User talk:PigeonOfTheAppil

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(About your review: new section)
(About your review)
 
Line 36: Line 36:
   
 
I realize you're new here--welcome! But I saw [[Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Preteens]] and frankly, it's significantly less that we look for in Pee Reviews. You might want to look at [[Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Guidelines]] and, when you do, realize that even [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Guidelines#An_Example_Pee An Example Pee] is a little on the short side. Again, I know you're just starting out, and I appreciate your willingness to jump right in--that's what we recommend here. But before you write another review, I'd strongly suggest reading the guidelines, and also checking out two or three reviews of anyone who's been named a [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:Boomer/People_for_the_Evaluation_of_Excrement_and_Influencing_Nominations_for_Greatness#Steel_Kidneys Steel Kidney] in recent months. (The reason I specify recent months is that the standards were rather lax a few years ago). I hope this helps, and if you have any questions, feel free to post a note on my [[User talk:Why do I need to provide this?|talk page]] and I'll pretend to know the answer. {{User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig}} 04:53, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 
I realize you're new here--welcome! But I saw [[Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Preteens]] and frankly, it's significantly less that we look for in Pee Reviews. You might want to look at [[Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Guidelines]] and, when you do, realize that even [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Guidelines#An_Example_Pee An Example Pee] is a little on the short side. Again, I know you're just starting out, and I appreciate your willingness to jump right in--that's what we recommend here. But before you write another review, I'd strongly suggest reading the guidelines, and also checking out two or three reviews of anyone who's been named a [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:Boomer/People_for_the_Evaluation_of_Excrement_and_Influencing_Nominations_for_Greatness#Steel_Kidneys Steel Kidney] in recent months. (The reason I specify recent months is that the standards were rather lax a few years ago). I hope this helps, and if you have any questions, feel free to post a note on my [[User talk:Why do I need to provide this?|talk page]] and I'll pretend to know the answer. {{User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig}} 04:53, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
  +
:Just adding on to my daddy, look at a review like [[Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/John Milton]] for an example- that is a good review.{{User:HELPME/sig}} 05:13, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:13, March 28, 2010

edit Welcome!

Hello, PigeonOfTheAppil, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there and there is a window over here if you don't fancy walking down the stairs. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you:

ChiefjusticeDS

Chief welcomes you!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box.

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but most people enjoy writing something while they are here. If you are critical and think the world would be infinitely better if everyone listened to you, then you should become a teacher, but check out Pee Review while they make sure you aren't a sex offender.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. You can also look into the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program.


OK, I know you may have seen this message on lots of other people's pages, but I still had to come to your page to leave it here. If you have absolutely any questions, no matter how trivial, feel free to ask me here.

Here are a couple of important things that you should bear in mind as a brand new user, especially if you can't be bothered reading the beginner's guide.

  • Read HTBFANJS I guarantee it will be a huge help to you and will stop your early efforts being deleted on sight by these guys.
  • If you want to create an article, then simply follow this link: User:PigeonOfTheAppil/My sandbox (obviously you can change the "My sandbox" part to say anything you like). Please don't create articles on this page as this is where other users can contact you.
  • Always remember rule 2 and be constructive and civil at all times. It works (mostly) and it won't get you banned.
  • Have fun, that is after all why we are all here.

Again, welcome!  ChiefjusticePS2 17:41, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

edit Pegasus

Nice article - now would be a good time to add some links so nobody comes along and slaps a {{deadend}}tag on it. Do you know how? If you don't, it's very simple - just add [[ and ]] either side of any word you'd like to turn into a link, like this. Welcome to Uncyclopedia. :-) Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 15:54, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and by the way - if it's something for which we don't have an article, such as stuffing a pigeon up the butt, you can make it link to something else by doing this: [[bestiality|stuffing a pigeon up the butt]], which will show up like this: stuffing a pigeon up the butt but take you to the page listed before the |. :-) Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 16:20, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

edit Well, you're obviously delusional

As it's a well known fact that there are no women on the Internet O_O ~Jewriken.GIF 16:58, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

edit About your review

I realize you're new here--welcome! But I saw Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Preteens and frankly, it's significantly less that we look for in Pee Reviews. You might want to look at Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Guidelines and, when you do, realize that even An Example Pee is a little on the short side. Again, I know you're just starting out, and I appreciate your willingness to jump right in--that's what we recommend here. But before you write another review, I'd strongly suggest reading the guidelines, and also checking out two or three reviews of anyone who's been named a Steel Kidney in recent months. (The reason I specify recent months is that the standards were rather lax a few years ago). I hope this helps, and if you have any questions, feel free to post a note on my talk page and I'll pretend to know the answer. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 04:53, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Just adding on to my daddy, look at a review like Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/John Milton for an example- that is a good review.Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! CUN Icons-flag-us NOTM 05:13, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects