User talk:KneeChee27

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 03:56, October 19, 2012 by KneeChee27 (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Woah...I should check my junk mail more often, huh? I coulda sworn user pages were exempt from the whole "vanity" rule. Was I wrong, or is this just some kind of Communist retribution for being inactive? If that's the case, I totally deserve it – I was just curious is all. User:KneeChee27/sig2 23:25, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

Unless you were hyping patent medicine or pimping, you are usually free to be a little vain on your user page. An appeal to Xamralco with an explanation might get it un-huffed. Spıke ¬ 23:31 15-Jun-12
I restored it. A vandal replaced it with spam and someone must of QVFD'd it or something. Sorry about that. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:17, June 16, 2012 (UTC)
Oh hey, no problem. I'll try to be less of a target for vandalism in the future. Thanks guys! User:KneeChee27/sig2 03:52, June 16, 2012 (UTC)
To summarize, no one gets punished for being absent; but being absent meant your page fell into disrepair. Why the vandal picked you is an open question. Spıke ¬ 03:55 16-Jun-12

edit yes hello

i have just semi-protected a bunch of pages in your userspace due to a persistant vandal. If you object to this, just let me know and I'll unprotect them. But you will still be able to edit them, just not anons and new users. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 00:14, October 1, 2012 (UTC)

Oh, cool. Thanks. I guess maybe I ought to stop pretending to hate Communism or something, huh? User:KneeChee27/sig2 03:56, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects