# User talk:Prettiestpretty/archive1/

## Opinions on Kitten Huffing

Do you hate kitten huffing as well? --Nytrospawn 03:49, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Snatch! Prettiestpretty 14:48, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
i love kitten huffing. It takes me so high. Ive seen the world in ways i've never imagined possible before. And it doesnt even have side efects! Legalize kitten huffing!!! --Rataube 03:05, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
OH GOD. Now I see the error of my kitten-huffing ways. I mean, just look what happened to Ratube! officer designate Lugiatm 20:58, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

## Inspirational

Thanks - you've truly inspired me... I'll be sure to tell all my sock puppets to vote for you! --some other user 03:51, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Aren't you a dear in my headlights of sincerity! I'd send you kisses, but not until the second date. Hugs, Prettiestpretty 13:50, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Seriously, you're the first person here to make me actually laugh without the aid of visuals in over two weeks. I think there are only 4 or 5 writers who have actually done it, in fact.
Anyhoo, if you're up for it, I'd like to continue in this same vein. IOW: You keep writing scathing articles about horrible wiki personality types, and I keep writing clinical-sounding pieces about wiki-based mental diseases, and all the articles link to each other. And, of course, since this is Uncyclopedia, we eventually assemble a lame-ass template for all of them, and maybe even our own category. But if you feel like I'm being a pest by proofing/illustrating your stuff like this, please let me know - I don't want to discourage you in any way whatsoever. I'm going to nominate you as n00b of the month too, though people will probably suspect that I'm your sock puppet when I do that. But hey, fuck 'em if they can't take a joke. --some other user 01:56, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
A fan club! I'm honored, and I'd like to thank people like you for making this happen. I'll keep contributing as the muse courts me, they all can't be zingers, though. And your picture to the Vitriol article just about made me pee in pants
I just think that there are two types of Uncyclopedia contributers:
• The ones that think "nonsense" is funny (it isn't), acting stoopid is funny (it isn't) are also the ones who think calling someone gay is funny (it isn't either) are also the ones who are hoping against hope that Mom or Dad will drive them and their friends to a movie.
• The ones who find wordplay, irony, satire funny are funny. I strive to be in this group because I'm old enough to drive myself, my husband and our kids to a movie if I could find one we all agree on.
BUT like me digress into some logrolling of my own - I also want to encourage you keep up quality work that you contribute to Uncyclopedia and your encouragement of others. Humor is hard work, and people need encouragement. BTW, you also need to keep contributing as well - your additions to the articles that I work on make the articles better.
Its time to load up the family and go grocery shopping so we can play "No, You Can't Have That" and "Put it Back". Prettiestpretty 16:43, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

## I Am No Longer My Own Wiki Mule

My password has been reset and I'm back to being ME. The foolowing text was sent to me, PrettiestPretty, while I was in exile as user:PrettyestPretty and has been moved overhere to 1) Provide continuity -and- 2)Bring an end to the Chinese firedrill of panic I created for myself. Rest assurred, my password problems have been cured and I've upped my meds. Prettiestpretty 15:34, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Set a valid email on your account this time. Heh. --Splaka 23:06, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I sure did. And let me know the next time you need a pat on the back when you've screwed something up and admitted that you feel like an idiot to everyone and their mother on this web site as a mea culpa, would ya, Hun? Hope Santa brings you more some compassion in the coming year, you seem to be running a bit low, you know what I mean? But I appreciate you sparing the few drops that you had; hope you haven't tapped out your reserve on my account. PrettyestPretty 01:08, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Splaka, I am really sorry for being such a sarcastic smart ass to your comment. I wish I could blame it on a woman thing, or the kids pouring syrup on the kitchen floor and getting the cat stuck in it (if you know how to get that out of cat hair without being clawed to death let me know), but it was just frustration with a situation of my own creation. I send you a sincere apology, my head hung low, ashamed, pouting lip, etc. Seriously, I was wrong and I hope you will acept this in the manner to which it is offerred. Contritly, PrettyestPretty 02:53, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Ouch. Hold a sec.  :) Splaka actually made a typo when he entered his nick during signup (should've been: Splarka), so I think he can relate to your situation. He took it well, and so can you.  :) You won't have much fun here if you respond negatively to neutral comments. Relax a little. We may be a bit nasty in the delete log, but we're an okay bunch really. -- T. (talk) 02:41, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Oh, dear. I have been bitch, and I do think that I should apologize. I was just so freaking frustrated that I could be that stupid. I just (weeping cruel tears) needed someone to say "there there, it will be OK." Not knowing the back story and working to right the ship (so to speak) I really was harsh. I'll apologize, and be abrave little toaster. Thanks for grabbing me and shaking some sense into me. PrettyestPretty 02:47, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)

## Shape-Shifters

Don't worry, I liked the new section in Veil of Smoke and Mirrors - it was your phrase anyway, so you have every right to add/change stuff! However, I am about to do my usual annoying-grammarian bit on it. --some other user 04:32, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Oh, God, be my guest. Wish I could, but sometimes you just have to make do with what you got, you know what I mean? Hugs, Prettiestpretty 14:34, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

## Clairvoyance

Not at all, compadre! I think the subject has vast potential, and has come a long way from its beginnings, largely thanks to your work. I'm glad to be of help!--King In Yellow 17:49, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

## Amazed? Naaah.

Don't thank me too much - after all, I'm the one who fingered the pre-existing bull-testicles photo in your latest VFH nomination. Besides, they almost have to think we're both sock puppets of the same person at this point... That might explain the unusually short initial-post-to-NRV periods, in fact. In a lot of ways it's worse here than it is on Wikipedia, but to be fair, these people have a harder job. (IOW, arguments over accuracy and NPOV usually take care of themselves, but arguments over what's funny or isn't funny usually require someone who's willing to have a ton of shit thrown at them, purely in the interest of getting certain people to calm down and shut up.)

I might take a break from Uncyclopedia for a week or two, actually... I've been spending too much time here, and it's starting to affect my productivity to the point where others are noticing. I've got one more article to post (hint: it's the one red link in the new Unpsychlopedia template), but after that I'll be cooling off, I think. I'll let you know if I decide to store a dummy GMail account here, though, in case they start huffing your articles in earnest and you're in need of a sympathetic ear...

## Self-congratulatory hoo-hah

PP, I just got an e-mail from a friend to tell me the Sock Puppet article was on the front page of Uncyclopedia, and there it was! So I'm out of my self-imposed cold-turkey exile to say thank you once again - it couldn't have happened without your help, and I really mean that. (I just hope it's still readable once the rest of the world has had their way with it!)

Now, as for this WikiSex article. That was the second thing I saw just now, and I do want you to know that while I am, in fact, male, and it would therefore be very easy for me (you know, as a guy and all that stuff) to interpret this in some strange twisted way, I'm actually just going to sublimate my innermost desires and treat it as just another very funny article that might need a little proofreading. I'll try to think of an illustration too, but that might be a tad more difficult for this one.

So, what did I miss while I was away? I wouldn't ask, but the WikiCities server's being awfully slow (it would be, of course, on a day when my first featured article is up there) and it won't give me 10,000 Recent Changes for some reason. I must remember to use watch-lists more efficiently! --Some user 14:44, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Hey, Don't I get anything in this? I contributed a paragraph! I want a screen graphic on my user page - WAAAH!
Guy, you go ahead and do whatever your little hearts content needs to do to whip that mother into shape. I have ideas, I do the best to get them down - if I could write in a clear and concise manner, I'd be rich. I've been a bit annoyed with the site of late, actually. I think that Uncyclopedia is having a bit of an indetity crisis of late because it doesn't know what it needs to be in order to be relevant. I'm amazed at the numbers of articles that I see that get a complete ride, but literally make no sense. But articles that could make sense and do make sense in satiric way get the heave ho rather quickly. Maybe its me, but this site holds so much possibility and instead it keeps going back to the same old stale jokes and then only goves praise to those who use it.
Oh, by the way, go and vote, ney RAVE for Babe Vigoda on the VFP page. Its getting beat up pretty bad because somepeople don't get it. Prettiestpretty

## Anytime

No problem. I'd be glad to give you feedback or just talk anytime you'd like. I'm on IRC just about always so feel free to swing by. =] --KATIE!! 21:01, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

### Deviled eggs

I really like this one! The style is quite amusing and the idea is executed very well. The images fit well, and the second especially made me laugh. The only critique I have to offer would be to try to remove the red links, or at least make them fewer. Oh and a thorough proofread is good for every article. Thanks for making me laugh! --KATIE!! 01:03, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

## Fake Personality Crisis

P.P., I'm sorry I haven't been back until now - last time I dropped by, the servers were reeeaaaalllly sloooooowwww, it was upsetting me to no end, and then when I saw they'd pulled your VFP nomination, I realized I was actually getting angry at Uncyclopedia - and not for the first time, either! But I did some work on WikiSex, which I didn't think would turn out so well at first, but then I found this animated GIF of Kermit the Frog and a Teddy Bear that someone had already uploaded...

I'm kinda torn on this whole issue of leaving the site. Some of what I've been seeing is disturbing, not least this tendency of certain admins to stub your articles and leave others alone that are stubbier. And I noticed nobody added a "Commander of the Order" template to my user page anyway, I guess I get to do that myself, but I was thinking maybe we should put it on yours instead? Just 'cuz I wrote that piece doesn't mean you don't deserve it more. (I mean, if you want to... I'm not interested in recognition all that much, really, and I can't imagine anyone else would mind.)

Long & short, I'm mostly in agreement with you - I think I'm going to curtail my own activities here significantly, though probably not completely. And if we're going to be criticizing anything or anyone specific, we should take that discussion "outside"... I've got an e-mail address stored with my account here, though that only works if you have one too. I'd suggest IRC or IM, but considering what I've just been working on, that would probably be a little too weird. --Some user 00:18, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

We can discuss this in an email. Not everyone is as self centered as the one or two that have really burned me but good. But I'm wondering if the exclusivity and the fawning over other users isn't all party of Wikipedia parody thingy. But then again, if it were a parody, everyone would be in the inner circle. Oh well, drop me a note via email and we can talk this through - why? Becuase who in the Hell has the right to ruin our fun, DAMN IT! Prettiestpretty 00:30, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

## Hey, stop that!

There you go nominating me for stuff again! Not that I mind, I guess, but the fact is I don't really help out many people around here other than you, and besides, I've barely posted anything here in two weeks. I'm curtailing! Let me curtail! --Some user 01:11, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Suck it up. You've been really great to me and I have a right to express that. Now if you don't win, don't come crying to me. Prettiestpretty 01:18, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
He was voted for a featured article and was promoted to Commander. He's not exactly dying from neglect around here.  :) That being said, some noobs have won for UotM, so why not? There's no harm in trying.  :) -- T. (talk) 01:31, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Todd, I understand. My point being that there is more than just cleaning up that matters for UotM - this guy has been terrificly supportive, and should count. Oh, BTW, if he's been promoted to order of the commander, could y'all slpa that award on his page? It would mean more to him than me doing it... Prettiestpretty 02:21, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
It's there, in the Awards section (Mhaille added it). -- T. (talk) 02:38, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
You are such a sweetheart! If you're ever in the trailer park, stop by and say Hey Prettiestpretty 03:50, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I mean, if you really have to nominate me for something, wouldn't "Writer of the Month" be more appropriate? Seems like UotM is for people who "clean up" the place, which I'm hardly guilty of. (And what's a "noob," anyway? Is that like a person who sneezes a lot?) --Some user 01:37, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
You've cleaned up a number of my messes and made sense of it. Admit it, you like people fawning all over you. Prettiestpretty 02:19, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

## Onomo. . .Something

I gots nothing against it. I'm all for the addition of good stuff. -- Lee 5:02 PM, Jan. 18 (UTC)

## CRAP! and Hey

There's been a fair bit of discussion about AAAAAAAAA! clones, both here and on IRC, and the overwhelming concensus that $repetition = -funny$. AAAAAAAAA! was funny precisely because it was an original concept. Sorry if you put a bit of effort in, but hey, keep up the good work on your other articles! -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Codeine what you did to those articles, and the way you did it was just about the LOWEST dirtiest trick. I really hope that one day someone CRAPS! on you like you did on me. Prettiestpretty 02:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Hey.....that CRAP! was tagged by Splarka.....OK the repetition ISN'T funny, I didn't like Hey for that specific reason, but I really liked the thought of seeing CRAP! on the front page. --
You know I used to have a lot of respect for him, but right now if he were the last man on earth I'd cut off his balls and throw them to the pigs for dinner. Prettiestpretty 02:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
And if CRAP! were the last repetitive article on earth, I'd still NRV it, hahaha! It sucked really, AAAAAAAAA! was good for many reasons that no others have been. Including Developers, meow, woof, BBBBBBBBB! and Crap. But hey, I didn't huff Crap (nrv tagging is even a compliment compared to huffing), and I even helped you defend Hey! So if you wanna be mean to me, that's ok, your loss, I won't defend your articles in the future. --Splaka 02:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Splaka - here's the deal. And I'm going to approach this calmly. Look, Am I correct in assumming that you have multiple screen names. If so, is Codiene one of them. Secondly, I have behaved badly, and I apologize. But what I'm feeling a great deal of frustration right now, and there is stuff going on here that I simply don't understand. I was under the impression that once the article was tagged that I had seven days to fix it, and then today when I went to do that, both were gone. But one thing that I hope you can understand is there's a lot of shorthand that goes on on this site, and I'm having a very hard time understanding all it. For you its easy because you've been doing this for a while, I don't get it and I don't know how to break through that wall.
So when I saw that the articles were vaporized, I felt completly betrayed because I didn't have a chance to fix it. And from standpoint that I didn't get a direct message from you made me feel like failure. Evidently everyone here thinks I am anyway - I had no idea until tonight that people think I'm unbalanced and that laughing at me is fair sport on IRC - HECK, I didn't even know there was an IRC until Dame Katie told me about it but I had no idea how it worked (and I still don't).
As for Codiene, yeah, I'm pissed. I really feel like that move was behind my back. Probably like me not coming to you and asking for guidence on what I need to do to improve things. I'm sorry. Goodbye. Prettiestpretty 02:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
1. Um. You are absolutely incorrect in assuming I have multiple screen names. I ONLY ever log in as Splaka here. Codeine is a brit, I am in California. Comparing our sleeping patterns should prove that pretty quickly.
2. NRV tagging usually shouldn't end up in a deletion, however, other admin can delete NRV tagged articles at will, if they deem them bad enough.
3. I don't send direct messages to all articles I NRV tag. Hundreds get tagged evey week. Many of those get huffed by other admin later. That would be a right mess to notify each user that their page was NRV tagged, or deleted.
4. As I am not cody, your attack was assumed to be (and taken as) separate and personal, and rather out of line. I responsed accordingly. --Splaka 02:44, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

See User_talk:Codeine#You_had_no_right... -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

## Naughty Page Blanker

Is there any particular reason that you blanked your own userpage? --officer designate Lugiatm 10:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

## Well

What's so urgent? What did you want to talk to me? (you can reply here if you want) --Boy Toy bitch at me 02:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

## Uncyclopedia/Undictionary

Hey, so I was going through orphaned pages today to filter out crap and I came across several entires you had written that are more like dictionary definitions. Normally I would tag those to be moved to Undictionary or deleted, but it looks like you spent some time on them and, frankly, no one reads Undictionary, so I didn't want to MoveToUndictionary them. Nevertheless you might think about expanding them into full articles, or at least formatting them more like and article and less like a dictionary entry. -- 03:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

## Welcome Home

Saw your lights on, hope the vacation was fun. Welcome back. --

You are such a sweetie. I had a really bad meltdown and am embarrassed by my behavior, so you little note means a great deal. Thanks. Prettiestpretty 01:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
And not a moment too soon! We've got to make you a /sig now, y'know. --Some user 02:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Whats a sig? Prettiestpretty 02:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Just an inline template that would be stored at User:Prettiestpretty/sig that would include your new title ("Dame", natch) and "CUN VFH" designation. Or are you being facetious? This is mine, though I don't normally use it:  c • > •  02:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
facetious? So now you've resulted to using big words. Well do me up one these things and tell me how to use it! Prettiestpretty 02:25, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Being Big Brother and all, I decided to help another one of my subjects. Your sig is now set the way you want it (or so I hope so). I presume you know how to set it up in your preferences? Just in case, though:

1. Go to preferences (--> [1])
2. Change "nickname" into {{User:Prettiestpretty/sig}}
3. Check the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box
4. Save

Good luck. :D --⇔ 22:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Aren't you sweet. Spent about an hour playing around with thing could make sense of what its suppossed to do. We'll try it out here! Prettiestpretty 00:36, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Oh noes! You're supposed to put your sig and timestamp by using ~~~~ (which can be acheived pressing the one but last button at the top of the edit page). --⇔ 07:06, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

## Ah, I see

The hurry is because this actually happened, and you're trying to get it into UnNews before someone else does? OK, I just checked CNN.com, and sure enough! And maybe you'd like me to proofread it... OK, give me 10 minutes. --Some user 02:27, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, and what do you think of the picture??? But what do I do with its and how do I get it up on Unnews? Prettiestpretty 02:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
The picture is fantastic, maybe even VFP-able. And I think you'd just type "UnNews:Whittington Shooting Possibly Not Accidental" or something to that effect into the "search" box, and then click on the "Create this article" link in the resulting "No such article exists" page. But you've put UnNews articles up in the past, no? --Some user 02:48, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Not with any success. Prettiestpretty 03:16, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Hey, if you think its VFP'able nominate it. Dame  01:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
I would have, but I wanted to give someone else a chance to give you some "DAP." And before I forget - Happy Valentine's Day! Is See Dick finished yet? If so, I could give it a once-over if you like... It's good to see you haven't lost your edge! - - -  c • > •  00:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Well did you go and vote for it? I don't know if I'll ever been done with Dick - that poor man who'se laying in the hospital bed had a heart attack, thats got to be worth a chapter. Oh, Buddy says I need to add something about "Jack Abram-off" guy. Happy Valentine's day to you too, sweetie. Email me and tell me whats up with you and all of that web page stuff that has blossomed on your name page. PS, Whats DAP. Dame  00:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

## Strange

I'm PMSing atm... I try not to do much on Uncyc when I am, heh. =] Nice to see you back. --KATIE!! 16:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, with me its high tide at full moon. Doctor-What-a-Waste tells me when it stops in another 10-15 that I'll miss it, but I have to tell you thats like telling someone in prison that they'll miss it when parole comes along. Dame  16:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

## Latest Project

PP - There's an article called Bumblefuck University, so if you were to add "ble" to what you're working on now, you could get a nice cheap tie-in out of it. Then we could add "Bumblefuck Chamber of Commerce," etc., and maybe get another template out of it. --Some user 02:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm game, but what's a "ble"? Dame
Its early honey and Prettiestpretty hasn't had any fuel yet. I'd rather keep it as Bumfuck. Everyone's been there once in their life. Do you have the time to work any magic on it? I gotta go - Penny needs coffee. Dame  12:08, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

## Hunting with Dick

Although Raddy's Joy of Killing image has a slight edge in votes, he agreed to let your Cheney image skip him as the featured image tonight because the fresher the real-life incident is in people's minds, the more humorous the image will be. However, several of us on IRC felt that the caption is rather weak and doesn't really relate too much to the actual event (though it does fit the article). Raddy suggested "Cheney later explained the shooting as a result of faulty intelligence" as a substitute caption, but I don't want to change it without asking you first. What do you think? --—rc (t) 04:13, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

I put up the image with your caption for now, but get back to me on that. Also, if I could get those TPS reports by Friday afternoon, that'd be greaaat. --—rc (t) 06:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Hey, it'd be great if you'd change the captions. Also, we didn't get your TPS report with the new cover sheet last time. Did you get the memo? --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 06:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Ehhh, why don't I send you another copy of that memo on the TPS reports, just to make sure you've got a copy. And we're going to need you to come in on Saturday to change those captions. That'd be greaaat. Oh, and... yeah, I think we're going to need you here on Sunday, too.  c • > •  06:30, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
MmmM... ...dats... uhm, my thtapler. I want my thtapler. Thwingline. They thwitched from the Thwingline to the Bothton thtapler, but I kept my Thwingline thtapler because it didn't bind up as much... ...I could thet fire to the building. ~ T. (talk) 06:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Updated the caption, gave it more Flair. Dame  13:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
You know what? This is my flair. *holds it up* ... it works better when one has fingers, I guess. Anyway, you have my undying support and admiration for shamelessly lampooning our dear, dear Dick. Clap, King, Clap! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Oh, sweet pea thank you. Tears work better when you have a face, you know. But I want you know that I couldn't have done if it weren't for User: Some user. God love him. He deserves credit for covering my back and commas - its hard to be precise when you're me - I've always been a fart in a windstorm kinda girl. But I'm still sending some sugar your way. Dame  20:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Would that God actually loved me. C'mon now, PP, you know I would never have been so nice to you or covering all those commas if you weren't practically the funniest person on the whole website! And I appreciate the Ninjastar thingie, but I'm still the one who owes you, not the other way around. And hey, I just looooove those Michael Bolton albums - he sure is great, isn't he? - -  c • > •  - 01:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Good deal, I'll update the front-page caption accordingly. --—rc (t) 00:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
OH DEAR GOD, I LOVE OFFICE SPACE! 00:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
I hate it. I feel dirty just for quoting it. --—rc (t) 00:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Well I feel dirty from talking to you! 00:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Well, well, SHUT UP! --—rc (t) 00:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

## Who has the bigger Spy collection, then?

Well, this might explain a lot about why you and I seem to have compatible senses of humor. I have all but four issues in the collection (all of which are from the first year). I think I counted 96 issues... I'm guessing you have a few lying around too? --Some user 19:00, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

The only magazine that ever mattered. Shame it became a parody of itself, (sigh). My seperated at birth article is about to launch. Keep your good eye peeled. Hugs, Dame  19:04, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
No Spy's laying around. Mobile homes aren't the best for storing really heavy things like magazines (thats my excuse for throwing out Buddy's Hustlers). But can you imagine the fun that they would have today?
Besides, the kids toys are everywhere. I caught my son with my box of Tampax this morning, shooting the tampons across the room using canned air. One hit a Precious Moments figurine that Buddy's mother gave us - breaking that thing was worth the price of box of these things at CVS. Do you imagine me as the sort that has precious moments figures about; neither do I so I don't know why keeps giving them too me. Sometimes I think I just should have had cats. Dame  21:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Yes, definitely get rid of the Precious Moments figurines! They come to life in the night and do evil things while you sleep, you know. Anyway, I think you and I might be the only Spy-aware people here, which suggests we're also the oldest, too, I shudder to think. (That in itself may also explain quite a lot...) I was sort of expecting someone to point out that Sir Alec Dow, Anagrammatist is just "What's In a Name" with a different name - in fact, I even stole one or two anagrams from old Spy issues, with slight modifications. You can probably guess which ones. Let's see, what else...? We have to update your /sig again, and I hope you don't mind that I put Making up Thomas Jefferson Quotes back on UN:VFD. I just think those things just have to go, ASAP, and I hope you weren't trying to save it because you thought I wanted you (or anybody else) to. Delete! Hmm, and maybe if I called myself "His Imperial Majesty" there all the time, people wouldn't screw up my entries. --Some user 21:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Save it because of you? Hah! No, I tried to save it because it was one of the few places I could use the phrase "nappy dugouts". I'm a bit under the weather today - I have chronic diverticulitis, and today is not a good day. The attack started yesterday and I thought the ship (so to speak) was righting itself. The doctor called this afternoon and said I needed to go to the ER, but I'm holding out for an office visit. And if Buddy's mother finds out she'll send me another one God forsaken statues. If no one ever told you before, eat you vegtibles and take you fiber - you do not want to get this. Its like being in fucking labor all the time. At least it helps keep me trim, but pains a bitch. What do we have to do to my signature? Dame  22:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Diverticulitis? Ouch! I'm lactose intolerant, which is bad, but at least I can control it somewhat, and there are pills you can take... I'll fix your /sig, it just needs a "VFP" added to it. I should give you a NinjaStar for something so you'll outrank me again - this time it only lasted two days! And as for TJ, all I can ask is please edit Thomas Jefferson instead. It's more likely to survive in the end, and I really want to be able to say I'm done with the quotes pages, once and for all. I normally don't ask people to vote for things, but I need help this time. No matter what people say in the Village Dump, I really think people are somehow intimidated by the idea of deleting "established" articles like this... I think I know why, too, but nobody's talking about that, either. --Some user 03:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Send me your thoughts in an email. Got some relief at 4am this morning. The anti-biotics started working and the pain started to subside. Its a bitch getting older. Dame  12:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC)