# User talk:Necropaxx/archive6

Here Thou Mayest Either Praise or Curse, Whichever Doth Suit Thee.

## PEE review

 The article UnTunes:Are we human or are we cancer? has been reviewed by PuppyOnTheRadio(talk) Version as at 28 July 2009 PEE review

I actually did about eight hours ago, but went to sleep before I told you. Pup t 21:24, 28/07/2009

Hey, thanks! Love the template, too! 23:34, Jul 29

## Rape

I hope you can enjoy this transition as much as I did. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Don't you have anything better to do than despoil the virtue of newly archived talk pages? No, don't answer that. 23:32, Jul 29
Better and preferable are two entirely different concepts. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Touché. (That's French for touché). 23:39, Jul 29

## Thanks!

 Orian57 would like to thank you! For voting him Playwright of the Month! He appreciates it and is also uncertain about why he is speaking in third person - he hates that. Seriously though, thanks, I'll almost certainly do more in the future.

22:08 1 August 2009

 Dexter111344 has awarded you a cookie!Now go play in traffic.

Cause I can. Did I mention you're awesome? MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 01:34, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Woah! What brought this on? /munches cookie. 23:55, Aug 5

## UnSignpost: July 30th, 2009

It's on time, you were just high and didn't realize when it got here! THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 02:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

## Cheerio

Thank you for voting. Sir MacMania GUN 16:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

## POOF

Hey, just in relationship to your comments on the VFH nomination, I'm aware that it's about to vanish predominantly due to the in-jokiness of it, which is cool, but you said that you weren't happy due to the strength of the writing. There is going to be a certain amount of re-writing on this, so can I grab a little more feedback on your perspective on this from you? Feel free to rip it to bloody tatters if it makes you feel better. Pup t 00:00, 8/08/2009

After rereading the article, I don't really see anything wrong with the article except that the writing doesn't inspire laughter. I think it's too serious, too much like an actual letter. Am I making sense? It also seems rather short. Hope this helps. 00:07, Aug 8
Ah, more of a "where is the funny" type of issue. That's cool - it's an eye of beholder type funny rather than in your face type funny, even though there is a couple of blatant gags in there, but they are not what I was using to drive the overall. Okay, no offence intended but it's feedback I can't really use to change this for the better, but by the same token I'm also not going to stress about it. I've got it in the back of mind though, so I'm hoping that next incarnation is a little snappier. Pup t 01:16, 8/08/2009

## UnSignpost! August 9th, 2009!! WE BE LATE, Y'ALL!!!

Hand delivered by MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 21:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

## A Mr Sherlock Holmes is at the door, sir

Thank you for voting for this article! Sir MacMania GUN[05:40 11 Aug 2009]