User talk:Kip the Dip

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 11:51, November 3, 2013 by Anton199 (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Go here to catch me at the other one.


There can be only one

If that's your perspective then what are you doing editing both sites? At the moment you've taken it on yourself to be a one man revolution on site and just trolling with no value. I'd prefer that you were constructive. If you can't be constructive, why not just be absent? The modicum of respect the remaining users have for you is waning, and you edge closer to a ban. You've gone from being liked to being tolerated over the past few weeks. Are you aiming for being hated?                               Puppy's talk page12:37 08 Feb

First off, thank you for editing my talk page with actual content, rather than tweaking my banner on top.
Secondly, while that "Spike can't be more wrong" speech and Highlander reference was meant for humor value, I apologize for falling back into '07esque dickery. It appears that I cannot be within Wikia or around Wikia apologists without resentment, so I shall choose to mostly remain absent, except for constructive purposes. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 00:50, Feb. 8, 2013
If it was for humour value it missed the point. Most of your recent edits have been a direct criticism of current users, which is why I've come to you. Thanks for taking the mature option.                               Puppy's talk page12:59 08 Feb

Pee Review

I did a pee review of two of your articles. You may want to withdraw your pee review requests on the other site. Speaking of that, you have a review up for Chanupocalypse, but that article is already featured. Perhaps that one should also be withdrawn.

Since I reviewed two of your articles, could you please review My Little Womb Newt since you like it so much that you think it should be featured. Spike left a few comments, but he is apparently totally ignorant of the show being parodied. --Mn-z 21:26, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

Pee review sorted.                               Puppy's talk page10:13 09 Feb

Ask Next Time

Hi Kip. I would have preferred it that you asked an admin regards Denza about moving one of his articles to a sub page. I have reduced your ban to a day. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:56, November 1, 2013 (UTC)

I apologize if I broke any unwritten social convention. Denza asked me to spare it on IRC. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 12:45, Nov. 2, 2013
Denza is permabanned here, as you must know; otherwise he would not need your help. What you did was move a newly-created article (whether or not its creation is ban evasion) to the userspace of a banned user at the request of that user. That is not an "unwritten social convention." It is using your access here to thwart a ban imposed by unanimous agreement of the Admins. I am sure you know that as well. Spıke ¬ 12:55 2-Nov-13
Okay, chill. This isn't some kind of two-men conspiracy. If anything, I've tried pretty hard to wash my hands and avoid Denza's drama magnetism spanning across sites and IRC channels. Whenever he whines about crap between himself, the Uncyclopedian community and admins, I half-way tune it out as white noise. Cards on the table: I did not know Denza was banned indefinitely. He gets so many times, I assumed this was a routine ban over more the same.
He came into one of chat rooms and asked me to move that article to userspace. Now, I did into account that he might have wrote it under a sock, but I assumed he thought it had comedic potential and wanted to expand upon it before it was hastily deleted. I can't for the life of me even remember what the article was. It was such a whim of an action, I didn't even take a second to consider that it was technically ban invasion.
This may have been a brief lapse in (or complete absence of) judgement on my part, but I assure you there was no intent of some anarchist spray-painting. All my bad-mouthing and disrespect of the .wikia domain Uncyclopedia over this past year has only made me grow remorseful and ashamed. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 00:39, Nov. 3, 2013
  • The article was pure cyberbullying crap. There was no comedic potential. All that could potentially have been achieved by moving it into users pace was to retain an attempt to troll.
  • Even if an article is protected, any user can view the code and save it on their own computer - I have a couple of deleted articles kept here in that manner. If this was being retained for any purpose other than to continue an attempt at trolling, then Denza could have done that himself.                               Puppy's talk page01:00 03 Nov 2013
All I know is that Denza thought the article known as Retarded potato was "gut-busting hilarious". Something about fat people. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 01:59, Nov. 3, 2013
Y'all need to chill. This is not a big deal, it is only a big deal because you are making it seem like it is. We don't have 10000000 rules about sockpuppetry and what is and what isn't ban evading for a reason: This is a relatively small wiki dedicated to bringing about laughs in its readers. If this is to be treated as something other than a minor slip up, not worth noting by anybody; then you have lost sight of that mission. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 05:48, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
What was the Retarded Potato article about? I missed it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:51, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects