User talk:MrN9000

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Main Talk Contributions Pee Pants Trousers Sandbox Bot

Welcome! This is the talk page of MrN9000. If you'd like to post a message, CLICK HERE to start a new topic. Rules of engagement:
Try to avoid getting engaged, it can be very expensive. Sign and date all your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text.	Don't Be A Dick Screw it, I don't really give a monkeys. Be funny, not stupid. Unless you are stupid in which case that's funny. If you post here, I will reply here.

My archives are here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here but not here

MrN9000 quit smoking.	This is not funny.

Contents 1 Moving Creationism 2 UnSignpost 4th March 2010 (your calendar is wrong) 3 UnNews:Lord Monckton Denies Denying Denial 3.1 BTW: Two more BS stories for March 7th 4 Surfing = Surfer 5 Erratic Capitalism 6 March 8, 2010 (yeah, the future!) 7 Hi 8 UnNews: March 10 - peek into the future 9 Uncyclopedia Beach Local 10 It's no problem for me, but 11 Random thought 12 Dude 13 A Bloody Winner 14 Thank you! 15 HTBFANJS 16 Thank you 17 TalkArchives1 18 Got Bot? 19 UnSignpost 11th March 2010 20 UnCyclopedia GOOGLE ADS on Main Page 21 Trying to make archive of talk page 22 redirect from MrN9001 - imposter 23 Ancient Uncyclopedia 24 Har Har 24.1 "Uncyclopedia Beach Local Initiation Procedure" 25 Thanks! 26 ... 27 David Carradine 28 I am so glad! 29 The "Scene" 30 Need some expert help for a good cause my dear chap! 31 Imperial Colonization Buccaneer Admiral walking the plank! 32 Vigilance week 33 Shockingly on-time delivery? 34 Ban patrol 35 UnSignpost 18th March 2010 (on time as always) 36 Gay Pubs 37 Our current Colonization 38 Fort Knox is full of shit!?! 39 Discordianism vote needed quickly and member retirement 40 How to be absurdly funny and not just a content freak 41 'Scuse me 42 UnSignpost 25th March 2010 (hand delivered for added flavour) 43 IC Replacement 44 I may not be around much 45 Unhuffing 46 File:Marysenude.jpg 47 UnSignpost 1th April 2010 - Always on time 48 Hi theres 49 VFS 50 Gay Pubs 51 UnSignpost 4/8/10 - Oh hi Signpost. 52 UnSignpost 15/4/10 - Yet another on time delivery. 53 Grue 54 Review 55 Vote now for Colonisation 56 UnSignpost 1 May 57 Article Space 58 You 59 Help! 60 The UnSignpost Is Not Dead! 61 nightwish 62 All the news that's unfit to print! 63 You thought I forgot? 64 Signpost: normal service resumed 65 Re one of your Top 10 of 2009 votes from January 2010 66 Another UnSignpost! Rejoice! 67 Read all about it! The UnSignpost rides again! 68 You sir, are a tosser 69 It's new and it's news! It's the latest UnSignpost! 70 :( 71 Ruddy hell! It's the UnSignpost 72 Avast me hearties!

Please do not watch this video. Whatever happens also do not watch the full version. Rather than doing that, it's far better to post a message to this user telling him that you know everything contained in this video is wrong, or that this should not be here in the first place.

Note: Here is some Leonard Cohen

[edit] Moving Creationism

I know what you said about moving Transformers but, er, um, could you move Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/Creationism and its talk page to Creationism? There are a number of reasons it's critically important to preserve the history--checking to see who actually did contribute and what those contributions were, double checking on who gets half credit if it gets featured, seeing what worked in setting up a colonization and what didn't, etc. I tried looking through the history of previous colonizations so I could learn from what was done before, and never did fine much of it, which means I probably repeated a lot of the old mistakes. The only way I thought of keeping the history without an admin doing that huffing/moving/unhuffing magic that you do is to cut and paste the IC version onto the current version, and then posting a BIG NOTICE in the talk page that the rest of the history is on one of the IC pages and linking to it. But that would split the history up which I'd prefer not to do if it's not too much trouble to do your magic. What think?  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  23:20, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Done. I think... IC should just edit the actual mainspace page they are rewriting. I never did really understand why SysRq wanted to do it on a different 'hidden' page. This is not my decision though, and you guys need to sort this one out between you. I do think that continuing to do this delete and re-create trick is not ideal however... It's not really something we are 'meant' to do with MediaWiki. Maybe if you do want to do it on a different page then you could just cut and paste, and attribute credit on the talk page at the time of completion. If you guys decide you do want to keep doing this, I will. I just don't think it's ideal, that's all. That's why I'm suggesting you just do it all on the page in mainspace. MrN  00:21, Mar 6

Thanks for your help. There's a few reasons I, like SysRq, think it works better on IC space.

1. We start out with a blank slate. That doesn't matter on IC, but would mean blanking the article on main space for a day or two or three.
2. When we start writing something, it's going to be a piece of an article instead of a whole article, which will be what was there before (however bad it might be).
3. By keeping it in IC space, we can control who edits--I really don't think we have (nor do I want) the authority to say who can or can't edit in main space.
4. By moving the entire history, as you'll graciously done for us, everything on the article is kept together in one space. It makes it much easier for someone (i.e. me) to go back and check things--as I said above, I got lost trying to track down previous ICs that were just cut and pasted. I found bits and pieces all over the place, and later on I found I had still missed parts of article's I thought I had found all of.

 Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  01:24, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Well... I don't think "blanking" an article in mainspace is too much of a problem. It would never actually be blanked, but would be a very short version of the new. You should not start editing the new page until there is an agreed new concept. I think that concept should be discussed on the main talk page of the article in question.

You don't 'control' who edits in IC now. Anyone can edit. You don't have to be a 'member' of IC to edit an IC article. Those are your main points, and I think they are invalid. I just realised that this 'fix' of moving the history is not ideal because if someone edits the mainspace page during the IC, then those edits will still show in the history of the page after I have done the huff/recreate. It actually looks VERY wrong. Take a look at this edit at 03:49, 13 February 2010. Look at the page history at this date/time. It looks like this user did something which they did not. I'm actually rather unhappy about that. I would really like you to come up with a way of preventing this from happening. We could sysop protect the mainspace page from editing, but then why do that when we could just edit the mainpage. I think that what has happened here is that both you and SysRq have started to believe that IC is some kinda a club which only you can control. That sir is not correct. Anyone can edit the IC page. People may choose to revert them if they wish, but it's not a private club.

If I might make a suggestion for how IC might be improved... Before voting on which article to IC I suggest that an overall concept be agreed or at-least suggested. You might have several good ideas for what the article should be like before you agree to start it. Rather than saying "lets do this... Um, what shall it be about?" ... It would be better to say "Here is my idea for this article, here is my idea for this article, here is my idea for that article (there may be several different ideas from different users and you might not have chosen which) but... The point is that you already know the concept before starting. I think this would then remove the need to 'blank' the article. Again, I'm not forcing you into changing anything here, but I'm sure you can see that this kinda thing is actually rather a significant problem. I'm hoping to come up with a way to fix this. Maybe thrashing out the basic concept in 'ICspace' but then doing a cut and paste into the mainspace page when you have enough to start the new article. If the edits were done on the mainspace page, I would much prefer to put temporary semi-protection onto the mainspace page in cases of high traffic pages than continue to do this bodge of huffing and recreating. If you can come up with a way of fixing this issue without needing sysop involvement that's going to be by far the best thing IMO. MrN  10:12, Mar 6

I'll think about what you said, and see what I can come up with (or what any one else who sees this comes up with--suggestions are welcome). Thanks for the info.  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  18:46, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

I've taken some time to think about this.

1. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to give a detailed response, and giving helpful suggestions. You could simply have said, "I'm an Admin that's the way it is if you don't like it tough cookies." But you didn't.
2. I COMPLETELY agree that the editing history being misleading is a major problem. That alone is enough to convince me that my pushing for that huffing/unhuffing thing was a bad idea. I'll probably post a note about it in the talk page to explain what happened, or maybe post a note on that editor's page. What I think I'll do instead is put each IC project on its own page, link to it from the project page (which was an IC member's suggestion), cut and paste from IC space to main space, and put a note in the edit history and on the talk page where the IC history is so it's easy to find and credit. It will be a little more work on both ends, but it's better than having an inaccurate history.
3. Personally, if IC articles had to be edited on mainspace, I'd rather not do IC. It would be much more efficient for me to simply find a user or two who wanted to work on improving an article with me, and do it that way instead of spending hours and hours writing notices and procedures and updates and checking everyone's edits, etc. Part of the advantage of IC is how it brings oldtimers and newcomers--and experienced editors who've never collaborated and maybe haven't even talked to each other--together, and can guide newcomers, who otherwise would be left out of collaborations, much more effectively than happens in main space.
4. Yes, I did think IC had control over what was done on IC pages (of course knowing that admins could always overrule anything we did). If IC doesn't have say over its own space, I almost question the point of having IC. But I suppose I can nudge non-IC editors by posting a note on their talk page telling them they're welcome to apply. I've already done that, and so far they've either joined or stopped editing in IC. Or I could consider an edit in IC space a de facto application to join. But I am tempted to move the current work-in-progress pages to my user space so I do have the authority to say only IC members can edit IC projects. Again, if IC is the same as main space, I don't see the point in having it set up as a group instead of just posting a template at the top of an article saying it needs work.
5. I like your idea of encouraging users to suggest ideas for colonization an article when they nom it, and plan to follow that. I don't, however, want that as a requirement. Frankly, when I nommed Creationism I had no real concept of a direction, which was formed by other colonizers and ended up becoming a feature article. On that article, at least (and so far on Batman), letting the concept come later and being decided by consensus seems to work.

Thanks again for your help and your patience with a bull-header editor!  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  21:46, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

So long as you are willing to put the effort in to run IC... It's up to you how you fix the huff-recreate problem, sounds like you have a way... My suggestion about needing a basic concept was based on what I have seen of how IC works, and when it does not work. When an IC fails it's because one one came up with a good concept for the article, which is daft when people might have ideas for another article which would not have failed. When you have been doing this for longer you will see what I mean... Sure there are times when you can come up with a concept after you start, but I suggest that if concepts are not flowing before you do, then that's probably a sign of trouble ahead. Again, it's up to you there though... As for if IC really is a private "club" and that only "members" can edit? I think UN:N probably applies really... As you said, if someone does edit, then that's an application to join. I do not want you to move IC to your userspace. Do not do that. IC does not belong to you. You are running it. I actually think the whole thing (including getting new members) would work better in mainspace, but as you are running it, you get to decide. The point of IC is that it's one central place where users who want to collaborate can get together and do that. It's NOT a system of exclusion. If you want to create a private club in your userspace go ahead, but that would not be IC, and I would ask someone else to run IC instead. Have fun. MrN  22:45, Mar 8

All righty then; I'll continue my practice of considering edits to IC space as grounds for application--or to be reverted on sight if not helpful, as is usually done in main space. As for the no-concept problem, the way it's set up now is the concept has a deadline--it's determined between Sunday and Wednesday, then only after the concept's formed do we begin writing the article. If it's not made by when I check it Thursday, I'll create it or we'll move on to the next article. I remember what you suggested about the benefit of having deadlines, and that's what we're doing. Worked so far.  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  23:00, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] UnSignpost 4th March 2010 (your calendar is wrong)

9001(bot)  00:11, Mar 6

[edit] UnNews:Lord Monckton Denies Denying Denial

Dude! You got me into Prefs, and I found the bitchin skin, "Beach" - and it's so cool that it not only makes me feel I'm a Uncyclopedia Beach Local, but also tells me how many edits I've made since 2008, and all kinds of neat looking gizmos. That plus my N-generated Signature, and FOR SURE I'm a Uncyclopedia Beach surfer, kinda, like you...COOL!!

I had this crazy idea for UnNews that is up, but not scheduled until 6th March. And it's even YOU'RE CAT. UnNews:Lord Monckton Denies Denying Denial So maybe you like to improve it BEFORE the release date. --- BUT, as you can see, I screwed-up his name in the headline, and I don't know how to fix it. We owe it to him. Dude! Ahh, daa, DONE!

Here's another UnNews for today: UnNews:Suicide Bomber Commits Suicide

[edit] BTW: Two more BS stories for March 7th

UnNews:Death Sues Life
UnNews:Mike Tyson KO’ed By Midriff Bulge

I have to go back and fix Local cause I just realized that surfing the Internet is also SURFING, which means that all Uncyclopedians are Uncyclopedia Beach Surfing Locals - COOL! And that's why we stomp any kooks who mistakenly wonder in. Cheers!!!--Funnybony  11:17, Mar 6

[edit] Surfing = Surfer

Dude! I think it's amazing that of all the words on Earth, the powers-that-be chose, "Surfing" to denote activity on the Internet. Cool!--Funnybony  12:13, Mar 6

It's used for orgasm control as well, gotta ride the big waves. Aleister in Chains 12:57 5.3.

[edit] Erratic Capitalism

I used some of that diplomacy you admins value so highly. Now, put down the ban stick.... no-one needs to get hurt! --Matfen 12:22, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

What? Dammit! I thought I was getting a few bans here! Ban stick is for banning! Um... Cool. Yea... If people then ignore ya after you have made a fair attempt at contacting them and resolving it... Then it's ban time time. I don't like to see people just reverting without bothering to use any talk pages. Cheers dude. MrN  16:19, Mar 6

[edit] March 8, 2010 (yeah, the future!)

Dude! I like this one as much as Tyson UnNews UnNews:Suicidal Surfer Sues Sea--Funnybony  12:53, Mar 6

Nice UnNews dude, but... I'm sure I have seen some of this material somewhere before. Easy on that dude... Otherwise great stuff. MrN  16:15, Mar 6

Sure! That crazy idea came from one of my articles, but it developed nicely into a news story. Well, HERE's a total original, also for March 8: UnNews:Atheists Decry SOS - Hope you like it--Funnybony  18:19, Mar 6

[edit] Hi

Could you restore the Princes Peach article that was recently deleted via VFD to my userspace please? I think I can improve it, since the current article doesn't seem to be going anywhere. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 02:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I put a copy of the last version here. It sucked major balls. I suggest you don't use it, and get this subpage deleted asap... MrN  00:19, Mar 8

Whoah, you're right. O_O Nevermind, go ahead and delete it again. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 03:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

[edit] UnNews: March 10 - peek into the future

Bro! Here's one you might like UnNews:Blanks: Cheap Alternative Or Ulterior Motive scheduled for March 10, 2010 - which is in the future - so you still have time to save the world. BTW: It's already March 8th where I'm sitting, so I topped-up recent UnNews with our SOS (yes, OURS!).

Also here's one for tomorrow, March 9th UnNews:Vietnam Copies Veterans Memorial with 300-Kilometer Wall. Dude!--Funnybony  18:16, Mar 7

[edit] Uncyclopedia Beach Local

Dude! Here's an article you could really get into cause you know you're way around Uncyclopedia so well. Please jump on this partnership: Uncyclopedia Beach Local Hope it doesn't get huffed before we finish it--Funnybony  21:41, Mar 7

[edit] It's no problem for me, but

you might have a problem with this. Also please read that. Thanks.  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  06:07, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

The author requested it be deleted, and it was an unused image. QVFD would have worked also... MrN  10:43, Mar 8

Oh, well, I could have gone to QVFD, but you're cuter. (Seriously, next time I'll try to remember to do that).  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  19:34, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

3 hours ahead of you. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:29, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

You're always first. It's not fair. Showoff!  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  21:08, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Random thought

I've just popped a few things on QVFD today, and managed to exceed the 20 items ruling (so therefore ripe for ban-stick, but I claim ignorance). Just thinking it might be advantageous to have another poop-smith on board, and I would suggest pointing the finger at User:SPIKE as he appears to be the most active user on VFD that I can think of, and would also be damned good at it. What say you? 05:06, 9/03/2010

Well... If you exceeded it, I missed you doing so. Maybe you have not read the rules properly for a while... SPIKE's contributions have been well noted. Bide your time for now though sir. If there were cabal business (which obviously there is not) then things would have a particular way of happening. Obviously they don't, due to there not being one, but if they did then there would be. I assume. MrN  11:29, Mar 9

I think after the next round of VFS we'll need to refresh our poopsmith list. Obviously, nothing like that will happen as VFS does not exist. ~ 15:26, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Depending on what may or may not happen at said nonexistent VFS process. Obviously. We probably also need to update this at some point. Or would do if that page were actually one which we had. MrN  15:32, Mar 9

Obviously, non of that will happen. ~ 15:35, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I feel I can rest assured that nothing is going to happen, and not knowing the cabal, which of course I don't, as there is no cabal, nothing will happen swiftly, and with no well-considered judgement. So there is nothing to worry about. Wednesday, 07:33, Mar 10 2010 UTC

I'm glad that we didn't have this conversation... MrN  07:35, Mar 10

Is there some new rule on QVFD, or did you mean VFD? If you were talking about VFD, the 20 article limit is on active nominations, so the rate of poop smithing does not affect the throughput of VFD. --Mn-z 22:12, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

He's obviously really talking about UN:BP. :P Yea... Thanks for reminding us of that rule. I kinda wrote it (by proxy) actually. ;) MrN  06:17, Mar 12

[edit] Dude

I was just messing around with that guy. You do know, don't you? Do you really think I'm trying to make this wiki family-friendly? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thatblondguy (talk • contribs)

Nope. I don't understand what you are saying at all. What guy by doing what? Please explain in full detail. MrN  15:00, Mar 11

[edit] A Bloody Winner

Dude! I read that "How to be a jerk without being an ass hole" deal, and, I decided, to just write shit, and if MrN gives it the time of day, then it's good, and if MrN actually improves it THEN it's a bloody winner. Just base my opinion on your reaction and advice. Can't go wrong. Cheers!--Funnybony  17:05, Mar 11

[edit] Thank you!

That IP with the Ron Howard obsession has been really getting on our nerves! Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 17:31, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

These "block" buttons are great. You guys should really look into getting yourself one, one day. :P :D (he he he) OH, GOD SAVE ME!!! The POWER IS GOING TO MY HEAD!!!!! /me shoots self MrN  17:57, Mar 11

Chief putting the IP onto UN:BP helps also... ;) MrN  18:05, Mar 11

I asked if they sold them when I was in Maplins the other day. No luck, though. :-( Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 19:03, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] HTBFANJS

Dude! I read that article, HTBFANJS (How To Butt F**k A Nasty Jewish Slut) - and I can't quite make out what it's on about. Something about humor, or some such!?? Anyway, I'm not a lone wolf, I don't expect to create anything great without a partner or partners, and I'm not really looking for a one-man FA. Lets do them together, which I much prefer. I have good ideas, like when in the band, but I needed a bloke from South Shields, who used to tell me, "Go-on fook yaa granny!", to bring my ideas to completion. So I'm no lone wolf Uncyclopedian, and don't really want to be. I'll be, like, Jerry Lewis and you can be what's his name? The drunk guy who was so straight. Anyway, think about it.. so here's a bit of LUNACY:

--Funnybony  17:52, Mar 11

You are a Funny one Mr "Funnybony". You put so much value in my opinion about some things, but how many time have I pointed to you to read that thing before, yet you have ignored me on that? OK, that sounds a bit like I'm having a go at ya. Dude, you know I'm not, cos I love you to bits cos of all the cool things you do. But... You may not even think it's true, but reading that really will have made you a better writer. Just like if you did some more Pee Reviews that would also make you a better writer 2. Not only that but it would also get a lot more people interested in your work, and you would have more contributors to your other work in the long run. I'm not the expert in comedy dude. Far from it. I have a sense of humour which is different to that of others, just like everyone else. What HTBFANJS does do is point you at some principles which have been shown to be effective in the past.

Here's the thing dude... You keep saying "My style does not cut it" and stuff like "what's the formula for success at VFH"? Well... It's taken you what? A year before you have actually read our document which explains that? Lol. Dude. Come on, you have to agree that that is kinda funny. I know that some of our best writers (I'm not one of them) often go back and read, and re-read HTBFANJS lots of times when writing. It reminds them of what works, and what does not, and is often a source of new ideas and avenues for articles. Dude... If you respect my opinion (I know you do but you're just a lazy arse who don't want to read documentation) then you will read HTBFANJS sometime again in the not too distant future. That's one heck of a read, and there is no way it's all going to have gone in after just one read through. Seriously, read it again sometime soon. You might also want to take a look at our guide to doing reviews. UN:PRG I wrote that in tandem with Cajek who is the author I think you should model yourself on. Even if you don't do any reviews, still read that. Of the great writers here, he's probably the dude closest to you in terms of humour style, and probably the best advice I can give you is to read some more articles from that his of his stuff which I gave you a while back.... It's like I say dude, if you want to get better, you are going to have to do some research. Not that reading Cajek's stuff is hard work. The dude is awesome, and you will love everything which he ever wrote. Or... Are you too old a dog to teach new tricks. :P :P :P MrN  17:57, Mar 11

Also... GO READ THIS AGAIN YOU BUGGER!!! MrN  18:20, Mar 11

[edit] Thank you

OK, you are right. Thank you for all. I will never forget you. 201.89.159.30 18:59, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Cool. It should vanish from the mirror next time it's refreshed, but that's nothing to do with us... Now... Why not write something for us? :D MrN  19:02, Mar 11

Where I write? 201.89.159.30 19:06, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

It's like... A wiki anyone can edit. :-) Whatever interests you... If you want a place to start... Read BGBU and then maybe HTBFANJS then (maybe) create an account here... MrN  19:09, Mar 11

Thank you, I know that wiki anyone can edit, but, I don't go to create an account. I don't know how to be funny, because I'm not funny. 201.89.159.30 19:35, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] TalkArchives1

Dude! How is the easy way to archive? Do I create a new page as UN:Funnybony/TalkArchives1 ? Or somethin'? Is it really simple? I feel like a bull-in-a-China-shop. PLEASE forgive my ignorance. Quite often I get accused of doing something I've never heard of before. Some people assume I'm a smart guy.. NOT! Big mistake! If someone shows me how to break a rock, then I can do it. BTW: Did I Spork an article? I hope Saint Peter is not going to say, "Dude, sorry, but you "sporked an article!" And I'm like, "Nanu-nanu!" In fact, maybe SPORKING should be added to the 2012 Olympics!? Cheers!--Funnybony  20:01, Mar 11

Did you look at how other users do their archives? Mine are listed at the top of this page for example... MrN  06:19, Mar 12

[edit] Got Bot?

Excuse me, my good fellow, but would you be so good as to spam this all over people's talk pages with the help of your handy dandy (and now Bio'd) bot? Would be awfully grateful. --UU - natter 10:41, Mar 12

Sure. Yea, he already told me about the top notch bio you did for him. His head has swollen up to 3 times its normal size, which as you can imagine leaves little room left in MrN towers... :) MrN  10:45, Mar 12

As always, I salute you and your spectacular efficiency. --UU - natter 11:21, Mar 12

[edit] UnSignpost 11th March 2010

9001(bot)  11:03, Mar 12

[edit] UnCyclopedia GOOGLE ADS on Main Page

DUDE...

--Funnybony  11:04, Mar 12

Holy Shit.

That appears to be what happens if you select something other than the default "skin" in Special:Preferences. I think the default (and so what I assume everyone else is seeing) has no adverts. Still that's a breach of our creative commons license I assume. Go into Special:Preferences and try some different settings... It's almost certainly an error by Wikia rather than something more sinister. MrN  11:27, Mar 12

Yea, if you select any of the "Monaco" skins it's going to do that... MrN  11:39, Mar 12

Thanks for the info. It doesn't really bother me, and the Monaco skin is so cool. I'll stick with it for now. Thanks--Funnybony  18:32, Mar 12

[edit] Trying to make archive of talk page

Dude! So you won't think I'm stupid - therefore I tell you up front. I'm stupid! See how smart I am? It takes a genius to know that he's stupid!

I looked at your archive - and couldn't figure how to save the old (current) talk page to a new name, and start a fresh talk page. All I could try was to MOVE it to another name, so I moved to User talk:Funnybony/archive1 - but all that did was redirect the old page. And, on top of everything, the whole deal is surrounded by warning lights and Uncyclopedia cyber threats. I don't want to be accused of breaking more laws that I never heard of. Now I'm really confused. I'm sure it's something super simple. But I still don't know it... HELP!!!--Funnybony  18:27, Mar 12

I sorted it for you, it was no problem to sort it out at all... Can you see what I did now? Here is the thing... I would rather you tried, and fucked it up, than not tried, and never learnt anything... MrN  23:00, Mar 12

Gee, then I must be doing good. I try things here and fuck them up all the time! No, wait. You said we're supposed to learn something?  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  03:08, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] redirect from MrN9001 - imposter

Dude! I escaped that MrN9001 Punji Stick trap, and finally found my way back to you. I don't trust your sock puppets (being one myself) and am glad to be back in the World. I saw that you made a NEW page for my talk Archives and freed up the original Talk page - which was a well conducted special forces operation of great risk. I'm still not sure how you did it. But give me a little time to solve the puzzle, and DO drop a hint. You're awesome--Funnybony  10:35, Mar 13

To see what I did... Why not look at my contributions? You can also look at the page history of the pages involved. MrN  10:59, Mar 13

I see WHAT you did. Piece of cake. But I still have no idea HOW you did it?--Funnybony  22:43, Mar 13

I don't understand! How can you see what I did, but not know how??? I just copied the contents of your talk page onto a new page! MrN  21:51, Mar 14

[edit] Ancient Uncyclopedia

Dude, I was reading an actual Sanskrit Purana this morning and had a crazy idea. Did you know that, apart from everything else, the Hindus also were first to have Uncyclopedia!? And in one Purana, the Hip Purana, there is detailed, esoteric, and bone fide information on Uncyclopedia. Even the book is Sanskrit titled "Uncyclopedia" (not very subtle, huh?). I just got started, and please DO join in Ancient Uncyclopedia. Cheers!--Funnybony  22:41, Mar 13

[edit] Har Har

[edit] "Uncyclopedia Beach Local Initiation Procedure"

The Uncyclopedia Beach Initiation ceremony is the worst form of NOT "hazing"! But it is a gruesome FACT (mainly cause most Locals are "Grue"s at heart). And all Locals have to survive pass it.

This initiation, also called the "belt-line" consists of:

1. Getting kicked repeatedly in the balls (on-line) - even if you're a she-person.
2. Getting humiliated constantly until you finally realize your own self-worthlessness.
3. Getting adopted by a "one-eyed" Sysop who's an “Ego-buster-from-hell”.
4. Eating an entire "humble pie" in one gulp.

NOTE: During the Uncyclopedia Beach Local Initiation Procedure Suicide is NOT an option. There's nothing funny about suicide (in spite of some idiot killing themselves being patiently absurd). So once the Initiation begins there is no way out, unless you bring a signed hand-written letter from your Mother asking that you be excused.--Funnybony  23:57, Mar 13

... How many times did I ask you to read HTBFANJS? How many times did you ignore me, and not bother!?! Dude, if anyone made it harder on you it was you for not taking the advice of all the people who suggested it b4. Lol. You are a silly bugger ya know! I bet you write a shit load better as a result of reading it. Ya will never admit it though! :P :P :P Did you ever read BGBU? Lol I bet not! MrN  20:20, Mar 15

[edit] Thanks!

Matfen thanks you for your vote! His article could not have been featured without you...

:) --Matfen 11:42, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] ...

Sorry about that edit. It was intended to be in good faith. Rest assured, I won't be making any more edits like that in the near future. --Matfen 16:55, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Well, obviously I assumed it was in good faith! That's why you are not banned! I did wonder WTF you were doing though. You could have explained that to me in the edit summary when you made the edit. That's kinda what they are for ya know! MrN  20:16, Mar 15

[edit] David Carradine

Why the hell did you nuke this? This was funnier than most of your articles.80.3.26.54 19:02, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Why the hell are you asking me that when you have obviously already read the deletion reason? Also, have you read most of my articles? MrN  20:14, Mar 15

Well, MrN, I've read most of your articles. They suck balls. You also smell funny. ~ 20:19, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Actually it's my balls which smell funny, but that's only because you have been sucking on them. MrN  20:21, Mar 15

Ah, that makes kind of sense. Carry on. ~ 20:22, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] I am so glad!

Hi

I am unfortunately fRENCH.

My name´s Jean-Michel Sarga.

A few days ago I was angry thinking that the peron who invented the idea of universal wiki has been f****d by a guy named Whales, and that would lengthen the development of neutral information (example in my field (I am a mathematics addict); definition of some words some people use) and in the same time in the case of human suffering related info( I don´t the phrase for "wars, etc") a pseudo-"neutral" "information".

I was thinking over during hours about this problem.

You can imagine my bliss and laughter when I happened to see a webpage that I thought being a wikipedia stuff on my firefox with the uncyclopedia article "Dick Cheney".

I love you all.

It must be unfortunate to be French. Monday, 23:52, Mar 15 2010 UTC

[edit] The "Scene"

--Funnybony  23:24, Mar 15

If you had done some of the things I suggested... Ya would know a bit more about being a local around here! MrN  00:51, Mar 18

[edit] Need some expert help for a good cause my dear chap!

Dude! I hope you feel properly glorified in Ancient Uncyclopedia. It was a fluke that I created the article. After creating I realised it was, like, an ancient Zen Uncyclopedia manual that's, maybe, a "must read" for Uncyclopedia success (it even includes HTBFANJS}. I think I might have a chance with this one passing the acid test. It really feels unique, and funny, and useful too. BUT, that could depend on your checking-editing it where necessary, and even adding more ancient Zen instruction, for example, the Ancient Uncyclopedia language with words like nOOb, Spork, Sock puppet, etc. It needs a Uncyclopedia Beach Local jargon, and again for the Uncyclopedia Beach Local article.

It would be good to list the top ten Unwords as jargon, and I'll also learn from reading that, cause I only know about FA, nOOb, Spork, etc, from you. So a mini Undictionary of 10 top Unwords would be actually helpful to both articles, just as I believe that Ancient Uncyclopedia is actually helpful beyond parody and actually quite right on. The article surprised even me. Hope your well, Dude!--Funnybony  01:36, Mar 16

Sorry dude, I can't really get into that article. I have looked at it a few times and I'm not getting it. Maybe check out The History of the Decline and Fall of Uncyclopedia and some of the pages linked from the bottom of that. In jokes need to be really, really good to be good. As you noticed some people hate em. ;) MrN  00:50, Mar 18

[edit] Imperial Colonization Buccaneer Admiral walking the plank!

IMPORTANT: If you want to make comments on any part of this message, please post your comments on the IC talk page. I've sent this notice out to about 40 people, and will likely never see your response if you put it on your talk page. But if you insist on doing it anyway (sigh), please at least start a new section using == (Your comments) == below my signature, or click the + tab up above, and make comments there. This message is set up as a template, so if you try to make edits in this message, it will edit it everywhere, and get me nasty notes from admins.

Actually, I'm looking for a temporary assistant/permanent successor as head of Imperial Colonization. I got put in charge of IC because I kept bugging a certain admin. I'd say, "Why isn't somebody doing this with IC?" and "Why isn't somebody doing that with IC?" So that admin basically said "Why, you're somebody; go do it" (see discussion here). But as you can see, I took on the position planning to update IC, get it moving again, and see it through one colonization. Well, that happened. IC was updated and reactivated and, thanks to some great colonizers, Creationism was recreated in a spirit of cooperation, was rewritten on deadline, was Pee Reviewed and, as a bonus, was voter-chosen as a feature article within about a day of being nommed. Our current project, Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/Batman is scheduled to be written by 20 March, and then we'll begin another. IC is moving...and I'm looking for someone to keep it moving. If interested, please post a note on the IC talk page--experienced and successful users only need apply. Ability to say "ARRRRR" like a pirate is not required, but would be nice.

---

 Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  16:53, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Vigilance week

It's all good. I figured if there is a push to delete the category then that may also reflect to the V-week itself (which I hadn't come across prior to now, so I actually do appreciate it as history.) Is there any need from an admin perspective to reawaken V-week? Puppy Debarked Thursday, 03:43, Mar 18 2010 UTC

I'm not sure what you are asking me here, but I will be very surprised if we ever get another one. MrN  09:06, Mar 18

Okay - as an opinion, do you think we need another one? Puppy Debarked Thursday, 09:50, Mar 18 2010 UTC

Na. V week was needed before we got ICU and VFD actually working properly. The standard of our crap these days is much higher than it used to be. Like I said, I will be very surprised if we ever get another one. MrN  10:12, Mar 18

[edit] Shockingly on-time delivery?

This is ready. On time. When you've picked yourself up off the floor, could you arrange for it to be delivered, please? --UU - natter 11:29, Mar 18

Course what I do by cutting and pasting a link into my bot is far more effort than what you do by actually like... Writing the thing every week. ;) It's awesome that you have managed to keep the thing going for so long. I guess doing stuff like this is why they voted ya UotY. ;) Anyway, go and ban the good Rabbi a few more times while you still can and get him to organise this whisky piss up tasting session. MrN  11:46, Mar 18

On the other hand, if I hadn't been cranking this out week after week, I may already have won my race to 20 features with Orian, and even written bloke, as you suggested such a long time ago. And I'll leave the Rabbi to organise things in his own sweet time, on the grounds that the longer he takes, the more chance there is I'll actually be able to make it! (Family business is hardest in the first few weeks and months, y'know?) Finally, it's taking the time to get a bot working in the first place that's the important part of what you do - I really, really can't be arsed with even trying that shit, so I remain very appreciative. Cheers! --UU - natter 11:54, Mar 18

[edit] Ban patrol

Yeah, sorry for undoing Rabbi's archiving work, I honestly had no idea why it happened, I was just using the Ban Patrol script as normal. It also has the tendency to replace previously reported IP addresses with new ones, meaning that you can try and report 5 people and only one ends up appearing. Something to ask Spang about do you reckon? --ChiefdusticeJS 11:27, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Probably. Maybe the database might be lagging? Try a purge to see if that fixes it? MrN  11:31, Mar 18

[edit] UnSignpost 18th March 2010 (on time as always)

9001(bot)  11:48, Mar 18

[edit] Gay Pubs

Thanks for the nom and mine's a Babycham if you're offering, big boy. ;-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:59, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

I have said it before, but there is something deeply concerning about the ability Uncyclopedia has to turn otherwise heterosexual men in raving woofters. With that said, I shall get yours in right away as I'm sure you are keep to have something nice sliding down your throat this evening. :) MrN  11:03, Mar 19

I blame Olipro. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:12, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Our current Colonization

Currently, the Main Page link "For the glory of her majesty" goes to the heading "This week's Colonization". As we ain't doing one every week, I changed the name of the heading. So could you change the link to go to Uncyclopedia:Imperial_Colonization#Our_current_Colonization? Thanks (By the way, we're beginning Discordianism, and you're welcome to help out).  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  05:13, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Also I copied and pasted Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/Batman to Batman, and did the same with the talk pages. I have links in each to the other to make it easier for future generations who explore our greatness to check the history.  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  21:14, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Fort Knox is full of shit!?!

Dude! Here is a new UnNews you might want to edit-add to. Because it's about Fort Knox gold being a FED illusion. Please take look at UnNews:Fort Knox robbed, nothing to steal. Hope you're keeping well, bro! Cheers!--Funnybony  14:12, Mar 22

[edit] Discordianism vote needed quickly and member retirement

VOTE DISCORDIAN NOW: We need your vote! On both Creationism and Batman, colonizers who participated came to a consensus on a direction for the article. But on Discordianism, there's been more discord--or at least not a consensus. So we're resorting to (sigh) democracy. Go to Uncyclopedia_talk:Imperial_Colonization/Discordianism#Article_ideas and cast your vote!

You can vote for one or two, comment on as many as you like, but vote quickly--this is an eleventh hour effort, and we will hopefully have a direction in a few hours. I'll be checking the results sometime around 03:00 UTC of 25 March 2010.

ARE YOU RETIRED?: Also note that colonizers who haven't participated in any of the last three colonizations will be moved to the retirement list. Quite frankly, I'm doing this primarily because I have to post each of these notices by hand (I don't have a bot, and sure could use one), and it takes a long time to post to the pages of people who are inactive in IC and even on Uncyclopedia. If you're put on the retirement list and want back on the active list, simply post a request on the IC talk page.

KEEP CHECKING THE IC TALK PAGE: Many important decisions and updates are made and/or described on the IC talk page that are never posted on user talk pages.

POST COMMENTS ON IC TALK. As usual, if you post them on your talk page, I'll likely never see them.

WHY'S REPLACEMENT NEED: A special added reminder that I, Why do I need to provide this? aka  IC Buccaneer Admiral WHY??? (stratagems) , am only interim director of IC and need a replacement. My intention was to lead IC just long enough to get it revived, which is a major part of the reason I took the title Buccaneer Admiral instead of Admiral of the Fleet, which is the official title of the head of Imperial Colonization. I plan to abandon ship retire shortly after midnight (UTC) on Saturday, 17 April 2010. I would really like someone to work with me on the current colonization, and I will be happy to assist whoever replaces me during the transition--I do not plan to leave IC, only retire as head. If you're interested, post a note at IC Admiral of the Fleet needed.

Happy colonizations!  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  18:28, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] How to be absurdly funny and not just a content freak

Dude! The truth be known. I sporked HTBFANJS and made my OWN: How to be absurdly funny and not just a content freak. Hope you "get" it! Cause it pretty right on. Still got more work to do, by this is enough for one night. I hope some VFH (Drab) "content freak" doesn't screw it up or get offended. Fuck them! They're the ones we're talking about. Cheers--Funnybony  04:43, Mar 25

I like that article (lol), because I can laugh at myself, but a handful of "content-free" articles do get featured, such as some of Cajek's, and some of Hyperbole's what I call "Adventures in Daily Life" articles (I don't appreciate your reheating of my lasagne or some such thing), and a handful of other ones that you have to look for, and my favourite one is probably Samuel L. Vacuum. I'm also in the process of giving a particularly harsh review on an article full of content, and taking a little break. Still, congrats on your first half-feature, no hard feelings, and boy, do I feel weird butting into your talkpage MrN. ~ 15:04, Mar 26, 2010

Oh! Dear! THAT!? Why that has been totally revamped and Al nomed it on his own, without any sexual favors. But maybe too late once a feeding starts. But it's much better, well, more politically correct and polite. Take another look if you have a chance, at least the new intro. Cheers!--Funnybony  00:59, Mar 31 00:59, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] 'Scuse me

You would appear to not be here. Is that a long term thing, or just a few days thing? And will it stop you firing up the bot to deliver this? --UU - natter 15:06, Mar 25

Say, just realized you haven't edited here for a week. Hope you're OK!  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  02:12, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

N told me in an email that he had a new job and would be working. So I bet he's been busy trying to save money for a TRIP. No sweat.--Funnybony  14:40, Mar 26 14:40, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

Tell him if he comes back soon to work here I'll pay him a 20c piece. He'll have to pay postage.  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  18:09, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Hokay, thanks for the heads up Funnybony. Hope it goes well MrN. --UU - natter 14:44, Mar 29

[edit] UnSignpost 25th March 2010 (hand delivered for added flavour)

--ChiefdusticeJS 22:09, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] IC Replacement

As you may remember, I took over IC when I got volunteered by somebody and agreed to do it temporarily to get it moving. That's happened--we've had two successful colonizations, Creationism and Batman, the first of which was featured and the second which is currently nommed on VFH. We're working on our third, Discordianism, under my big cheesy leadership, and to give enough time to complete it and to find a suitable replacement, I've announced I'm retiring from the leadership position as of 17 April 2010.

My question is, how is my replacement chosen? Is it an admin decision, does IC do it by vote, do I decide (although even if I could I'd do it with the consensus of colonizers)?  Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  18:53, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] I may not be around much

We've had a death in the family, so I don't know when I'll be around for the next week, at least. Would you mind checking occasionally UnNews to see if everything's OK? Thanks. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 14:41, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Unhuffing

How would one (1) or several (lots of fingers) users go about reviving a huffed article? This came about when I saw that Ratmaster was deleating his/her pages, and saw the Non-huffable Kitten article, which seems fine for Uncy now, and Mn-z said it was deleted at one point. So the question, how to undelete a deleted page. Thanks. Aleister in Chains 15:24 29 3 mmx

[edit] File:Marysenude.jpg

Mr. N, could you please hack up (undelete) Image:Marysenude.jpg? If yes, thanks. If no, okaaay... 124.181.33.85 11:06, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] UnSignpost 1th April 2010 - Always on time

Friday, 04:45, Apr 2 2010 UTC

[edit] Hi theres

Despite your having set up a collaboration page, I brought this idea up again, since it is by far my best one. You're welcome to participate in setting up the office. It will not be a user group but rather an idea tank, to steer writing when a writer is stuck. But we talked about it last year. -- Random  Man 07:10, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] VFS

For your vote in VFS and as promised last time You have been awarded a Certificate guaranteeing you safe passage whilst inside those areas of Uncyclopedia under Zionist domination. Certificate also redeemable for one (1) free bagel at your nearest grocery - simply print out and present to the shopkeeper to claim your free bagel with the filling of your choice. Rabbi Techno

[edit] Gay Pubs

[edit] UnSignpost 4/8/10 - Oh hi Signpost.

Pleb/C/K/GUN • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:54, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] UnSignpost 15/4/10 - Yet another on time delivery.

--ChiefdusticeJS 20:34, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Grue

Why did you delete my edit to this page? I thought it was an improvement over a list of purely random ideas, because it shortened it by 2 and added a more original one. --Sbluen 04:59, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Anyways, since you're not on right now, I'm just going to make my edit again until you give a better explanation. --Sbluen 03:25, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Since MrN is currently not here permit me to make something clear to you for him. If an administrator deletes a page or reverts a contribution you make to a page and you wish to take issue with it then you wait for a reply from the administrator, or if they are not around you take it up with another administrator. You most certainly do not restore whatever was deleted and justify it through the absence of that admin, do it again and you will end up banned. I hope I am making myself clear. --ChiefdusticeJS 12:03, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Review

Hello, would you be so kind as to pee review an article I have been writing? I needed an early review and a few comments on the overall concept. It is here, if you are able to help. Thanks. Latin is for sissies 05:03, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Vote now for Colonisation

Hello ladies, gentlemen, and other,

As you may be aware we have now reached the point where April's Colonisation, Discordianism, has been successfully moved to mainspace, and we are currently voting on our colonisation for May.

As I have been press-ganged encouraged strongly to take the reigns of IC, I'm sending this out to remind all current and previous members of IC to vote on next months colonisation. Voting is taking place here as we speak. As of 1st of May I will be announcing the page that will get our tender mercies, so I encourage you to vote - or nominate - now.

Good luck, and may the farce be with you!

Tuesday, 03:35, Apr 27 2010 UTC

Discordianism has been added to VFH. Go, read, enjoy, vote. Wednesday, 09:45, Apr 28 2010 UTC

[edit] UnSignpost 1 May

Brought to you by fucking magic. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 10:18, 1 May 2010

[edit] Article Space

Howdy MrN. I have this article that I've done as a rewrite for the Tony Stark page, but I'm unsure how to go about it. Can I just copy and paste, or am I supposed to go through the whole VFD thing? --Matfen 09:19, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Since MrN is a little inactive at the moment, I'll answer for him. You can just copy and paste yours over; I have looked them both through and yours looks far better, and the text is spaced out. Just copy and paste, call it a rewrite, pay me a small gratuity and head home. --ChiefdusticeJS 09:22, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

I would normally ignore you out of fear for MrN bollocking both of us, but seeing as he's gone off somewhere, I'll go along with it. Oh thankyou, tahnkyo ChiefJusticeDS! I shall be sending my imaginary sister round shortly... --Matfen 09:30, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] You

This isn't going to be a thing about how you should return, or anything. Just a little thing to say that wherever you are, and whatever you're up to, I hope you're well. --UU - natter 12:51, Jun 7

[edit] Help!

Can you make this page any better:

The Twilight Virus

TELL EVERYONE!

--Gamma287 20:06, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Also can you stop touching me inappropriately. And where are your pants? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

[edit] The UnSignpost Is Not Dead!

A new UnSignpost issue, another template spammed onto your talkpage, enjoy! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 14:11, 24 June 2010

[edit] nightwish

I understand why you got rid of this page but i think something extremely funny could be done with the name, if you or one of your talented friends wrote a strong article it would fill a large hole in uncyclopedia Pireninja 08:34, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Just to let you know, if you want to increase the chances of someone writing the article you should try listing it here. List it in the correct place and one of our editors is far more likely to spot it. --ChiefdusticeJS 08:56, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] All the news that's unfit to print!

--ChiefdusticeJS 12:09, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] You thought I forgot?

	Thanks for voting Socky Uncyclopedian of the Year
	Mere words cannot express my gratitude, so I'm giving you this beautiful spinning sock star as well.

Thanks! Also, get back here, you old chap! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 14:53, 1 July 2010

[edit] Signpost: normal service resumed

Oh dear god, am I really doing this again? --UU - natter 10:51, Jul 9

[edit] Re one of your Top 10 of 2009 votes from January 2010

Dear Mr/Ms MrN9000, Greetings. I am the lawyer for Arthur C. Clarke's estate. Last summer, following the listing of an article on this website (henceforth referred to as "Uncyclopedia"), namely the article titled 2001: A Space Odyssey, as a featured article, I and my assistant began to prepare a copyright infringement suit against you, and were about to file it in December 2009 when both of us were attacked violently by the user MacMania, who was imprisoned for his central role in this infringement, but had apparently escaped custody to exact revenge against us. Needless to say, MacMania was once again taken into custody, but we lapsed into a comatose state. However, now that we have woken up, we have found out, much to our chagrin and dismay, that you have further encouraged such infringing actions by selecting 2001: A Space Odyssey as the number 2 article of 2009, and that England once again failed to make the World Cup final. We must, of course, take further action, and would like to notify you that unless Uncyclopedia's administrators take action, we will press the following charges: 1. continued support, encouragement, and flaunting of copyright infringement; 2. indirectly causing severe physical harm to me and my assistant; 3. potentially providing shelter to Paul the Octopus, whose psychic powers clearly drastically demoralized the English national football team against the German team, which is an unspeakably criminal act. We will drop these charges only if you agree to furnish us with a Paul the Octopus voodoo doll* for our perusal. Please let us know if this is possible. Your obedient servant (strictly in a figurative sense) James Steel c/o Alesha Phillips London EC4M 7EH UK * Must be complete with voodoo boiling water, voodoo olive oil, voodoo knife and voodoo fork.

Better late than never, or at least that's the thought. (I guess you might not be around right now, so maybe there is such a thing as being too late ...) (Sorry about the length of this, by the way.) Horribly belated thanks for voting 2001: A Space Odyssey into #2 of 2009! Sir MacMania GUN—[01:53 16 Jul 2010]

[edit] Another UnSignpost! Rejoice!

—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 09:59, 16 July 2010

[edit] Read all about it! The UnSignpost rides again!

--ChiefdusticeJS 13:52, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] You sir, are a tosser

And a wanker for thinking that RL is more important than us. Just hope you should know that. ~ 14:36, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

He impregnated me and then abandoned me.....hope he gets his.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

I thought you were into that sort of thing -- Prof Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 15:17, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] It's new and it's news! It's the latest UnSignpost!

—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 15:50, 5 August 2010

[edit]  :(

:( --Roman Dog Bird 06:07, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Ruddy hell! It's the UnSignpost

--ChiefdusticeJS 11:56, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Avast me hearties!

By the powers! this e'er be fer a reminder o' tha great, grand Imperial Colonization be startin' up again! Whether you be a sprog or a privateer we be expectin' ya ta come 'round an participate in this sweet trade lessen' you be a lily-livered squiffy, scallywag, or scurvy dog thar. Aye! ~ Buccaneer Happytimes.