User talk:PuppyOnTheRadio

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Contents 1 New page 2 3 Not really a Pee Review 4 Thanks for the Pee! 5 Example of Australian English 6 OK, coolest signature in the world 7 Care to Bear it all? 8 Freedom of Sleep 9 Hey Pups 10 I'm in need of some ideas, Can you help

[edit] New page

Feel free to reap, but make sure you give me flowers.

[edit]

FLOWERS!!! Love, The XHTML Compliance Fairy 22:29, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Not really a Pee Review

Follow up to our discussion.

I only found two versions, this and that. Frankly, I wouldn't have found the second one if I didn't know you had done it and hadn't agreed to check this out, and I doubt many users would either. I like the concept of "multiple personality" gives you different articles; I think one of your strengths here is that you go beyond the limits and try different things (although you've also made great contributions in existing forms). But I think the way this is set up will require too much from the reader. Personally, "GET THIS NOW MAEK HER SCREAM FOR MERCY WITH YOUR KING DONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [http://www.tifareth.com/penis-enlargement/index.html right" would not have got me clicking the link; it would have got me going to VFD. If I weren't active here, I would simply have looked for another article and ignored the link.

If there was some way you could make several personalities all easily findable on the same article, it might work. For example, on one visit the reader might see one personality and several sections, each section have a "click on" link that in fact went to a different version of the same article. That I think could work. As usually, this is only one person's opinion. Happy editing!     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  22:45, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Actually, both of those versions are So so's. My contribution was somewhat different, being User:PuppyOnTheRadio/Dissociative Identity Disorder. But all in all, you've basically pointed out what I felt was the major flaw with both the original and with my version, so I think I might just let this one die until I can work out a better concept for the whole thing.

All righty!     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  22:58, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Why: With the original, it might make more sense if you start from the first revision and then read through them one at a time.

Puppy: I dunno, have it change in 10 seconds (depending on the length of the page) without reloading? You could probably do it with a little javascript. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 00:21, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

If wikimedia let me use javascript I would. Unfortunately I'm limited to flash (which creates issues and I' never used) or animated gif (which I used for microsoft knowledge base but couldn't use for a full page as it wouldn't format right, look ugly, etc.) No real solution. It's back to the realms of deep user space for this one. Sigh.

Admins can set CSS for specific pages, and they can probably (possibly) do the same thing with JavaScript. If you want to go for it, make sure it works in your own uncyclopedia.js and then pester an admin. (Or pester an admin first, since I'm not sure.) --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 03:25, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the Pee!

The baby got featured OK, and it wasn't even my intention. Many of you make me sorry I decided to leave but I'm not to be bribed - least of all after my good bye rant. Have a look at the final exchange on the talk page of Classical Satire for a quick larf. It would also be fun to nitpick your Pee for good measure, all except the final part. Nice. -- The  Rulebook 07:47, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Example of Australian English

Hi! Would you please move your example of proper speaking from White folks to Australian? Australian already has a glossary but doesn't have an example. Whereas it doesn't belong in White folks, because neither this nor any of the other country-specific sections there have anything to do with whiteness, and I'm on the verge of deleting them all. I'd move it myself but the one footnote already in Australian would have to leapfrog the footnotes in your section and I don't know how to do it. PS--Is that a clickable animated GIF? Wow. Spıke ¬ 14:05 22-Dec-09

Thanks. Spıke ¬ 04:25 23-Dec-09

[edit] OK, coolest signature in the world

Yep. I've got a man crush on your keyboard, it's like Jimmy Page's guitar. Other people have them, but to make it sing takes a few of the purple pills and an eight of an ounce of the mud weed. Aleister in Chains 14:57, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Dude, did that thing just move? If not, than I need to stay off the Mary Jane a bit. `- ho scopato tua madre nel culo - 01:01,23December,2009

Your new sig is pretty cool. But so is mine. So I guess that makes us pretty cool. I guess what I'm trying to say here is that you're pretty... or something.  ~  Happytimes are here!  (talk) (stalk)   02:31, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Care to Bear it all?

I've got an (unrelated) idea for nimbus clouds. How's your free time for this?  ~  Happytimes are here!  (talk) (stalk)   02:31, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

I figure I'm done with it as much as I can be. It has been rewritten a few times and you've added some fantastic elements. I think that it is about as good as I can do - actually, I think it's better than what I can do, so I'm happy to have it go up VFH.

[edit] Freedom of Sleep

I have done your pee review and am going to bed now. Btw, thanks for the nom on my article, even if it was in vain... ---Matfen815 04:35, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

Overt Linkage for those who have difficulty finding articles hidden behind fancy blue words that aren't the same name: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:PuppyOnTheRadio/Sandbox

If it gets voted down, then I'm not surprised. It's always hard to get self-referential humour on the front page. POOF died the same death the first time it went up, and became less funny when I removed the self referential aspect and put it back there, and only got quasi-featured. The advantage here is that even if it doesn't get on the front page, it's getting people to read more of your work, and this was an extremely well written piece. And thanks for the review.

[edit] Hey Pups

Havent talk to you in a while. How you been. Staying out of the pound?--WILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 09:52, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] I'm in need of some ideas, Can you help

I am currently working or a article on the show Whale Wars (it can be viewed here), but I'm kinda having some trouble of thinking what else to put on there, so I'm asking a few people on ideas, including you. If you have an idea, you can either go to the discussion page on that article or my talk page and tell me your idea. And please, don't suggest anything stupid (something that contradicts the HTBFANJS). If you don't have an idea, then sorry for wasting your time (or am I?). Thanks!--WILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 08:25, December 24, 2009 (UTC)