User talk:Manforman/Archive 4

awesome!

Gerrycheevers sincerely thanks you. Your vote for NotM is much appreciated. As a token of his gratitude, Gerry wishes to offer you his services should you ever be looking for a goalie while planning a pick-up street hockey game.

thanks again for your support. i hope to continue to earn your respect, approval, and spare change. also, sorry if this isn't where you want your comments, but i figured it would be better than in your archive and your 'harass me' function tricked me into creating an article in mainspace. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 04:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

VFD

Any chance of letting anyone else nominate something? The Oblong Lobster 09:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

There is a rule on VFD that says "Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations. " So don't The Oblong Lobster 11:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

• Acctaully, your just on the cusp of a ban, sir. So, either lay off the nominations for a little while, or you will be found to be flooding and served with a 1 day ban. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Who Cares

I don't know where to start on this one other than "NO!". That template was terrible. It was on one page, and obviously served a purpose there, but that page was a BHOP page. Next time, just include the code that you put on the template page on the page itself. Anyway, that was a crappy template, and I'm letting you know why its gone. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Span tags and you

Can you watch your <span> tags in your signature, please? Specifically the <span class="sigexpand"> one. It keeps getting left open.

Also, why don't you have that tag in User:Manforman/sig instead of your preferences? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 01:17 Sep 08, 2007

By gosh, you're right. I was looking at your posts in Forum:For the love of God, someone put this image on VFP and they all started with that sigexpand tag without a closing tag. Then I looked at your comment on my page, and it wasn't there. *shrug* Sorry. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 17:13 Sep 08, 2007

sock

I am no sockpuppet right? --Blakie 03:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Please don't ban me. Thank you. --Blakie 03:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

And I will be funny and not stupid. And I am not Blake C. --Blakie 06:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Swoosh! It's outta here! Touchdown!

Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Gobshite

Why'd u nominate me for that? I never did anything to you. - User:Deadpool992

Thanks for unominating me. - User:Deadpool992

template:math

Thank you for adding that image, man. Keep up the good work in math.
--Cajek 21:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

The (Late) WotM Thankering

Hey Manforman, thanks for your support in my WotM victory. I couldn't have done it without ya, just like the great article that HowTo:Deceive people on eBay became. Thanks again man, and don't let the UGotM shit hold ya down. Write and be proud of yourself. --THINKER 01:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your use of {{Indefblocked}}

Hi. Please settle down on the use of this template. It's mainly kept for the "more notable" type of Uncyclopedians that deserve it, such as Metropolis, Fonchezzz, etc. Other users don't really need it, especially blatant vandals that we try to ignore. It doesn't help. Thanks. --AAA! (AAAA) 05:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm Curious

Why did you think Blakie is a sock of Blake C? I couldn't see any real proof of that, except for that fact their both idiots....~ 06:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Larry Craig Article

Please let me know why you think the Larry Craig "needs a steamroller". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sadchild (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the response. So you are aware, the article (started by myself, it didn't exist prior), was based on the text of his wikipedia article (not all of it, but a fair amount of it). I was trying to stay true to the guideline "The truth is usually funnier than nonsense. The funniest pages are those closest to the truth." So basing it on existing facts with minor tweaks may have made it sound too serious, but i was trying to include the following suggetsions: repetition, the straight man, gay jokes and rule one. How to be funny and not just stupid And, most importantly I was amazed the article didn't even exist yet and was much needed. Sadchild 12:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)sadchild

And now, a Public Service Announcement

Thekillerfroggy and Doctor Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Skullthumper would like for donating to the Throws and Downs Club of America. So keep your pillows held up in your room, lock your liquor cabinet, and alert the local authorities of possible pillboxes. Only you can prevent pillow fighting!

Thanks for your vote! Have a whale!

The UnIdiot would like to award you with a authentic Kansas whale! Because apparently Kansas has oceans now! Treasure it always! Only 789,729 more left! Tell your friends! Thanks for voting on Kansas whaling!

I'm looking into my crystal ball...

I'm seeing you trying fruitlessly to update your CSS... and I'm seeing you forgetting to hard refresh your browser... amirite? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 23:32 Sep 16, 2007

Good question. Um, are you using Firefox? /me crosses fingers. It's marking all the pages as voted despite you not clicking on them? I'd clear your cookies out if I were you. I could be wrong, but it's worth a shot. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 23:42 Sep 16, 2007

Useless Gobshite of the Month

I notice on Scott's page, you sent a template thanking him for voting Against. Well, I voted against also. Can I please get a thank-you template too? --YeOldeLuke 01:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Category:Deletion Survivor

Dude, thank you for helping with that. I'm not sure what you did, but apparently you thought it was as good an idea as I did to make that category. Anyways, thanks again! --  Le Cejak • <-> 01:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

No Prob

Yeah it's all good. I'm even okay with you nominating my stuff for VFD because it's like a forced peer review. I'm writing a new article called J'accuse... and it's NOT a template! Aren't you happy? --  Le Cejak • <-> 21:04, 20 September 2007 (UTC)