User talk:SPIKE

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 18:06, May 14, 2014 by 81.129.119.243 (talk)

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Please add any new topics at the end to be sure they are noticed.
  • Don't split conversations between pages, for the benefit of future readers.
  • Post to User:SPIKE/UnNews about UnNews and UnNews Audio.

Archives

Wikipedia:User scripts

We were discussing scripting the other day. Although this doesn't give a solution to the watchlist thingy we were looking at, there may be some scripts in here that you could find useful.                               Puppy's talk page02:19 am 03 Apr 2014

File:HETtuna.jpg

This was unused for about three years because a vandal from 2011 (whom Pup has just reverted) deleted an entire section from Political cartoon, which contained that image. Could it be restored, please? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:31, April 3, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:02, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
And thanks for picking up what I missed.                               Puppy's talk page01:03 pm 03 Apr 2014

French

Could you protect this page against IPs by any chance? It is a consistent target for receiving un-original French stereotype quotes from what I can only assume to be the same determined anonymous person. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:07, April 9, 2014 (UTC)

Visual editor

Wow!....I think we've got Visual Editor, like Wikipedia! Have you seen that? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:42, April 9, 2014 (UTC)

I know this was directed to Spike but for the wondering ordinary minstrel, what are you refering to specifically? Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:45, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
I see it too (second line of buttons at the top of the page). I'll play with this the next time I am on unmetered Internet. Spıke ¬ 11:53 9-Apr-14
Sorry can't see them. Are we talking about the "edit", "ban patrol" etc. buttons? Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:55, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
Never mind just seen it! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:00, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
Nothing seems to happen when I click on it. Simply refreshes the page. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:03, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
Do you have Teh JavaScriptz switched on? It might even require Teh Flash. Spıke ¬ 12:35 9-Apr-14
Visual editor seems to work only on mainspace pages (which is a rational thing, as it's supposed to make editing articles easier, without bothering with the wiki formatting), that's probably why you couldn't see it at the beginning. I clicked on it, but it takes a lot of time to load (Wikipedia's VisualEditor also does, so it's not different). If it works, you'll still see the page the way it looks like when it's saved and when you click on something and start editing, it'll just associate the changes directly to it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:35, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
I too see no effect--nor the spinning wheel suggesting that additional stuff is loading. When I "click on something and start editing," I get the old-style edit box. Spıke ¬ 23:54 9-Apr-14
OK, I haven't seen it work here (because of it cannot load) but I tried it once on Wikipedia and it's pretty much how it worked. Maybe it's a bug and they're still going to fix it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:21, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

William Riker

Hello spike, Regarding "I believe thumbnails with scaling or caption do not animate", please see the article "Blue Screen of Death" and the GIF "Data can never get past level 2". I used exactly the same code as that GIF (with the other image's dimensions of course, 290px) and it didn't animate. Have no idea why.

Anyways, I think the still image the thumb is showing pretty much sums up what I want it to say anyway.

Regards, Ihasakitler 09:06, April 10, 2014 (UTC)  :)

It's the way wiki parses images. If an image is resized wiki software converts it from the server end to a png type file - which means with animated GIFs you only get the first frame. If the original image size is 320px width (for example), the displayed size needs to also be 320px.
So if you want the file to be displayed at 280px, you need to locally save the file, and use an editor like GIMP or Photoshop (not MS Paint) to resize it with all frames intact, and then re-upload the edited file, and then add it to your page.
The problem there, of course, is that resizing will lose some of the image quality. Because stupid computers are stupid.                               Puppy's talk page09:43 am 10 Apr 2014

Where's Puppy?

So that you know what's going on, I'm doing stuff on other Wikia wikis at the moment - most of it with some transferable value back to here. It means my edits are likely to be even less regular than they are now, but method and madness, etc.

What you may not be aware of - a significant number of wikis use user talk pages in a very different fashion. Instead of responding to a thread on the page that it was started on, users respond back on the original poster's page. Which means that if you read a single page you won't understand the conversation. Like listening to half of a phone call.                               Puppy's talk page01:12 pm 10 Apr 2014 13:12, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

Oh, most definitely that will be done.                               Puppy's talk page01:12 pm 10 Apr 2014
I'm not too sure how legal it was. Aparently the laws relating to bestiality differ from state to state. The raw meat was a concern for me though.                               Puppy's talk page01:12 pm 10 Apr 2014
Only on Tuesdays, and you have to book in advance. She accepts Paypal though.                               Puppy's talk page01:12 pm 10 Apr 2014
So now you understand what I mean about confusing now. The way we use talk pages makes much more sense.                               Puppy's talk page01:12 pm 10 Apr 2014

Thanks for checking in. That would be the Wikia "message wall" or whatever they call it? I religiously pick up requests for help from newbies and move them (and the inevitable reply) to the newbie's own talk page. With luck, you noticed my post in the middle of your talk page that the Watchgadget bug is solved, and might never have affected any other Uncyclopedian in the first place. Spıke ¬ 14:38 10-Apr-14

Message Walls are different again. They are used more like how we do User Talk here. As for moving stuff to newbies talk pages - only time that becomes problematic is using IP talk pages. I had a message on WP: when I wasn't logged in, telling me they'd reverted my edits to an article. Finally reałised dynamic IP address, so the message wasn't for me. At the same time, the intended recipient is now unlikely to ever see it, as the message banner won't show.                               Puppy's talk page02:55 pm 10 Apr 2014

Yaks in Canada

There is a great debate going on in my head right now. I remember how we voted down That time I nearly took a sojourn to Canada while I was being raped by a yak at VFD and remember my reasons for voting to delete it. At the same time, I remember that it was the most original and maybe even the most worthy My sojourn that was deleted. But then I remember that six people voted against it. At the same time, the discussion took place before I started UnBooks:My sojourn, and the outcome could be different if it was now.

And I forgot what the article actually looked like, so I don't know what do. Could you please help, by looking at the article and saying if it could survive in the UnBooks and possibly make it better, or if it's simply not funny, no matter where it is and even with possible polishing? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:09, April 14, 2014 (UTC)

I think you meant to write, "I remember...my reasons for nominating it." If the purpose of your Book is to be funny, rather than a forensic re-creation of a previous frat party at Uncyclopedia where the same exact articles have to appear and contain some of the same text that was typed originally, you might spend the same time writing a new chapter that is even more original and worthy. Spıke ¬ 15:55 14-Apr-14
Funny - I haven't hadn't read this message until now but still wrote a new chapter, which I hope is original and worthy! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:41, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
The deleted article, apart from a "15-foot yak cock" (which offers nice alliteration but no humor) is indistinguishable from one of the ones you have up on VFD, and can't hold a candle to your "Peloponnesia," which braids erudition around its randomness. PS--Another thing I wouldn't waste time on is dealing with 'bot Fnoodle's tagging of articles for using deprecated tags. Spıke ¬ 17:15 14-Apr-14
Why not? I read that if a tag is deprecated, it is probable that it soon won't work on some browsers. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:27, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
I read the yak sojourn you mention Anton, and it's maybe one of only ones I've ever laughed at. Quite clever, actually, and I would have voted a keep on that one. Although the first caption needs the formula mark-up (as does your new addition, which is quite pleasing to the intellect and may gain favor for your book. a book which needs a cover!) Aleister 18:25 14-4-14

Accountant

Congratulations for the save and feature Spike. To have an original article on accountants is something Uncyclopedia can feel proud of. I was thinking of writing a Scottish Independence Campaign article to cover the events leading up to the Scottish referendum in 2014. To think that by the end of this year we Brits might be facing a huge change in how we perceive our state (as complicated as it is already) is something I am dreading, especially as an exiled Scot. I think its better to write it up in one big article rather than countless UnNews that I have thought of writing on the subject. Also I'll get round to Mr. Miliband's article at some point too. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:17, April 14, 2014 (UTC)

At some point in researching one of my India articles, I read about India's tendency to react to any civil uprising by creating new states or shifting their boundaries. As your country and mine were organized by pre-existing states with distinct identities, the current news in Scotland is more disturbing than, say, shifting the border between Chihuahua and Coahuila, Mexico. Will persons like you be offered the "right of return"? Spıke ¬ 18:42 14-Apr-14
PS--I would spike UnSignpost:Article/Does_Uncyclopedia_need_more_admins?. Not only is the current vote -1 toward a goal of 5, but the deadline for that phase of voting passed four days ago. Spıke ¬ 18:46 14-Apr-14

Yes it is rather disturbing. The loss of the British identity is most distressing especially for someone like me who is from all over the British Isles. The nations of Scotland and England don't really exist in my view and the view of the majority of people who live in the South East of England, being economic migrants from different places within Britain and the rest of the World, the identity of an "Englishman" is certainly the nomenclature for a white person who is from a particular county/region of England. If Scotland breaks off the word British can still be used but we won't be politically united so we'll have to broaden the meaning of "Englishman". Anyway how Salmond can pull of the trick without any sensible economic ideas is ridiculous. The "No" campaign have everything in favour of them, the last two Prime Ministers were Scottish, Scotland will be financially unstable, Scotland will lose the high up diplomatic position that Britain currently has etc. All we need now is someone who can actually argue back at Salmond because there seems to be no figurehead for the campaign against.

As for the UnSignpost article consider it, as usual, late news. It makes people aware of the situation if people don't know and also points out an absurd factor behind the idea of wanting more admins. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:38, April 14, 2014 (UTC)

VFS April

Can you close the vote as "Did not pass round 1", and delete the vote (with link to prev version in history)? Keeps getting added to, and I would prefer that people realise we're post 10th day. Would do it myself, but time poor.                               Puppy's talk page10:07 pm 14 Apr 2014

Remanded to the Chief Justice, who did so. Spıke ¬ 19:52 16-Apr-14

Hello

And I am sorry for my long absence! I am back and will start doing the poopsmithing again. Sorry, technical problems didn't allow me to drop by. Compassrose-transparent Bro. Nicholas 23:55, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

Sounds good! If "technical problems" permit, let us know in advance of future long absences! Nothing that needs your attention right now. Spıke ¬ 00:11 16-Apr-14
It was internet failure, just so you know. It will not happen again, I assure you. Compassrose-transparent Bro. Nicholas 00:15, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
The internet will not fail again??? You had better write an UnNews! Are you sure you are in Greece? It sounds like Turkey!!! Spıke ¬ 00:19 16-Apr-14

Gaza War

I found there wasn't too much to re-write on the article. I gave a satirically biased towards Israel article and rather emphasised the common sense options to resolve the situation. Might need some more humour though. My views on the subject are quite strong and I fear that in some areas they burst through a bit but were not smothered with enough comedy. Please take a look and add where you can. Thanks! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:32, April 16, 2014 (UTC)

I looked in and groaned when I saw you were trying to give the historical background for the war. Jews versus Arabs should be regarded as one of those cases for which, as I recommend in CoW#Extremists, you should steer wide of your own views and of common-sense (that is, real-world) resolution, in favor of more fanciful and absurd interpretations, even randomness. To the point, even a "satirically biased" article is perceived by half of its target audience as not satirical at all. Read User talk:Mctomerd11 for an example. In particular, Adolf Hitler does not belong anywhere near this article: Too serious. Spıke ¬ 19:52 16-Apr-14
Oh I see what you mean. I guess that's a more original take. Might try a re-write of my re-write then tomorrow or sometime soon. Going to sleep now though! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:00, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
I looked in closer just now. The final section (Aftermath) gives me the strong impression someone is trying to sell me one side in a political dispute. I can force myself to see that you are writing with irony, but I cannot separate it from the serious. In particular, there is a question we ought not try to answer on this website — whether the economic differences between Israel and Gaza are the result of racism or of culture — and any informed reader scours even a frivolous or ironic approach to the question to decide which side the author is on.
I hope all this doesn't give you nightmares! Spıke ¬ 20:06 16-Apr-14
Yes, you are too kind, the final section was only my views with hardly a lick of humour. I'll re-write again and eliminate any bias to either side instead just going for humour that isn't satire (so Al on your earlier point, I think this is a comedy website, not just a satire website). Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:50, April 17, 2014 (UTC)
And regarding hardly a lick of humour, reaching out to Mctomerd11 with a passing scolding on how his country should behave will not end well, nor least of all be the basis for a collaboration. Satire is fine; but political commentary with a comic twist — This is what Beck and Limbaugh do on talk radio every hour, for the overt purpose of changing minds.
One section starts: "Due to the genocidal levels of civilian deaths at the hands of the homicidal Jews...." I don't know or care whether you believe this, or believe the exact opposite and this is a twist. It reads like extreme rhetoric (especially to an Israeli like Mctomerd11). Again pointing you to CoW#Extremists, reading "humor" that takes the exact form of a call to jihad is going to be very unfunny to some, and humor only by mechanical transformation to the rest of us. Spıke ¬ 10:46 17-Apr-14
I didn't write that line. My re-write is not finished and I agree that things such as that line are obviously going to offend an Israeli so they should be removed. But commenting on how his country's political dealings should be on his talk page is a point I decided to make to emphasise that he cannot play a race card. Even if we did write a biased article it would be acceptable as long as it had the comedy element. Political comedy is a great way to get across a message but I agree that it should be left out of this article. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:11, April 17, 2014 (UTC)
PS - I would consider the first re-write more a Jon Stewart style than Glenn Beck but I'm sure that's all the same to you! Also I haven't actually finished so you needn't keep pointing out lines I didn't write and telling me they are my work! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:14, April 17, 2014 (UTC)
I didn't say you did write that line but was just offering it as an example. On your comment to Mctomerd11, my point was that such comments seem to make it more likely, not less, that he will play a race card. As for the direction the article should take, we are in agreement. You'll see I have been in (at Sections 1.2 and 2) to make it more whimsical; would you please see what you can do about the following sections, and we'll call it a day? Spıke ¬ 12:18 17-Apr-14

Will do. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:30, April 17, 2014 (UTC)

Love reading through the article at the moment however the Attack, Ceasefire and Aftermath sections still need work. I'll have a crack on them now. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:05, April 18, 2014 (UTC)

User:Vance69

Do you think it's a normal userpage? Looks rather suspicious to me, but at the same time I don't think it's spam. On the other note, your vote for Ernest Hemingway probably ended the conflict if there was any! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:59, April 19, 2014 (UTC)

It is one of the world's userpages, and immediately tag-worthy if it were moved to the encyclopedia. I've greeted him with gentle instructions. Spıke ¬ 21:11 19-Apr-14

User:ConCass2/Bottom (TV series)

About the article I wrote, what was it specifically that it was deleted for? Your reason was "it's more of a blog than humour", but that's a bit vague. I assume the article was too positive or something like that, but could you care to be more specific? --188.30.28.63 10:57, April 20, 2014 (UTC)

Sure thing.
  1. Began with five quotations.
  2. Had no comedy theme other than to run down the show.
  3. Body of the article was nothing but a list of characters, with more of the same.
In short, you need something to hold the page together other than the quality of your own insults. Also, you are not a registered Uncyclopedian so there is no userspace in which to move it. If you'd pick a user name (and write back, logged-in, so I know who you became), I can give you a copy for further work. Spıke ¬ 11:04 20-Apr-14
I'm currently abroad and don't have my home computer, so I can't make an account for now, but thanks for explaining. --188.30.28.63 11:56, April 20, 2014 (UTC)
Nothing you do on Uncyclopedia is stored on the computer you're using (except a cookie, which is useless after you log out), so you could register now. In any rate, I hope you do so after you return home. Spıke ¬ 14:43 20-Apr-14
It was the email that was stored on my computer, and I needed the confirmation message. Anyway, I've got the account. But could you explain what you mean by "run down"? I don't remember any insults in the page, I just assumed it was deleted because it looked like it was praising the show. --ConCass2 (talk) 13:53, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Oh, right, there is that. (Also, pages you browse may go into your borrowed computer's cache, to increase speed, unless you clear it out at the end or specify a "private browsing" session.) No, I deleted the page because it looked like you were mostly just insulting the show. It is now in your userspace at User:ConCass2/Bottom (TV series). Please go easy on the initial quotations and reliance on lists! Spıke ¬ 14:19 22-Apr-14

Gaza War (Section 2)

Shall we get this up to a feature standard? Then we can (hopefully) get a feature (half point each) and it will also encourage a preservation of the article in its current form so that no one takes it back down the route of racism or verbal attacks. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:17, April 21, 2014 (UTC)

What we have already done encourages that. I think the Gaza War has jumped the shark, but I'll check in on your editing. And as predicted, your scolding of Mctomerd11 on how to run his country to satisfy the BBC (and on which British political party to disfavor) had no effect. Spıke ¬ 11:38 21-Apr-14
On the contrary I have given him a view to think about. As I said I was advising him on what another group of people thought on the subject. Not sure how the Beeb would be satisfied but if they care more about people cooperating and having fun in this World rather than selfish isolation causing war then to quote Brown, "I agree with Nick." Do debates really need a winner and a loser in your mind? No one wins or loses a debate, debates just encourage broader reading. I found it most enjoyable and interesting. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:01, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
I might stick it on VFH if its any good after your check through anyway as I think it's quite funny now. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:50, April 21, 2014 (UTC)

Wish sandwich at VFS

I learned something...http://m.metrolyrics.com/rubber-biscuit-lyrics-blues-brothers.html                               Puppy's talk page11:32 am 21 Apr 2014

Yes, hence the link. Those lyrics refuse to leave my head through the ears, but I don't see them in any of the written lyrics. Spıke ¬ 11:38 21-Apr-14

Block of User "User670839245"

SPIKE…!!!....You un blocked me, but you DID NOT UNBLOCK MY IP!!! How careless… User670839245 (Talk | Local Contribs | Block Locally (log)) 19:52, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

He's such a bastard. --ChiefjusticePS2 19:53, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Nice to see you found another IP; I have heard there are several available. But I cannot see my permaban of it in the log, nor any evidence that it was undone. Spıke ¬ 23:04 24-Apr-14
not perma-ban, but auto ban. For 24 Hr. ANd that IP is a mobile phone which I will never use to browse Wikia unless I have to make a quick edit somewhere. User670839245 (Talk | Local Contribs | Block Locally (log))15:39, May 2, 2014 (UTC)

Fishy goings on

Just uploaded a file of Sushi, representing Sushi, and have stumbled across Mr Lovecraft's most famous creation: Cthulhu Spawn accidently. What's the correct procedure sir? GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  14:41, April 25, 2014 (UTC)

Re-upload your image under a different name. I have reverted the Cthulu Spawn image to the original. --ChiefjusticePS2 14:47, April 25, 2014 (UTC)
Yup; play nice and always mind the legend that says you are proposing to upload a new version of an image name already in use on someone else's page. Chief, thanks for kibitzing; I have three full domestic issues simmering this morning, one involving plumbing. Spıke ¬ 15:35 25-Apr-14
You're welcome to have a look at my pipes any time. --ChiefjusticePS2 17:17, April 25, 2014 (UTC)

Glenn Beck shuffle

The articles under this name (and derivations) have all been shuffled around. The way they were named went through some discussion at VFD, and the move has made the inferior (IMO) article come under the main title. Because they've been moved by someone with rollback/admin rights the histories are all messed up. Can you have a look and either clean up the moves so histories are correct, or undo the moves?                               Puppy's talk page06:06 am 27 Apr 2014

I shuffled the articles. The reason I did this is because I think the FA Glenn Beck article had more to do with the show than the person, so I changed the names of both articles to make them more fitting. However, if you think this was the wrong move, feel free to revert it.--EpicWinner (talk) 06:40, April 27, 2014 (UTC)

Equitism

Spike,

I thank you for your concern with the page posted under the heading "Equitism" however I must inform that that was simply being used as a project for a class that is to be presented tomorrow afternoon. The project was create our own political ideology. I understand that it isn't funny but if you can at least wait until after 2PM eastern standard time tomorrow to take action that would be appreciated. We need this for our grade so yeah... The preceding unsigned comment was added by Equitism (talk • contribs)

In Spike's brief absence, not really a justifiable reason to keep an unhumorous article on a site dedicated to humour.
Solution 1: Create a wiki of your own to host this stuff
Solution 2: Make a blog
Solution 3: Tell your teacher that any assignment that relies on you adding your work to an unrelated website is ludicrous, and that you aren't going to put up with his draconian bullshit, drop out of school, and start working as a prostitute, get string out on whatever the cool kids are doing these days, and die an early death from lifestyle related illnesses.
Although I am speaking for myself on solution 3 - I doubt Spike would agree with the details. He'd probably suggest a sports scholarship, followed by injuries sustained on the field, and early retirement into an alcohol infused oblivion. He likes sport.                               Puppy's talk page10:14 am 30 Apr 2014
I do agree with the outline. Meanwhile, author seems to have found an ideology already: I have a need, and therefore you (actually, your webhost) are obliged to provide your facilities even though I am not participating for the purpose for which the site was set up. I do not agree with this ideology. However, if he is anything beyond a beggar, he will see that the page lives on in his user page. I am sure the Cabal would not have me go further, regarding misuse of the website, because of the possibility that he will come back and contribute something appropriate. Spıke ¬ 11:49 30-Apr-14
PS--Nope. He put it back in the main encyclopedia. It's gone, and he's gone. Spıke ¬ 15:36 30-Apr-14
This is one of the users from "Equitism". It was our groups choice to use the wiki type page, it wasn't required by the professor. Spike, your last comment confuses me a little bit about agreeing with the outline. The most important detail with that was that it was not a real ideology. We created it for the purpose of the presentation. Also, we had a couple different people working with this site and so the person that kept re-posting was a different than me, who is the one who posted here. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 98.100.254.104 (talk • contribs)
This is one of the problems with group accounts: it is hard to know if two changes were made by the same person, and a single editor can get the entire account blocked, which is the case right now. I suggest that you choose a different username, if you would like to contribute to Uncyclopedia in order to write something funny. Concerning the assignment, I am sure there are many other wikis where it will be allowed and maybe even welcome, you just have to search for a relevant one, where fake ideologies could be posted. Another choice would be to try and make something out of it, even if it's fake, so it could be kept here. Finally, if you don't have any time to make any changes or to look for a new wiki, you can [contact] Spike and maybe he will allow this article to exist as your userpage for a while, considering that it was not your fault that the page got recreated. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:54, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
Equitism user again, it really isn't a big deal now. My group presented today so there's nothing we can do now. I did manage to get a screenshot of the page while it was still up prior to the, in my opinion, rude taking down of the article. I understand, you all just want funny or humorous articles. But it's like there's limited posting space here? Why was it such a big deal to remove an article like that? I guess that's my thing. Like why should it matter to anyone what I post there? If you don't want to see it, don't go to it. Plain and simple. And by the way, regarding future posting, I really don't see this being a place I will want to stay and continue posting. Any place that makes a mockery over the conflict in the middle east the way that this site isn't a place that I want to be. Nothing against you all, it just isn't my place. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 98.100.254.104 (talk • contribs)
In other words, after your misuse of our website: (1) It is we who have been rude, but (2) We did not really inconvience you (nyah nyah!), and (3) We should not have held you to the rules of this site because the site has more resources than it needs, and (4) You don't like this site anyway, because it "makes a mockery over the conflict in the Middle East" (I should hope so, as we are here to make mockeries). Good riddance, then; and although you might get a passing grade in your coursework for your dopey "new ideology" that everyone be coercively equalized, you have avoided an actual life lesson, and are still on your way to growing up to snap your fingers and wait for things to be given to you. American public school, no? Spıke ¬ 21:38 30-Apr-14
"I really don't see this being a place I will want to stay and continue posting.". Can we use that as UnAdvertising? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:01, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
"The site where 9 out of ten unfunny grade-schoolers refuse to post." Spıke ¬ 22:07 30-Apr-14
Prostitution or sports - I was right all along. And with all the stuff on here the “making fun of the Middle East” was the breaking point? People's triggers constantly amaze me. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Equitism (talk • contribs)
Can someone restore the article to my user space, or if it still exists elsewhere point me to it? I'm mainly curious, but also want to see if there is comedic potential.                               Puppy's talk page11:08 pm 30 Apr 2014
Well you did inconvenience us because at the time of our presentation, it wasn't available. Yes you were rude because we simply needed it up for one more hour and then you could've done whatever you wanted. Also, it was a class project, the ideology wouldn't actually work and I know that. I was in no way just waiting for "things to be given to me," I was simply trying to complete this project. Yes I went to American Public School, but it was great education and I learned from that you have to work to get places in life. I recognize that there are some people who have a sense of entitlement come from having things giving to them, I am not one of those people. As for the thing referring to the middle east, I wasn't saying that that wasn't your intent, I just know I don't care to be around that. Lastly, as for "prostitution or sports", I am guessing you mean that would be how I have to make a living? Yes I played sports when I was younger and I had a lot of fun. But my career will be nothing to do with either of those.The preceding unsigned comment was added by Equitism (talk • contribs)

Hi E. I'm kind of interested now in seeing what you wrote, maybe we can funny it up. This is often a good site to write on, and new kids have to learn the rules (and to be given time to learn them, I would hope). Why not come back and try again, with the thing on your user space or something, or pick a page here and see if you can add to it. You may end up liking some of the stuff here, but maybe not. How did you find the site in the first place? Aleister 21:35 30-4-14

Honestly, as a representative of E, I would not feel comfortable passing out the information that our entire group worked on because it is all of our collective intellectual property. I would be more than willing to share it but just not here you understand right? The preceding unsigned comment was added by Equitism (talk • contribs)
You do realise you released the intellectual property under an NC-BY-CC-SA licence already, don't you?                               Puppy's talk page11:44 pm 30 Apr 2014
Yes I am aware but if it's gone, I'm not going to bring it back. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Equitism (talk • contribs)
Spike, let's get that back so Puppy and I and others can funny it up, put clown pictures on it, and make it an unintellectual property, pretty please with cherries buried in there somewhere. Aleister 2:53 May Day '14
I decline. The article is unfunny, as it was designed to be. Kids write crappy compositions, as Art Linkletter parlayed into a best-selling book once; and the only point of poking fun at a grade-school composition placed here by defiant mistake is to ridicule the newbie (and take a victory lap at his expense), a useless digression into navelism, at the expense of writing really funny pages, exemplified by the Fisher Price saga and by several pages on VFD right now. Spıke ¬ 01:44 2-May-14
Translation to Australian required: What age range is grade school again?                               Puppy's talk page01:50 am 02 May 2014
Roughly 5-17 years. One of the interchangeable entities behind User:Equitism, whom I do not know nor care to distinguish, referred to "American public schools" in the past tense, but if he or his parents is paying US$20,000 a year to a university for babysitting while he cranks out this crap, that is the real joke. Spıke ¬ 01:57 2-May-14
I wish these guys learnt to sign their Equitism stuff. I thought it was related to the actors' union Equity. Guess not!--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:07, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
Oh, well, I am sure the composition was not bad, and I think we are not here to judge people, their school and their projects, even if one got posted here by mistake. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:28, May 2, 2014 (UTC)

82.18.103.160

This user created a talkpage which looked very much like spam and so I nominated it on QVFD. However, a bit later I found out that he just copied a subpage of the article Scam letter (Scam letter/addtalk), made by Puppy, which ought to look like spam, so I crossed the nomination out. So if this block was not made by a mistake, please ignore this message. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:57, May 2, 2014 (UTC)

I checked out his deleted contributions and that is the only page in them. I have removed the ban. --ChiefjusticePS2 07:43, May 3, 2014 (UTC)

Another section dedicated to Napoleon

Could you, please, tell me what you think about my additions to a general's quote in Napoleonic Wars#The French view of Napoleon's defeat? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:07, May 4, 2014 (UTC)

I don't exactly know what the joke is that a French general would pepper his discourse with French phrases (some of whose meanings will not be obvious to some of our readers) (except if the joke is that he is not speaking entirely in French, or more likely that he was but the writer of the encyclopedia article did an awful job of rendering it), but the joke is told many, many times.
By the way, in Section 7.3: If Fish Day is really a joke in French, and if it really needs explaining, just cut it out. Spıke ¬ 22:57 4-May-14
Fish Day was my addition, it is not a joke as such, it is April Fool's Day in France. The joke I made was to re-name it Salt Day for reasons explained in the article. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:36, May 5, 2014 (UTC)
The French words were added for the style. The main joke was about his attitude in the battle. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 07:45, May 5, 2014 (UTC)
When I was typing the last message, I myself was not sure what my jokes were. Now, I remember. There seems to be only one word that may a pose a problem those who don't speak French - Le Monde - "The World", which is also a rather well-known French newspaper, so it's an independent joke, which could easily be interpreted as a bad translation. If you don't think it's good where it is, I can remove it easily. Just tell me. All of the other French words look almost exactly like their English equivalents, which is also a joke (that the French language, which the French consider so special, is not so different from English after all), sometimes even exactly - such as lion. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:44, May 5, 2014 (UTC)

SPIKESTER

Alright, you haven't voted for one of my pages on VFH in a long, long time. Aside from whatever that's about, would you please read, word for word if you start liking it, my Will Harridge page, which I've put some good time into in the last couple of days, and I have a feeling - as a real baseball fan - that you might like it. If not, can you give some advice of why not and what I could tweek. Thanks. Aleister 23:34 4-5-14

Thumbs and nails

Is it only my browser or did something really happen to image formatting? All the thumbed pictures now don't show in line with the text, but very separately, breaking the impression they were supposed to make. I've seen it happen on two different computers, so I presume it's something general. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:19, May 7, 2014 (UTC)

See Forum:Thumbnails are broken. Spıke ¬ 19:25 7-May-14

What the Hell happened with my home page?????????

As above my home page just disappeared. Any help? The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheWikiMan026 (talk • contribs)

Please sign your posts to talk pages. At 16:06 UTC, it seems you redirected it to The home page of TheWikiMan026, a move that will baffle everyone else as well. Upon further review, in fact, that is one of a half dozen things you did that will baffle everyone else and baffled you. Spıke ¬ 17:49 10-May-14

Uploading images

Details of filenames deleted by Spike

I need you to upload the following images to the Memory Delta wiki, thank you....I need you to upload the following image to the Stargate wiki, thank you....I need you to upload the following image to the Sanctuary wiki, thank you.... Benna.

When you make an account on Wikia, you don't necessarily receive one on Uncyclopedia (and backwards). I don't think Spike has an account on any of these wikis and he is not in charge of any of them, so it will be as difficult for him to do this as it will be for you. Not counting the fact that it is outside his responsibilities. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:47, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, Anton199, and you are quite right on both counts. Spıke ¬ 18:03 12-May-14

I disabled my account on Memory Delta wiki, It was TyphussJediVader, can i get it back?. Benna.

See just above. Spıke ¬ 18:04 12-May-14

What are you talking about?. Beanna.

What are you talking about?. Beanna.

What does thi mean: See just above. Beanna.

Are you going to tell me. Beanna.

Wait a minute, you were being funny. Beanna.

I don't know why you can't read it from Anton199 when I tell you that Anton199 stated what I would have stated. I am not an Admin on any of the target websites, I cannot upload photos there, and I don't want to upload photos there. Moreover, I do not want them to remain here, given that everything you uploaded today is here for the sole purpose of transfer to other websites. Moreover, your request refreshes my chronic suspicion, expressed on your talk page, that you are not here to write funny articles but to flog your adolescent crush on the Stargate babes (whether or not you are adolescent). For all of the above plus pestering me with six untimestamped posts after I replied, you are banned for three days. Spıke ¬ 20:59 12-May-14

Dialup → Dial-up

For some odd reason I can't move Dialup to Dial-up (as Dialup is not the proper name) Any help? --TheWikiMan026 Signature 17:36, May 12, 2014 (UTC)

You cannot move it to "Dial-up" as there is already something there, to-wit, a redirect to "Dialup". I would once again gently suggest that you put aside giving this website better organization than its other users have seen fit to give it and write a funny article. Spıke ¬ 18:03 12-May-14

Ermahgerd

WHER DERD U DERLERT ERMAHGERD? The preceding unsigned comment was added by Areagle (talk • contribs)

Ladies and gentlemen, what language do you think it is that Areagle is speaking? Make your guesses now! 5,000$ to the first right answer! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:13, May 14, 2014 (UTC)
I deleted it because it was gibberish. Gibberish amuses you and is so unclever that it will not amuse the reader. It should be done in your own userspace, such as at User:Areagle/Ermahgerd. Spıke ¬ 15:16 14-May-14

Yo

yo yo yo unban me plz

Personal tools
projects