# User talk:Mhaille/archive20

## Good Morning

The missus was just making toast - want some? RabbiTechno 10:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

You got baked beans with that? ~ 15:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Melons? Or maybe a peach... --

## comment

I agree with you completely re your thoughts at Sad State of Uncyclopedia. i just added some comments which you may find interesting, at Uncyclopedia:How_To_Be_Funny_And_Not_Just_Stupid#The_.22.40.23.24.25.5E.26.2A.22_Rule:_Being_Crass_or_Tasteless_Doesn.27t_Automatically_Make_Everything_Funny, and also at Uncyclopedia_talk:How_To_Be_Funny_And_Not_Just_Stupid#comment_on_humor_and_level_of_text. just wanted to let you know. feel free to write. thanks. --Sm8900 16:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

## what the fuck~!

You cannot remove my page, never! You'll be doomed, I'm going to plant an atomic bomb in your ass. >:( Kiewzhenyi 17:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Following the kind words left above, could you set a range block? We got numerous socks from this gentleman. ~ 17:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Ya and you are a dick... this is like supposedly a free article site. Matty Babes is credible, maybe do more research nextime and unhuff his site. Thankyou

Thankyou for your kind words. I have no idea what you mean about "a free article site"....Uncyclopedia is a satire site, where people write articles in the style of Wikipedia, but with humour. --

## Oh Thank Christ

No, don't worry, I haven't suddenly found Jesus...but thank fuck you finally blocked IP 203.61.120.169...I've been clearing up his little 'accidents' for nearly an hour! RabbiTechno 23:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

--Roflnova 08:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

## You lied?

You have more talks than me! And also your page is more complex and interesting. --Xaerun 09:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

LIED is a bit harsh. Economical with the truth sounds much fairer.... --

## Goatse

Now, before you start drooling, can you please unprotect Goa Tse? It really shouldn't have been protected that long. In all likelihood, sannse is going to paddle your ass for that. Danke. -- — 20:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

The leather paddles? Or the one with the metal studs? --

## Uncyclopedia email?

I'm (trying) to start a new column in the vain of Ask Cthulhu, called Ask Dr. Hypochondriac. However, under the current plan I need an email address at Uncyclopedia, in order to receive the "Dr. Hypochondriac's" letters. Not knowing how to create one, I've come to you. --Acolyte MUN RA My cat is better than Benson harass stalk 04:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Then again, do you think I could get away with it if I just used my own Yahoo! email? Or would that ruin the mystique of authenticity? --Acolyte MUN RA My cat is better than Benson harass stalk 04:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Why don't you sign up for a free one at gmail or hotmail....something with a fitting name for the spoof character. That way you can actually pick up the emails, AND make it into part of the humour of the page. --

## Recycling & Nazism

How are you my friend? Yes, I know what a subject/headline to have to look at. Anywho, I know I haven't been a contributor in a while, but I'm going to do a rewrite of my Recycling article without all that Nazi crap. Is there some way we can put Aaaaaaaaaaaaasf's version and mine to a vote? See User talk:Aaaaaaaaaaasf. I just don't think Recycling, Russia, Communism, Nazis and Family Guy need to be in every article, much less the ones I wrote. More cleverness is needed around here not more references to WWII and pop culture. Thank you for your time sir.-- 19:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

## Mhaille, me ol' mucker

Wonder if, should you have the time, you could take a look at the article I knocked up yesterday - especially with regard to the 'promo' pic which, despite it being second draft, I'm still not entirely happy with. Any suggestions (for image and article)? RabbiTechno 20:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

## Apology

Even though my block has expired by now, I'd still like to apologize for the serial sockpuppetry I engaged in last night. It didn't occur to me that it was harmful. I'm sorry. --Acolyte MUN RA My cat is better than Benson harass stalk 17:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry in itself is above such polarities as "good" and "evil", it comes down to the reason behind its use. Of course, sockpuppetry can be used to abuse the system, voting for and against featured images, or articles, or supporting individuals for "awards". Thats why we treat it the way we do. Welcome back.... --

## Funny that Shit Up

Hello again. I've done some work to funny up (in my opinion) Recycling. What do you think of it? I know it's not polished, but I took out all that Nazi stuff... Your opinion matters to me, and to anyone who has a pulse around here so I look forward to your comments here; Talk:Recycling.

## Hello, USERNAME, and welcome to the non-automated Thank You messaging system!

Forgive the awfully mechanical introduction, I swear this Thank You is entirely personal, spare this introductory sentence. I'm running out of personalized-message-juice, so I'll cut the bullshit. Thanks for the vote on UotM, I seriously hope one day you become a B'Crat. Though the job appears purely cosmetic, there's the low expectations and lack of respect that naturally comes with the job, a lack of respect you so truly deserve. Thanks, again. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

## Monthly Awards

Can you unprotect it so I can update those? Otherwise ZB and Jim will never get their 15 minutes....~ 09:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

...Or you could do it yourself! ~ 14:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Maybe I could.....maybe I couldn't.... --
you might get it]. ~ 14:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

## One Side of Phone Conversation

Hello again. I'm working on Titian right now. I'm trying to do a section called "One Side of Phone Interview Concerning This Article" and I need something to intersperse between what I am saying (what is visible) like some kind of charlie brown's teacher voice... I don't want what the actual interviewer is saying to be visible but I think it's tough to interpret the humor (?) without anything between what I am saying (I know this sounds convoluted, see Titian to see what I mean. Since your my go to guy on all things format etc, I thought you could help. Thank you, and if none of it's funny, let me know.-- 20:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

## Concerning Sodomy

I'm would like to link part of a headline to jump back to a previous part of the article. In this case "One Side of Phone Conversation Concerning Previous Summation" I would like that to be linked to earlier reference of Sacred and Profane Love. Is that possible? Oh and I will put it farther down in the article if necessary to make the jump visible...-- 17:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey dude, this User:Flyingfeline who doesn't know me because I've been gone for six months huffed Boethius and I just started on it yesterday! I asked him to restore it, but he is probably busy not researching who's articles he is fucking with. If your around can you bring it back. Thank you. I will be doing more glorious work on it today.-- 14:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

I believe its a she. I've moved a copy of the article to your user space to allow you the freedom to continue working away from the mainspace area. As soon as you think its complete let me know and I'll move it to mainspace. --

## Help Requested

I've put a help template on my article: Most Haunted, but nobody seems to be able to tell me about it. Can you help me out with it please? Please post your answer in my user talk page please. --Razorflame 15:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Noel Coward quote and other small fix-ups. It's my first actual non-UnNews article, and I want it to go off with a bang. --Razorflame 16:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

No worries....we'll see what we can do to knock it into shape. Any ideas for images? --

I believe that one should be of Yvette in the beginning with the words, "You are HOT!" written above it like in a yearbook (the thing girls do). I'll think up of more soon. --Razorflame 16:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Adopt me? --Razorflame 17:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

But what would your REAL parent think? :) Sure....I've not adopted someone for a while.. --

Again, thanks for the awesome picture...I'll try to get some more pictures in the meantime... -Razorflame 18:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Also, please check User:Razorflame/Ideas and tell me if you think any of those ideas would be good ideas for an article or UnNews? Thanks, -Razorflame 18:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Is there anything I have to do in order to get the -~~~~ to use the sig page? -Razorflame 18:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

You need to click on Preferences (top right) and add the following where it says "nick" - {{User:Razorflame/sig}} --

Nice dude! Thanks for the help!  :) Maybe I'll be able to help you too someday :) -Razorflame 18:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Ban Kko please? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC) I just reverted a vandalist act.

What do you think of the changes that I've made to Most Haunted today? I think that that is going in the right direction now....what do you think? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Nice dude! Great work with the table....I'll continue on with the table now, maybe you could flesh out some good ideas for possible future episodes?? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh, ok. I forgot to put in a <tr> before the new row...thanks for pointing that out to me :) -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

## Seriously, what the fuck is going on around here now?

Did some new rules regarding new articles get established? I mean, yeah I've been gone, and no one knows me now, and I guess that means I don't get any respect fromt the noobs, but really, who are these admins watching every move...?!-- 18:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Claudius, the reason I posted that was because I thought you were just another person who was going to just post crap. I had no knowledge that you've been around here longer than I have, for I have just joined this site. Sorry for the mix-up. -Razorflame 18:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Claudius, as far as I am aware nothing has changed with regards to the construction tag. FlyingFeline hasn't been around for about 6 months (basically since she was opped) so maybe she's just getting back into the swing of things. I moved a copy of the article to your userspace, simply because that's how I usually work. Allows me to build up the framework of the article before it is unleashed upon the world. If you feel inspired, I could do with some help with this incidently...
Other than that, its great to see you back and active again. We've missed you. :) --
I'm looking at this Snark article. It's good, but I'm going to have to study the Wikipedia article before I contribute. Your always writing the hard stuff! :) -- 22:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Maybe this might get your creative juices flowing? ;) --
It ceartainly got my 'juices' flowing... I sporked your pr0n for this: HowTo:Pick Up a Nymphomaniac, hope you don'tmind. 22:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

## Indeed.

Men is what we are... except the mongoloids.

We Are Devo 15:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

## Fecal astrology

The actual name for divining the future through the examination of turds is, as you are doubtless well aware, scatomancy. Funny how you never see old pikey women doing that at the fair - and you wouldn't want to cross their palm with silver afterwards either. You might want to cross the road though. RabbiTechno 19:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Great title, just a shame it was only a single line..... --
A most interesting conversation, hope you two lads don't mind if I 'butt' in... 19:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Mhaille's a lad? Damn, I've been grooming in vain...RabbiTechno 19:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
That's what you always say, but you're fooling no one. --
So sorry to disappoint... Furthermore I have been a student of Scatomancy for quite some time, so if you are ever in need of a good illustration on the subject, I would be much obliged. =) 19:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
No shit? RabbiTechno 19:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Indeed =) One should check out UnScripts:Secrets of Uranus if one were so inclined. 19:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

## Most Haunted

What do you think of some of Cajek's edits? I think a few of them are not called for....-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 14:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I love the May Contain Ghosts warning. :) Thing is with articles on a wiki, the best way to get them to grow is to get other people to edit and add their slant on "funny". That way you get a wider spread of comedic taste within the article. I can't see anything in his edits that I'd personally have a problem with. --

I changed the quote on the top to make it on Most Haunted again, though. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 15:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Here's the results of the Pee Review:

 Humour: 5 Right, that's an "average" to start with. This feels like a WiP, so no surprises there. There are some decent lines, I quite like the "typical episode" summary in particular. However, it does feel short of ideas in places - the episode list at the end in particular. Either lose that, or re-work it considerably. Concept: 6.5 well anyone who's ever seen Most Haunted knows it's a good enough target, but you need to mine as much as you can from it, and I'm certain more can be done with it than this Prose and formatting: 7 No spelling mistakes a quick glance could pick up, grammar's not bad. Needs a bit of work for readability and flow, but that's best to do when you're happy with the content of the article - Terry Pratchett calls it "sanding and polishing". Images: 5 One image, not too bad, but nothing hugely relevant to the show. A shot of the show itself, replete with green night vision and Acorah or at least Yvette Fielding would help a bit - properly captioned. Miscellaneous: 5.875 Average of the other scores again. Final Score: 29.375 There's promise here, and you have a subject that lends itself nicely to parody. But you need to spend a bit more time fleshing your ideas out, and re-working bits. Futher comments below. Reviewer: --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 23:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

OK, first step: read HTBFANJS. Again! This is not a slight, or a suggestion you've not read it - some of the best authors on here read it every time they write something new, and it does help!

Next: be ruthless, trim the bits that aren't really working. The list at the end, in its present state, adds nothing. You probably suspect some bits aren't quite so hot - trim them, try again.

Then expand the bits that do work. For me, that's the episode synopsis - although there's a chance that the brevity may work in its favour, I reckon a good sized section with an overview of the typical episode will give you plenty of scope to enjoy yourself with the absurdity of the topic. Spend time on Yvette's clumsy attempts to build tension, discuss the requirement for green night-vision cam at all times, allow yourself more room to explore Derek's communion with the local spirits.

Or take the concept and put a spin on it. How about discussing failed attempts, like trying to make America's Most Haunted at The Overlook Hotel from The Shining, or Amityville, and failing to find anything? Discussing Derek Acorah's ludicrous ramblings in depth should be fun as well. Is he making it up? Is it real but at the wrong time? Is it completely geniune? The article on Acorah doesn't do the job that well, so you have plenty of room to have a run at him.

Basically, this feels promising, but there's plenty of work to do. Roll those sleeves up and get stuck in! If you want further suggestions, you know where my talk page is. Hope this helps...

Finally, as always, these are only my opinions, others are available. And good luck! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 23:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

According to Under user, we should add more episode summaries to the episode list on the bottom, and I could use a little help with that. Also, I could use some help with making the general readability and flow of the article better so that it flows easier. Thanks for all your help so far! -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 04:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

## Article Writing

I really don't think that article writing is my forte here....I think maybe I could just do proofreading and additions to already written articles, but I really don't think that I have what it takes to write full-fledged articles on here yet...what do you think? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 15:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

The best way to get into writing is through contributions at first, I find. Very few people jump straight into fully formed article writing. I spent over a month reading Uncyclopedia before I even started writing, which I think helped, but I wouldn't expect anyone else to do that. :)
I do think that Uncyclopedia has made me a better writer, but like everything else it takes time. --
Some of my first articles, like Postman and Napolean are quite atrocious, if I do say so myself  ;) 19:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

## New UNIB

I've just added a new UnNewsInBrief article in the page that I told you about earlier. Maybe you could have a look at it and tell me if you think it would be worth making into a full fledged UnNews article? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

## RE: Epilepsy

Just in case you are wondering before you even start reading, no, I am not epileptic The problem is with the page... 216 megabytes of information, most of which is the same image. I did edit away most of the images (still left quite a few of them) but the edit was undone, and I was reccommended to get an Admins approval before making such a large edit. I just would like you to take a look a tthe article epilepsy (takes a long time to load, just letting you know) Regards Javascap 21:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Please excuse my n00b, he doesn't know he's adopted yet. 21:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

## Mo9P

He followed through on his threat and tubgirl'd RecentUnNews twice. Please ban, this is pretty urgent :) -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

MY GOD DAMNED EYES !!!! ~ 22:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

## Ya might like it!

Hi, I noticed that you showed some interest in Moving the goal posts, you might also be interested in Project Manager, or not. :) Have fun.

## You thoughts?

Dame  00:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

## A note from Albino Zombie (you know, that guy you sent a message to?)

THANKS!!!! I'm feeling very comfortable here, I've already made the most awesomest user page EVERR

## Hey

Lately I've been really annoyed at the constant stream of shitty bandcruft articles. I've made these templates to try and help with that. I was wondering if possibly I could get some sort of backing from you (i.e. you and your 1337 admin-ing skillz0rz) to help with this? <.talk.work.?pedia.$A^{waits}_{ward}$

## why?

Did you delete Mary Cheney. It's SOOOOOOOOOO funny

Would that be three short lines of limited mirthdom? People who say size doesn't matter have short dicks. --

## Casework

I have a question: 65.183.4.30 has made only six edits, so he hasn't built up a solid history yet. Half of them were helpful typo corrections. The other half shows s/he desperately needs read HTBFANJS. Is this sort of thing banworthy? If not banworthy, what should be done, if anything? Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" (cover your eyes!) 18:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

With IPs who don't seem to actually do that much we usually just revert and leave it as that if the contributions aren't any good. If they become regular users they often sign up for an account. --

...about something approaching, and now I can't find it - whats up? Dame  23:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Should I buy a hat? Do I hear wedding bells? Do I get banned for sticking my enormous Semitic nose in where it's not wanted? :) RabbiTechno 23:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC) (with abject apologies)
I find your Semitic nose to be rather attractively proportioned. ...although your other facial features more than make up for that. ;) Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" (cover your eyes!) 23:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
You drop a few breadcumbs and the next thing you know everybody is ready to eat cake...Dame  23:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
The time is with the month of winter solstice, when the change is due to come. Thunder in the course of heaven, things cannot be destroyed once and for all. Change returns success, going and coming without error. Action brings good fortune. Sunset. Sunrise.
Also we intend to run things to coincide with the forthcoming Thanksgiving festivities. --

## Cheers!

 Ta muchly!Under User would like to present you with a chandelier by way of thanksfor voting for his hat-trick highlight article, HowTo:Fuck Off.It isn't tasteful or stylish, is in no way understated (unless you happen to live in a palace) and so forth, but it has a long chain, sturdy hand holds, and swings well, and will be an invaluable aid to fucking off stylishly in future. Place it carefully!

Oh, and the sweariest vote deserves the sweariest thanks: ta very bastard much, cuntybollocks!

You have been thanked, and now (with weary predictability) I must fuck off! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 23:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

## Turkey Balls

Hey, I don't know if you saw my message on my talk, but you can put back the part about me putting up the \$20 for the Aristocrats category. Of course that is the only category i'll be presenting cash to, but I'm hoping it draws some hilarity.

I'm thinking that we should launch next monday, and run it for 3 weeks (or however long PLS is, I don't know). So get that shit nice and pretty, reinstate the cash prize, and let the debauched savagery begin! --THINKER 23:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Shhhhh....the children are listening! --
Pfft, call it a soft opening; generate a little buzz ;) --THINKER 23:40, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

## N00b Questions

Hello again! Hope you are well and not too bothered by my N00b questions... I have read quite a lot of the help now and am learning (I think), but I have a few questions that I was hoping you would be good enough to answer...

I have now written a few articles as referenced from my user page:

I think Moving the goal posts is probably the best I have done and that the others are a bit lame and am trying to improve them both myself and by increasing the "exposure" that they get in the uncylopedia. Like everyone (I guess) I think it would be nice to have people read what I have done, and hopefully add to and improve it. It's kinda obvious that unless it's linked to from other pages no one is very likely to find it...

I know about the Pee review, and will pluck up the currage to try it soon. Obviously I could add a link to various categories hoping that someone will fing it when browsing through but which ones? For example [[Moving the goal posts] could be added to Buisness, which I have, but it could also be added to pratically all of the other sub-categories below it. Some of these have sub-categories, which have sub-categories and so on. Whats normally done about this? Just try to trawl down the sub-category list to find the single most relavant category or should I put it in lots of places? Also there are other categories (not under Business) which Moving the goal posts could be argued to be related to e.g sports, hobbies etc... Whats the norm with categorys?

I guess I could also increase the chances of someone finding my work by adding links to it on various other articles related to the subjet. I'm wondering what's considered normal here and what would be considered spamming? Obviously any links would need to be relavant (and hopefully funny), but again i'm wondering what is considered the norm.

I think I'm getting the hang of using sandboxes, but have a few questions about them. I take it that if I save something under one of my user pages it does not bother anyone by showing up on "recent changes"? How do I get a list of what sub-pages I have under my user page (for when I forget)? How do I delete something under my userspace?

If I have the construction tag on an article does this reduce the chances that it will be edited by another user? I'm thinking of removing the tags but am cautious to do it for fear of getting the huff! Any guidance on when the best time to remove the construction tags is?

Any guidance one the above (and obviously any criticism of what I have done) would be very welcome. Especially if you fancied looking at Pointless Paradox (it may be pointless) I think I might be on dodgy ground on this one! If your not into reviewing that's cool, I will wait till I get the courage to take it to the Pee review and wait for my assassination! Thanks in advance MrN  Fork you! 23:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Wow! I'm watching what your doing! It's soo cool! Maybe the Uncylopedia is not pointless! MrN  Fork you! 00:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
From my point of view all three are decent little articles, and I feel with a bit more work the first two could easily grow into Featurable Articles. As you say, putting your articles up for Pee Review CAN lead to a bit of character assassination but very few writers get their work right from the off, and its normal for articles to be edited and re-edited until they reach their maximum humour levels. The thing to remember is not to take criticism personally. Its just an article, and not everyone is going to have the same experience and tastes in humour that you have.
The fact that you on this talk page asking the right questions makes me think that you're smart enough to get used to the way things work around here pretty quickly, and once you get over the fear factor and settle into your own writing style I think you'll really prosper. Not sure that answered any of your questions, but its very late, and I probably should go sleep now. :) --
Thank you very much for you comments and efforts with my articles... I wonder how long it will take for pointless paradox to get huffed! Last time I put it up it was under a different name, but with the same idea and it did not last long before being huffed! Obviously the huffer (is that the right word) did consider it pointless! I had better go to bed too, sleep well and hope to catch you again soon... :) MrN  Fork you! 01:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
To compound the problem I have just stolen your sig! OK. It's 1:11! Go to bed! MrN  Fork you! 01:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

## GHe

Who is GHe, and why does he have admin powers? I've never even seen this user on here, ever...-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 00:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

He's a Wikia janitor, as explained on his userpage. If you follow the link you'll see that Wikia janitors have admin access on all Wikia wikis. If you hop up and down on one leg for a while, you'll likely get tired. -- — 05:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

## Protection of my siggy?

Could you protect my siggy page? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 01:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Done and done. --

## Mild irritance

Special:Contributions/208.108.138.71 -- — 12:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah good, I see you've dealt with them already. -- — 12:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah....more of a flyswatting than a banhammering.... --

## Carry On and Off

Thanks for the kind comments - I will do my best to make it longer ... The article, I mean. Oo Er, Missus. --OliverKnight 16:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

## Grace slick

Hi. I hate to be a whiner, but I saw you worked on Grace slick, a particularly shite article IMO. Bonner added an ICU tag, which you removed. I almost put one back on, then noticed that, well, you took it off. Hm..     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   19:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

## check it out

!

Check out my talkpage.

User_talk:Sliferjam
so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 19:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)