Bradaphraser was throwing away last year's Christmas cards, and realised they had purposefully forgotten about you. This user is completely thoughtless, doesn't care about Multi-culturalism, and therefore DEMANDS you have yourself a Merry little Christmas... NOW!
Failure to comply with result in disciplinary action up to and including excommunication from the Capitalist Church
May you focus on your successes and forget your failures here at the end of the year. Never forget how we all improve one another's lives. Season's Greetings.--<<>> 17:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
I get it, hahahhahahhahahaha, it's funny—The preceding unsigned comment was added byXenuIsGod (talk • contribs)
Specifically the image on seahorse... It's kinda... random... given that there's no reference to anything to that effect in the article. I've left it there at the moment pending though...TheMono 02:10, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I think it's more an issue of relevancy - the article is written in a very faux-serious style, so the completely random reference to Seahorseia seems a little out of place. Possibly an image on the Theory of Dryness would go better? A hyper mathematical looking diagram or somesuch? But I don't think the image there fits. TheMono 03:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay... I moved it to the South America as that didn't have an picture either.--Mrasdfghjkl 03:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
LOL. I didn't even notice the template. I'll get rid of that, but it is very funny lol. TheMono 03:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
They voted for me. And I didn't even have to bribe them. War on Humor-- Bradaphraser
And yes, your picture MAKES that article work. :) Those of us who can write but can't use photoediting software depend on folks like you to make these articles awesome. :)--<<>> 03:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Please cease placing {{Bush}} on random pages. --Sirgwax (talk) 04:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
In fact, cease your entire Bush and Arab related rampage; most of your content is short, unfunny and inappropriate. --Sirgwax (talk) 04:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Oh... and... Sauron and Internet are lunked to on the {{Bush}} template so they shouldn't count as random.--Mrasdfghjkl 02:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Oh... and... since when are Islam and Arab, synonymous?--Mrasdfghjkl 02:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Too Good Too Reeplii, Are You?!--Mrasdfghjkl 09:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I got distracted and forgot to reply. Your point is valid but at this point, I've decided to give up on the matter of {{Bush}}. You win, enjoy. --Sirgwax (talk) 14:46, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Okie:dokie.--Mrasdfghjkl 03:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that I completely stripped this article of its grotesque red links. I hope you don't mind. I checked the history, but I still don't know if it was you who put them all in; regardless, too many red links are bad for articles: they're ugly, distracting, and make the article look unproffessional. Aside from that, I thought the writing itself was great. Also wanted to let you know that I'm working on an article language guide (HowTo:Speak Chicken) to go along with yours, as well as my other one, HowTo:Speak Dolphin in case you care. -- DiZtheGreat( Worship me!)(Praise me!)(Join me!) 04:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I've been keeping an eye on the Sarah Palin article and noticed that you have made some good edits. One poiont of order that I do have to ask is that you try and refrain from placing images on a left align, especially on very short paragraphs as it tends to chop up the article, and not in a good way. Phrased another way, Ms. Palin is definatly a "right" leaning person, so images on the right are in keeping with her fascist views. Pip, pip. 16:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I added the "liberals" section to that article because on the talk page some users wanted it added to the article to get the liberal bias added for humor purposes. Is there a way we can do it that we both agree on that won't get reverted? If so, please let me know. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 12:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)