User talk:Rcmurphy/archive4

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Your fame precedes you

<Hinoa> Eh, we'll get RC in here.
<Hinoa> If he says "feature," then huff it.

--KATIE!! 17:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

National Try To Assassinate The President Day reskin

April 22nd is coming up fast so I've thrown up a main page reskin at Babel:Ap. It's a parody of the MPAA's you can click but you can't hide message placed on sites they shut down. This would be a non-traditional reskin, so all the images could be links to the real main page. Also, could you please copy the contents of MediaWiki:Skin/Babel:APPL.css to MediaWiki:Skin/Babel:Ap.css so that all the MediaWiki stuff is invisible a la Babel:APPL. - Nonymous 20:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

All right, sounds fine. --—rc (t) 01:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Also I forgot, can you add the line Babel:Ap to the MediaWiki:Uncyclopedia.js reskin list? - Nonymous 02:08, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Done, but check me, I'm not a tech guy. --—rc (t) 03:18, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Hahaha. Good one. And yes rc, you did it right. --Splaka 05:12, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
If we get visited by any men in black suits, I had no part in this. --—rc (t) 05:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

PLS judging

Sorry, I would love to, but I lack the time.--Rataube 14:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Good deal, I know that's a lot of stuff to read through. --—rc (t) 18:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

I see I've been quoted on here.


That thing took longer than it should have. But then again, it's not like it's "Professional Quality™" or anything. Consider yourself the second person to have their own Magic card on Uncyc. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 05:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

DYK(e) submissions

I noticed you and User:Epynephrin having a bit of a disagreement over Uncyclopedia:DYK submissions, but before that, I noticed this strange blanking of big swatches of DYCK. Was this sanctioned? Was it vandalism? I didn't wanna try to fix it myself since you've edited it already... but... well, still looks wrong? PS, you're a slut! --Splaka 04:14, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

The history is screwed up. Maybe it was the server problems or whatever happened this morning. I was the one who removed all those entries after updating the main page DYK template, but the diffs are showing otherwise. And there's no disagreement with Epynephrin - if you mean my "come on, people" edit summary, that was just me moving DYK submissions up to the actual submission section instead of the lower section which contained the current DYKs. Blar. --—rc (t) 07:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Poo Lit Voting

~ Wild Weasel on The Poo Lit Voting Process

RC, because I've been occupied, and Major Gwax reminded me to vote - ON THE DAY OF THE DEADLINE - here are my last minute Poo Lit votes. The time stamp means that they "...shall not be re-count unless in instance of a plurality in favor of those discussed in Section 6, Paragraph C of the Maryland State Constitution." Amended Version
Thank you, and God Harry Connick Jr. bless. — 2nd Lt. Sir Edward, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP 13:36, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks - I hate to be anal, though, but I ideally need your top five from each category...otherwise the voting will be off. I know you got the notice late, so if you don't have time or get this message in time, that's okay, I'll figure something out. Thanks for judging! —rc (t) 22:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
There. You anal...guy. So anal. So demanding. Well, it's time for beer! — 2nd Lt. Sir Edward, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP 00:09, 22 April 2006 (UTC)~
Thank you sir! I'd buy you a beer myself if it weren't for those pesky spatial impossibilities. —rc (t) 00:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Reskin idea

Talk to me on mIRC at some point this evening.--ShroomsShroom!Gay2Sir Flammable KUN Prince%21.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2Shroom!Shroomirror 16:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


RC - how does a guy contribute monies around here? I'd like to see this site keep going, and though you guys never ask for cash, I'm sure a little wouldn't hurt. Or it could - if it was counterfeit. But mine's not - you can see the ghostly watermark of that founding father what won the battle of 1812. Creepy. — 2nd Lt. Sir Edward, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP 21:51, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, we're hosted for free by Wikia through Google ads, so we don't have to worry about hosting fees. If there's anything else we might need money for, tech-wise, you could ask Chron. Aside from that the only thing I can think of is sponsoring future writing competitions, if we have them (and I hope we do, though I probably won't be organizing the next one :) ), and cash for the admin heroin fund. —rc (t) 22:51, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, my broker did say investing in a humor wiki was a bad idea. I checked, and sure enough, UNC on the NASDAQ is listed at -0.01. How, I'm not sure. But that's worth less than Enron! — 2nd Lt. Sir Edward, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP 00:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Activate the reskin?

It's NTTATPD, can you activate the reskin? I just noticed that it coincides with the release of The Sentinel. Neato. - Nonymous 00:33, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Usually I start them around 10-midnight Pacific - that way they last for the entirety of the day for American Uncyclopedians (our biggest constituency) and are there in the morning when the Brits (second biggest) wake up. If you're around at that time and I haven't switched it over yet (I should be around tonight but I can't be sure), you can check into the IRC room and ask another admin to do it, or just see from Recent Changes who's active and ask them. —rc (t) 00:38, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


I tried out that awesome strip generator thing you have on your page. This will keep me entertained for hours. Here is one I made earlier: [1]. Thanks! --Mosquitopsu 16:45, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Hooray for geek humor! It's addictive, innit? —rc (t) 17:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


In VFP I didn't want to move the image but I remember an admin saying that at -3 that anyone can remove an image but I probably misread - my bad :( -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 05:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

No problem...for future reference the top of VFP says "Do not remove or archive nominations. Loser admins will see to that." —rc (t) 05:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Return of the Phantom Pieclone Wars Whatever

I am a lazy, lazy whore. In my defence I have been getting an awful lot of oral sex recently so that mitigates in my favour. I trust my funnituditiness hasn't ebbed too much in the time I've been away. I've plenty more crap up my sleeve, but that's mostly because I like sticking my arm up cow's arses. I've also forgotten how to do anything because I am a complete idiot. Ah, innocence born of Electroshock Therapy. Is there anything it can't cure? The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pieclone (talk • contribs) like a week ago


why did u remove the break news nom in the VFP when there is only one other nomination?--Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM BLK |_LG7+::: 09:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

make that non
Because that image only had a total of about one vote (or maybe zero, one of them was ambiguous) and that's hardly worthy to be featured on the front page...for the time being, if there's nothing with a significant number of votes on VFP, I'm just not going to feature an image and have all the currently featured images at their regular weights. —rc (t) 14:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
nobody said u had 2 feature it --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM BLK |_LG7+::: 06:19, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Yes, but it would have taken a lot of straight Fors to make much headway, and there's no reason to give that one preferential treatment just because it was the only nomination. And the page looks refreshing and clean without any waiting images... —rc (t) 17:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for being rc! Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 00:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

The Truth At Last

I was pleased to see you finally advertise your personal stable of sockpuppets on your user page. I hope that it is a predecent that all admins will follow, in time.  :) Because I haven't been banned yet (or ever, actually—was this an administrative oversight?), I'm taking it as tentative approval that the 37 or so (who can keep track?) puppets that I personally operate (or have operated) are Cabal-Approved™.

Hmmm. This was supposed to be a thank you note for your well wishes on my page. So, thank you. :) I have been having fun with my kiddies. The 3 month old said "Mama" yesteday for the first time, so we're all agush around here.  :) Unfortunately, I have not a single article to contribute to the Uncyc rubbish pile, so the "triumphant return" you'd hoped for will be less so. I'm relieved there was no parade planned.

Fortunately, it seems like there is a wealth of talent around here, uncovered by the Poo Lit contest. So, I intend to rest on my WotM laurels and watch some other contenders duke it out in the ring, and probably hand a folding chair to my favorite(s) while one of my puppets distracts the referee.  :) ~ T. (talk) 11:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Bah, you think that's all the socks I have? I didn't even mention my ranks of spambots and flamepuppets, just my Mediawiki testers.
Anyway, I hope you enjoy...what would it be now, semi-retirement or semi-unretirement? Whatever it is, enjoy it. I'm trying to decide whether to ease up on my Uncyclopeding for the summer...first I have to find something else to do in its place, I suppose... ;) —rc (t) 17:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, RC!

I appreciate you going to bat for me over this whole lost password debacle. I'll be checking your talk page, as well as Todd's, to see if there's been any progress. I figure if I don't see any news by this time next week, I'll just go ahead and recreate myself - maybe actually put the "Dalek" in my name this time. :) Again, cheers! (KIY) -- 19:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Continued at Todd's talk page —rc (t) 04:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


Sorry for any mix-up with my vote... I was thinking in terms of For/Against and not For/Against/Yes/No, but after you pointed it out I can see it may not have been as clear as intended. So I suppose Forgainst and Yo are right out, eh? Imrealized 06:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

No problem...I think I've actually had "Forgainst" votes before, believe it or not. —rc (t) 17:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

it consumes

Tuluppa, non-notable band. You know what to do. --Splaka 06:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

I tried my hand at it. Feel free to replace it with something better. ~ T. (talk) 12:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Oh, for the days of It consumes and Bontempi. I'll let Todd handle this one - too many things to do at once right now!!!#$@# @$# —rc (t) 03:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


Well, it's tied for number 1, currently, and the fact is, it'll be hard as Hell to feature. I might be easier to do as a reskin than a traditional feature. What are your thoughts?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 12:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Admit it, that was your plan all along. You sly dog. ;-) ~ T. (talk) 12:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Just had a chat over this (mine's the other article thats tied!!!!) and I agree with Brad that Yahoo! would work better as a reskin, losing the rest of the Uncyclopedia navigation from the front page. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Sure, that's fine. Just pick a date for it and I'll feature Colossus of Barbie Segregation (sigh) Biggles today. —rc (t) 03:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Except that I'm not even changing the article today, so ignore that detail. —rc (t) 03:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Take a look at it, and see if you think it's ready, but I believe you can pull the trigger when you want, now.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
I have also included a link to Maine Page on the Yahoo! page, so that if anyone wants to go there, they can. I thought it might be fun to claim that Yahoo! is being featured on the 306th anniversary of Gulliver's birth, but that of course is rediculous and only a weak pretense. It's up to you, if you wanna put an explanation of why Yahoo! is the reskin in the featured article space. It'd be different, if nothing else.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
My picture looks wack! And the google ads at the bottom are awesome! --ZB 19:14, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
You may wanna hold off, I'm gonna try to resize the bar at the top so that it doesn't look so crap. I will do it tommorow (I hope) because I have no time today. Unless you find the pixelation to be "funny" in which case go for it without the update. --ZB 19:22, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Acctually my hard drive is being a bitch (its full) so I'll need to dump some stuff before I can resize the image. I say go ahead with the mainpage. --ZB 20:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Too late Zombie! You offered! I totally agree that it looks like crap, and I was too shy to ask you, but you OFFERED! I need it done soon, so the world can know your glory, please ;).--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 21:40, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
...emptying the harddisk as we speak...but what dimensions? And this may take more work then I expect, cause ill have to reimport the icon pictures...I say set a date and I'll work towards it...damn I hate deadlines...and I got exams to "study" for...shit shit shit...what dimensions? --ZB 00:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Crap... I didn't think pulling the "you already said you would" argument would actually work. Um... crap. I'm horrible with dimensions. I'd actually just do trial and error and see how that went, if it was me (assuming that's not a rediculous suggestion. Man, I need to learn how to gimp). Um, I need it to fill the screen, so about 1000 px across, I guess... I dunno. Go with that estimate.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Just tell me when you guys decide on a date. —rc (t) 01:19, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
How sweet. ^_^. --Splaka 06:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
I mean, I'm not against public displays of affection, but really...all over my talk page? —rc (t) 07:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Rc, Brad, I can't change the picture size. When it gets to be about 500 px in width, potochop deciedes it only wants to save in .tiffs. I don't think I can upload .tiffs, but even if I could, my hard disk (in all of its 3 GB free glory) isn't big enough for me to save said image. Hence, I move to just keep image at the current resolution, and place the Yahoo! skin on the mainpage when ever you feel like it Rc. I think that it is a joke in and of its self that the image is looks poorly done. --ZB 21:50, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Ok.  :/ Well, thanks for trying, anyway. If I can't get a righteous soul to do a better one (which seems unlikely at this point), I guess it's a go tonight, RC. (I hate intentional crappitude, but I guess it can't be helped. Grr.)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 23:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
What resolution do you want it? 1000x? --Splaka 02:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Sure, sounds good to me (is clueless... go with what looks good is my motto) ;).--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
speaking of pretence for the reskin... what'd you think of the fact that our reskin coincided with Yahoo! announcing their new front page?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
They probably saw the reskin and were scared they couldn't keep up with us, so they had to change things. They had to evolve to survive. —rc (t) 21:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
They still kept the same top bar that I rendered so well photoshopilly. --ZB 21:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


-> Template_talk:Untoon. --Splaka 06:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

ANSWERED sort of but not really. —rc (t) 07:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, you suck, or are just lazy like me <3. --Splaka 20:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

On another topic, not quite worth a heading: I've fucked with Template:VFH. It now includes the code to place Template:FA in hidden (white) text. It includes the current revision ID (last edit) as well as the current date (right that moment) saving thinking on the part of the FA implementor. I've made the text visible for you. Try it out, see if it works. Does anyone else swap the templates for features on a regular basis? --Splaka 20:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

That works and is darn cool, thanks. I'm the only one who regularly switches the templates. —rc (t) 03:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Whats the Score?

Thanks for the recent edits on my User page....much appreciated. On another note I was looking through some of the voting responses on VFH and came up with "an idea". At the moment the Score is shown with the Against votes taken away from the For votes to create a total.

The thing I've noticed (and I'm biased here I admit) was that one current article had nearly 30 For votes, with around 15 Against votes. Currently this would make for a +15 total. Another article has 18 For votes and only two Against, making for a total of +16.

My point is, that under the existing system, some articles can be featured with considerably less For votes as long as they do not attract any Against votes. With a majority rule the voices of the "winning" opinion should be heard, whilst the "losing" minority should be placed on boats and shipped out to Mexico. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Well, the problem with that is we'd either have to come up with a definite way to calculate things that way, or it'd become a lot more subjective for me to choose. Also a lot of the articles with more polarized voting are not necessarily "better" or "worse," but just "different" - for example, a lot of people thought that Insert title here was clever enough to be featured, but others didn't think the originality was enough. I don't think an article should be rewarded for having a lot of For votes if it also has a lot of Againsts, considering that all the votes are (presumably) valid opinions. Remember, if we sacrifice our democracy, the terrorists will have won. —rc (t) 15:28, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Can you pull

My africa image off VfD. It was a stupid idea putting it up there for comparision. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

You mean VFP, right? Done —rc (t) 18:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

The Copyright facists at wikipedia

Your permission was not enough to use the image. These folks are nazis. They continue to delete your unencyclopedia photo from my page. See: Travb 00:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

I'll answer this when I have time, which unfortunately isn't right now. —rc (t) 01:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia'd —rc (t) 22:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


Snoopy headless dance

I just want to dance

Hello, Rcmurphy/archive4, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Here are a few good links for n00bs:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or the use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome!  -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. I hope I do not mess up things here too badly. :o) --Rcmurphy

Templats VFH/FA

Snoopy headless dance

Pray to the Rain God

Just a note, I changed the code on {{VFH}} so that the text is now in a hidden div, just in case our same-color-text is causing google to not index us (in which case, we the admin really should not endorse it). I fixed your .css but you may have to refresh. If that doesn't work, view the page source ^_^. --Splaka 06:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I was wondering why it didn't show up at first. It was fine after a refresh though. —rc (t) 06:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Mea culpa. Hey, randomly, can you take a look at this and tell me whatcha think? Wikipedia:Template:Mprotected. We are already almost to this stage. --Splaka 10:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Isn't that essentially what we have now, except as part of the ImageFP template? —rc (t) 19:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, also temporary protection for all images showing up in the course of events, like the featured article template thumbnail, anniversaries, etc. --Splaka 04:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Hm...yeah, but that's...more work...I don't know, do you think it's really necessary? —rc (t) 07:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Maybe? Maybe not. We did have one upload vandal upload gay porn one night. I deleted them all, but one happened to be overwriting that thumbnail (the dead sysop one). I didn't notice until it was too late (We really need a way to differentiate between new uploads and overwriting uploads in recent changes, rar). --Splaka 07:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, that'd be nice. If you think protecting other images would be useful we can do it. —rc (t) 20:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


Snoopy headless dance

Peace and love, man

Newcookie Kalir has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Because you're the first person in a while who doesn't think that hippies are some manner of vermin. (Honorable mention to anidnmeno for being a hippie shortly after I found out) --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 04:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Why thank you, though I'm not sure what brought that about. I mix up some patchouli soap every so often. In my bathtub. In the barn. —rc (t) 04:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm talking about those strip generator things. Like the rose gun and such. --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 15:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh, those. Yes, I believe the hipster uprising is coming soon. Beware the bohemians... —rc (t) 17:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


Sorry for stepping on your toes. When I didn't see you in IRC I thought you might be busy elsewhere. I didn't send out the announcement on the mailing list though. ~ T. (talk) 04:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

No problem - I was actually in a hurry this evening to clean out VFH and update the featured article because I had something to do in "real life," so it was a pleasant surprise to see one of those tasks already done! —rc (t) 06:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Can I be unbanned?

Snoopy headless dance

Free, free at last

I am the user Arm and you banned me a while ago for being an idiot. Can I be unbanned now Mr. Admin Sir? I learned my lesson and wont ever vandalize again.

-Arm-- 16:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

All righty, you're unblocked. Do stay out of trouble, hmm? —rc (t) 17:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)



Your're in the league of Benson!


It's about time we had another re-skin, right? Well, here's one that has a specific timestamp - 10th of December: ED Reskin. Wadda you think? Could you give me a little help with the image in the corner please, I would like to get rid of the background image and also the potato- making it a modified ED logo. Comments very much appreciated. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 13:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Wait, do you actually want this to be featured on 12.10? Personally I think an ED reskin is a bad idea - best to forget them altogether, in my might want to link it on IRC or something for other opinions.
As far as the logo goes, we can upload the new logo to image:Wiki.png on the day the reskin goes live. Or do you mean you need help with making the image itself? —rc (t) 19:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
The idea was mulled around on IRC for a while, Mhaille, Olipro, Guest/Sikon being a few of the people coming up with the concept. I will muse the subject again there. With regards to the image, something like a defaced "ae" would be good, and we need to remove the background image from the featured article - probably meaning removing the {{:Link}} and pasting in the text, and then removing the javascript. Unless my knowledge of the background images is completely wrong. Basically sorting the image out is way beyond my capabilites. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 08:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorted the background image now, need to go over the finer points on layout. Will continue discussion on IRC. People whose opinions I have are listed there. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 19:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Erm, what am I being blamed for? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
I thought it was you who came up with the original idea. Meh. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 16:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
IRC'd —rc (t) 22:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Jerk... You know I can't top that

Snoopy happy dance

Dance, my puppet

OKay, so at first I had a creeping suspicion, but I didn't want to say anything in fears of looking arrogant... But, congratulations... you won. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

League of Benson


you're in the league! Benson 12:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)



So, it's been a long time since I've earned my keep around this here wiki and thus I decided to update PFP in all its glory. However, when adjusting the weights on the FI template, I came across this little event... Though I've re-adjusted it, believing it to be a mistake, I wouldn't object to it not being a mistake, if you get what I mean. *taps nose* --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|CM|+S 20:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Er, oops. Nobody can prove that was intentional... —rc (t) 20:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Love the Texas 'toon

And it's so true, too...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Heh, thanks. I thought you might notice it, but I wasn't sure whether you'd be amused or offended... —rc (t) 05:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
While it's POSSIBLE to offend me, it IS quite hard. For tips, talk to Mhaille.  ;)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Calvin and Hobbes

Thank you for nominating my rewrite of Calvin and Hobbes for VFH, the first step (well, second I guess, after me rewriting it) in its path to featured status. I promise not to let having a featured article go to my head. [place sarcastic/ironic joke here in which I do something to indicate that it's gone to my head]. --Nakedman 03:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Uh, I forgot to respond to this. But no problem. —rc (t) 02:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Your 'toons is good

Hey, just wanted to say I'm enjoying your work and even paid a visit to your Blob Blog (*snicker* Bob Loblaw's Law Blog, man I miss Arrested Development). But actually I also have a question — are you guys trying to save all of the former UnToons because the first one I did is a fairly bulky file and I was thinking I should delete it perhaps? I figured you'd be the guy to ask. - Imrealized 04:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Personally I think they should all be saved, though it does seem sort of inefficient if they'll only be seen one day a year...perhaps we could organize past cartoons in some way - link the main UnNews page to a gallery of cartoons arranged by topic or something, I dunno. I'd like them to get some screenplay even after their day in the sun, but I can't say I've thought about it too much up to this point. Of course, they could always be fit into regular articles or news stories, for one. —rc (t) 04:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm glad I asked ya before I pulled the trigger on it. As far as a link to a gallery goes, I wish I could help out on that, but I'm still at the sporking codes phase (I'll get better one day, maybe even soon). If someone else started it I could figure out what I was doing enough to pitch in, but the creation of all that is beyond my pseudo-rudimentary coding skills. I'll hold on to the pic for now and see if I can work it in somewhere along the line. Thanks for thee help and keep up the good blob blog job (that kinda doesn't sound right). - Imrealized 05:05, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, and I'm sure my coding is much, much worse. But if I have the time and inclination someday I'll see what I can do. —rc (t) 05:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Canada Day

Hopefully you get this message before July 2nd. Okay, So I made this reskin. And this logo, but since there are no admins on IRC right now, I can't get anyone to put make them one and the same. Oh yah, and feel free to put it up whenever you like (during July 1st). --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Acctaully Tompkins and Mhaille got the logo. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Right then, it's looking like a go for July 1. 2007. —rc (t) 20:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure wheter to laugh or cry at that statement. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


Hello. I was just wondering how low the VFH score could get. Have you seen a lower VFH score than George W. Bush? It's score was -6 when you removed it, which was the lowest score I've seen. --Sbluen 05:46, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I usually remove them when they hit -3, so an article getting all the way to -6 before I or some other admin removes it is quite a feat. Offhand I can't remember any that have gotten so many negatives, much less in so short a time. —rc (t) 05:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Aw! You were supposed to leave it up all week and see just how low it could go! Spang talk 06:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm waiting for somebody to nom one of your articles before I do that. —rc (t) 06:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
I plan to nominate 123Fat123 for UN:UGM for this and this nomination. He is probably the worst judge on this site. --Sbluen 20:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Even he seems to agree. —rc (t) 23:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Nominated. --Sbluen 03:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Moving discussion

RC, is it possible to move the VFP discussion on Splenda in the Grass to the image's discussion page or the VFP discussion page? I have a somewhat wordy retort to Zombie (including information on the Splenda being sold in Canada as he claims it isn't) and I feel that the discussion page of is a better place for this. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Brad moved it. —rc (t) 15:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

vandalism in progress

Check out the recent changes. IP hass vandalised 5 pages when I last checked. I'm a n00b and don't know what to do. --Markfiend 15:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I blocked him. Thanks for the timely notice! For future vandalizations you can do the same thing you did here (notify an admin if you see an active one in the recent changes) or report the IP to Ban Patrol. —rc (t) 15:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
But don't use the Forums. :) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
'K my bad. :) I must admit I paniced (panicked?). --Markfiend 15:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
No problem, no damage done. —rc (t) 15:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools