User talk:Miley Spears/Archive 2

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Archive 1

Please Post Messages Below

Captain Obvious says, "Please post messages below."


I meant to tell you, it's tradition to despoil somebodies page after they archive! Pup t 07:22, 1/09/2009

And you deserve this

GoldenShower Rejoice, Miley Spears! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Excellent review on POOF - detailed on the points it needed to be detailed, gave a good overall idea on where it can be taken. Good job. You're wrong, of course, because it was a perfect article, but otherwise good job.

The links at the bottom of the page refer to two different places - one which was a really misguided forum on here, and the second was to a blog that this was heavily based upon. There are some... glitches in the grammar of the letter that are transplanted directly from the original. (In fact I found that both of the sources that I used were funny in a very black humour way, which is why this came about the way it did.)

The "How can you help" section is the area that needs the most work. Agreed. Also the "as the kids are calling it" stuff was a later addition to the article. You're right, it doesn't work, and it's being axed.

I hate images going left-right-left because I have a very textual base to my articles. Left justified images... actually, read this review as it's explained in here. I wouldn't normally have that many images, except, of course, for that storyboard idea. But that does need a good lead-in... suggestions?

The final two things are the "obscenititties" and the "illetarite" jokes... Did you notice the MS underline on the first one? Please tell me you saw it but it didn't really register that it didn't belong there. That's the idea I was working toward. The second one was a cheap gag, and it actually got a few positive comments. I wasn't sure if I liked it or not, but the first time this was up for VFH that seemed to capture the attention of the... less subtle voters.

I like your humour and your way of looking at things. I'd love to have your touch in here as well. Pup t 08:29, 1/09/2009

Thanks for the award! :)
I read what you said in the review, and I see your point about putting pics all on the right. In magazines, the text is usually fully justified, while here it's not. I still prefer them on both sides, but can see it's good to be careful to watch placement. But I do think your putting them all on the right works very well here--it's making it easy for those folk who can't read. The rest is, as always with humor, a matter of opinion. I don't think I said this in the review, but as I'm new here, I'm only reviewing things I like (I saw a longtimer thrash someone's review of their article just because the reviewer was a noob). I may read through half a dozen submissions before I pick one. I don't have an idea for a leadin right now, but will think about it. That first pic would be fine if I and probably others hadn't seen it so many times. :) DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 22:09, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
Where's the longtimer/n00b discussion you're talking about? Pup t 22:41, 1/09/2009
I wish I could remember. But shortly after I started here I was looking through Pee Reviews to learn how to do them. I saw one where the writer basically said "Who the hell are you, Noob, to tell me how to write?" It wasn't worded that way, but that was the idea. I figured for the article writer to talk that way, it must have been someone who wasn't a noob, but can't prove it. Sorry I don't remember more! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 22:46, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
It's a rarity, from my experience. Although I've had a couple of the old-timer's have a go at me over the last couple of months. Personally, don't care - I have always said that PEEs are 90% opinion (in fact I think I said that to you not long ago), which means no matter what is said in there, by that token it is always accurate. Where the problem lies is in wether or not it's helpful. So my reviews are always "What I would do..." and "One option you have is..." and I rewrite parts of it in my mind, and the stuff I can't quite work out I'll mention, and give half-hearted options, but always throw it back to the originator. What does boil my bunny is when someone reviews, and rather then just give feedback go in and do a partial or major re-write. Pup t 22:54, 1/09/2009
I did one Pee Review where the writers liked it (there were two primary ones) and suggested I rewrite it myself if they didn't get around to it. I haven't done it yet, because I want to give them first shot. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 23:02, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
I wouldn't do that. So far I've done only a few rewrites, Number bases, White Folks, Swimming, and Pawn shop. Although theremay have been one or two others that I've forgotten about. Number bases is the best of them, and that's about the fail at VFH. White Folks was to try and clean up all the ugly racism and make it funny, which it still only half is, Swimming was just really annoying me so most of what I did is reformat it and get rid of some of the worst excesses. (Somebody really wanted it to say that Gareth Kean was a Pervert though, and kept reverting, so I threw that into Six Hats.) And Pawn Shop was a stub I extended when I was first learning how to format and trying to find my comedic feet. And I nearly forgot 4Kids, which I started to redo and then stopped because I didn't really know the topic anyway - just hated it. At the same time I've written a bundle of new things, 3 of which have become FA, including Psyché, which I should never have done the accent on the e because it's a bastard to write!
You have a really good voice. Write more original stuff - Dead puppy was a really good piece. Despite the concept of killing puppies. Killing puppies is never the answer. (If I get someone to huff the puppy huffing article, then that becomes a huffing huff. So is that a huff squared? Would that then be a kwarter?) Pup t 02:29, 2/09/2009
Too much huffing math! But on the article they suggested I rewrite, it's a topic no one knows anything about anyway. So I'm as not qualified as anyone. And congrats on Psyché! You've done a lot here. Have you edited other wikis? DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 02:38, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
No. Well, not completely true - I've messed up an article on wikipedia that I had been targeting for a spork, and realised that the wikipedia has some major issues, but that was after being in here, and as a direct result of being in here. I used to be a mildly successful creative writer, and I've done a little html/css/javascript/web design training. But for the most part I was recently unemployed and bored. Pup t 09:05, 2/09/2009

I'm new here

Thanks for welcoming me. I edit Wikipedia and other wikis but this looks much funnier. Is the format here like there? Why do I need to provide this?

Editing articles, making links, all that wiki programming stuff is basically the same. But people here tend to tease more than there, so even if someone sounds like they're mad, they may be kidding. Really check out what I posted on your user page. It helped me a lot! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:50, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
I saw you're with the Colonization project and tried to sign up. But it wouldn't let me join. Can I sign up through you? Why do I need to provide this? 03:56, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
You sign up directly. I don't know why it wouldn't let you apply. I'll check and see what I see. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:01, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
Before you sign up, you might want to read User:SysRq/Imperial_Colonization. I'm not sure why you don't see an edit button--or do you? If you do, click on it. If not, maybe they have something that makes wait a few days before applying. I had to wait 4 days before I could edit some articles here. I hope this helps! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:08, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
Ok I guess I can wait. I'll just edit randomly. Why do I need to provide this? 04:12, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
Great! I'm signing off now, so have fun and see you soon! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:16, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
See you. Why do I need to provide this? 04:18, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
Imperial Colonization is semi-protected. You should be able to access it around 4-5 days after you first registered. ~Jewriken.GIF 22:45, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools