User talk:Monika

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Ooops

Sorry. ~ T. (talk) 20:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

 :( don't hate me! (No problem - it wasn't clear or anything. You meant well, and thanks for that.) --Monika 20:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

edit Photoshops mean hippies!

Good job on those and all.

 ::blush:: Awww thanks. --Monika 01:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Have a cookie!

Newcookie Hinoa has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

For the quick revert to Idiocrates while I was taking out the trash. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 05:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

COOKIE! --Monika 05:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

edit A caution

Not to take things too seriously or anything (I hate it when people do that), but you might want to reconsider this edit. If I recall correctly, Nin is underage, so providing those links to him directly might not be entirely prudent, even on the anonymous internets. —rc (t) 18:36, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Will do. --Monika 18:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh wow, I am slow today. It took me until now to properly figure out what you actually said there. ::goes to edit edit::. (The original reasoning was he kept trying to get me to add Zelda and Peach porn to an article here...) --Monika 08:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Romania?

This being Uncyclopedia, I've taken the liberty of changing some pictures of where countries are located and making them larger or somehow weirder. WikiFan05 07:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

But poor Romania! --monika 07:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Nah, they won't mind. WikiFan05 08:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Are you sure? I've met a lot of Romanians in my day, and they don't seem to like being confused or combined with Serbia. They have their pride. --monika 08:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
If they don't like it, they can have another revolution! (But...will I be shot by a guard after singing the fourth word of The Internationale on trial?) WikiFan05 08:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Ugly Image Placement

Thanks for fixin' up my mess over on Sith Vicious. I noticed when I made the jump over to Firefox how horrible it looked, but was too lazy lacked the proper skills to fix it. That said, I'm quite impressed with your work (particularly, well, all of it). Just out of curiousity, have you ever read Good Omens? -- Imrealized fire away 22:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Heard of it but haven't read it yet. I have a terrible terrible backlog of books I need to read and haven't, and it's one of them. Would you recommend it? --monika 23:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Absolutely, if you go in for a bit o' satiric blasphemy (is there any other kind?). The Gaiman/Pratchett (not Pratchett/Gaiman as Americans would lead you to believe) dynamic works quite well. Terry Gilliam was all set to convert the whole thing to film, but it fell through (can you say "The Man Who Killed Don Quixote"?) and now a film script sits silently with the knowledge that the book is probably better anyway. If you read it and enjoy it, I'd also recommend James Morrow, who also treads on some sacred ground. Eh, just more books for the backlog (I'm still slogging through the final third of my collection — they buy much faster than they read). Well, that's enough parenthetical thoughts from me. Keep up the funny. -- Imrealized IMme 00:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I have a rather significant problem of buying DVDs faster than I can watch them. I feel your pain. --monika 00:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Random

Looks to me like you got the random thing right. Just in case, the correct way is - <choose> <option weight="xx">option 1</option> <option weight="yy">option 2</option> <option weight="zz">option 3</option> </choose>

Though because of the way the mediawiki software caches pages, you can't get a new option by just clicking the page title again. You have to purge the cache, which you can do by adding a {{purge|optional link text}} template to the page. Users going to the page for the first time will always get the random option appearing proberly, assuming it is set up correctly. Hope that helps! Spang talk 04:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Oddly, the thing seemed to start working by itself, for me and for people I had looking at it. But I'll probably throw in the purgey thing as well. --monika 04:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Typical! Totally wouldn't have started working if I hadn't made the effort to try and help make it work though ^_^ Spang talk 04:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
It was all you. ::thumbs up:: --monika 04:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Congrats!

Your article has been featured! Also, I've put one of your images on VFP, although it looks like it may need to be resized (a lot).--Anon32 talk 12:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Yeah congratulations on the Featured Article..... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Thanks! ('course it has to happen on the day I have no internet... ) --monika 23:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

edit Commander

Because you got your Super Smash Bro's Extreme Beach Volleyball featured, you are hereby Commander of the Order. You should've gotten this for previously for your Featured Article, in case you didn't know. Always looking to see people get credit where it's due. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 18:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Ah yes, thanks! --monika 06:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

edit On the cownting

Why did I put 7 instead of 5? I usually am so good at first grade math, and yet I gave your article a better score than it deserved. For that I deeply apologize (I don't even like the article!). Keep up the good work! (and I will most certainly keep up the bad work!) --Anyone 19:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

 :) No need to apologize. (Looks like you probably counted an against as a for.) --monika 19:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

edit I could do this all night.

GO TO HELL, UNCYCLOPEDIANS!!! -- 20:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

You sir/madam, are teh ghey. --Anyone 20:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

edit Explainsshit

This is like the most tempting spoiler ever. You think too much. Keep it up. Also, if you make Japan-France about 1.5 times as long I'll VFH it. The Fifth Samurai was what got me - David Gerard 21:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! I've been thinking of rewriting Japan-France for a while, but the proper inspiration hasn't hit yet. --monika 21:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

edit SSBX image

Image:SSBX.png - I want to adapt a version of this for the cover of the 2006 version of Zombie Bukkake, on the principle that repeating an earlier joke makes a running gag. Do you have the original file, or at least the image layer (no overlays), to hand? - David Gerard 15:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, if you have somewhere to stick 6MB of photoshop. --monika 15:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
If you can email it to that would be fantastic, if yer ISP doesn't choke on an email that big. Or just that layer if that's still too big. Thank you! - David Gerard 16:49, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
First attempt, saints preserve us - David Gerard 20:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
You're missing the layer that makes the trim on Jigglypuff's bikini. --monika 21:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
dam nice shots. how many did you make?

edit queery

i lost my virginity to a monika, was it you? - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 00:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

No, no it wasn't. Sorry. --monika 00:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

edit Don't worry, this has nothing to do with virginity

In honor of your revertions to my talk and user pages, I hereby give you this...useless thing. May it serve you well. What fowl(sic) knave would dare blank my jank?! What is this world coming to... --Anyone 15:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! --monika 16:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

edit Xmas Mail

Xmasmoosewreath Nothing says [[Insert religious or pagan holiday of your choice]] like getting drunk with a moose. So this year, why not savour a treasured Canadian tradition with a bottle of hooch, horns, hooves, and hypothermia? The drinks are on me. ~ Todd Crown Royal

--Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 15:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

edit Varg Vikernes

That's nice you are watching your articles, but please look what are you reverting. In this edit you've also reverted this. Szoferka 11:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

edit don't

please don't vandalize the work on interwiki

Who's vandalizing what now? You are adding a section to my article that looks ugly and doesn't add any content, so I'm removing it. --monika 01:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

edit Turing Test

Look familiar? I had a look at your rewrite and decided that since I was going to delete the old page anyway, we might as well put something in the gap... And this is definitely good enough for mainspace even if it's not finished yet. Maybe this'll give you some incentive as well...? --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

 :/ I kind of really wish you hadn't done that, because it's totally not good enough for the mainspace yet. But I'll take that as a hint to work on it. --monika 05:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Trust someone who's seen an awful lot of things that weren't ready - it is. Things don't have to be works of art before they go out there you know - it gives other people a chance to have a bit of input and maybe do things you wouldn't have thought of. But if you can't stand to have it there yet then fair enough I guess. Just promise me if you decide you can't be bothered to get to it soon then you'll put it in mainspace for someone else to finish...? I can pretty much promise no-one will try to delete it as it stands. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm perfectly fine with people helping it in its current state. I'm also strangely fine with the current setup where the mainspace article redirects to it. --monika 23:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
I was just kinda wondering if/when you were thinking of putting this into the mainspace? I'm a fan of the subject matter myself, and rather like the idea of nominating this for VFH at some point. It looks like it's almost finished to me, and the VFH vote might be rather fun... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 00:53, May 3
It's less than half finished. All that's there is the bare boring scientific description of the process, and I've barely touched on the history of robot espionage, which is intended to be most of the article.
Eh. I lie. It's maybe almost 2/3rds done, which is more than half. I've had health problems for a while now and it's impacted my... ability to think of words to write down to say things. There's probably a word for that but I can't think of what it might be. (I'm actually being serious about this.) It's also seriously impacted my abilities to think and also to get shit done; I've even taken this past year off from school. (PhD in AI/robotics which is about as complete and on hold as this article.)
I appreciate that Uncyclopedia is super important and all (also being serious about this) but my brain is broken and stuff, so it'll probably take some time. I actually do intend to finish this article (and have real life notes on it and stuff somewhere), probably next (unless I get coerced into writing another metal article on VFD), but yeah... I'm a stupid person.
If you know any users with encyclopedic knowledge of espionage and/or cold war history (or watches a lot of Get Smart) that would like to cowrite this thing, send them my way.
--monika 01:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough, I just thought it could go into the mainspace now, but that's obviously your call... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 01:22, May 3
If I die, you can put it up and then finish it off by cutting off suddenly and going into a few sections of things I've written on talk pages and stuff like that. And make sure everyone knows that I was planning on keeping the structure but replacing all the characters with characters from Megadeth. It can be my The Salmon of Doubt. --monika 01:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Megadeth? Oh, yea, you are "our" Megadeth author, so that would make sense I guess... Those dam guys over at VFD! I wish I could claim to have an encyclopaedic knowledge of espionage and/or cold war history, but I'm afraid I would fail the test... I really like your work though, although unfortunately I fear that much of it might not be fully appreciated by some of the readers, but hea, I guess that's not the point... I actually did 2 AI type modules on my degree, and I think I picked up on some/most of Turing Test, I wonder how many other people will... Sounds like you have plans for this article for the future, so I will leave you to get on with it, and look forward to the finished version. Enjoy. :-) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 01:44, May 3
Appreciation is for the weak. --monika 01:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Appreciation of articles all week? Me? Na, I was actually being sarcastic in lots of very clever subtle ways... But not really. Well you may not like the appreciation, but tough. You are appreciated so there! MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 02:04, May 3
Oh, I never said I wasn't weak. I'm pathetically weak. --monika 02:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

edit Just wanted to tell you...

...job well done on that License Note article. And why I'm at it, the Bleach one was pretty stellar too. Way too many anime articles turn into nothing but obscene nonsense. Here's to (broadcast) order! --Deep 23:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! --monika 04:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

edit Got to ask

Considering this a user adding site, and that is its point, why do you feel so threaten when someone adds to your article? *is just curious as you have deleted things several times from several people and some of it was really good*

I do really enjoy your bleach/kubo tite stuff though, although i never heard of your others although i am off to read them now ^_^

I don't feel threatened. The #1 complaint I hear about the Bleach article is that it is too long. The #2 complaint I hear is that it starts to wander, especially at the end. If a newly added section is well-written and good, I will leave it, and even put in the effort to fix it up. But in light of the complaints (especially since the article is currently up for VFH and people are voting against it because it is too long, I'm more likely to cut than keep. I cover this (both anti and pro) in more detail in the discussion. --monika 03:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
P.S. I'm curious what deletions you consider really good.
P.P.S. It's not a "user adding site". It's a "user editing site".

I went back looking for it but it seems my experience of pedia is very limited as i can't seem to find that reference to the first captain of the 13 squads, you know the bit that refer to him as someone from another era and made jokes of his age? *it really was very good and made me laugh, i don't know who added it though*

And in all honestly, i like the length of your article, and it is a well written intelligent piece. A 'tongue in cheek' short of thing that as you can see, many seem to enjoy. I honestly do hope it grows longer, and that you do make more references to individual characters. It is a truly wonderful read ^_^

 :) I'd argue brevity is wit but you probably wouldn't take me seriously, as we are discussing a 4500+ word article, of which 3600+ are mine. May I suggest that effort spent making a good article longer might be better spent making a short article fuller, or a bad article better, or a new article? (It's like Tite tried to explain to reporters during the sweatshop scandal - a little helps a lot more over there.) --monika 15:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

edit ^_^

Personal tools