User talk:Little Jimmy

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Maddox

Kudos on the Maddox article. You actually made it worth reading! And it was actually funny too! I felt like I was really reading a Maddox article. This will definitely be featured. Plus, I'm glad you liked my image idea. Kip the Dip 01:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I just read it, and I agree; Maddox is fantastic. Good work. --YeOldeLuke 15:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

I hear you're rewriting the Maddox article. Awesome. I uploaded this image and I was wondering if you would use it:

If it's not badass enough, you can add edit more Maddox images into it, or you can have him say "Go fuck yourself" to Sophia the potato, or whatever. Tell me what you think. Kip the Dip

edit Welcome

Hello, Little Jimmy, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Here are a few good links for n00bs:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or the use the "sign" button (Button sig) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome!  -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

You may also want to read
Here are some other helpful places for new users:
Adopt a N00b
List of New Users--Hrodulf 20:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

edit dfbnsfkjnbs

I think your revert of my edits was a bit unjust; Maddox has been known to write as if he was the sort of person he is parodying as a form of extreme sarcasm, and also, he would never say "pea-brained imbeciles" when "moron" has a much crasser, shorter, lazier ring to it, and the same actual strength of emphasis.

I'm going to re-revert; if you feel really strongly about this, phone me up and we can talk compromise.--Gubby 15:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok, here's my case. Read these two: Where he goes against his usual grain of self-aggrandisement and even makes himself look kinda silly (second one) for the sake of parody.

Maybe I can make the style more directly sarcastic: I'll take another look at it now.--Gubby 13:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

edit Hello Little Jimmy

I just had to write that, never having put those words together before. I saw your exchange about Ricer, which is now on your user page somewhere. That it was huffed probably has nothing to do with the article, although it could always use an edit (some people polish their pages for years, decades really). The site has deleted thousands of pages, literally, in fire weeks and fix tag deletes and releated deletions. Pics too, thousands of them. I'm one of the Symbol keep vote Keep. people, who don't want things which are good deleted. In the case of your page, it's the best of three worlds, as you and the site gets it back and you get to edit it with the skills and eye that time away has given you. And good to meet you too, you probably have many stories from the old days and can gather us around a campfire to tell them. Aleister 10:32 30-1-'12

Personal tools