User talk:Miley Spears/Archive 1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Welcome!

Hello, Miley Spears, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you:

If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but it certainly is a fun and easy way to express your creativity. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Miley Spears/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If you want to write and don't know where to begin, consider contributing to Uncyclopedia's current colonization of the week, a group writing project to improve a single popular article. Anyone is welcome to contribute, so come help out!

If the current colonization doesn't suit your fancy, then browse our rewrite and idea categories. We have lots of articles just sitting around for someone to improve, so don't be afraid - dive right in!

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. Again, welcome! Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk)

Thanks for the welcome! Miley Spears 04:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


edit You are now adopted

As the adoptee, you are entitled to do whatever you feel like. That's my rule fr my adoptees, which I just made up. Lemme know if you have questions. --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 18:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much for adopting me! Miley Spears 03:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

edit lol

lol miley--Fallopian 06:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

I guess for this site lol is a good thing. :) Miley Spears 06:58, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
yeah,pretty much.--Fallopian 07:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

edit Award from UN:REQ

Thumbs up2

This user created Ricardo Montalban, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)


Thumbs up2

This user created Brooke Shields, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)


MadMax 18:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Wow! I got an award from Uncyclopedian of the Year 2007! I guess that means I'm special. Or not. Really, thanks! Miley Spears 00:42, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
And I got another one! Now I'm really maybe special! Miley Spears 23:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

edit Salty Chocolate Balls

I don't want you to get the impression that I'm coming down on you or anything. On the contrary, I think you're a great addition to IC, so here's a cookie.

Newcookie Somebody has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Also, I'm terrible at thinking of headers for talkpages. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN21:48, 6 Aug

Don't worry you're fine! And thanks for the cookie! Remember I'm a n00b here but I've edited the not-funny wiki for a long time. Everybody here's been sweetness and light compared to how some people treat you there! Miley Spears 22:13, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

edit It's Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band, sit back and let the evening go (toot toot toot toot)

Hey, just wanted to say that some of the stuff you added to the IC is rather good. However, while this Goddess stuff might make fascinating theological discussion, it doesn't really suit on an article who's primary purpose is to make people laugh. So I hope you don't mind the changes I made. -- dismal Ape (model) (Riot Porn) 02:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I kept the Satan as Goddess stuff out, and tried merging my other hopefully funny stuff with your funny stuff and other people's funny stuff. I hope you don't mind that I put a couple of your short comments in quotes. The tone of the article is primarily encyclopedic, and I think your deviations from that are much funnier with some authority figure saying them. Miley Spears 03:49, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

edit UN:N

Don't ever take that personally. It's a policy here at Uncyc as well as a running joke. It's usually applied to vanity cruft, but it's also applied to facts. We aren't real worried about facts you see. You'll get the hang of the place soon enough. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN16:49, 7 Aug

All right thanks! I'm used to working on the not-funny wiki, and there it's used as a technical term that means "Me and this other user are going to do 200 reverts of each others edits and get half the admins pissed at us and then one or the other of us will get censured or banned." Miley Spears 16:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Editing Wikipedia is a mistake. I did it once, and now I have an extra testicle. -- dismal Ape (model) (Riot Porn) 17:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

edit Noob

Hi, actually I didn't nominate you, I think you got the wrong guy, but I certainly wouldn't complain if you won (from a quick glance over your contribs). As it happens we're both nominees who were cancelled due to supposed ineligibility, so I feel your pain. If it's any comfort, I set up a support group for the dozens of victims who suffer this tragic fate every year - together we will find strength and revenge will be ours! mwaha mwaha MWAHA MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! *cackles*

I'm not bitter --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 21:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 21:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
If you're talking about the correction I made to my post on your talk page, not at all! I can't think of anything I said to you that I meant to be sarcastic. If you hadn't let me know, I probably never would have known. :) Miley Spears 21:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
lol, no, I meant the post in general, I thought you were venting spleen at being made ineligible but mistakenly believing I was involved in some way. I'm very much against that "noob" rule, it should be to do with how long the user has been an active consistent member of the community, not how long ago they signed up. I happened to join and spend a weekend writing articles, but then was busy with (real) work for a month and have been editing more since my contract finished.
I'm not bitter--El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 22:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Also, I'm a detail freak too, so please don't leave on account of differing tastes in comedy (if you are indeed thinking of doing so) - just check out some of Guildy's articles out, there is definitely a niche for obsessive perfectionist types around here. --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 22:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
So now I'm an obsessive perfectionist type? What are you saying?! OK it's true. I guess after writing serious articles for so long my stuff sounds like take offs of serious articles. That's because it is, you Detail Freak! :) Miley Spears 00:36, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Actually I'm not saying that, I was just assuming that given another comment I read further down the page. What I was really saying is that there is a niche here for whatever comedy you want to do so don't worry about any friction you may have with anybody regarding personal taste, that's the nature of a wiki like this. "Obsessive perfectionist" for some strange reason sounded more flattering and positive in my head than it does when i read that sentence out loud again :p --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 00:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I think I like being called an Obsessive Perfectionist. I think I'll add that to my user page. Miley Spears 01:13, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
lol, I'm a definite detail freak, so it's cool with me. Also, apparently you're on for the Noob trophy again so I put it back on your page, DON'T LET THE NASTY PEOPLE TAKE IT AWAY AGAIN OK? --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 15:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Actually I took it away last time, but that's not the point. --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 15:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

edit What is a 69, exactly?

I'm not that familiar with the term. You mean the sex position? Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Exactly. Two people "eat each other" at the same time. Somebody thought the head-to-tail/tail-to-head position looked like a 69. I don't know why they didn't think it was 96. Miley Spears 21:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, I like the idea of a "first 69" and it involving the fruit of the tree of knowledge. But by saying how it's described in the Judeo-Christian and Islamic faith separately and then using a term which you seem to be claiming is only applicable on the Islamic one, it's like the article is choosing Islam above Judaism/Christianity. But the way I rephrased it allows all Abrahamic religions in the picture, because it's not like it's a race to eat the fruit first. To be interpreted as a 69, they just have to eat it together, which "Eve ate a piece of the fruit and Adam took a bite as well" seems to imply. I'm just saying, making it less specific will ensure more people understand the humour. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Socky has a point. You need to wash the Wikipedia off ya. Detail<Funny. If you bog the article down with too much unneccessary detail, it becomes less funny. Still, you're doing a great job so don't quit on us! -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN22:03, 7 Aug
I think you're both very funny people. But for this I disagree. It's set up as a comic build with two parts:
God then bet Satan that he couldn't get Adam and his sex-changed clone sister Eve to eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge. To protect His bet, God had previously told Adam, "thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." (Gen. 2:17). This became known as the First Divine Lie.
Satan, on the other hand, told the always-naked couple the naked Truth. He said, "Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil." (Gen. 3:4-5). According to Christian and Jewish scripture, Eve ate first, then Adam ate. According to the Qu'ran, the naked Adam and Eve both ate at the same time. This became known as the First 69.
The line "This became known as the First Divine Lie" builds to the comic release of "This became known as the First 69". If it's left as two people eating fruit, the reader's going to have to think, "What does that have to do with 69? Oh, I get it, ha ha." But with it being specified that they are naked and "ate at the same time," the punchline hits with a, well, punch.
However, if you want, the line "According to Christian and Jewish scripture, Eve ate first, then Adam ate." could be cut without losing the joke. But for Christian and Jewish readers (or anyone who's heard the Bible's version of the Adam and Eve story), I think it's funnier with both lines. Miley Spears 22:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
How about this? "A still-naked Adam and Eve could no longer subdue their urges and they started eating the fruit like vicious wild animals. This became known as the First 69." It may not be exactly like the scriptures, but it's more funny and less detailly. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion, but how is that 69? 69 is two people eating each other simultaneously (that is, having simultaneous oral sex with each other), and that says they're eating fruit. The intended joke was that the reader assumes they're eating fruit, but.... Miley Spears 23:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I think we could cut out a lot of specifics and not lose the joke, that's what I'm getting at. The "First Divine Lie" line works all on it's own, it doesn't need the follow up which, quite frankly, isn't as funny anyways. And it begins to drift away from the point again. Plus, unlike Wiki, nobody reads Uncyc for facts. We don't need to be that specific with the historical stuffs. Just a general line like "A still-naked Adam and Eve both ate of the apple. This became known as the First 69". would work just as well without getting mired down with needless distinctions. In any case, the whole "First 69" joke isn't all that funny anyways IMO. Did I say that already? It's been a long day, forgive me. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN22:31, 7 Aug

If people think it's not funny, we can cut it out. I'd rather it be gone completely than to have a not-funny version substituted. Miley Spears 23:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Raping your literary and comedy skills since 2002.--Almost Sir Random Crap
"Rape me, my friend." -- Nirvana
96 would be the most awkward sexual position imaginable. Really, I don't know what you'd hope to achieve set up like that... --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 21:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't know what it would achieve, but it might be worth a try. Miley Spears 22:20, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah I guess it would be a decent novelty position once in a while (also I'll stop posting things now since your talk page is rapidly getting out of control...) --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 22:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

edit An unsolicited sexual advance

Hi there! I took a good look at God this morning, and made a few minor edits and tweaks. But overall I have to say that it's looking very good so far, and we have mainly you to thank for it. I think we just about enough on the Genesis/Jesus angle now, and I'd like to see us move this forward into more contemporary times. I'm hoping you'll continue to grace us with your contributions. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN16:29, 8 Aug

Thanks! I never thought about moving God to modern times because I thought He died on the cross. Wasn't there a cover of some magazine years ago that said He was dead? We could use that. I'll be back to the article in a couple days I have to take a break from it. And I'll be gone from computer most of the rest of this weekend. Miley Spears 16:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh, aye. We definitely want to take it into modern times as well. Our overall goal is to portray God as a gambling sports fan, so we're going to need to have some examples of actual sports, not just references to a mythical Angels vs. Devils soccer match (which is great btw). ApeonThursdays has got an idea or two already, so perhaps when you get back you could get with him and see where you want to take it. Have a good weekend! -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN16:39, 8 Aug

edit That first day will kill ya

Check out Forum:Noob eligibility requirements Not everyone believes someone should be disqualified on the basis of one day! Binky The WonderSkull 01:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I'll check it out. Thanks! Miley Spears 18:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

edit You might be interested to know

That I renommed God for VFH. The first nomination wasn't given a proper chance IMO. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN23:09, 19 Aug

Thanks. Miley Spears 04:17, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

edit VFD tip

Those votes with the grey padlock beside them? The ones with the "kept" comment from an admin in the comments box? You don't need to vote on them - they're already closed. Just so you don't waste your time in future. --UU - natter UU Manhole 16:05, Aug 20

Thanks I missed that! Please forgive my n00bness! Miley Spears 16:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

edit I notice you've been "messin' up" a bit on VFH

Whether you've been failing to sign your votes, breaking numbering, not numbering at all, or anything else like that, I'm here to give you a warning and some recommended reading. Really recommended. Read that and please learn how to do things right from now on. Thank you. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:49, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

That's weird. When I first voted about two weeks ago, I posted I hoped I did it right. I got a note saying I did it better than many of the old-timers See Here. I just checked; the one who told me that was you. Now you say I'm doing it wrong. I'm confused! Miley Spears 19:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
I learned the format is different for different types of voting. What's right one place is wrong somewhere else. Thanks! Miley Spears 02:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

edit Defaultsort and Brooke Shields

DEFAULTSORT sets the default sort key when showing the article listed in categories. It's useful for people's names. In the case of Brooke Shields, setting the sort key to "Shields, Brooke" sorts her in the letter S of her various categories (Actors, Goddesses, etc). --Dr. Chuck 01:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Miley Spears 03:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

edit VFH

Hey... try and keep down the chatter on the VFH. For some reason if you respond to voters on something you have written then people either vote against or don't vote. (I'm not completely innocent of that either, to be honest, but if I have a question I'll usually go to the user's talk page - not that you can avoid it with an IP.) And good luck! Pup t 00:50, 26/08/2009

Thanks for the tip! On my last comment, the voter who just used a number doesn't have a user page. But I'll remove my comment. Miley Spears 00:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
That's cool. I have a feeling that may be partially what knocked Vitiligo out of contention, and almost hurt What I did on my hols. You're allowed to be proud, but you have to wait until other people have done what they want, and then just casually wander in and go "Yeah, I guess I'll vote for it now" while inside you're screaming "VOTE FOR THIS, YOU BLIND WANKERS!" Pup t 03:04, 26/08/2009
Stop reading my mind! :P Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Fine... I'll just go back to reading your e-mail again.... hmmm, so you are interested in having a longer penis, are you? Pup t 03:17, 26/08/2009
Yes, but only in a glass display case. Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
you keep your BOB (battery operated boyfriend) in a glass case? Now that takes gratification to new heights! Pup t 03:48, 26/08/2009
Not to get off on the subject, but thanks for setting the votes on UnNews:Police_shoot_pet_Chihuahua_dead_after_giving_it_warning to read as "Score: # rounds into fido." That's funnier than my article! :) Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Flattery will get you... Well, not everywhere, but where ever it gets you will be fun! Pup t 05:27, 26/08/2009

edit Not looking good

I'd say that this is destined to a DNF status. That's not always a bad thing, as it means that you have a better idea of where the benchmark is and you can get some feedback from it. Matt and Trey, the creators of South Park, brainstorm their shows by throwing ideas at each other, not for the purpose of writing a show, but in order to make each other laugh. Keep a note of those who have voted for, and those who have voted against. The ones who abstain or vote against will give you the best feedback, so be ready to ask a few questions, and then throw a few things at them and see if they laugh. Pup t 07:27, 26/08/2009

What's DNF? Thanks for your suggestions. Also can it still be on the front page as an UnNews article? I can always change the date so it sounds current. The article it's based on came out in June anyway. Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
"Did not Finish" - although in this context it was referring to "Did not feature." And UnNews is a law unto itself. We can have an article about rape that is destroyed completely in VFH, but still makes it onto the front page because of whim of an admin. (And I'm still a teensy bit bitter about that one.) Pup t 22:05, 26/08/2009

edit Miley

Well, I'm glad to know that someone can be a huge fan of Miley Cyrus AND have a good sense of humour! Concerning your translation, that sounds like a lame porn movie that could be entitled "fessées pour lycéennes". WiiKend 07:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! From what I hear, it is a lame porn movie. Also how would the title be capitalized? Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 22:25, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

edit Fist-fucking

Thx for your very detailed pee review I think a lot of the things you said could really improve the article (which was a translation from french as you certainly have noticed). I'll try to find the time to make the corrections you suggest but feel free to do them if you want (except maybe the "narrow-minded' part which is the 1st part of the "open-minded" joke at the end of the article). WiiKend 07:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Glad if it helped! But I do think the "open-minded" joke at the end will be equally funny without the early narrow-minded reference that I think hurts a potentially very good article. Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 22:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
And don't forget either of you that reviews are 90% opinion... I keep thinking that we should have a huge <opinion> at the start and </opinion> at the end. Pup t 22:40, 27/08/2009
I think you meant to say most reviews are 90% opinion. Mine are 100% truth. :D Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 22:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I concede... 10% of the time they are correct all the time! Pup t 03:42, 28/08/2009

edit Brooke Shields

Good spork... I will end up voting for it, but I'll give it until tomorrow... Just curious. Why didn't you mention the fact that she played a desperate burlesque performer in Cabaret who can't get her man? Pup t 22:21, 27/08/2009

Only because I ran out of jokes by the time I got to the On-stage productions part. I cut out a whole bunch of not-funny stuff after my Pee Review. And thanks for promising to vote! Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 22:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
It's okay... looking at how they brushed over it in the Wiki article as well makes this more poignant. Pup t 03:43, 28/08/2009

edit On Pedobear

As long as your working on the article, (meaning it doesn't go without 7 days without an edit) an admin will not huff it. If you really want to make sure that it doesn't get huffed, I'd recommend moving it into userspace while your working on it. --Mn-z 04:49, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I'd be interested in helping. I'll post suggestions on the article talk page. Binky The WonderSkull 18:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Great! I'd love your help! Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:36, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

edit Thank you!!!

Personal tools
projects