articles from alphabetical to by date. I'm putting together a little tutorial so that other users might do it in the future and in case anyone wants to have some tools for data manipulation by using programs they're familiar with (excel, word, text-editor). --ShabiDOO 22:49, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
I set up a simple routine that can convert the lists in around two minutes using simple programs. I took 70 screen shots and prepared some text to explain it...the only problem is I can't seem to upload multiple files right now. Maybe I'll try and set it up on a new wiki or something. --ShabiDOO 03:04, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
Ah. If you're happy to wait a while I could probably do that via a DPL. Much less work, and it's dynamic.                               Puppy's talk page07:10 am 24 Dec 2013
For that matter, including or excluding the namespace?                               Puppy's talk page07:11 am 24 Dec 2013
I've already updated the last three years (as it only takes 2 minutes to do each year). So you can take your time. I'm curious how you'll divide each year into months without creating 12 new subtemplates. What do you mean by including or excluding the namespace? --ShabiDOO 08:02, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
Does UnNews:I'm a pedantic bastard go under U or I?                               Puppy's talk page08:58 am 24 Dec 2013
It goes deep inside that deep deep shaky part of your deep inner anus where even deeper deeper feelings of overwealmingly pleasurable deep pleasure is waiting for it!!! --ShabiDOO 09:02, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
So I is on top. And I know where U belongs.                               Puppy's talk page10:26 am 24 Dec 2013
And why are you changing them to dates instead of alphabetizing them as before??? That made it much easier to find a feature. Once a feature is featured, it becomes a feature and not a dated feature. I am so confused by this that I am eating Spam and downing it with goose grease, and I'm a vegan! Aleister 11:48 24-12-13
Aleister, there is Uncyclopedia:Best_ of#2013 - all featured articles of 2013 in alphabetical order and Uncyclopedia:Best_of/2013_(by_date) - all articles by date. Anton (talk) 13:11, December 24, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks to all for a useful piece of organizing. Who'da thunk that, by this one measure, the site is more lively than in 2012?! I have humped the "Best Of" Forum on the Sitenotice. Spıke Ѧ 13:53 24-Dec-13

Hurrah! Best of uncyclopedia for all!!!!!!!!!!! --ShabiDOO 14:19, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
Yeah! Anton (talk) 14:26, December 24, 2013 (UTC)

edit Pee Review

Our reviewing system has been restarted yesterday, as you might have noticed. It concerns every single article there and right now everything can be reviewed in a lite form and without scores. Any comments and questions are welcome and you can try reviewing something or submitting your work to Pee Review. Thank you for your ideas and feedback, Shabidoo! Anton (talk) 08:31, December 25, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for Anna Pavlova! Your review proves that 'Lite' does not mean 'worse' and ... that there are some mistakes and unclear aspects in the template that still have to be changed. Anyway, the review was great, even though I haven't finished reading it yet. Anton (talk) 18:25, December 26, 2013 (UTC)

edit Award

Anton (talk) 19:58, December 30, 2013 (UTC) Thanks. I'll have to write a fair few more before deserving this. But thanks :) --ShabiDOO 00:49, January 10, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for my late response, but I would like to say that you deserve it already, but there is a chance that you will be satisfied with yourself after my comment and stop your reviewing career. That's why I won't say anything of that kind, but you can still acknowldege the fact that you deserve the award.

Oh, I just said it. Anton (talk) 15:18, January 25, 2014 (UTC)

edit Shabidoo!

Help, help me sir, please. I can't upload photos at uncy major, so could you transport the two photos near the end of the Guidebook article - the one of the Susan B. Anthony stamp and the one of Susan in the cloud from uncy minor to uncy major? Thanks (and I think those may be good nicknames until we make some kind of peace between the nations). Aleister 21:18 24-1-14

So I'm still your image uploading bitch? --ShabiDOO 21:20, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
No, you'll in a long line. Mimo, lwyr, others have helped. Why I can't upload there is a mystery to me and mine. I usually ask those I see on-site on recent changes. Thanks. Aleister 21:22 24-1-14
LOL I don't mind. Don't hesitate to ever ask me. Anytime. In the mean time...consider helping me with User:Shabidoo/Market_reach --ShabiDOO 21:25, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
Thanks!! I'll look at your page later, time to make my deluxe super duper amazingly delicious undeniably nutricious lentils and rice. Aleister 21:29 24-1-14
Done. It turns me on being someones pic-upload bitch. --ShabiDOO 21:30, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
O_o ... Oh well, this is Uncyclopedia after all... --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 23:02, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

edit hi god

Helloo.... it is your adopt a pet here. How do you do...stuff.. how do you do stuff.

UMMM Could I get a link to nominate an article of mine for pee review? I would like to make it better but I am at a point where I could use the help of others. And given the total control spectrum here I have no clue how to do this with out upsetting the folks here. So what is the procedeure I need to follow to get some other editors help in editing an article of mine?OMGwhatHaveIdone (talk) 05:12, January 30, 2014 (UTC)

Okay...first...Hello is spelt with one o. need to relax about proceedure and stuff like that. If someone reverts you or tells you not to do something then theres another rule you have but otherwise just do things. Users and admins should be patient and helpful and hopefuly not revert every single edit you make to an article.
I looked at the stuff that you wrote and I think Broom_Hulda_Clark has a LOOOOOOOOOOOOT of promise. I'd be very happy to pee review it. Why don't you go to here and follow the instructions. I'll then pee review it (or whatever article you want peed on).
And a paralel universe today is Christmas and children are opening presents of dried vegitables that can come to life and swim in an aquarium for ten minutes a day. --ShabiDOO 05:27, January 30, 2014 (UTC)
Did you know that today is Chinese New Year? Anton (talk) 18:24, January 31, 2014 (UTC)

edit Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Art of War

I've put the Art of War in pee review for you to do your worst at Shabidoo! Thanks for offering to review it. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:39, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

edit Marilyn Manson

The exceedingly new nOOb that I am has posted yet another fantastically amazing article for you to read young Shabster. I dare you to write a page dedicated to her debut album. If you do I'll create an appropriate image for it should you provide the words. Keep up the filth. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  22:38, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

edit Pee Review

Does the template confuse you or is it intentional? Anton (talk) 20:03, February 5, 2014 (UTC)

No...the template is fine. I was just setting up the three different things I wanted to talk about in the article. --ShabiDOO 10:28, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
NOpe My confusion is genuine. I make no claim at being the smartest. Apparently I do not think I can nominate myself for a pee review. And I am at a point where I would like some outside assistence in improving my article on Broom Hulda Clark. I'm doing my best to make a great parody but I am at a point where well.. some bounce back ideas would be usiful.

So If you wanted to nominate that... I would like that.. IF not thats cool... Lots of other stuff here....

It is ok to ask to have an article nominated right? Cause I aint read nothing to the contrary... I would not want to think this should be so confusingly difficult... Simple is better. OMGwhatHaveIdone (talk) 06:26, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

Never mind.. I was looking at the nomination proccess for elegibility of the month... OK I think I can do this correctly now.... I am going to attempt to do so.. WHATCH OUT!@!!OMGwhatHaveIdone (talk) 06:32, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

edit UnNews:William Roache: Guilty as charged

A good save on this UnNews! Spıke Ѧ 15:06 6-Feb-14

Thanks SPIKE. --ShabiDOO 10:28, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

edit Abby's

nomination is back! Anton (talk) 18:00, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Nice. I've been watching the hockey, curling and skating at Sochi. At least when it comes to the events it's super well organized and people are having a great time. I wish I could be there!!! --ShabiDOO 20:36, February 20, 2014 (UTC)
Go Team Scotland GB for Bronze in Curling!! And at least a Silver tomorrow. Also hope the moustache works out well. Personally I did mine in the shape of a Blackadder but there you go! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:07, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

edit Pee Review

Don't want to rush you, I'm sure you're a busy guy but could you possibly get round to reviewing The Art of War? Thanks. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:47, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

Hey. I've already written half of the review. I'll have the other half finished by the end of the week. The article is already well written...I don't need to make any significant changes...just some rewording or reconceptualising individual sentences. --ShabiDOO 17:28, February 26, 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:57, February 26, 2014 (UTC)
That must be the longest Pee Review ever, and you deserve a photo of something shiny. (I had to peek in at a file named "peeart"...sounded kinky....) Spıke Ѧ 00:23 3-Mar-14
Haha. LOL Thanks spike. It's not even done yet. But it's a really well written article so it deserves a good pee. A peeart. Scotpatt don't read it until it's done please. --ShabiDOO 03:02, March 3, 2014 (UTC)

edit IPod Car

When I nominated this article for VFH, you said that it was "not quite ... but almost". Do you have any ideas on how to improve it, please? Anton (talk) 19:51, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure you noticed this section! But if you did, my bad, and feel free to ignore it and tell me that you have ignored it. Anton (talk) 18:15, February 26, 2014 (UTC)
Hey Anton. I did see it. I've thought about this since I read it. I honestly can't brain storm anything as of yet. I'll let you know once I do. And well done on the medal count this year!!!!!!!! --ShabiDOO 00:39, February 27, 2014 (UTC)
Ok, that's fine! I made some edits and will nominate this for feature. If you think of anything, your comments will be welcome! Thank you! And, wait, what medal count? Anton (talk) 07:47, February 27, 2014 (UTC)

edit Pee Review/Art of War

Just to say, I've read through this. It is the most amazing pee review I've ever read. Certainly lots for me to improve on. I am quite busy now so may improve the article this weekend. Thanks once again! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:05, March 7, 2014 (UTC)

I'm glad you like it. Do with it what you please. Take as much or as little from it as you want and change as little or as much needs to be changed and take as long or as little as it takes to edit it. --ShabiDOO 15:01, March 9, 2014 (UTC)

edit RotM

If you would like this award to be revived, there is a question raised at Forum:RRRRRotM. Anton (talk) 14:35, March 8, 2014 (UTC)

edit Uncyclopedia:VFH/RationalWiki

Are you sure you read through the whole article? The article was a parody of a RationalWiki page that mocked both Conservapedia and RationalWiki. Parodies included in the article were the disproof of God at the end of each section, the Conservative Bias section (a mock of Conservapedia's Liberal Bias sections), the RationalWiki admin warning, the Conservapedia vandalism etc. I was not attempting to say RationalWiki was more stupid than Conservapedia, I was mocking them both in the name of comedy. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:00, March 18, 2014 (UTC)

I couldn't have better explained my articles, than Scott just did! Anton (talk) 08:00, March 18, 2014 (UTC)
I call it the "this is why it sucks" style not because it's a bad style only because the majority of the article is entirely negative. It's okay to write an article in the "this is why it sucks" style ... there are many good ones ... but it's best in my opinion as long as you infuse some other very different concept in to it or if you really really exagerate the negative aspects. It's just my own personal take on these kind of articles. For instance...instead of saying "RationalWiki is said to have a particular agenda against America" it could be exagerated like "RationalWiki doesn't hide its hate of Americans and apple pie".
Or the article could be titled: Conservapedia vs. Rationalwiki.
But then...that's just my own take on it. My style. As you can see three uncyclopedians disagree and voted for. If you two are happy with the article then my comments are just friendly lines and nothing more. --ShabiDOO 10:25, March 18, 2014 (UTC)
I am not persuading you to change your views, I'm just seeing how I need to change my writing. I think that the "it sucks" style is only a part of the article. For example the parody theme is an element in the article that you seem to have missed when quoting, "RationalWiki is said to have a particular agenda against America." This is in the small section written by a Conservapedian vandal who is trying to make his writing more encyclopedic looking so as not to get caught as a vandal (deliberately placed above the admin warning, as though RationalWiki is so perterbed that it failed to see the Conservapedia vandalism and mistook it for the truth). Anyway thanks for taking a look and if you have any ideas for improvements let me know. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:43, March 18, 2014 (UTC)

edit The Satanic Verses of Bhagavad-gita on VFH

Thanks for the useful advice for Alpalwriter. You might take some of it to his talk page, where Anton199 has given him additional guidance. Spıke Ѧ 01:28 20-Mar-14

edit Thank you for your reviews! And here is...

Pee reviewer of the month award Reviewer of the Month March 2014

Congratulations! Anton (talk) 13:14, March 29, 2014 (UTC)

edit Pee Review

Hello! You've done some splendid Pee Reviews recently, care to flex those reviewing muscles and have a look at this one for me? I would value your opinion, in the form of a review or otherwise. Thanks. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:05, April 14, 2014 (UTC)

Hi Chief. Yes ÇI'd love to do it. You'll have to be a little patient but I'll work on it one bit at a time over the next couple of weeks. --ShabiDOO 17:21, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
GoldenShower Rejoice, Shabidoo! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Superlative work on Pee Review. I'll have a go at making some changes a bit later this week. I changed my mind quite a few times when I first picked up the rewrite, that probably accounts for the variation of ideas. I felt the signs of death section was weakest but I'll have a go at trimming the others as well. I appreciate what you say about padding but I fear that's a tendency of mine more than a concious attempt to make the article longer; if something can be said in ten words I can be relied upon to take one hundred to say it. I'll make a couple of changes to it and may ask you to cast your eye over it again, if that would be alright? --ChiefjusticePS3 18:13, April 26, 2014 (UTC)

edit Napoleonic Wars

A lot of efforts and edits went into this after the article failed VFH, and so I would like to ask you: do you think that now it's good enough to be featured? The factual bits were removed, a few parts rewritten and of course proofread. It will be nice to hear your comments! Anton (talk) 20:41, April 25, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! The intro seems more lively now (both mine and Scott's opinion), but how does this go together with "make it more factual"? Anton (talk) 13:51, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
By factual I mean keep things historically accurate and realistic as much as possible. Use the absurd lines only once a paragraph or better yet once every two or three paragraphs. Too much absurdity weakens the pace, the humour of the absurdity itself and makes the factual elements of the article seem pointless. Unless the article is filled with uber-halrious absurd lines (which is very hard to do) I really recommend being selective with it.
After the intro you mention star wars, the midddle ages in 1789 and many references to Dr. Guillotine. I think thats a lot of absurdity in only three paragraphs. Personally I find the middle ages reference funny (though extend it a little more...hit us on the head with just how much Napoleon put Europe into the middle age misery for some time...but you should reconsider the starwars line and with the Guillotine there is no reason you can't be factual about it and very funny.
Does this help? --ShabiDOO 01:28, May 1, 2014 (UTC)
Yes, thanks! Only, Guillotin really existed and there is a myth about his death on the guillotine, his own invention (which some sources, as Wikipedia, claim false). Anton (talk) 14:05, May 1, 2014 (UTC)

edit Your three-day ban

The technical issue here is that no one ought to use ALL CAPITAL LETTERS to give any Forum greater prominence than any other one. Your writing competition is not inherently more important than discussions of policy, software bugs, and so on. Your first revert cited "tradition," but I replied via Change Summary that this does not depend on what you or other Uncyclopedians have gotten away with in the past.

You reverted my move of this Forum a second time, with Change Summary: SPIKE your mandate to controll every single trivial aspect of this site is over. Back off and go do something useful. You've sucked out enough life force on this site and driven enough people away. If my " over" it would not be based on the proclamation of one fallen-away user who visits sporadically, and basically only to add an adversarial opinion to the proceedings. If I were a control freak, I would delete the entire Forum, as the main motive is not to promote new comedy writing but to advertise your new web home within our rule against deliberately sending Wikia traffic elsewhere. Spıke Ѧ 12:42 27-May-14

I respectfully disagree with the "one fallen-away user who visits sporadically", because I think Shabidoo tries hard to find time to edit both wikis and to be useful to both of them, and "to advertise new web home", because I think the inter-site competition is a good idea for both sites. But I agree that it was certainly not very productive or user-friendly to start a move log war out of a minor issue (at least for me) and was definitely not a good advertisement for the competition, which is also supposed to improve on relationship between different users and the two sites. In my opinion, Spike did not do anything bad to the forum. Anton (talk) 17:38, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
Here, here. Whatever Shabidoo's opinions of our site and other sites that look similar are, he is still an active member and contributes well-meaningly to this site. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:44, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
I retract my evaluation of Shabidoo, which was a side rant not relevant to the ban. Spıke Ѧ 17:50 27-May-14
Personal tools