User talk:Qzekrom/Archive 3

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Qzekrom
Revision as of 23:06, April 1, 2012 by Qzekrom (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

edit Please help me write this article

I need help writing User:Qzekrom/The Universe Is a Giant Computer. It's based on some crazy physics theory I had, saying that if spacetime is quantized then the Universe must be written in an object-oriented programming language. Perhaps someone could help me write it? Thanks! Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!02:39 06 Mar '12

Find someone whose writing style you like and ask on their talk page. (I might have a look at it later, but have a bit on my plate.) Pup 09:09 06 Mar '12
It's your theory, so toss up more than a cartoon and then others can get what you are aiming for and add to it. Aleister 9:55 6-3-'12
Oh, okay. I'll get crackin'... after I finish some schoolwork. Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!23:59 06 Mar '12

edit Valentine's Day (though it's too late (though we could go for next year))

“Roses are red,
Violets are blue;
In Soviet Russia, poem writes YOU!!
~ Josef Stalin on love

WDYT? Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!01:21 07 Mar '12

edit Higgs

Did you want company in writing the UnNews? I'd be glad to flesh it out. Aleister 12:57 9-3-'12

Yeah, thanks! Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!21:21 09 Mar '12

edit Archive

/Archive 2 --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!00:36 10 Mar '12

edit More Russian Reversals

“In America, you google the President.
In Soviet Russia, President googles YOU!!
~ Yakov Smirnoff on his latest invention

WDYT? --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!02:55 10 Mar '12

edit Redirect loop!

Go to User:Qzekrom/redirect1. Then keep clicking on the links! Pretty cool what happens. --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!03:08 10 Mar '12

So if you're stressed, just click away! --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!03:09 10 Mar '12

Double redirects are a no-no. You might want to fix these. (Although I've always wondered what would happen if you did this. Now I know.) Pup 03:16 10 Mar '12
  1. It was an experiment.
  2. It's not a double redirect per se, it's a collection of pages that redirect to each other (exactly 3). Now they all link to Special:Random.
  3. Isn't it permitted in your own userspace, provided that it doesn't annoy others and it's a great way to waste time?
  4. I didn't know that.
Are you happy now? --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!03:36 10 Mar '12
  1. Which satisfied my curiosity as well
  2. Well... A redirect to a redirect page is theoretically a double redirect. This was three double redirects.
  3. Userspace stuff is generally okay. This may have been an exception.
  4. That's why I said something.
I wasn't unhappy before. Pup 03:49 10 Mar '12
Not like anyone actually gives a shit about userspaces. (Although everything is part of the Uncyclopedia viewer's experience, since everyone's a potential editor. And why was the page Forum:What's vigilance? deleted for "vigilance"? --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!03:58 10 Mar '12
Irony. And vigilance as a deletion summary usually relates to an article being deleted due to QVFD, VFD, or expired ICU or fix tags. It has also been used for deletion of vandalism or vanity. Basically it's a catch all for deletion due to not being of the standard that an article should be at to warrant its inclusion amongst the pantheon of articles here, or due to the request of the author. Speaking of which, if there are pages that you've done that you want to delete, quickest way to do it is add it to QVFD with the comment author request. Pup 04:35 10 Mar '12
Alright. It appears to be 23:39 in my corner office. I better be going. --Qzekrom blocked <insert name here> with an expiry time of indefinite (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) 04:39 10 Mar '12

edit No unreasonable bans

@ChiefjusticeDS I really enjoyed that.

At least allow talk page editing because I don't know how to use the IRC. --Qzekrom blocked <insert name here> with an expiry time of indefinite (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) 22:04 10 Mar '12

It can't be done. The block is a block on everything. I usually get around it by not being blocked to begin with, but I also have my email set up so I can at least email whoever blocked me. (Assuming they also have their email set up, of course.) Pup 10:31 10 Mar '12
They do that on Wikipedia. I don't know how, but if some hacker figured out how they do it, then thank Arceus. --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective! 22:35 10 Mar '12

edit Timestamps

I see you've copied PotR's timestamp format, and I'm going to have to ask you to put it back to a more standard form for the same reasons I gave him - not only does changing the format make it harder to follow when things happened in a conversation, but since pages are cached there is no guarantee a relative time will be anywhere near accurate (and it usually isn't).

Unrelatedly, Wikia also doesn't let administrators here choose whether or not to allow talkpage access for blocked users. Just saying. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 23:14, 10 March 2012

Okay... (Second bullet point) How come? --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective! 23:17, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your cooperation. And for the other thing, because they're mean, or something. I don't know. 1234 ~ 16px-Pointy 23:26, 10 March 2012
You're welcome. --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!23:43, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

edit Template

User:Qzekrom/ubx/ImAPokemon doesn't render properly. --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 01:58, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

edit A little note about intellectual property...

It means you're not allowed to memorize popular copyrighted songs such as the Pokemon Theme Song. --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 03:00, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

edit The Pea Buddy Awards

We need you! Either prepare yourself mentally for the severity of the trials (don't sign up just yet, you cheat!) or commit your soul as a judge right now. May the Lord shine his blessings upon thee! Snowflake mini Mattsnow 00:32, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Dunno about that. I'm rather busy myself, which explains my prolonged absence. --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 20:00, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

edit Hey

I just realised I'd killed your old signature. Now fixed. And I also just sorta finished User:PuppyOnTheRadio/mathematics. You seem to be fairly math savvy. What do you think?                               Puppy's talk page02:18 20 Mar

Thanks. I re-read thy concept if yours as the universe as a computer program, and it reminded me of this. Well and truly dated, but still a good story.                               Puppy's talk page04:17 22 Mar
Thanks. Did I even write something there, because I hope I'm not being rude to other people on Uncyc. Especially on Uncyc. And that theory is actually something I came up with so I'll try to prove it when I get into college, but I'll write a funny version here before I go on to do that because I haven't figured it out yet. Any suggestions? --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 20:57, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
That's interesting. I think the first few lines are about solar power. I'll bookmark it for later... that is, after I finish my homework. (Do you think it's funny that whenever I say "homework", I link it to the article on Sex?) --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 21:03, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
I use to do a lot of homework when I was your age. And you mentioned the concept and started asking for suggestions on the idea. It also reminded me of the "above type III" idea on the Kardashev scale. Which I find ironic, as a measure of civilisation having a name similar to Kardashian.                               Puppy's talk page12:02 23 Mar

Wondering if you've seen the news covered on this new thread on Above Top Secret (ATS). I've found the best way to read things there is to sign up as a member, even if you never post anything, because when you are logged on the ads keep doubling and attacking in pop ups and floaters. I don't know what's wrong with the site owners to let that happen to their users. Anyway, more everything-is-a-computer-program data. I have to go do my homework now. Aleister 1:14 23-3

I don't know that article exists. And you still have homework?? --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 19:59, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

edit if ("WIKIPEDIA" != "UNCYCLOPEDIA") {

I once created what was supposed to be a section of Wikipedia's page What Wikipedia is not, which is apparently a spin-off of UN:NOT. It's called Wikipedia is not a jokebook or, more recently, Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia. It's currently in my "pseudo-userspace" at Wiki at User talk:68.173.113.106/Wikipedia is not a jokebook and was originally intended to be transcluded onto WP:NOT. Is it really necessary to have that there? --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 23:31, March 23, 2012 (UTC) }

It's not a bad section. Why wasn't it used on the page? I have a very little joke on one of my wikipedia pages, and I think somebody put a "citation needed" thing on it recently. I'll sneak it off soon. Aleister 23:41 23-3-'12
I don't know, I'd probably check WT:NOT archives --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 23:42, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
WT:NOT, that's funny. Aleister (UTC)
Lots of retaliation. Also the contents of that section were more terse back then. --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 00:24, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
There is a mild issue here. Wikipedians hate haet hat Uncyclopedia. They have created accounts here purely for the purposes of vandalism (Wikipedia:User:TenPoundHammer/ User:RemmaHdnuoPneT), they have created policies against us(User:Otterathome/Uncy), they have demoted the Uncyclopedia site out of spite (Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Uncyclopedia/1 - note the two users who started that request), removed from the interwiki link (metawiki link), and generally act like dicks towards us (Jed Clampett's wallet). I doubt they'd be happy to see a reference to us in a significant policy document.                               Puppy's talk page12:27 24 Mar
Not good idea. --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 01:46, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
LOL Wikipedia sucks. Every loser who contributes full-time to that site is a waste of both oxygen and electrons. I would not give two shits for that fornicating sack of rotting elephant cocks. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usSat, Mar 24 '12 5:06 (UTC)
Wow, you really have a lot to say about Wikipedia. I actually think it's an ideal site for storing information all in one place, especially good for research projects. Other sites you have to dig your way through irrelevant cruft and advertisements. The other option is reading books, which are generally above my grade level. --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 16:08, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
Dude, I was just parroting their outlook towards us...I wasn't serious... ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usSun, Mar 25 '12 4:14 (UTC)
I know, man. --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 19:40, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
I generally like Wikipedia as a good starting point for research. The community there not so much. Have you read the garbage people have been saying about the Muhammed article. Apparently adding a hatnote at the top saying click here to remove images is a form of censorship. Despite the fact that it would require someone to choose to click and self-censor, which they could do with a little wiki-fu anyway.                               Puppy's talk page10:30 24 Mar
Sounds pretty typical. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usSun, Mar 25 '12 4:14 (UTC)
Looks like they've page-protected Muhammad. --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 19:41, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
What hatnote? Can you get me the link? --Qzekrom sig trans This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 19:41, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images                               Puppy's talk page12:09 26 Mar
Wow, I didn't know you were on Wikipedia. --Qzekrom sig buttonalkies 00:15, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
I'm not there in a big way. I have access through work PCs so I muck about there a little. As I said above - the community there are pretty shit.                               Puppy's talk page12:32 26 Mar
That's nice. And I ambivalently concur with you because it's difficult to organize coordinated action especially since I'm not registered. --Qzekrom sig buttonalkies 00:18, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

edit You are growing an uncanny resemblance to me.

Isn't that odd? ~Pleb Sig-banner the magic! Dan the Hedgehog TheHappySpaceman Eclipse BANANA BATLETH 02:48, 03/26/2012

What? Oh, I didn't notice! XD --Qzekrom sig buttonalkies 00:21, March 27, 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects