User talk:RabbiTechno
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Contents |
[edit] Archived Talk Pages
Discussions and abuse up until 19.06.2007:
General name-calling and accusations up until 02.10.2007:
Discussions of a frank and sexual nature General Crap up until 10.11.07:
More tedious nattering up until 28.12.07
The Witterings of Many Diseased Minds - 28.12.2007 to 08.02.2009
More crap - 08.02.2009 to 11.03.2009
More server space wasted - 11.03.09 to 15.04.09
Bring on the raep - 15.04.09 to 05.07.09
Night Soil - 15.04.09 to 19.12.09
[edit] Angry Dude
Hey..... you put that ICU thing on Angry dude i edited it is it good now? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blondefish (talk • contribs)
- It'll do. Feel free to remove the ICU. :-) Rabbi Techno
kvetch
Contribs
FOXES 10:41, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Award
Hello again, glad to hear you won the thing and thankyou for the thankyou. --Nikau 10:29, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
- What thing was that? Rabbi Techno
kvetch
Contribs
FOXES 10:42, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
- The thing with the scrotum. Anyway, how are you getting on? --Nikau 13:07, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, that thing. Can't even remember what I was giving that out for, now. Otherwise - all is well. You? Rabbi Techno
kvetch
Contribs
FOXES 13:17, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I appear to have nearly finished my one article before quietly forgetting this place for another 9 months - User:Nikau/Extraterrestrial life - would only be polite to read some more of your creations while I'm here, anything you deeply recommend? --Nikau 13:44, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Visiting only every nine months or so might not be a bad idea, actually - you'd miss out on so much of the crap that makes Uncyclopedia the sort of place that it is. I tend to go down the "intensive use, then go on sabbatical for a while" route; I'm coming up for my fourth Uncyclopedian birthday in a couple of months and might well decide to have a few months away shortly thereafter. I won't recommend any one of my creations - to do would feel unpleasantly conceited - but there's plenty to choose from. Now, I'd better have a look at your new one. :-) Rabbi Techno
kvetch
Contribs
FOXES 10:15, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
- ...which, I must say, is bloody excellent, actually. "...all ancient civilisations were comprised of skeletons that lived underground..." is genius, as is the diagram of the Universe. Let me know when you finish it and shift it into mainspace, as I think you've got a definite contender for VFH there. Rabbi Techno
kvetch
Contribs
FOXES 10:24, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind words, I changed it a small amount in the Europa part. Being a prolific writer of news pieces on here, would you mind also reading this User:Nikau/UnNews: US surge in Afghanistan may be followed by more strategy alterations, warm feeling to see if it is any good also? --Nikau 13:01, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
- ...which, I must say, is bloody excellent, actually. "...all ancient civilisations were comprised of skeletons that lived underground..." is genius, as is the diagram of the Universe. Let me know when you finish it and shift it into mainspace, as I think you've got a definite contender for VFH there. Rabbi Techno
- Visiting only every nine months or so might not be a bad idea, actually - you'd miss out on so much of the crap that makes Uncyclopedia the sort of place that it is. I tend to go down the "intensive use, then go on sabbatical for a while" route; I'm coming up for my fourth Uncyclopedian birthday in a couple of months and might well decide to have a few months away shortly thereafter. I won't recommend any one of my creations - to do would feel unpleasantly conceited - but there's plenty to choose from. Now, I'd better have a look at your new one. :-) Rabbi Techno
- Well, I appear to have nearly finished my one article before quietly forgetting this place for another 9 months - User:Nikau/Extraterrestrial life - would only be polite to read some more of your creations while I'm here, anything you deeply recommend? --Nikau 13:44, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, that thing. Can't even remember what I was giving that out for, now. Otherwise - all is well. You? Rabbi Techno
- The thing with the scrotum. Anyway, how are you getting on? --Nikau 13:07, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
- It looks good to me - I made a couple of very minor changes to the punctuation and grammar, but otherwise it all seems ready for moving to mainspace. Rabbi Techno
kvetch
Contribs
FOXES 12:20, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Done and done. --Nikau 21:20, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Good and good! So - are we going to be blessed with more contributions from you before you vanish again? Rabbi Techno
kvetch
Contribs
FOXES 15:23, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Good and good! So - are we going to be blessed with more contributions from you before you vanish again? Rabbi Techno
- Done and done. --Nikau 21:20, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
[edit] ;)
Thanks for bagels mate ;). Your article looks really nicely and is so funny for that I had to nominate it :)
Ptok-BentonicznyTalk to the Pole 16:12, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] UnSignpost Delivery! - December something!
The Newspaper that took a long enough vacation to make former President Bush jealous.
December 17th, 2009• Issue 70 • Fuck You! I Felt Like It!
|
UnSignpost and random editor return from two month break, find that not much has changed
After 2 months, one would think that things would change. But from the looks of it, nothing really has for Uncyclopedia in the past few months with out UnSignpost. In particular, the problems in caring, changing things, doing other things and caring have gone from the problems of two months ago, to the problems of now, with nothing really changing. The causes of these problems, discovered after much digging through archives seems to be the general Nobody cares aditude of the site, and the general populations inability to really change anything, because they don't care. A random user who had been missing since around the last issue of UnSignpost made this comment. "Well, when I left, uncyc had been having its own problems and everyone had been complaining about the same things for some time and nobody really cared enough to do anything, or just couldn't make anything happen." says THEDUDEMAN, who had been missing since late September. "I thought I'd come back and see what was happening in the world of Uncyclopedia, and by the looks of it, nothing has changed" While the general population of Uncyclopedia has been alerted to these aging problems, nobody has raised any fuss to get any of them solved. It seems nothing will ever happen because as they all say, nobody cares. UU notices return of USP, hijacks article for own nefarious ends
Yeah, that title pretty much gives it away - evil admin UU has hijacked this section of the USP to announce two festive initiatives: the Mince Pie contest, and the Ban Parto-ho-ho-l, both of which are to be found on his userpage. So if you think you can eat more mince pies this Christmas than UU or current runaway leader Barry Gibb of Bee Gees fame, or if you want to request a friendly festive joke ban for one of your Uncyc chums, get yourselves across to the most festive userpage on the wiki! YOU ARE ALL LAZY TALLYWHACKERS! An Editorial. Alright you lazy sons of bitches (no offense to Zana, of course), what in the hell have you been doing these last few months? Gerry takes time away from this The Post was started by Cajek and Skully in May of 2008. That's really as far as I got with my research though, so I guess your history lesson is over. Regardless, how many amazing stories have been broken from the fine investigative journaling over the years? Like the time we broke the story that the UnSignpost was starting up. Or the time we told everyone Spang's talkpage was destroying the Wikia servers. A problem that still haunts us today. Without this venerable post, those stories never would have been unleashed upon the moronic and ignorant public that includes you, who are both a moron and ignorant. We need this thing to bring us the news, and make us laugh. We need this thing for the sake of parody. But, above anything else, we need this post in order to waste Dexter's time when he's forced to deliver them. Have you seen his edits around here over the past few weeks? That guy's getting to be WAY too useful, and if we don't stop him now, who knows what he'll do next. Fix VFH? Win Last person to edit wins? Nip this in the bud Uncyc. Nip this in the fucking bud. |
| ||||||
| UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox | |||||||
Late deliver courtesy of Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 23:55, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Wiki Religion
This article was put in ICU- I have make extensive changes, please let me know what you think.
Cheers —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.219.184.207 (talk • contribs)
- Massively improved - and a pleasure to find a new writer who sees the ICU tag and thinks, "Right - I'll read this and see how I can improve my article" instead of "Wahhhh! How dare anyone suggest my writing isn't perfect?!" If I may, I'd still suggest you add some pictures, however - otherwise, feel free to remove the ICU whenever you choose. Also, if you're planning on sticking around, have you considered signing up for an account on Uncyclopedia? It takes mere seconds, allows you various rights and priviledges that you don't get as an IP and - best of all - it's free. :-) Rabbi Techno
kvetch
Contribs
FOXES 09:55, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Guinea pig
As the only user name I recognize in the Guinea pig change history: See if you don't think the article has gone straight downhill since the 1-Aug-09 version:
- Just before your last revert there, AnonIP, perhaps trying to clean up the intro with its "shit tube" model of the guinea pig, replaced the intro in its entirely--with random babble.
- Changes since then have been minor and have mostly introduced new memes, including "shoop da whoop"
- A misformatted bit of scatology (though perhaps it's appropriate in the case of the guinea pig) has been added to the final list.
I'm inclined to revert it to the 1-Aug-09 version--unless you do so first, or know of a reason why not to. Spıke ¬ 22:44 4-Jan-10
- I'm inclined to agree, so I've reverted it. You really have to wonder why people bothered adding some of what had been added! Rabbi Techno
kvetch
Contribs
FOXES 09:46, January 5, 2010 (UTC)


